logo
Amid US' rising debt, falling treasury-bill appeal, should you shift investment focus to RBI-issued Indian government bonds?

Amid US' rising debt, falling treasury-bill appeal, should you shift investment focus to RBI-issued Indian government bonds?

Time of India10 hours ago

Appeal of US Treasuries waning
Peers facing similar issue
Relevance for India
End note
There is a metamorphosis happening in some pockets of the investment world. The nation leading as the reserve currency of the world—the United States—has been stripped of AAA status by the three big rating agencies, S&P, Moody's and Fitch. From September to December 2024, the US Federal Reserve cut its overnight rate by 1 percentage point. Since the last rate cut measure on 18 December 2024, even as the market is expecting further rate cuts, the US 10-year government bond yield has remained more or less at a similar level, apart from fluctuations. Since then, the US 30-year government bond yield has moved up by 20 basis points, or 0.2%. This represents a bigger malaise: a crisis of confidence.The US government has pumped up its fiscal deficit. The Fed has printed tonnes of money after Covid. When the government spends more and runs up a high fiscal deficit, it has to issue bonds, which are a form of loan.At present, the outstanding stock of US Treasuries is more than $36 trillion. These numbers may not ring a bell, so let's give a perspective. The outstanding debt of the US is 123% of its gross domestic product (GDP). This level is the highest since World War II. Following the war, the US economy was damaged and the government had to spend more. Since those times, nothing of that scale has happened. Arguably, the global financial crisis of 2008 and the outbreak of Covid-19 in 2020 were of a lower proportion.Obviously, the US needs external buyers for its Treasuries, that is, other governments. In 1970, 5% of the US debt was held by foreigners; in 2023, this number rose to 29%. The implication is that dependence on external sovereigns is increasing. Earlier, China was the biggest external holder of US Treasuries, as it has a big trade surplus with the US. However, China has been selling US Treasuries for quite some time. Now, it is only the third largest holder, behind Japan and the United Kingdom. A relatively lower demand from abroad leaves it to institutions within the US; heavy supply of debt looking for buyers.Let's return to the sovereign credit rating of the US. Credit rating agencies may be behind the curve, and in the case of the US, they are influenced by the reserve currency status. The market, however, is more fleet-footed. There is a metric called credit default swap (CDS), which indicates the cost of purchasing an insurance or cover against default. The cost of the US sovereign CDS today is much higher than those of countries like Germany, Japan, the UK or South Korea, while also just lower than Greece and Italy. This means that the market is placing the risk level of the US as just safer than Greece or Italy.To be clear, it is not just about the US. Japan is facing problems in selling its long maturity government bonds. Due to lack of buyers for Japanese government bonds (JGB), the Bank of Japan is forced to purchase. To an extent, this issue exists in Germany as well—few takers for long-maturity government bonds.Essentially, the bond market is giving a message to governments that if you pile up too much debt, we will either not buy or buy at a high cost, that is, at a lower price. The sovereign debt level of Japan is much higher than that of the US. Today, the yield on 30-year JGB is higher than China's, something that was unthinkable earlier.The level of sovereign debt in India is much lower than that of the countries mentioned above. Central government debt is approximately 56% of the GDP and, adding up the states, it is 83% of the GDP. When the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) sells government bonds through the usual auction process, there are enough takers.Let us look at this in the context of ownership of foreign portfolio investors (FPIs). Purchases of Indian government bonds by the FPIs have moved up since September 2023, when JPMorgan announced the inclusion of India in its bond indices. Even after relatively buoyant purchases compared to earlier, the FPI holding in Indian government bonds is only 3% of the outstanding stock. In case the FPIs pull out from India (an unlikely scenario), the markets here would feel an impact, but a limited one.Another aspect is the influence of global central banks on the RBI's interest rate decisions. Interest rate action from the US Fed or European Central Bank (ECB) does influence policy makers at the RBI, but their priority is about parameters in India, like inflation and GDP growth. Bond yield levels in our secondary market are influenced by global factors, like yield level in the US, but only so much.One metric tracked by market is the level of Indian 10-year government bond, US 10-year government bond, and the spread or differential. The higher the yield level of Indian bond, the stronger the case for FPIs to invest in the country. This spread is much lower than earlier. Indian bond yields have come down, driven by the RBI rate cuts. The mindset has to change; Indian fundamentals are better than that conveyed by the just-investment-grade rating accorded by S&P, Moody's and Fitch. The US yields need to be higher than earlier due to the reasons mentioned above.To invest in Indian government or corporate bonds, mutual funds, portfolio management services and alternate investment funds are among the available routes—or you can do so directly. You can invest in the US Treasuries through the liberalised remittance scheme (LRS) route, particularly if you have an expense in forex coming up, say, child's education abroad a few years later, to save on currency depreciation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India's industrial production rises 1.2% in May
India's industrial production rises 1.2% in May

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

India's industrial production rises 1.2% in May

New Delhi: India's industrial production rose 1.2% in May, provisional data released by the ministry of statistics and programme implementation on Monday showed. In April, industrial production grew by 2.7% annually, a six-month low and lower than the 3% increase in March. Experts had observed that India's industrial growth has been subdued this year, with consumer demand significantly shaping the economic landscape. On an annual basis, IIP growth stood at 4% in FY25, lower than the 5.9% pace in FY24. The output of eight core infrastructure sectors, which account for two-fifths of India's industrial output, expanded by 0.7% annually in May, its slowest in nine months, provisional data released by the commerce ministry on 20 June showed. India's manufacturing activity dropped to a three-month low in May as growth in new orders and output softened, according to the HSBC India Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index compiled by S&P Global earlier in June.

