Inside the plans for new Gatwick runway as campaigners claim it is being done on the ‘cheap'
Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (CAGNE) argues the West Sussex airport's plans fail to address crucial issues like noise pollution, surface transport, housing needs, and wastewater treatment. The group has threatened to push for a judicial reviewif Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander approves the project.
Gatwick's proposal aims to bring its standby runway into regular operation for smaller aircraft take-offs, boosting the airport's yearly flight capacity by 100,000.
The £2.2 billion privately-funded project includes shifting the existing runway 12 metres, expanding both terminals, adding new aircraft gates, and improving road access.
The Transport Secretary faces a 27 February deadline to decide on Gatwick's application for a development consent order.
Sally Pavey, 59, who chairs Cagne, claimed there are 'many holes in the submissions made by Gatwick'.
She said: 'This is a new runway on the cheap.
'There are so many things that haven't been confirmed or finalised.
'The Secretary of State would be very unwise to actually approve it, because it's going to cost the local authorities dearly as they'll have to pay for the ramifications.'
Ms Pavey said Gatwick has provided 'very little reassurance' about the impact of expansion on noise, while she described the major transport links to the airport as a 'single railway line and a single road which can't be expanded without major investment'.
She questioned 'where is the affordable housing?' that would be needed with an increase in the airport's workforce, and called for a wastewater treatment plant to be built on-site as existing facilities in the area have 'very limited capacity'.
Gatwick insisted 'full and thorough assessments' of these issues have been carried out.
Ms Pavey also expressed doubts over the UK's ability to meet its carbon reduction obligations and grow the economy if Gatwick is expanded.
She said: 'Why would you spend some of your really valuable carbon budget on building another bucket and spade runway that exports sterling on cheap flights overseas?
'(The extra passengers would) spend money out of the country, benefiting other countries' economies.
'The carbon budget is so precious. If (Chancellor Rachel Reeves) is talking about boosting the economy, you surely should be looking for home-grown businesses.'
Ms Pavey said aircraft noise significantly affects many Cagne members, including some whose homes started being overflown after flight paths were adjusted.
The number of flights at Gatwick is limited between 11.30pm and 6am, but Ms Pavey claimed the airport authorities 'cram in' flights just outside the restricted period, which she said is still when 'most people are trying to sleep'.
Operating as a two-runway airport would enable Gatwick to add around 10-15 flights per hour at peak periods.
A recent Gatwick-commissioned Civil Aviation Authority report found 17,300 people lived in an area around the airport where the average sound level from air noise in summer 2023 between 11pm and 7am exceeded 45 decibels (dB).
The Department for Transport (DfT) has adopted 45dB as the lowest night-time average noise level which has an observed adverse effect.
A spokesperson for Gatwick, which is owned by French company Vinci and investment fund Global Infrastructure Partners, said: 'As part of the development consent order planning process for our northern runway plans, full and thorough assessments have been carried out on surface transport, noise, housing provision and wastewater treatment.
'We understand noise in particular is an important consideration for local people and managing noise levels for the local community is extremely important to us.
'Our noise footprint has reduced by around a third over the last 20 years, due to quieter aircraft.
'If our northern runway plans are approved, we will commit to ensuring noise levels are no louder than they were in 2019 – our busiest year.
'This can be done as quieter aircraft will join airlines' fleets, offsetting any increase in noise from the additional flights.
'Recent polling shows 80 per cent of responding residents across the South East support the airport's growth plans, while more than 100,000 businesses were represented in letters to Government endorsing our plans.'
A DfT spokesperson said: 'As this is a live application that will be determined by the department, it would not be appropriate to comment.'
Gatwick describes its proposal as 'shovel ready' and believes it could start construction work this year.
