logo
No spare time, no spare bedrooms: young Australian families under pressure are turning away from foster care

No spare time, no spare bedrooms: young Australian families under pressure are turning away from foster care

The Guardian19-07-2025
Robyn and Nick Lloyd have been foster carers for a decade, welcoming more than 30 kids into their home.
There's a financial and emotional toll to being a carer; but also joy attached to providing a safe environment for some of society's most vulnerable members.
Some of the foster children stay with them a few days, others for months. They cared for one little boy for two years.
The Sydney couple, who have three biological daughters, have drawn on support networks during their time as foster carers, including their local Anglican church members and an older fostering couple down the street who were fill-in grandparents for some of the younger foster kids.
Robyn also regularly meets with a group of about 20 carers living in the local area.
But she has noticed that the group is rarely replenished with younger members, raising concerns that the next cohort of carers has gone missing.
Australia's living and housing costs are so extreme that younger families – mainly millennials – who would typically represent the next generation of carers have neither the time nor spare bedroom to foster.
'I'm not seeing lots of younger families come through the carers' networks; there haven't been many under 40,' Robyn says.
'We need carers. One of the things I love about being a foster carer is being part of the village that raises them.
'These kids just need people to support them and love them.'
There were 7,980 foster carer households with a child placement as at 30 June 2024, according to the most recent Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) data. This represents more than a 10% drop in numbers in just three years, and 20% drop over the past decade.
Traditionally, such a large cohort like the millennials reaching the young family stage would represent foster care potential, according to the Association of Children's Welfare Agencies; however, this is now unlikely.
The association's chief executive, Simone Czech, says the number of foster carers leaving the system is high, while the number of inquiries to become carers is decreasing.
'The nature of children needing care is that it's not necessarily a role whereby you can work nine to five,' says Czech.
'In an ideal world, foster kids should have their own bedroom so that they've got their own space. That's not necessarily a requirement, but it's just that question of how much space, and time, does a household have to take on a foster child?'
Australia is not the only country facing a shortage of carers, with the UK among nations also recording a shortfall between retiring and new applicants.
There are extreme shortages of carers for large sibling groups, teens and children with complex needs.
But Australia's intense housing problem, whereby Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne and Brisbane are all in the top ten least affordable global cities, creates a particular challenge to policymakers.
Last year, almost 73% of Australia's 2.2 million couple families with young children had two employed parents, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data. A decade ago, it was 61%.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
While some of that change is linked to choices within households about workforce participation, much of the extra work is born from financial necessity.
Many industry participants say the solution to the foster care crunch is twofold. First, state governments need to invest more in early intervention, kinship and home-based care models to take the pressure off the foster system. And governments need to provide more support to slow down, or reverse, the decline in carer numbers.
'We need to stem the flow of kids needing out-of-home care, but there will always be a need for carers,' says Czech.
'Carers are worth their weight in gold, and we need more of them.'
A lack of foster carers has resulted in many kids being placed in emergency accommodation, such as hotels, motels and serviced apartments, where they are looked after by a rotating roster of workers.
This is bad for the children, and is hideously expensive for taxpayers, with costs as high as $2m a year for each child.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The NSW government recently banned so-called alternative care arrangements, although their use persists in other states. The NSW government also recently announced a 20% lift in the foster care allowance as it tries to arrest a slide in carer numbers.
The new rate means the carer of a typical five-year-old child receives a tax-free allowance of just over $787 per fortnight, according to the state government, which is the highest rate in the country.
Barnardos Australia chief executive Deirdre Cheers says the burden of living costs is hard to shift, even with the increased allowance. 'It's a really good thing, and New South Wales is leading the way there,' says Cheers.
'But the reality is that many people don't have room in their house, or they need to work one, or even two jobs to keep their own family afloat.
'We need people who are not just providing a bed, but who can be actively involved.'
Victoria's allowance rates are among the lowest in the country, and it's no coincidence that the state is losing carers at a rapid rate. In 2023-24, 429 carer households left the Victorian system, and just 162 joined, according to AIHW data.
Rowan Pulford, a policy adviser at the Foster Care Association of Victoria, says the cost of not investing in foster care is enormous.
'You either invest in foster carers or you spend the money elsewhere,' says Pulford, who is also a carer.
'Emergency placements and residential care are not only hugely expensive, but also incredibly damaging to the child.
'The life trajectory of those children can also be really poor.'
While raising allowances will help keep some carers in the system and encourage some prospective carers to join, there's no easy fix.
Many organisations are looking to retiring baby boomers as part of the answer, given they are the largest group with spare bedrooms. As a cohort, they have a high rate of home ownership, and many own their properties outright.
That could be part of the solution; however, even retirees with robust bank balances are being affected by cost-of-living pressures, given many are now caring for their grandchildren as their own children grapple with intensifying work commitments.
In Sydney, Anglicare has kept its number of carers stable, even as the wider sector sheds numbers.
The chief executive of Anglicare Sydney, Simon Miller, says foster carers need support to stay in the system, especially in an era of cost-of-living pressures. The organisation has adopted a model tested overseas called the 'foster circle' whereby a carer's local community, which usually includes the local church, steps in to help the carer household.
This can include cooking meals, babysitting and financial assistance, along with care for the household's biological children.
'This model has been hugely successful in reducing the turnover of carers and helps carers actually stick out when times are tough,' says Miller, referring to its success in the US and UK.
'We do think that it would be a really good thing if this type of initiative was adopted by the wider sector.
'As the saying goes, it takes a village to raise a child. We think it really does take a village to care for a foster child.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station
‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station

