Elon Musk bows to Trump: Tesla boss admits posts attacking the president 'went too far' in humiliating climb down after their spectacular feud
Elon Musk has said that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Donald Trump in a humiliating climbdown from his online feud with the president.
'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote in a message on his social media platform X on Wednesday.
He did not say which specific posts he was talking about. Tesla shares in Frankfurt were up 2.44% after Musk's post.
Trump and Musk exchanged insults last week after the former DOGE boss described the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination.'
A full spat exploded in public as Trump said his relationship with Musk was over, threatening to take away government funding from Musk's SpaceX company.
But Musk doubled down, escalating with a now-deleted post that claimed the president appears in documents related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump rejected the allegations and told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind', making clear he has no immediate plans to reconcile.
Musk has also since deleted a post signaling support for impeaching the president.
Sources close to Musk had said his anger has started to subside, and that they believe he may want to repair his relationship with Trump.
The abrupt volte-face comes after Trump threatened 'serious consequences' for Musk if he sought to punish Republicans voting in favour of the controversial spending bill.
Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation.
Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending.
'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump, who also branded Musk 'disrespectful,' told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be.
There were reports that said Trump planned to sell off the Tesla he purchased earlier this year.
'I haven't heard that, I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit,' Trump told reporters Monday.
Musk's father said on Monday that the spat was triggered by months of intense stress on both sides, and that it needed to stop.
Asked whether he thought his son had made a mistake by engaging in a public clash with the president, Errol Musk said people were sometimes unable to think as clearly as they should 'in the heat of the moment.'
'They've had five months of intense stress,' Musk told Reuters at a conference in Moscow organised by conservative Russian tycoons.
Elon Musk was asked about The New York Times story during his May 30th going away event in the Oval Office alongside the president. He pushed back and mocked the newspaper for its 'Russiagate' coverage, but later denied the Times' report on his social media site, X
'With all the opposition cleared and two people left in the arena, all they have ever done is get rid of everything and now they are trying to get rid of each other - well that has to stop.'
Asked how it would end, he said: 'Oh, it will end on a good note - very soon.'
Musk's father told reporters he was standing by his son.
'Elon is sticking to his principles but you cannot always stick to your principles in the real world,' Musk's father said. 'Sometimes you have to give and take.'
Trump has, in recent days, held back on criticising Musk and publicly wished him the best.
On Monday, the president was asked about a New York Times report that said while campaigning for Trump, Musk had been doing so much ketamine it was affecting his bladder, while also taking Ecstasy and psychadelic mushrooms.
Trump said: 'I really don't know, I don't think so, I hope not.'
He then added, 'I wish him well ... I just wish him well, very well, actually.'
He also said he'd keep Musk's Starlink system in place.
Trump also said he never saw Musk get physical with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which had also been alleged.
'No I didn't,' the president answered. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' Trump said.
Musk had roundly denied the allegations of drug use.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Pete Hegseth fields questions from the House Armed Services Committee (J Scott Applewhite/AP) In one back-and-forth, Mr Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer when Representative Adam Smith asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Mr Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. Representative Mike Turner asked: 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' As Mr Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Mr Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Mr Hegseth responded. Time and again, officials pressed Mr Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead,' Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a US ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. Donald Trump has repeatedly said he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland (Alex Brandon/AP) 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the US, said on Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Mr Hegseth danced around the direct question from Mr Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Mr Smith said. Mr Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for US strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other US leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with representatives. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Mr Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed. That became a quick trap, as Mr Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Mr Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Mr Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Mr Moulton then asked Mr Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Mr Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president'.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Elon Musk has a lot to lose in Trump brawl: podcast
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. The Tesla and SpaceX billionaire boiled over with criticism of the US president after leaving his government cost-slashing role. In this Viewsroom podcast, Breakingviews columnists debate the tale of the tape for the bruising bust-up. Follow Jonathan Guilford on X and Linkedin and Peter Thal Larsen on Bluesky and LinkedIn. (The hosts are Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are their own.) Further Reading Elon Musk picks a losing fight with Donald Trump EU's SpaceX rival demands more than financial fuel Trump and Musk's ally-bullying weakens the West Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt-out of targeted advertising.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Two Jan. 6 police officers sue to force US Capitol to install memorial plaque
June 12 (Reuters) - Two police officers on duty during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by U.S. President Donald Trump's supporters sued federal officials on Thursday, saying the government has refused to install a federally-mandated memorial to officers who fought to defend the iconic building. The lawsuit, opens new tab, filed in federal court in Washington, said the agency that operates and maintains the Capitol is violating a law that required a plaque to be erected commemorating the actions of law enforcement on Jan. 6. Officers on that day battled a mob of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol in a bid to block his 2020 election defeat to Democrat Joe Biden. More than 100 police officers were injured during the riot. Congress in 2022 had passed a law that directed the Architect of the Capitol to honor the officers who defended the building. The law, signed by then-President Joe Biden, gave the Capitol office one year to display a plaque in the building. Representatives from the Capitol and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The plaintiffs in the new lawsuit are Harry Dunn, a former U.S. Capitol police officer, and Daniel Hodges, an officer at the Metropolitan Police Department. During the riot, Dunn protected injured officers, the lawsuit said. Hodges at one point during the assault was kicked in the chest, and someone tried to gouge out his eyes, the lawsuit said. In a statement, a lawyer for the plaintiffs said 'Congress's refusal to install the plaque is an attempt to rewrite history. So many politicians' careers now depend on ignoring the fact that Donald Trump tried to overthrow democracy.' Architect of the Capitol Thomas Austin testified at a U.S. House subcommittee in April that the U.S. House speaker's office has not told his office to make any modifications to the House. 'We have not received final instructions to install the plaque,' Austin said. A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The lawsuit could become a new flashpoint over Jan. 6. After his election to his second term as U.S. president in January, Trump pardoned about 1,500 of his supporters who were charged in the attack. Some of those individuals had been accused of attacks on police officers. Trump's pardons drew criticism from some police organizations and Republicans. "Pardoning the people who went into the Capitol and beat up a police officer violently, I think was a mistake,' Republican U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said at the time. The case is Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges v. Architect of the Capitol, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:25-cv-01844. For plaintiffs: Brendan Ballou of Lichten & Liss-Riordan For defendant: No appearance yet Read more: Republican Senator Graham calls Trump's Jan. 6 pardons a 'mistake' US judge says Trump Jan. 6 pardons reflect 'revisionist myth' Hundreds of Capitol rioters released from prison after Trump's sweeping pardon
