UK threatens to sue Abramovich to release frozen money from Chelsea sale
LONDON, June 3 (Reuters) - The British government has said it is fully prepared to take Russian businessman Roman Abramovich to court to help release frozen funds from his sale of Chelsea soccer club that were intended to help victims of Russia's war in Ukraine.
Britain sanctioned Abramovich in a crackdown on Russian oligarchs after Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, triggering a rushed 2.5 billion pound ($3.4 billion) sale of the club on condition that the money would be used to create a humanitarian charity.
The money has been frozen in a British bank account because of a disagreement between Abramovich and the government over how the money should be spent, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
They said Britain wants the funds spent only in Ukraine in line with a wider European push for Moscow to foot the bill for the deaths and destruction caused by its full-scale invasion but Abramovich wants the money to go to all victims of the war.
British finance minister Rachel Reeves and foreign minister David Lammy said in a joint statement the government was ready to take Abramovich to court.
"We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far," they said.
"While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible."
New York-based law firm Kobre & Kim, which represents Abramovich, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reuters reported in March that Britain was considering legal action over the issue.
George Foulkes, a member of parliament's upper house who has campaigned for ways to release the money, said the government may look at ways to use other frozen Russian assets to help victims if a legal route cannot be found to resolve the disagreement.
"It is symbolic, and I think if we can do this it would set a precedent, and we could look at all the other money tied up in property, banks and overseas territories," he told Reuters.
Chelsea was sold to a consortium led by U.S. investor Todd Boehly and private equity firm Clearlake Capital in May 2022. The sale hinged on Abramovich not benefiting from it.
($1 = 0.7398 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Small-town mayor is accused of body-slamming a predecessor in drunken country club dust-up
An upstate New York mayor and one of his predecessors have given wildly different versions of an apparent country club brawl that left one of them bruised and bloodied. Current Rome Mayor Jeffrey Lanigan and former Mayor Jim Brown allegedly got into a physical altercation Tuesday night at the Teugega Country Club. Brown claimed that Lanigan assaulted him in the parking lot and left him with a bloody injured arm that had to be treated at a local hospital. 'He body-slammed me into the car. He caught me off guard. I didn't see him coming,' Brown told the Daily Sentinel. Brown, who served as mayor from 2004 to 2011, said that he was walking to a car with another person when he was approached by Lanigan, who was elected in 2024. 'I'm talking to an individual straight like that, ok, and then all of a sudden, I didn't have time. [Lanigan] comes over and body blocks me right into the side of the car. Just boom,' the former mayor said. 'And then he looks me in the eye and says, "We don't want you here. We don't want you here." Twice.' However, Lanigan alleged that he approached Brown respectfully and that he tried to help his predecessor because he appeared intoxicated. 'Mayor Lanigan, and in an attempt to get his attention placed his hand on Mr. Brown's shoulder. Mr. Brown responded by flailing his arms and he became verbally aggressive,' his office told CNY Central. 'Recognizing Mr. Brown's apparent level of intoxication, Mayor Lanigan made the decision to escort him to his designated driver's vehicle a short distance away for his own safety. 'While assisting Mr. Brown into the car, the verbal dispute continued. No physical assault occurred, and the situation ended shortly thereafter.' Brown refuted Lanigan's version of events and claimed there is video evidence that supports his statement. 'It's a lie,' said Brown. 'There's footage. They have the footage, I think the Sheriff's Department has the video, because there's cameras on the parking lot.' Oneida County Sheriff Robert Maciol confirmed to local news outlets on Wednesday that his office took a complaint from Brown regarding the confrontation. 'We did receive a complaint from former Mayor Brown concerning an incident last night at the Teugega County Club involving current Mayor Lanigan,' Maciol said. 'Deputies have spoken to some witnesses and taken some witness depositions. Currently obtaining some potential video footage.' As of Wednesday afternoon, no charges had been filed nor arrests had been made, according the local news. Lanigan claimed the two of them had been friends for years until recently when Brown started bashing 'his administration for no apparent reason.' 'Public life can bring moments of tension, and unfortunately, politics can be ugly. I am disappointed in Mr. Brown's recent public outbursts,' he said.