The Guardian

time7 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station

As more families seek affordable housing outside Sydney, they are experiencing a daily stress: their bosses want them back in the office more frequently but the train services to get there are becoming more and more unreliable. NSW has just recorded its worst year for on time running for Sydney trains, with nearly one in five running late, but the real problem is with intercity trains. Since July, one in three have failed to meet the punctuality benchmark. 'It's usually late. It's a surprise when it's on time,' says Elita Bird, who travels from Gosford. 'The slightest thing with the weather, which is increasing, it just runs late.' 'Terrible,' says Kim, who asks not to use her surname. She makes the one hour, 40 minute journey from and to Tuggerah on the Central Coast to Central station every weekday. 'They just constantly cancel, reschedule them and they're very slow because we get stuck behind the all-stations trains.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email It raises serious questions for the Minns Labor government as it attempts to deal with a housing crisis and skyrocketing house prices, which are sending families farther afield to find a place to live. 'If you want to take the pressure off house prices we have to make it easier for people to live outside the major cities. That means having reliable public transport,' says Dr Geoffrey Clifton, senior lecturer in transport at the University of Sydney. The headline numbers the NSW government releases on train performance do not fully capture the agony of the state's long-distance train commuters as Sydney Trains combines the performance of the city and the intercity services. 'Whilst Sydney Trains did not reach its own 92% performance target over the past three years, in part due to protected industrial action during this period and severe weather events, on time running in 2022 was 92.1%, 95% in 2021 and 92.5% in 2020,' a spokesperson told the Guardian in an official statement. But it is an entirely different story if the focus is on the intercity services – trains to the Central Coast, South Coast, Blue Mountains and Southern Highlands. Those services have failed to meet the 92% benchmark – trains arriving within six minutes of their timetabled arrival during peak hours – for all seven years, where data is available. So far, in the first three weeks of the 2025-26 financial year, just 65.2% of trains on the four main intercity lines were 'punctual'. It was little better in the previous 2024-25 year: just 70% Worse still, punctuality is worse when commuters are trying to get home. In the week 30 June to 4 July 2025 just 37% of trains taking commuters home from the city were 'on time'. In the week 19 May to 23 May, when the east coast was hit by huge rainfall, just 21% of evening peak trains were on time. Rain leads to several problems: subsidence on to the lines, as well as crowding into middle carriages as passengers huddle under cover in the central part of platforms. Bird says she now looks at the weather to decide whether she should commute or work from home. 'If there is rain or wind, then often there's a line down. I know what the problem is: Cockle Creek station [on the Newcastle line] just floods really easily and that then leads to delays further down the line. It doesn't feel like they are being upfront about what's going wrong,' she says. Communication is another bugbear of commuters. 'My train stops multiple times and is often about half an hour to 40 minutes late to the final station,' says Liam, who commutes to and from Springwood in the Blue Mountains. 'There's some very quiet message. One of the days there was someone on tracks but delays are a very common occurrence.' Clifton says Sydney Trains relies on phone calls and paper instructions to tell train drivers what to do – such as skipping stations or terminating early. Digital systems are being introduced. The Central Coast and the Blue Mountains lines have seen a significant decline in the punctuality of their services since Labor was elected in 2023. The Central Coast line was on time 60 to 70% during 2024-25, with some weeks as low as 35%. On the Blue Mountains line, most weeks only 45 to 65% of trains run on time. The South Coast line's punctuality is also deteriorating while there has been some improvement on the Southern Highlands line. Clifton says NSW has struggled to provide a reliable service between cities partly because the lines are so complicated, with 'lots of old tunnels and bridges'. The other part of the equation is maintenance, he says. Sydney Trains admits maintenance backlogs are at 'a new maximum', which means temporary speed restrictions are now in place on parts of the network. A spokesperson says the maintenance backlog built up during the industrial action from September 2024 to February 2025. It's not the same story elsewhere. In Europe, Switzerland topped the list with 95% of its long distance trains arriving within five minutes of the timetabled time in 2024. The Netherlands was not far behind with 94%, followed by Belgium at 90%, France 89%, and Italy 80%. Surprisingly Germany, once a poster child for train punctuality, has achieved only 54% on the same measure, with commentators saying the deterioration is due to ageing infrastructure and a lack of investment. Sydney Trains points to the new Mariyung trains as one of the investments the Minns government has made. 'New trains can certainly help once the new fleet is introduced but the teething problems can last at least a year or so,' Clifton says. The transport minister, John Graham, says: 'Settling the rail agreement means all energy can now be focused on reliability. We have got that message loud and clear.' But Clifton says Graham and other members of the government should experience the train system for themselves. 'If they did, they'd see the delays, the breakdowns, the frustration… The truth is Labor thinks they can take these seats for granted.'

