Reforming Utah's human trafficking laws
The state of Utah is more lenient compared to both other states and federal penalties against sex trafficking, Rep. Candice B. Pierucci, R-Herriman, said Monday evening during the House Judiciary Committee meeting where she sponsored her sex trafficking amendments bill, HB405.
'It is certainly time for Utah to enhance this and really, quite frankly, crack down on human trafficking and demonstrate that we are — at the very least — in line with where the federal government is with these, in my opinion, evil individuals who are trafficking children and our most vulnerable population,' she said.
Pierucci shared statistics on trafficking in the U.S. that highlight just how lenient Utah is comparatively.
U.S. state minimum prison sentences for child sex trafficking and labor trafficking:
Utah: Sex trafficking — 5. Labor trafficking — 1.
Georgia: Sex trafficking — 25. Labor trafficking — 10.
Oklahoma: Sex trafficking — 15. Labor trafficking — 5.
Missouri: Sex trafficking — 10. Labor trafficking — 5.
'Human trafficking of a child, under current code, is a first-degree felony, but with just five years to life in prison,' Pierucci said. Her bill 'would bump it up to a first-degree felony, with 10 years to life if the victim is 14 years old, but younger than 18 years old, and 15 years to life if the victim is under 14 years old, which is in line with federal code.'
HB405 would also change human trafficking for sexual exploitation from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony.
During her presentation, Pierucci also shared statistics of trafficking crimes in correlation with the U.S. southern border:
In 2022, the Department of Homeland Security opened 1,373 human trafficking investigations. In the same year, the Department of Justice opened 668 human trafficking investigations.
In 2020, more than half of all sex trafficking survivors were in the United States illegally, Pierucci added. In one study, most victims reported being recruited for both sex and labor trafficking. 75% of victims had an unknown immigration status.
Another study, she said, indicated that 60% of Latin American children who attempt to cross the border alone or with smugglers are captured by cartels and exploited in child pornography or drug trafficking.
Though the bill passed 7-1, Rep. Grant Amjad Miller, D-Salt Lake City, and two attorneys gave public comments, all expressing concern about its language.
If the bill focused solely on increasing the felony severity from second degree to first degree, Miller said he was more likely to fully support it, but it's 'simply the mandatory minimum element' that he said keeps him up at night.
Miller said that imposing a fair sentence takes input from all parties involved in the case for a judge to decide how long a person should go to prison. 'Then, there's another layer of the board and partner parole to indicate what is an important and fair and just sentence to levy because no two cases are the same.'
'When we impose mandatory minimums from the State House, we take all discretionary powers away from all of those actors, and it's based on that narrow scope alone. It's the mandatory minimum that dissuades me otherwise,' he added.
Pierucci responded that she, too, struggled with mandatory minimums at first, 'but then, as I read and interviewed some of the horrific stories, I do think there are some crimes that you should have an automatic amount of time. And I think that sex trafficking of children for sexual labor is one of those.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man, 38, accused of spiking pregnant girlfriend's drink with abortion drug
A 38-year-old man is facing capital murder and tampering with evidence charges in connection with accusations he terminated his girlfriend's pregnancy without her consent or knowledge, investigators announced earlier this week. The alleged incident, according to a news release from the Parker County Sheriff's Department in Texas, an area about 35 miles west of Fort Worth, occurred in October 2024. An unidentified woman who was reportedly dating the suspect, identified as Justin Anthony Banta, a Texas resident and employee of the United States Department of Justice, told sheriff's investigators that she'd informed the 38-year-old that she was pregnant in September 2024. Banta, according to the woman, told her he would cover the cost of an abortion and suggested they order the abortion-inducing medication Plan C online. 'The victim informed Banta of her desire to keep the baby,' investigators said. On Oct. 17, 2024, at approximately six weeks pregnant, the woman received a sonogram from her doctor who reported a healthy pregnancy with strong vital signs and heartbeat. Later the same day, Banta met the woman at a coffee shop where the victim believes he 'added abortion-inducing pills to her drink without her knowledge or permission.' The following day, the victim reported exhaustion and bleeding so heavy that she went to the emergency room. On Oct. 19, according to sheriff's investigators, the woman lost the pregnancy. During an investigation, the 38-year-old's cellphone was confiscated as evidence. Sheriff's investigators believe that Banta, who works in the DOJ's IT department, remotely accessed the device and performed a reset, 'thereby deleting crucial evidence related to the case.' On June 6, authorities arrested Banta for tampering with physical evidence and a charge from the Texas Rangers for capital murder. The 38-year-old later posted $500,000 bail and was released. The federal IT worker, who is separated from his wife, NBC News reported, and his lawyer are denying the allegations, saying Banta only met the alleged victim four times. U.S. Marshal wrongly detained by ICE agents in lobby of federal building Michael Heiskell, Banta's attorney, told the outlet that his client has cooperated with investigators since last fall when his relationship with the woman ended and that, so far, law enforcement has shown Banta no evidence that the woman was in fact pregnant. 'There were discussions about her being pregnant, but that was never confirmed by her to him. And yes, he did research Plan C,' Heiskell told NBC News, while adding that his client did not put the drug into the woman's drink. The Parker County Sheriff's Department expressed its gratitude to the owners and staff of the coffee shop for their cooperation with the investigation, though they did not say if there was potential video evidence linked to the case. Nearly all abortions are banned in Texas, and abortion-inducing medication cannot be accessed through doctors or pharmacists in the state. Residents can, however, get the drugs through online providers. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia argue he isn't a flight risk and should be released
