
Human rights laws allowing 'feckless fathers' to avoid being deported, top police chief claims
Human rights laws are allowing offenders who have 'fecklessly' fathered children in Britain to avoid deportation, a top police chief said yesterday.
Stephen Watson's comments come as both Labour and the Conservatives are finalising tough proposals on immigration, with ministers hoping to curtail the use of the European Convention on Human Rights by foreign criminals.
A new Bill will contain measures designed to restrict the use of the 'right to private and family life' under Article 8 of the ECHR.
Asked about its impact on policing in Britain, Sir Stephen said it wasn't for him to point out what the legislative framework should look like but said Article 8 was often used by offenders to overturn deportation decisions.
'It seems to me that is entirely unhelpful, particularly when people are simply claiming on the basis of having very often fecklessly fathered a number of children in our country, that they somehow shouldn't be deported because they've got the right to a family life,' he told the Policy Exchange think tank at a talk in London. 'Well, I – and I suspect most of the public – beg to differ.'
Labour's crackdown will work in tandem with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's plan for overseas 'return hubs' for foreign nationals with no right to be in the UK. Talks with Balkan nations including Kosovo and Moldova to establish hubs are ongoing.
Sir Stephen took over Greater Manchester Police in 2021 when the force was in special measures, but it has now been recognised as the country's most improved force in three consecutive years under his leadership.
In the wide-ranging talk, the chief constable also called for non-crime hate incidents to be scrapped. Sir Stephen said the policy, where data is collected for incidents when no crime has been committed, was 'past its sell-by-date'.
'This is the antithesis of doing the basics,' he said.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has been rebuffed by Europe after calling for a shake-up of human rights laws.
Speaking in Strasbourg yesterday she said the European Convention on Human Rights 'feels out of step with common sense' and needed to 'evolve'. But, Council of Europe secretary general Alain Berset said he opposed changes: 'I am not calling for reform of the ECHR, nor do I support any effort that would weaken it,' he told the Politico website. 'It should never be used as a scapegoat in domestic political debates.'
Ms Mahmood said the public's confidence in the rule of law was now 'fraying'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Has Reform peaked?
A couple of days ago, I spotted Nigel Farage on the terrace of the House of Commons, enjoying a late afternoon drink in the sun with his fellow Reform MPs. I could hardly complain about his work ethic, as I should have been in the office myself. I saw him looking out across the Thames – content, relaxed, and surrounded by friends, all of whom agree with the bookies' suggestion that he is set to become our next Prime Minister. On top of the polls, on top of the world, the master of all he surveyed. And yet, only six weeks or so after Reform's triumph at the local elections, is the shine starting to come off Farage? A YouGov poll this week had the party down two points to 27 per cent, with Labour up one to 24 per cent. Reform's lead over Labour has halved in a single week. As relaxed as Farage seemed as he tucked into his pint, is he worried that his momentum is starting to stall? It's hardly been a peaceful month at Reform HQ. Just as the party was basking in its seizure of ten councils, two mayoralties, and the constituency of Runcorn and Helsby, Farage came under steady attack for his latest pie-in-the-sky policy package: scrapping the two-child limit and introducing a new transferable marriage tax allowance to his already costly plan to lift the income tax threshold to £20,000. Then we had Zia Yusuf's two-day resignation and his replacement as the party's chairman by self-styled paranormal expert Dr David Bull; a man who has claimed that 'immigration is the lifeblood of this country.' Endless in-fighting, ideological incoherence, a shallow policy platform: the general impression created by Reform is one of unseriousness. I bet Farage still can't believe his luck: a doubling of his party's vote share in a year, the implosion of the Tories (languishing on 17 per cent in that same YouGov poll), and an utterly useless Labour Government. Downing Street beckons. But if the last year has proven anything, it is how quickly political fortunes can change. One day you're cock of the walk, the next a feather duster. Could voters dump Farage just as quickly as they picked him up? Certainly. But one hesitates to write off Reform because of only one poll – especially as other pollsters have the party topping 30 per cent. The reasons for Farage's success are structural. Voters hated the Tories, and now they hate Labour for much of the same reasons. With both old parties discredited, why not take a punt on something different? It helps when that this new party is led by one of the best-known politicians in Britain – and one of the few with any credibility on the salient topic of immigration. A day after I spied Farage on the Commons terrace, I saw him again at a Tufton Street talk on the future of net zero. He was by turns charming, insightful and profound, especially when tracing climate extremism to a broader crisis of godlessness. Between calling for escalation in the Middle East, and pledging an end to the fracking ban, he seemed confident and unchanged. He will never become a statesman in the traditional mould. But it is always a pleasure to see him at work.