Are young women finally being spared the unique cruelty of male literary opinions?
Are young women finally being spared the unique cruelty of male literary opinions?

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Are young women finally being spared the unique cruelty of male literary opinions?

Gen X, millennial and gen Z men are reading less than boomers and older generations in Australia, and there's only one good thing about it. Thirsty, bookish young women might now be spared the niche heterofatalist torture of a sexual objective frustrated by the obstacle of male literary opinion. Oh, what a second-by-second social negotiation it was; if she hadn't read the enthused-about text, would her desired object find her vapid and shallow? If she had read it, she was in even more trouble: would his interest be piqued or levelled dare she confess she found Stranger in a Strange Land a meandering journey? Would she argue Fight Club beat you around the head with its message? Would the young woman really have to listen to him read out bits from And the Ass Saw the Angel before his pants removal? I'm grateful, at least, that the latest generation of girls who bear the heterosexual burden are unlikely to experience the unique cruelty of collective, instant male disinterest after blurting out 'Goldberry is a completely unnecessary character!' amid casual Lord of the Rings chat at the pub. But I am sad that, if figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and discussed by the ABC last week are to be believed, the steps of this complex, sometimes ugly, sometimes exhilarating dance may be becoming the stuff of anthropological archives rather than an ongoing scene of potential frisson. The ABS data does exclude reading for study or any online reading – including news – so it's possible younger men are indulging in the written word in other areas. Oh, boys; with the passage of time, have your forsaken your Goldberry … or have you forgotten her entirely? It's even sadder news that reading is down across the board. Among Australian senior school students, according to Australia Reads, 29% of them did not reportedly read a physical book last year. It's not an Australian problem. In the 1970s, 60% of American year 12 students read daily. By 2016, it was 16%. Obviously, screens, the internet, binge TV replacing long-form narrative consumption habits and the – yes, again – handheld doom machines are accessories to their cultural decline. Johann Hari's excellent book Stolen Focus explains in detail how technology has 'hacked' our attention spans for short-form, immediate interruption, with the result of rewiring our brains against the concentration required to immerse in a book. In case you can't find the time, energy or quietude to read it, Hari also explains that overwork, chronic stress, ultra-processed foods, poor sleep and environmental stressors are compounding the problem. Neuroscientists agree: Prof Maryanne Wolf has warned that reduced practice in sustained reading may not only weaken the brain's capacity to manage complex texts, but might also denude critical thinking, empathy and cognitive depth. This is where the gendered division of the world's remaining novel readers may be most painfully felt. Anna Burkey, from the book industry initiative Australia Reads, told the ABC that studies have shown parents read less to their male children than female ones, reinforcing an unconscious pattern that puts crucial developmental tools further away from boys who need them. As educators, male literary identity Brandon Jack and the Tough Guy book club movement strategise how to reverse the damage of gender-holing literary curiosity and get books back into boys' hands, the rest of us must grapple with the emotional world the present reading divide has contributed to creating. It's a gendered empathy deficit. Not only does it facilitate social carelessness and cruelty, but it is socially isolating. And it is leaving men and boys lonely and socially isolated at disproportional rates compared with women and girls. Nearly 43% of Australian men report loneliness, a recent survey shows, with 16% experiencing severe loneliness. I can't help but recall advice my mother gave me growing up as an only child with working parents: 'You'll never feel alone if you make friends with books.' I didn't, because I did. Humans invented storytelling in order to provide lessons in survival: we faced this, we dealt with it this way, this is the result, for good or ill. Sure, we can get stories from screens, but as that market has widened it's also flattened; a 'new literalism' of storytelling on screens has emerged of such comprehensive over-explication that there are few imaginative demands placed on viewers at all. It's from the imaginative, interpretative effort of reading stories from text that our brains wire a broader, personally felt social understanding, which provide us strategies for forming connections, maintaining relationships, overcoming restrictive and uncomfortable social roles, and being able to negotiate systems of help and of care. The same social psychologist who tracked the decline in reading among American teenagers published data from her 40-year longitudinal study identifying a maturity regression among today's western young people. They're having less sex, fewer dates, less civic participation and drinking less, meaning that 18-year-olds are more like how 15-year-olds used to be 40 years ago. Other scholars confirm; the rising generations have become more risk-averse. I've argued that the omnipresent social surveillance of mobile phone technology may be a reason … but one wonders if it's partially because they're consuming less vicarious experience from books to construct informed risk matrices around what they're likely to encounter. There are always social and emotional risks in the dance of sexual attraction. But sometimes, ah – mutual book-learnin' left boys and girls with some stories to tell. Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store