Inside the plans for new Gatwick runway as campaigners claim it is being done on the ‘cheap'
Gatwick Airport has come under fire from campaigners who say it is trying to open "a new runway on the cheap".
Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (CAGNE) argues the West Sussex airport's plans fail to address crucial issues like noise pollution, surface transport, housing needs, and wastewater treatment. The group has threatened to push for a judicial reviewif Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander approves the project.
Gatwick's proposal aims to bring its standby runway into regular operation for smaller aircraft take-offs, boosting the airport's yearly flight capacity by 100,000.
The £2.2 billion privately-funded project includes shifting the existing runway 12 metres, expanding both terminals, adding new aircraft gates, and improving road access.
The Transport Secretary faces a 27 February deadline to decide on Gatwick's application for a development consent order.
Sally Pavey, 59, who chairs Cagne, claimed there are 'many holes in the submissions made by Gatwick'.
She said: 'This is a new runway on the cheap.
'There are so many things that haven't been confirmed or finalised.
'The Secretary of State would be very unwise to actually approve it, because it's going to cost the local authorities dearly as they'll have to pay for the ramifications.'
Ms Pavey said Gatwick has provided 'very little reassurance' about the impact of expansion on noise, while she described the major transport links to the airport as a 'single railway line and a single road which can't be expanded without major investment'.
She questioned 'where is the affordable housing?' that would be needed with an increase in the airport's workforce, and called for a wastewater treatment plant to be built on-site as existing facilities in the area have 'very limited capacity'.
Gatwick insisted 'full and thorough assessments' of these issues have been carried out.
Ms Pavey also expressed doubts over the UK's ability to meet its carbon reduction obligations and grow the economy if Gatwick is expanded.
She said: 'Why would you spend some of your really valuable carbon budget on building another bucket and spade runway that exports sterling on cheap flights overseas?
'(The extra passengers would) spend money out of the country, benefiting other countries' economies.
'The carbon budget is so precious. If (Chancellor Rachel Reeves) is talking about boosting the economy, you surely should be looking for home-grown businesses.'
Ms Pavey said aircraft noise significantly affects many Cagne members, including some whose homes started being overflown after flight paths were adjusted.
The number of flights at Gatwick is limited between 11.30pm and 6am, but Ms Pavey claimed the airport authorities 'cram in' flights just outside the restricted period, which she said is still when 'most people are trying to sleep'.
Operating as a two-runway airport would enable Gatwick to add around 10-15 flights per hour at peak periods.
A recent Gatwick-commissioned Civil Aviation Authority report found 17,300 people lived in an area around the airport where the average sound level from air noise in summer 2023 between 11pm and 7am exceeded 45 decibels (dB).
The Department for Transport (DfT) has adopted 45dB as the lowest night-time average noise level which has an observed adverse effect.
A spokesperson for Gatwick, which is owned by French company Vinci and investment fund Global Infrastructure Partners, said: 'As part of the development consent order planning process for our northern runway plans, full and thorough assessments have been carried out on surface transport, noise, housing provision and wastewater treatment.
'We understand noise in particular is an important consideration for local people and managing noise levels for the local community is extremely important to us.
'Our noise footprint has reduced by around a third over the last 20 years, due to quieter aircraft.
'If our northern runway plans are approved, we will commit to ensuring noise levels are no louder than they were in 2019 – our busiest year.
'This can be done as quieter aircraft will join airlines' fleets, offsetting any increase in noise from the additional flights.
'Recent polling shows 80 per cent of responding residents across the South East support the airport's growth plans, while more than 100,000 businesses were represented in letters to Government endorsing our plans.'
A DfT spokesperson said: 'As this is a live application that will be determined by the department, it would not be appropriate to comment.'
Gatwick describes its proposal as 'shovel ready' and believes it could start construction work this year.