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man arrested by the government and sent to an El Salvador prison in error and then returned to the United States last week, argue in a court filing Wednesday that he man should be freed from jail pending trial. 'Mr. Abrego Garcia asks the Court for what he has been denied the past several months — due process,' attorneys for Abrego Garcia wrote in a memorandum opposing prosecutor's efforts to keep him detained. Abrego Garcia was returned to the United States on Friday to face federal charges that he was involved in a scheme to transport people in the United States who are not legally able to be in the country. He was in federal custody Wednesday night. Abrego Garcia's attorneys argued in Wednesday's memo that he is not a flight risk, as prosecutors have argued. His attorneys say legal standards to keep him detained have not been met. "The government isn't even entitled to a detention hearing in this case — much less detention. Mr. Abrego Garcia should be released," his attorneys wrote. An arraignment and detention hearing is scheduled for Friday in Tennessee. Abrego Garcia, 29, was arrested in Maryland on March 12, and the Department of Homeland Security claimed he was a member of the gang MS-13, which he denied. The government then deported him Abrego Garcia to El Salvador where he was imprisoned in the Center for Terrorism Confinement — despite an immigration judge's previous order that he not be sent to El Salvador. A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return to the United States, which administration officials resisted. The Trump administration then asked El Salvador to return Abrego Garcia to the United States last week to face human smuggling charges filed in Tennessee. The case became a high-profile battle over whether the Trump administration was bound to return Abrego Garcia under the federal judge's order. El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said at the White House in April that he would not return Abrego Garcia. The matter went to the Supreme Court, which disputed the language of "effectuate" in the judge's order but ruled that the Trump administration was required to 'facilitate' the return of Abrego Garcia. The two-count federal indictment unsealed in Tennessee charges Abrego Garcia with one count each of conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal aliens for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal aliens for financial gain. The indictment alleges that from about 2016 to 2025, he and others conspired to bring migrants illegally to the United States from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador and elsewhere, through Mexico and across the Texas-Mexico border. Abrego Garcia and a co-conspirator 'ordinarily picked up the undocumented aliens in Houston, Texas area' after they had crossed the border, the indictment alleges. The pair then would transport 'the undocumented aliens from Texas to other parts of the United States to further the aliens' unlawful presence in the United States,' the indictment says. Chris Newman, an attorney who represents Abrego Garcia's family, said last week that the Trump administration for months engaged in 'a campaign of disinformation, defamation against Kilmar and his family." This article was originally published on
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Undocumented students seek to challenge end of Texas in-state tuition
The Brief Undocumented students in Texas are seeking to challenge a court ruling that ended their access to in-state tuition rates. This comes after the U.S. Department of Justice and the state of Texas agreed to end a 2001 law that allowed in-state tuition for certain undocumented students. The students argue that ending the program could increase tuition costs by up to 810%, potentially forcing many of them to drop out of college. DALLAS - A group of undocumented students are asking a federal judge to allow them to challenge the court's ruling that ended their access to in-state tuition. The filing comes in response to a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Texas over a 2001 law that allowed undocumented students who had lived in the state for more than three years and graduated from a Texas high school to attend public universities at the in-state rate. What they're saying The students are hoping for a chance to argue their case for the Texas Dream Act after and agreement was reached between the Department of Justice and the state to end the program on the same day the lawsuit was filed. Court documents state the average cost for SAT members to attend a college or university in the state will increase by up to 810% compared to their current rates. "Such an increase puts college out of reach for many students--some of whom have already spent years in college and will not afford to complete their program," SAT's attorneys said. The filing highlights several students across the state that may not be able to complete their degree if the Texas Dream Act is ended. One such student pursuing a Master of Science degree at the University of North Texas has been paying out of pocket for the program since 2020. "She has been able to afford her education because she was able to pay reduced tuition rates," court documents state. "However, she cannot afford to pay out-of-state tuition and will likely be forced to drop out of her program." Dig deeper For nearly 25 years, the Texas Dream Act has provided access to in-state tuition for thousands of undocumented migrant students at Texas colleges and universities. The law allowed for students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they have lived in the state for three years before graduating from high school, and for a year before enrolling in college. They must also sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. The Texas Dream Act was signed into law by Republican Gov. Rick Perry with bipartisan support in the state legislature. Well before DACA provided federal protection to undocumented children, Texas was the first state to create this type of tuition program for them. Now more than a dozen states provide a similar program. The program serves around 20,000 students in Texas, according to the nonprofit organization Every Texan. Despite multiple Republican attempts to repeal the law, those efforts never made it to a full vote in the Texas house. The most recent attempt happened this session. Senate Bill 1798 passed out of committee on May 14, but was marked as "not placed again on intent calendar" on May 26. The settlement between the state and federal governments came just days after the most recent Texas legislative session ended. The Source Information in this article comes court documents filed in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Information on the Texas Dream Act comes from previous FOX 4 reporting.
