Museum discusses Dillinger Gang
May 24—LIMA — There were just a few empty seats during Allen County Museum docent Karlyn Lauer's presentation about Lima's brush with the gangster era Saturday at the Allen County Museum.
The Great Depression brought about tough times around the nation and in Lima. Amidst those trying times, the rising tide of crime and desperation swept into town in October 1933 because of John Dillinger and his gang, leaving a sheriff dead and a city forever marked by the violence of the gangster era.
Allen County Sheriff Jess Sarber, whom Lauer described as a "well-respected man," was shot and killed the evening of Oct. 12, 1933 during a jailbreak plotted by Dillinger's associates.
The Dillinger Gang had robbed the Bluffton Bank, now known as the Citizens National Bank of Bluffton, of $2,100, on Aug. 14, 1933. Afyer being captured, Dillinger was in the Lima jail awaiting trial.
"They always wanted small banks in small towns," Lauer said.
Prior to the arrest, Dillinger was found at the apartment of his girlfriend, Mary Longnacker, by police and made it known he wanted to be in the Allen County Jail so his plan could come to fruition.
Two days before Sarber was killed, members of the gang were seen walking around the jail, trying to draw up a plan to get Dillinger out.
"Two gang members come back to town [the next day] and visit an attorney telling him John's sister is upset and wants to see John," Lauer said.
Feeling uneasy, Sarber decided to cancel the jail's church service that night.
Around 6:20 p.m. Oct. 12, Charles Makely, Harry Pierpont and Russell Clark entered the jail while Sarber and his wife Lucy Sarber were joined by Deputy Wilbur Sharp for dinner and casual conversation.
"They (gangsters) say they're officials from Indiana and want to interview John," Lauer said.
When Sheriff Sarber asked the men for credentials, he was quickly shot. Lucy Sarber and Sharp were then locked in the basement for several hours, leading to an unimpeded escape for Dillinger and the men.
The men then arrived in Hamilton with their girlfriends who had food, shelter and medical supplies on the ready before relocating to Chicago where business continued, continuing to rob small banks in small towns around Chicago.
"They are successful businessmen, they dress in the best clothes, they have the best apartments, they have the fastest new cars," Lauer said.
In January 1934, Dillinger killed a police officer, Patrick O'Malley, in eastern Chicago.
A short time later in Tucson, Arizona, the gang was caught and extradited to Indiana and Ohio, Dillinger to Crown Point, Indiana, and Pierpont, Makely and Clark to Lima for the death of Sarber. Pierpont and Makley were sentenced to death; Clark received life in prison.
After breaking out of a jail in Crown Point on March 3, 1934, Dillinger continued his criminal spree until he was betrayed in Chicago by a woman facing deportation.
On July 22, 1934, FBI agents shot and killed Dillinger outside the Biograph Theatre in Chicago.
Makley and Pierpont attempted a last-minute prison break with wooden guns carved in their cells. Makley was killed in the attempt. Pierpont, badly wounded, survived long enough to be executed in October 1934.
Lauer has was pleased to present the topic during the afternoon hours Saturday.
"It makes you feel good you know? It's a topic people are interested in," Lauer said.
The Dillinger exhibit is on the bottom floor of the Allen County Musuem, 620 W. Market St., Lima.
Lauer had two books on Dillinger present for attendees to flip through after the presentation.
Reach Cade Higgins at 567-242-0351.
