Putin ‘rewarded' for Ukraine invasion with Trump summit, experts warn
The summit, which took place at a military base in Anchorage in the US's northernmost state, was aimed at kick-starting a peace process to end the war in Ukraine.
Very little appears to have been materially resolved as a result of the meeting.
Mr Trump has insisted 'some great progress' was made, with 'many points' agreed and 'very few' remaining.
Sir Keir Starmer, meanwhile, commended the US president's efforts to make peace, and said Mr Trump had 'brought us closer than ever before' to an end to the war in Ukraine.
Leading foreign affairs and military experts have however claimed the summit's main effect has been to lend legitimacy to Mr Putin, who has been considered a pariah by many world leaders since the invasion began in 2022.
Orysia Lutsevych, deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia programme and head of the Ukraine forum at the Chatham House think tank, said: 'After six bilateral Trump-Putin phone calls, five trips of Trump's envoy (Steve) Witkoff to Moscow, the Alaska summit, watched globally with so much anticipation and anxiety, failed to produce any tangible outcome to stop Russian aggression against Ukraine.
'Russia has received a reward for its invasion.
'Trump called Russia a 'great country' and said there is strong mutual understanding between the two parties.
'This represents a further fissure in the already shaky Transatlantic alliance, the rupture of which is a primary Russian aim.
'The Alaska summit represents another step towards this goal.'
Keir Giles, an associate fellow of the Russia and Eurasia programme at Chatham House, meanwhile suggested there were 'two dangers' which could emerge from the summit.
The first is that Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky may now be perceived by Mr Trump as a 'softer target where he is more willing to exert leverage', and that the US president could 'once again try to strongarm Zelensky into compromising the future of his country'.
The second danger is that European leaders 'might once again think the immediate danger has passed' and become complacent, after their scramble to speak to Mr Trump ahead of the summit.
Dr Neil Melvin, director of international security at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) meanwhile suggested Mr Putin would walk away considering the summit a success.
Dr Melvin said: 'Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war.
'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.'
He added: 'Russia's war aims have not changed since it launched its invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
'At the summit, Putin was clear that he wants to address first what he calls the root causes of the war.
'The Kremlin identifies these as Nato enlargement, the emergence of governments in Ukraine resistant to Russian integration projects, and challenges to Russian claims about territory and ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
'This is Russia's precondition and underpins Putin's demand for a 'comprehensive peace deal'.
'This agenda would lead to the subjugation of Ukraine.
'Putin made no concessions at the summit.
'Moreover, he succeeded in presenting himself as a legitimate equal to the US president.
'He will also consider it a victory that he was able to marginalise Zelensky and European leaders from the central discussion about the future of European security.'
Elsewhere, party political leaders in the UK warned against lending Mr Putin legitimacy.
Sir Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader said: 'It's clear Putin doesn't want peace.
'Trump's attempt to sweet talk him into a deal has failed, so it's time for Trump to finally get tough.
'The UK should seize Russian assets to help Ukraine today, and press the US to do the same.'
Green Party MP Ellie Chowns meanwhile said the world was 'left where we started' by the summit, adding: 'A brutal war caused by Russia's aggression and no real solution in sight.
'Any lasting peace plan without Ukraine's full participation and consent will fail.
'When you compare how Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin to his publicly humiliating Zelensky, it's clear that the only winner from these talks is Putin.