India to lead global oil demand growth amid 500 GW green push: S&P Global
India to lead global oil demand growth amid 500 GW green push: S&P Global

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India to lead global oil demand growth amid 500 GW green push: S&P Global

New Delhi: India is set to lead global oil demand growth and significantly expand its renewable energy base to 500 GW, even as geopolitical uncertainty, shipping realignment and energy transition reshape global energy systems, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights. At a roundtable conference in Mumbai, experts from the firm highlighted oil market volatility, emerging trade and shipping patterns, and India's role in global energy demand and decarbonisation. Premasish Das, Executive Director for Oil Markets Research and Analysis at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said global oil demand growth could slow from 1.2 million barrels per day (b/d) to 0.8 million b/d in 2025 due to trade and economic disruptions. 'The Trump administration's sweeping tariffs on all trading partners have introduced significant economic uncertainty, potentially reducing global GDP growth from 2.8 per cent in 2024 to 2.2 per cent in 2025,' he said. China and the US are expected to see the steepest demand drop, especially for diesel and jet fuel. OPEC+ had increased output by 411,000 b/d for May–July 2025, leading to a 20 per cent fall in Brent prices. Das said this output growth, driven by compliant producers, may be offset if overproducers such as Iraq, Russia, and Kazakhstan cut volumes. Oil prices temporarily spiked above $80/b following US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, but later stabilised after a ceasefire. The average Brent forecast for 2025 has been raised to $68/b from $63/b, but is expected to fall below $60/b by year-end due to strong supply growth. India is projected to lead global oil demand growth in the long term, increasing its reliance on imported crude and reinforcing the need to diversify sourcing strategies, Das added. On trade dynamics, Rahul Kapoor, Vice President and Global Head of Shipping Research at S&P Global, said India is gaining prominence. 'India stands at a critical inflection point, with immense potential to capture a greater share of global trade,' he said. He added that India had reduced its oil import exposure to the Strait of Hormuz from around 55 per cent during 2019–2022 to 41 per cent in 2024, largely due to increased sourcing of Russian crude. He said shipping strategies must now consider geopolitical risks, sanctions, and tariff changes. Eduard Sala de Vedruna, Head of Research for Energy Transition and Sustainability, said India's installed renewable capacity has crossed the 200 GW mark. He said the government has now revised its 2030 target to 500 GW (including hydro), after missing the earlier 2022 goal of 175 GW. 'The country is heavily reliant on coal, which accounts for a substantial portion of its energy production. However, there is a strong push towards diversifying the energy mix,' Vedruna said. He added that in S&P's base case, the 500 GW target may be reached by 2032. He identified infrastructure limitations, financial stress in discoms, and regulatory hurdles as key challenges. However, he said policy support, new technologies and private investment are enabling growth in energy storage, smart grids and electric mobility. Jenny Yang, Global Head of Power and Renewables Research, said power demand globally will rise by over 80 per cent in the next 25 years. She said renewables and batteries would make up 96 per cent of new net capacity additions until 2050 due to cost competitiveness. In India, non-fossil fuels accounted for 47 per cent of installed capacity and 24 per cent of generation in 2024. By 2050, these shares are projected to rise to 77 per cent and 66%, respectively. However, conventional thermal power will still contribute 16 per cent to global capacity additions to maintain grid reliability. Looking ahead, S&P said India's energy transformation depends on improving regulatory mechanisms, encouraging public-private partnerships, and investing in R&D. The speakers also stressed the need for international cooperation to access funding and global best practices.

RBI guidelines reducing provisioning for project finance are credit positive: Moody's
RBI guidelines reducing provisioning for project finance are credit positive: Moody's

India Gazette

time32 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

RBI guidelines reducing provisioning for project finance are credit positive: Moody's

New Delhi [India], June 30 (ANI): The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) final guidelines for project finance loans, aimed at managing risks while supporting the viability of projects, are credit positive according to Moody's Ratings. Moody's, in a report on Monday, noted that it does not expect a significant day-one impact on profitability at the system level because the guidelines apply only to projects that have not achieved financial closure by October 1, 2025. Furthermore, the global rating agency asserted that the additional provisions (25-60 basis points) apply only to projects specific loans, while other loans (such as term loans, working capital loans) to companies in the infrastructure and commercial real estate (CRE) sector are not impacted. The final guidelines of the RBI, released on June 19, noted that existing projects will not be subject to higher provisioning requirements, which was a reversal from the draft guidelines proposed in May 2024. Moody's, in its report, noted that it expects lenders with large exposures to the infrastructure sector - mostly public sector banks and infrastructure-focused non-bank finance companies (NBFC-IFCs) - to see a slight negative impact on profitability from in-progress loan applications that do not achieve financial closure by October 1, 2025. 'Nevertheless, this will likely be a one-off effect,' Moody's supplemented. The June 19 guidelines finalise the level of provisioning required on standard assets in the construction and operational phase for all lenders and lay out prudential conditions to improve the viability of the projects being financed by RBI-regulated entities. Notably, the guidelines reduce provisioning on standard assets in the construction phase to 1.0-1.25 per cent from the draft proposal of 5 per cent -- which Moody's claims market participants viewed as 'too prohibitive' for project financing. 'We expect lenders to pass on the bulk of the incremental cost of provisioning through higher lending rates on subsequent new projects, mitigating the impact on their bottom line,' Moody's opined. Additionally, Moody's said it expects the finalisation of guidelines will reduce uncertainty in project financing and support medium-term growth amid substantial government investment, besides expectations of greater private sector involvement. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store