It hopes the upgraded runway will be operational by the end of the decade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Sustainable aviation fuel not a ‘silver bullet' to decarbonisation, warns MP
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is not a 'silver bullet' to decarbonising the industry, ministers have been warned. Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the Transport Committee, urged the Government to 'look beyond' SAF in its mission to reduce carbon emissions. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she is 'determined to make rapid progress' on the roll-out of SAF, to ensure Britain can continue to 'grow and thrive'. In January, the Government introduced a mandate which requires an increasing amount of sustainable fuel to be used by jets, with the aim of ensuring 22% of all jet fuel comes from sustainable sources by 2040. Opening a debate on the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill, Ms Alexander said she wants to see more passengers 'take to the skies, not less'. She told MPs: 'We're determined to make rapid progress on this issue, because we do have an ironclad belief that our success as an island nation rests on our international connectivity. 'The flow of trade, exporting British expertise, the movement of people for business and leisure, all depend on aviation continuing to grow and thrive. 'We could put our head in the sand and pretend people do not want to fly, pretend the sector does not support hundreds of thousands of jobs, that people do not look forward to foreign holidays or family reunions, that air freight isn't a significant part of our trade by value, but we'd be on the wrong side of both reality and public aspiration. 'The truth is, demand for flight is only going in one direction. According to the CAA (Civil Aviation Authority), passenger levels were 7% higher in 2024 than the previous year. 'If we do not respond, if we don't set aviation up for long-term success, we don't just make ourselves poorer today, we kiss goodbye to the growth and opportunity this country needs in the decades to come. 'So I'm clear, I want a future where more passengers can take to the skies, not less. But like the rest of our economy, that must mean emitting less carbon, not more. This Bill will help to secure that future.' Intervening, Conservative MP Sir Julian Lewis (New Forest East) said: 'I gather that only last week, the International Air Transport Association highlighted the fact that sustainable aviation fuels, at the moment, cost approximately five times the cost of conventional jet fuel. 'Can she explain how the measures in the Bill will bridge that gap to make it economical?' Ms Alexander replied: 'There is constrained supply at the moment, we have one commercial production facility in the UK at Immingham.' She added: 'What we need to do is build investor confidence to commercialise some of the demonstration projects in sustainable aviation fuel that exists around the country.' During the second reading debate, Ms Cadbury said: 'I know that we need to see changes in aviation to meet our really ambitious climate goals, now that aviation and shipping are included in our carbon budget, this is even more important. 'I hope that the Government will also look beyond SAF when thinking about decarbonising aviation. SAF is not and will not be the silver bullet solution to the sector's responsibility, to this country's decarbonisation strategy.' The MP for Brentford and Isleworth added: 'The Climate Change Committee warned this Parliament in 2023 that relying on SAF alone was, I quote, high risk. 'For example, Heathrow Airport is already the single greatest source of carbon emissions in the UK, and the current plans for expansion will add an extra eight to nine megatons of CO2 a year. 'And if the Government do expand Heathrow, then it will mean that other airports across the UK would face having to make cuts to ensure that aviation didn't reach its carbon targets. 'Or, furthermore, and probably both, as continuing increases in aviation emissions grow, that will have to be offset against significant cuts in emissions in other sectors. 'So I ask the Transport Secretary, what is the Government doing to address that particular challenge?' Shadow transport minister Gareth Bacon branded the Government's pledge to begin work on the Heathrow expansion in this Parliament as 'very far-fetched'. He added: 'There are substantial logistical and financial barriers to its construction, and so far, the Government has provided no solutions on these points.'
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits believe roads will be fully driverless in 15 years - but want tougher laws
The government has set a timetable for the introduction of self-driving vehicles but research suggests many people are wary People want tough laws to keep driverless cars safe, a poll found. Most think self-driving vehicles will be commonplace within 15 years, and a quarter of young adults expect to buy one in the next three years. But the safety of the rapidly evolving technology is a concern. Nearly four in 10 questioned in research by National Accident Helpline disagreed that the current laws are adequate to address it. This figure rose to more than half among people aged 55 and over. Nearly 60% of the 2,000 respondents agreed that drivers should have a new licence for a self-driving car, while almost eight in 10 think self-driving cars should be required to pass more stringent safety tests than human-driven vehicles. The results come after Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander this week announced that the government will allow self-driving commercial vehicle pilot schemes from spring 2026. Uber, one of the first firms taking advantage of the move, says it will launch a robotaxi service in partnership with UK AI firm Wayve in London as soon as next spring. A wider rollout is expected when the full Automated Vehicles Act becomes law from the second half of 2027, although local authorities' consent will be required. John Kushnick, legal operations director at National Accident Helpline, said: 'What's fascinating is that many people express safety concerns about self-driving cars, yet often overlook how unsafe human drivers actually are. This highlights a clear gap in public understanding – most accidents are caused by human error, not technology. 'Over a third of respondents said they'd trust autopilot on planes more than a self-driving car, but again, that comes down to familiarity and education. Automation is already making travel safer, and public attitudes will likely shift over time, just as they did with autopilot in planes. "Liability, however, remains a key question. With autonomous vehicles, it's likely that manufacturers will bear more responsibility. "The benefit is that these cars will record everything, making it easier to establish fault. However, we'll need to rethink how insurance works when the human is no longer in control – does the policy belong to the person or the machine?" The implementation of the Automated Vehicles Act has been delayed by a year. It became law in May 2024, was initially hailed as a major step forward for the UK's self-driving car ambitions, establishing a legal framework stating that when a vehicle is in self-driving mode, the manufacturer - not the human occupant - is liable for its behaviour, with the intention of paving the way for the introduction of autonomous vehicles as early as 2026. Several factors contributed to the government's decision to push back the approval date, with safety concerns playing a major role.
Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Sustainable aviation fuel not a ‘silver bullet' to decarbonisation, warns MP
Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the Transport Committee, urged the Government to 'look beyond' SAF in its mission to reduce carbon emissions. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she is 'determined to make rapid progress' on the roll-out of SAF, to ensure Britain can continue to 'grow and thrive'. In January, the Government introduced a mandate which requires an increasing amount of sustainable fuel to be used by jets, with the aim of ensuring 22% of all jet fuel comes from sustainable sources by 2040. Opening a debate on the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill, Ms Alexander said she wants to see more passengers 'take to the skies, not less'. She told MPs: 'We're determined to make rapid progress on this issue, because we do have an ironclad belief that our success as an island nation rests on our international connectivity. 'The flow of trade, exporting British expertise, the movement of people for business and leisure, all depend on aviation continuing to grow and thrive. 'We could put our head in the sand and pretend people do not want to fly, pretend the sector does not support hundreds of thousands of jobs, that people do not look forward to foreign holidays or family reunions, that air freight isn't a significant part of our trade by value, but we'd be on the wrong side of both reality and public aspiration. 'The truth is, demand for flight is only going in one direction. According to the CAA (Civil Aviation Authority), passenger levels were 7% higher in 2024 than the previous year. 'If we do not respond, if we don't set aviation up for long-term success, we don't just make ourselves poorer today, we kiss goodbye to the growth and opportunity this country needs in the decades to come. 'So I'm clear, I want a future where more passengers can take to the skies, not less. But like the rest of our economy, that must mean emitting less carbon, not more. This Bill will help to secure that future.' Intervening, Conservative MP Sir Julian Lewis (New Forest East) said: 'I gather that only last week, the International Air Transport Association highlighted the fact that sustainable aviation fuels, at the moment, cost approximately five times the cost of conventional jet fuel. 'Can she explain how the measures in the Bill will bridge that gap to make it economical?' Ms Alexander replied: 'There is constrained supply at the moment, we have one commercial production facility in the UK at Immingham.' She added: 'What we need to do is build investor confidence to commercialise some of the demonstration projects in sustainable aviation fuel that exists around the country.' Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander (Joe Giddens/PA) During the second reading debate, Ms Cadbury said: 'I know that we need to see changes in aviation to meet our really ambitious climate goals, now that aviation and shipping are included in our carbon budget, this is even more important. 'I hope that the Government will also look beyond SAF when thinking about decarbonising aviation. SAF is not and will not be the silver bullet solution to the sector's responsibility, to this country's decarbonisation strategy.' The MP for Brentford and Isleworth added: 'The Climate Change Committee warned this Parliament in 2023 that relying on SAF alone was, I quote, high risk. 'For example, Heathrow Airport is already the single greatest source of carbon emissions in the UK, and the current plans for expansion will add an extra eight to nine megatons of CO2 a year. 'And if the Government do expand Heathrow, then it will mean that other airports across the UK would face having to make cuts to ensure that aviation didn't reach its carbon targets. 'Or, furthermore, and probably both, as continuing increases in aviation emissions grow, that will have to be offset against significant cuts in emissions in other sectors. 'So I ask the Transport Secretary, what is the Government doing to address that particular challenge?' Shadow transport minister Gareth Bacon branded the Government's pledge to begin work on the Heathrow expansion in this Parliament as 'very far-fetched'. He added: 'There are substantial logistical and financial barriers to its construction, and so far, the Government has provided no solutions on these points.'