Featured Local Savings
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Surge of ICE agreements with local police aim to increase deportations, but many police forces have found they undermine public safety
During his first few months in office, President Donald Trump has been establishing a framework for deporting undocumented immigrants en masse. It's something he has previously vowed will be 'the largest deportation operation in the history of our country.' Part of that operation includes what's known as the federal 287(g) program. Established in 1996, it allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose work is normally carried out by federal officials, to train state and local authorities to function as federal immigration officers. Under 287(g), for example, local police officers can interview people to determine their immigration status. They can also issue immigration detainers to jail people until agents with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement take custody. 'Illegal immigration has wide-ranging consequences, including a troubling surge of dangerous drugs into our state,' T.K. Waters, sheriff of Jacksonville, Florida, said in a February 2025 statement to explain his office's participation in 287(g). 'We remain committed to partnering with President Trump's administration and our federal counterparts to secure our borders, protect Floridians, and establish a framework for the rest of the nation to follow.' Local police authorities across the country – from Jackson County, Texas, to Frederick County, Maryland – are participating in 287(g) for similar reasons. Since Trump began his second term in January, ICE has increased 287(g) agreements from 135 in 25 states in December 2024 to 628 in 40 states as of May 28, 2025. As a criminal justice scholar, I believe the surge of 287(g) agreements sets a dangerous precedent for local policing, where forging relationships and building the trust of immigrants is a proven and effective tactic in combating crime. In my view, the expansion of 287(g) will erode that trust and makes entire communities – not just immigrants – less safe. There is a long history of federal authorities collaborating with local police to enforce immigration laws. During the Great Depression, federal officials blamed Latinos for taking American jobs, and local agencies helped them deport up to 1.8 million people to Mexico. It's estimated that 60% of those deported were U.S. citizens. In the early 1930s, local police participated in immigration raids in California and other states. As author Adam Goodman details in his book 'The Deportation Machine,' state and local government agencies, including social workers, welfare agencies and police, acted as 'de facto immigration agents.' Trump's mass deportation plan mirrors President Dwight D. Eisenhower's 1954 federal immigration initiative, which resulted in 1.3 million deportations. As author Natalia Molina notes in her book 'How Race is Made in America,' local police often served as 'immigration cops' in Eisenhower's program because the federal government 'did not have enough agents to cover such a large territory' as the U.S. During his two terms, President Barack Obama deported over 5 million people and used the 287(g) program to help him do that, primarily to target jailed or recently arrived undocumented people. Obama's use of 287(g) peaked at 76 agreements during his first term but dropped to 35 during his second term. A Justice Department investigation launched in 2008 found the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office in Arizona engaged in unconstitutional law enforcement actions against Latinos. The Justice Department found that the sheriff's office engaged in a pattern of 'unlawful seizures, including unjustified stops, detentions, and arrests, of Latinos in violation of the Fourth Amendment.' Forty states have adopted 287(g) agreements as of May 2025. This could have effects outside of the immigration laws. In the past 45 years, many law enforcement professionals in urban areas have highlighted the importance of forging relationships and building trust with immigrant communities. That's because the police depend on the participation of all citizens to prevent crime and solve criminal investigations. But police departments across the U.S. have found that 287(g) partnerships erode that trust. In 1979, Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates created Special Order 40 that prohibited local officers from enforcing immigration laws in response to community complaints alleging discrimination against Latinos. Gates issued the order 'to encourage immigrants to cooperate with police and build community trust.' Other large police departments followed. In places such as Chicago and San Francisco, they shifted focus from helping federal immigration officials to prioritizing community relationships. William Bratton, who led six police departments, including in Boston, Los Angeles and New York, criticized 287(g) in a 2009 op-ed. He said that deputizing local officers to enforce immigration laws immediately 'undermines their core public safety mission.' Conservative police scholar George Kelling, co-author of the broken windows theory, which presumes that visible signs of disorder can lead to crime, also expressed support for local police agencies prioritizing their community relationships. In a 1999 study, Kelling highlighted a San Diego police memo announcing its refusal to enforce federal immigration laws. The San Diego Police Department, he wrote, 'thought through its values, mission, and functions and elaborated a policy that put public safety and harmony above aggressive attempts to ferret out undocumented aliens.' During Trump's first administration, some police chiefs echoed Bratton and Kelling. They warned that employing local officers to enforce immigration measures could spark fear and damage public safety. Former Seattle Police Chief Kathleen O'Toole stated in 2016 that Seattle police officers were prohibited from 'inquiring about a person's immigration status.' And former Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn announced in 2016 that his department does not enforce immigration law. He added, 'It is our opinion, our strongly held belief that our responsibility is to protect the residents of our city. To protect them, they must trust us, they must be willing to report crimes, they must be willing to be witnesses.' President Trump has frequently linked immigrants with higher crime rates, calling them murderers and rapists. But multiple studies have found that undocumented people commit fewer crimes than U.S. citizens. Although the Trump administration is expanding the use of local police in immigration enforcement, research casts doubt on using mass deportation as a crime reduction strategy. A 2018 study on 287(g) from the libertarian Cato Institute found no evidence that ICE-led partnerships with local police decreased crime rates. And a 2014 study on the Secure Communities Program, which calls for local police agencies to share arrestee information with federal immigration officials, found that this program has 'no discernible impact' on crime in medium and large municipalities. The Trump administration's expansion of 287(g) ignores the shift that some big city police departments have made away from immigration enforcement in favor of community policing. And I believe it threatens to undermine the relationship between local police and the increasingly diverse communities they serve. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: W. Carsten Andresen, St. Edward's University Read more: Federal threats against local officials who don't cooperate with immigration orders could be unconstitutional − Justice Antonin Scalia ruled against similar plans Nearly 54% of extreme conservatives say the federal government should use violence to stop illegal immigration How sheriffs define law and order for their counties depends a lot on their views − and most are white Republican men W. Carsten Andresen was employed in the past (2000-2003) at The Police Institute, a Rutger's University Think Tank run by George L. Kelling.