It hopes the upgraded runway will be operational by the end of the decade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Deport now, appeal later' is proof we haven't learned from Windrush
The Windrush scandal ought to have sounded a warning about what happens when you deport people without due process. Claudius was allowed to stay in the UK after being minutes away from being put on a flight at Gatwick airport in December 2014, without a right to an in-country appeal. He recently settled a six-figure sum from the Windrush Compensation Scheme. Others have been brought back to the UK at huge cost. Being able to deport people is the right of a government but, sadly, the debate has become more emotive than evidence-based. 'Deport now, appeal later' – the drive to deport non-British nationals who commit crimes before they can appeal against their removal to their place of origin – is being expanded. The scheme will now cover 15 more countries, including Canada, India and Australia, bringing the total to 23, nearly three times more than the original eight. And I fear we're heading for another Windrush-style scandal. In recent times, there have been stories of heinous crimes committed by foreign national offenders, and of spurious claims for avoiding deportation. Stories about deportations being thwarted by cats or a fear of foreign chicken nuggets are the headlines – but they're never the story. Behind each case is a complex set of circumstances involving family life in the UK and what happens to people on return to countries, often ones they don't know or have ties to. UK laws make it mandatory to deport anyone sentenced to more than 12 months in prison. A Brazilian client of mine, who was saved from deportation after we intervened on his behalf, had been sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment when his car, involved in a collision which caused whiplash, was found to have a mechanical defect. I am not downplaying the seriousness of his offence, but I weighed up his sentence with that of the finding in the Lammy review that non-white men receive disproportionately higher sentences for the same offence. His partner was heavily pregnant, he had no previous convictions and he worked full time. On the 2019 deportation charter to Jamaica, a young man who had lived most of his life in the UK, including in care, was deported after a conviction for driving offences. I don't condone his offending, nor that of three brothers convicted of GBH. But that two who were British were able to remain in the UK while one whose paperwork failed was deported in his 30s to a country he last saw when he was two years old suggests something is very wrong with a system that is quick to deport people who have lived most of their lives in the UK – and, in some cases, even people who were born in Britain. Then there is the question of whether the people for whom a prison sentence means deportation should ever have been sent to prison at all. There are almost 98,000 people in UK prisons – just under 4,000 are women. Yes, the prison system is at breaking point but as someone who spent two years working in women's prisons, the majority of women I encountered were victims of drug and domestic abuse, suffered mental health problems and had very few opportunities and multiple complex needs on the outside. Prison does nothing for these women, yet here they are, outnumbering the number of foreign national offenders who might be deported. We understand the number to be under 1,000, but no one has posited alternatives to imprisonment for women, and some men, as a way of making savings. And what of the 1,000-plus British people in prisons abroad in countries that could decide to send them back to the UK, cancelling out any savings? The idea that this is about savings is hard to understand in isolation from a discussion on wider sentencing and prison reform. And if there are considerable savings to be had, this can only be one policy criterion. Surely victims of crime expect to see offenders punished in some way. Whatever the details of the scheme, it is inevitable that most people won't be imprisoned in their home countries, many of which have weak capacity and conditions. The UK has stopped the extradition of people to countries with poor prison conditions. The existing early release schemes could be made to work while providing some justice for victims. A list of countries added to the early release scheme involves countries not known to produce many foreign national offenders in the UK, so unless the new ideas are merely political, it is hard to see at this stage what might be achieved. And if we start removing people before they have a chance to exhaust both their criminal and immigration appeals, I suspect we'll be bringing some back – at huge cost.
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Drivers over 70 could face mandatory eye tests every three years
The UK Government is considering compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. Ministers are also considering cutting the drink-drive limit in England and Wales to bring it in line with Scotland, according to The Times. The proposals, set to be published as part of a road safety strategy in the autumn, come amid concern about the number of people being killed or seriously injured on Britain's roads. Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents, and numbers have remained relatively constant following a large fall between 2000 and 2010. A Labour source said: 'At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments. 'In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2 billion per year.' Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022 and prompting concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working. Under the plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms. This figure would be in line with Scotland, which cut its drink-drive limit in 2014, and the rest of Europe, where no other country has a limit as high as that in England and Wales. The UK is also one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving, leading ministers to consider compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests as increasing numbers of drivers are being caught with drugs in their system. The Labour source added: 'This Labour Government will deliver the first road safety strategy in a decade, imposing tougher penalties on those breaking the law, protecting road users and restoring order to our roads.' The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Drink-drive limit could be cut in plan to overhaul road safety laws
In a major overhaul of the UK's road safety laws, ministers are also considering tougher penalties for uninsured drivers and failing to wear a seatbelt, according to a report in The Times. The proposals, set to be published as part of a road safety strategy in the autumn, come amid concern about the number of people being killed or seriously injured on Britain's roads. Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents, and numbers have remained relatively constant following a large fall between 2000 and 2010. A Labour source said: 'At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments. 'In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2 billion per year.' Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022 and prompting concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working. Under the plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms. This figure would be in line with Scotland, which cut its drink-drive limit in 2014, and the rest of Europe, where no other country has a limit as high as that in England and Wales. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is due to publish the Government's road safety strategy in the autumn (Jonathan Brady/PA) The UK is also one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving, leading ministers to consider compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests as increasing numbers of drivers are being caught with drugs in their system. The Labour source added: 'This Labour Government will deliver the first road safety strategy in a decade, imposing tougher penalties on those breaking the law, protecting road users and restoring order to our roads.' The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation.