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shame on you, Labour. How can you still sell arms to Israel?
Sandy Slater, Stirling. • What appalling, deeply distressing scenes were screened on Channel 4 News on Tuesday night with people in Gaza desperate for food being mown down by Israeli Defence Force bullets. Former UK Supreme Court senior judge Lord Sumption was interviewed on the programme and said he believed Israel was committing gross breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza by killing on an indiscriminate scale. He also opined that genocide was the most plausible explanation for what was taking place. Gaza is now in ruins with most of its infrastructure, hospitals, schools and other public buildings shattered beyond repair. People are starving, hundreds are being slaughtered every week and children are suffering unimaginable horrors. Why oh why are our Labour MPs not up in arms; how can they watch this deteriorating catastrophe every night on TV news and do nothing? Why is Scottish Secretary Ian Murray not leading a delegation to Westminster to demand we stop supplying Israel with arms as of now? I truly despair. Alan Woodcock, Dundee. Read more letters Scotland could be Ground Zero With great fanfare, Keir Starmer and John Healey this week revealed that the mysterious magic money tree, never available for things that people need but always in full blossom for incendiary hardware, is once again being shaken down for "defence". Meanwhile, a former director of Russia analysis at the CIA tells the journal Foreign Policy that "the Russians recently revised their nuclear-use doctrine, and one of the things that they specifically said in there was that if there are attacks by an adversary on important state or military infrastructure that would disrupt responses, potentially by Russia's nuclear forces, that is potentially a trigger for Russian nuclear use". The fact that Ukraine is a non-nuclear nation becomes irrelevant, because it is perceived to be enabled by the US and Nato, which ARE nuclear powers, ergo justifying a potential nuclear response. Long ago, a Westminster political correspondent said that if there were to be a nuclear war, he was certain that in the aftermath I would be saying "I told you so" [as a former chair of CND]. It gives me no pleasure at all to say we are very possibly nearing that stage, and none of the things Messrs Healey and Starmer have announced would make any difference, even if we already had them. I don't need to remind anybody where Ground Zero in Europe is. Oh yes, aside from the US submarines currently in the Atlantic, Scotland would be the most significant target. In fact, in US nuclear war planning, it's always been "independent". It's called Unit 11. Marjorie Ellis Thompson, Edinburgh. PM is right over Russia Hugh Kerr's 'the Russians are not our enemies' claim (Letters, June 3 on the basis that 'they lost 20 million people helping us defeat Nazi Germany', is I suggest delusional. Firstly, Stalin, who murdered millions of his own citizens, not least in Ukraine, before the war, was an ally of Hitler, until Hitler betrayed him and invaded the Soviet Union. Then the Soviets became our allies on the basis that our enemy's enemy was our ally, but certainly not in reality our friend. Nor is Putin's dictatorship, murderers of civilians, abductors of children and suppressors of political opposition, the kind of friend I would wish to have. It is only too clear that his invasion of Ukraine is just the start of his dream of expanding westwards. Whatever Keir Starmer's failings, he is right to warn of the threat that Putin's Russia poses to European liberal democracy, of which the citizens of these islands are a fundamental part. By relying on American heft, Europe, UK included, has for too long under-invested in defence. With Donald Trump in the White House, those days are over. We must shoulder that burden ourselves because a government's first responsibility is the defence and safety of its people, and we know the price of appeasement. As the Romans had it: "Si vis pacem, para bellum' – if you want peace, prepare for war. Roy Pedersen, Inverness. Despairing of the SNP Where does one even begin with the SNP? No, to £2.5 million to one of Scotland's and the UK's cutting-edge employers ("SNP in munitions ban hypocrisy row over Ferguson Marine", heraldscotland, June 3); yes to £2.5m to promote a language that virtually no one in Scotland speaks or even comprehends. Then, the leader and his prospective candidate in the Hamilton by-election disagree on how to manage child poverty, an issue that's been an awful by-product of capitalism since that economic system became dominant ("SNP candidate Loudon takes different stance on the Scottish Child Payment from Swinney", The Herald, June 4). You'd think that a party who'd been in power for 18 years would have the perfect opportunity to come up with fresh ideas on how to eradicate child