Yahoo
25-05-2025
- Yahoo
Museum discusses Dillinger Gang
May 24—LIMA — There were just a few empty seats during Allen County Museum docent Karlyn Lauer's presentation about Lima's brush with the gangster era Saturday at the Allen County Museum. The Great Depression brought about tough times around the nation and in Lima. Amidst those trying times, the rising tide of crime and desperation swept into town in October 1933 because of John Dillinger and his gang, leaving a sheriff dead and a city forever marked by the violence of the gangster era. Allen County Sheriff Jess Sarber, whom Lauer described as a "well-respected man," was shot and killed the evening of Oct. 12, 1933 during a jailbreak plotted by Dillinger's associates. The Dillinger Gang had robbed the Bluffton Bank, now known as the Citizens National Bank of Bluffton, of $2,100, on Aug. 14, 1933. Afyer being captured, Dillinger was in the Lima jail awaiting trial. "They always wanted small banks in small towns," Lauer said. Prior to the arrest, Dillinger was found at the apartment of his girlfriend, Mary Longnacker, by police and made it known he wanted to be in the Allen County Jail so his plan could come to fruition. Two days before Sarber was killed, members of the gang were seen walking around the jail, trying to draw up a plan to get Dillinger out. "Two gang members come back to town [the next day] and visit an attorney telling him John's sister is upset and wants to see John," Lauer said. Feeling uneasy, Sarber decided to cancel the jail's church service that night. Around 6:20 p.m. Oct. 12, Charles Makely, Harry Pierpont and Russell Clark entered the jail while Sarber and his wife Lucy Sarber were joined by Deputy Wilbur Sharp for dinner and casual conversation. "They (gangsters) say they're officials from Indiana and want to interview John," Lauer said. When Sheriff Sarber asked the men for credentials, he was quickly shot. Lucy Sarber and Sharp were then locked in the basement for several hours, leading to an unimpeded escape for Dillinger and the men. The men then arrived in Hamilton with their girlfriends who had food, shelter and medical supplies on the ready before relocating to Chicago where business continued, continuing to rob small banks in small towns around Chicago. "They are successful businessmen, they dress in the best clothes, they have the best apartments, they have the fastest new cars," Lauer said. In January 1934, Dillinger killed a police officer, Patrick O'Malley, in eastern Chicago. A short time later in Tucson, Arizona, the gang was caught and extradited to Indiana and Ohio, Dillinger to Crown Point, Indiana, and Pierpont, Makely and Clark to Lima for the death of Sarber. Pierpont and Makley were sentenced to death; Clark received life in prison. After breaking out of a jail in Crown Point on March 3, 1934, Dillinger continued his criminal spree until he was betrayed in Chicago by a woman facing deportation. On July 22, 1934, FBI agents shot and killed Dillinger outside the Biograph Theatre in Chicago. Makley and Pierpont attempted a last-minute prison break with wooden guns carved in their cells. Makley was killed in the attempt. Pierpont, badly wounded, survived long enough to be executed in October 1934. Lauer has was pleased to present the topic during the afternoon hours Saturday. "It makes you feel good you know? It's a topic people are interested in," Lauer said. The Dillinger exhibit is on the bottom floor of the Allen County Musuem, 620 W. Market St., Lima. Lauer had two books on Dillinger present for attendees to flip through after the presentation. Reach Cade Higgins at 567-242-0351. Featured Local Savings
Yahoo
19-05-2025
- Yahoo
Malcolm X used reading to reach his full potential. Will kids now do the same?