'He was handed the credibility of a seat at the top table while his forces continue their attacks on Ukraine.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
From Washington: The Congressional Clash Over DC Crime, Redistricting
This week, President Trump invoked a section of the Home Rule Act, enabling a federal takeover of the D.C. police department. He stated that the move was necessary to restore safety and combat violence in our nation's capital. FOX News Senior Congressional Correspondent Chad Pergram explains the authority the Act grants to both the President and Congress, and how Republican lawmakers might take further action to support this effort. Later, he looks ahead to the midterms and discusses how the ongoing redistricting battle could impact election outcomes. Later, Congressman Troy Downing (R-MT) explains why he's pushing legislation to overturn limitations on coal, and why it's a necessary power source for America to win the race on artificial intelligence. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Von Der Leyen, Rutte and Stubb May Join Trump-Zelenskiy Meeting
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Finnish President Alexander Stubb plan to join Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Washington for his meeting with Donald Trump on Monday, said people familiar with the matter. The people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations, cautioned that discussions were ongoing. The plans aren't finalized and could still change, the people said.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Quincy's Scott Campbell faces crowded field in bid to retain at-large council seat
QUINCY ‒ Incumbent Councilor-at-large Scott Campbell's bid for a second term pits him against seven competitors for three seats. A Tuesday, Sept. 2, preliminary election will whittle the crowded field to six candidates who will appear on the ballot for the November general election. During an interview at the city council's offices in City Hall, Campbell said he's running on making housing affordable and continuing the council's support for Mayor Thomas Koch's transformation of the city. Campbell described himself as a lifelong Quincy resident and the youngest of eight in a family committed to community service, primarily through sports. Campbell said he continues that legacy to this day by coaching and organizing an annual golf tournament for alumni of Quincy and North Quincy High's football program. "I stayed involved my entire life," Campbell said. "Not because it's something good to do. It's a responsibility." Campbell began his professional life working in sales and customer relations for the telecommunications sector, including such firms as Granite Telecom and AT&T. But when he turned 30, he determined it was more of job than a vocation. In 2001, Campbell joined former Quincy city councilor, state treasurer and gubernatorial candidate Tim Cahill as a special aide, later rising to the position of chief of staff. Campbell described Cahill as a role model in politics. "The stances he took may not always have been popular," Campbell said. "It was the right thing. It wasn't always the easy thing." Campbell began a new job in January with the Massachusetts Sheriffs Association as director of government affairs. He was elected to city council in 2023 in an uncontested race. Quincy City Council candidate Scott Campbell: On affordability Asked what he hopes to accomplish if reelected, Campbell said he's focused on making the city affordable to live in for three generations of families. He said there are existing options, such as property tax abatements for veterans and seniors, which everyone may not know how to access. Campbell also named the Affordable Housing Trust Fund as part of a strategy to bring down housing costs. Private developers building market rate housing in the city can pay into the fund in lieu of building affordable units as part of their own projects. "Can we find a way to utilize that money," Campbell said. Quincy City Council candidate Scott Campbell: On the raises In the spring of 2024, Campbell and the rest of the council approved a 79% raise that Koch proposed for himself, increasing the mayor's salary from about $159,000 to $285,000. At the same time, Koch proposed a roughly 50% raise for the councilors, which increased their pay from $29,500 to $44,500. The council approved that raise as well. After the State Ethics Commission launched a conflict-of-interest inquiry, Koch and the councilors deferred the raises until after the next elections. The raises take effect in 2026 for the councilors and 2028 for the mayor. Or perhaps not for the mayor. A group of Quincy residents are working to put a citizen petition on November's ballot that would set the mayor's salary at $184,000 and take away elected officials' ability to increase their own salaries. Campbell defended his support for the mayor's raise by highlighting what he sees as the city's progress over the 17 years of Koch's tenure. "This is a national story here with the transformation of Quincy," he said. "By and large, it has been extremely successful." Asked why he didn't recognize that the mayor's and council's actions may have violated state conflict-of-interest law, which bars public officials from participating in matters in which they have a direct financial interest, Campbell said that others led the "process" which he only followed. "We were relying on a process," he said. "That process was presented to us." Asked who presented him with the process, Campbell named City Solicitor Jim Timmins and Council President Ian Cain. Performing arts, presidential center: Quincy reveals big new plans. With no price tag. Or address Courts: Quincy health commissioner will fight drunken driving charge at trial, lawyer says Quincy City Council candidate Scott Campbell: On the statues Speaking on the two, 10-foot-tall bronze statues of St. Michael and St. Florian planned for the façade of the new public safety building, Campbell said his initial response was concern over their pricetag, but ultimately he supports them. "My biggest issue was the cost," Campbell said. "At the end of the day, they fell within their budget." The statues cost $850,000, according to city officials. Commissioned as early as 2023, they were not disclosed to the city council, which approved the project's budget, or the residents until The Patriot Ledger reported on them in February. "By and large, (the public safety building) was managed in a really great way," Campbell said of the $175 million project. "We're talking about a landmark building, a 100-year building. To over simplify it, you don't buy a new suit and wear old shoes." Campbell said he doesn't think the statues violate the constitutional separation of church and state. Rather than Catholic figures, he said St. Michael and St. Florian are "accepted symbols of spirituality" for police and firefighters and "less about religion and more about protection." Three civil liberties organizations sued the city on behalf of 15 residents, claiming that Koch violated Article 3 of the state constitution, which bars government from elevating one religion over others. The plaintiffs are seeking a court order prohibiting installation of the statues, which are scheduled to go up in early October. Peter Blandino covers Quincy for The Patriot Ledger. Contact him at pblandino@ Thanks to our subscribers, who help make this coverage possible. If you are not a subscriber, please consider supporting quality local journalism with a Patriot Ledger subscription. Here is our latest offer. This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: Incumbent at-large councilor Scott Campbell runs for re-election Solve the daily Crossword