poverty, and many other of society's problems. But wait, if that government is the parochial SNP, whose total stock of ideas, strategies and tactics amounts to how to make Westminster and the UK look bad, then none of our problems is addressed, and you end up with our leading Scottish politician eating rusks with two-year-olds, rather than talking to fellow politicians about the defence of the UK which, last time I looked, included Scotland. Stuart Brennan, Glasgow. Capital woes will get worse Edinburgh's woes continue with the £1.7bn sea of debt that is only going to get bigger ("Edinburgh faced with £1.7 billion 'sea of debt' amid fears for services", The Herald, June 4) This is symptomatic of the general situation in Scotland as a whole under the less than careful guidance of the SNP. Large debts accrue because of reckless spending and suddenly taxes must rise to cover this but it is never quite enough and so the cycle goes on ever upward. There is a limit and it has already been breached. Edinburgh wants to introduce a visitor levy, and is also mooting a congestion zone tax on cars. Elsewhere, taxes on cruise ship passengers are in the pipeline. This will actually lead to the exact opposite effect, a drop in revenue as people go elsewhere. If Scots return an SNP administration in 2026 all this will continue until the penny finally drops with Holyrood, that is once it has sorted out its toilet rules properly. Scotland is going down the pan. Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and with Defence Secretary John Healey (Image: PA) Flip side of the equation Once again Guy Stenhouse seems determined to present his jigsaw but with several key pieces missing ("Public sector workers who refuse to come into the office should be sacked", The Herald, May 31). He makes rather sweeping assumptions about Tesco and Aldi and suggests that their performance in one field somehow equips them, or other private sector organisations, to deliver important public services. To take the examples he cites, Tesco and Aldi can certainly be considered successful if profit levels are the only factor taken into account – £3.1 billion and £553 million respectively. At face value, he might be entitled to think he has a case. However he might want to consider other significant figures in this equation such as the fact that 30% of children in the UK are now living in poverty. He might also want to look at the exponential rise in food banks in recent years and the fact that over three million people last year were having to make use of them. While there are many factors giving rise to this situation, I believe it does call into question the "success" of the supermarkets if their pricing policies are putting their products beyond the reach of a significant number of people, particularly the most vulnerable. Mr Stenhouse might consider taking a more measured view the next time he wants to offer up another "private sector good/public sector bad" rant. Andy Crichton, Cupar.
The Herald Scotland
43 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump says Putin told him he'll 'have to respond' to Ukraine attack
"We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine," Trump said, referring to Ukraine's surprise drone attack that destroyed dozens of Russian bombers, "and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides." "President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," Trump said. More: Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike The Ukraine attack was the most damaging Ukrainian attack on Russia in the three years since Moscow invaded. It came after Russian forces launched a deadly barrage of hundreds of drones and missiles at Ukrainian cities on May 25, prompting Trump to say Putin "gone absolutely crazy." Later, Trump warned that Putin is "playing with fire" by refusing to engage in ceasefire talks. More: Russia demands harsh terms at Ukraine peace talks Trump, who has struggled to mediate meaningful peace negotiations between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy, has recently taken more of a backseat. After Trump held a two-hour phone call with Putin on May 15, Trump said conditions for the next round of peace talks would be "negotiated between the two parties." Recounting his June 4 call with Putin, Trump also said they discussed Iran, which has just dismissed a proposal from the Trump administration for a deal that would prevent it from developing potential nuclear weapons technology. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected a central U.S. demand that Iran abandon uranium enrichment, calling it "100%" against the country's interests. "I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement," Trump said, adding that Putin suggested during that call that he participate in the discussions with Iran. "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" Trump said. Contributing: Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