Put yourself inside a 6-by-8-foot prison cell, no window, bare concrete walls. A concrete slab juts out from the wall with a mattress to lay on. There's a creaky desk and chair and, in the corner, a wooden pail to defecate in. For 17½ hours a day, this is your reality. You do have a pen and paper. And there is a library nearby, but only with books. No multimedia center here. No smartphone, no television, maybe one or two radio stations, but only for an hour at night. Those other six-and-a-half hours are spent either working in the laundry or walking outside in the yard. Could you do it? For 39 months? Malcolm X did, and if he hadn't endured this cruelly deprived reality, we would have never heard of him. At Charlestown State Prison (now Bunker Hill Community College), Malcolm Little, as he was called at the time, endured suffocating idleness and boredom. He turned to the books in the prison library for, at the very least, a distraction from the thought of being incarcerated. As he explained to Alex Haley years later: '…I knew right there in prison that reading had changed forever the course of my life. As I see it today, the ability to read awoke inside me some long dormant craving to be mentally alive.' On May 19, 2025, Malcolm X would have been 100 years old. He only made it to 39. That itself is tragic, but it would have been even more so if his mother Louise had never taught him how to read. Louise gathered her seven children around the table during the Great Depression, her husband Earl killed after being run over by a streetcar, and asked them to read aloud from the dictionary, the Bible, and from newspapers established by Jamaican activist Marcus Garvey and Grenadian politician T.A. Marryshow. 'A strong-minded mother,' Malcolm wrote to his older brother Philbert while incarcerated, 'has strong-minded children.' According to the National Literacy Institute (NLI), not only are 21% of American adults illiterate, but also '130 million adults are now unable to read a simple story to their children.' Imagine if Louise did not have the ability to read to Malcolm or teach him how to read aloud and hear his voice gain strength. Would he have been able to survive those hellish months in prison? Would he have been able to write his now-famous speech, 'The Ballot or the Bullet,' delivered at Cleveland's Cory Methodist Church on East 105th Street? In prison, as Malcolm read, 'months passed without my even thinking about being imprisoned.' Reading, even in that tiny, ancient, decrepit cell, released him. 'I never had been so truly free in my life,' he wrote in his autobiography. 'Black Fourth of July': Before it became a federal holiday, Boynton activist knew Juneteenth needed a celebration Smartphones have the power to capture the mind of a child or teenager and place it on a hamster wheel fueled by dopamine, an imprisonment of distraction. In 2025, reading a book takes a backseat (is it even in the car?) to the eye strain required to take in a 15-second soundbite, watch a ball strike a line of dominos, enjoy a new music video or scroll an endless clothing catalog. At Charlestown, Malcolm threw himself into reading a wide range of titles. He cracked open an old copy of Shakespeare's Macbeth, unsure of what exactly he was reading. But he had time and little to no distraction, so he dug into the etymology using a dictionary. As he improved, he was eventually transferred to Norfolk Prison Library, and the prison library there was large enough for him to find more specific titles. He devoured Frederik Bodmer's The Loom of Language, studied Grimm's Law, read ancient Persian poetry and joined a Great Books discussion group, Machiavelli's The Prince being one of the 17 books discussed. Here's hoping it doesn't take prison for children to crack open a new book and learn about another world. Patrick Parr's third book is Malcolm Before X, published by the University of Massachusetts Press. He grew up in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, and graduated from Cuyahoga Falls High School in 1999. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Malcolm X shows the power of reading, even decades later | Opinion