The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tories say they would support UK joining fight against Iran if Starmer deems it necessary
Update: Date: 2025-06-19T07:44:31.000Z Title: Patel: Tories would support UK joining fight against Iran if Starmer deems it necessary Content: Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said the Conservative party would support the government in joining the military fight against Iran if it was deemed necessary, reports the PA news agency. Asked whether she would agree if the UK joined the offensive, she told Good Morning Britain: While we want peace in the region, we're crystal clear that Iran should not be able to obtain nuclear weapons. And if the government judges that such action is necessary to avoid that then we would absolutely support the government if it deemed it necessary to ensure that we can defend our country, our citizens and effectively a lot of our strategic equities in the Middle East region. She said she believed the opposition would be able to hold the government to account without a vote in parliament on such a decision. Meanwhile, energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said that Keir Starmer will be a 'cool, calm head' guided by international law in response to the Israel-Iran crisis. According to the PA news agency, Fahnbulleh told Times Radio: Legal advice is for the prime minister, and I think that's where it will stay and you can understand why I won't comment on that. But what I will say is that we have a prime minister who is a lawyer and a human rights lawyer, he will obviously do everything that is in accord with international law. No one wants an escalation. No one wants this to erupt into a major conflict in the region that is hugely destabilising for every country involved and for us, globally. So the most important role that the prime minister can play, and is playing, is to be that cool, calm head, to urge all partners around the negotiating table and to find a diplomatic route out of this. The attorney general, Richard Hermer, is reported to have raised concerns about any potential UK involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, something which could limit any support for the US if Donald Trump decides to bomb Iranian nuclear sites. Patel also told Good Morning Britain that the government needs to 'step up' the evacuation of British nationals in Israel. She said: I think the current government's response is not sufficient and if families of embassy staff and personnel are being evacuated then I think the same facilities must be extended to our citizens. More on all of the above in a moment, but first, here are some other developments: The UK government will have to sign off on the US use of its Diego Garcia base in any bombing raid on Iran, it has emerged, as ministers gathered to discuss a range of scenarios amid further increasing tensions in the region. The prime minster chaired an emergency Cobra meeting to discuss the UK's response to the crisis in the Middle East which could escalate further should the US enter the conflict between Israel and Iran. The foreign secretary is scheduled to meet his US counterpart in Washington. David Lammy and secretary of state Marco Rubio will discuss the Middle East as potential American involvement in the conflict looms. The MP behind the assisted dying bill will be joined by bereaved and terminally ill people as she makes her case for a change in the law before a crucial vote on Friday. Kim Leadbeater is expected to re-state her argument that dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives, but opponents of her bill have warned it fails to guarantee protections for society's most vulnerable. Britain's benefits system faces collapse without cuts to disability payments, Liz Kendall has said, as the government published plans that put it on a collision course with dozens of angry Labour MPs. Ministers will restart the approval process for two controversial oilfields on Thursday, even as new figures show the UK will be almost entirely dependent on foreign gas by 2050 regardless of whether they are approved. The Bank of England is predicted to keep UK interest rates at 4.25% on Thursday amid rising food inflation and the threat of surging oil prices pushing up the cost of living. Most economists think the Bank of England's monetary policy committee (MPC) will opt to keep rates on hold when it meets on Thursday.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Sweden parliament backs $31 bln borrowing to boost defence
STOCKHOLM, June 19 (Reuters) - Sweden's government said on Thursday all parties in parliament have agreed to back its plan to invest heavily in the rearmament of the country's civil and military defence, and to pay for it with loans of up to 300 billion Swedish crowns ($31 billion). "Sweden is in a very serious security situation," Defence Minster Pal Jonson told a press conference. "It is therefore very good that we can present a broad and long-term political agreement on very big defence investments in the coming years." The parties have been negotiating the defence deal in recent months. Under the new defence agreement, Sweden plans to raise military defence spend to 3.5% of GDP by 2032 at the latest, Jonson said. ($1 = 9.6910 Swedish crowns)