Longer term weather forecasts could get more accurate - thanks to the cloud
The Met Office has transferred to a new off-site supercomputer - which could make 14-day forecasts as accurate as seven-day equivalents.
Operating using Microsoft's cloud-based Azure system, the new computer could also help predict extreme weather further in advance and advance climate research.
The weather agency used its first supercomputer 60 years ago, but until now it has almost always been run on site.
For more than a month, Azure has been running off-site simultaneously with the Met Office's previous supercomputer, which has now been switched off.
Chief executive officer Penny Endersby said on the agency's website that "a big change like this is like changing the engines when you're flying over the Atlantic" - noting that the new computer had already been running in parallel with its old system for more than a month.
"You can never have a stop, which is why we did the long parallel run with the old supercomputer," she added.
"So, success at this phase is that nobody can tell the difference."
Charles Ewen, the weather agency's chief information officer, said the Met Office uses numerical weather prediction "to predict the future state of the atmosphere" which "takes the laws of physics that are fairly well understood and applies them at scale".
He added: "To do that is very, very computationally expensive. It's simulating the future state of the atmosphere.
"Operationally, that's 200 to 300 terabytes of information a day."
Using Azure, he said the Met Office will be able to start fresh projects without having to build new infrastructure.
Segolene Berthou, head of a research team working on the Met Office's environmental prediction capabilities, added that the supercomputer will also allow for a model to be run several times with slightly different parameters.
"The coupled system we're preparing is running faster and more smoothly on the new supercomputer," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Nissan Ariya Interior Layout & Technology
It's a minimalist delight here – there are controls but on the centre console and dashboard you'll find them lit through the veneer. They give a little haptic click when your finger presses. It's much easier than a touchscreen. Visually, they're a little piece of magic. Only issue is you have to look down to find them because they're not three-dimensional, and they can be hard to spot in direct sunlight. The dash is a simple affair, a layered cake. Big screens stand proud atop a band of cloth, and below are a line of vents. And below that the veneer that carries climate switchgear. The whole thing is slim, architectural and high quality. What's the infotainment like? You've got a big 12.3in touchscreen display in the middle of the dashboard, and another 12.3in digital instrument panel behind the steering wheel (backed up by a decently sized head-up display if you've ticked the right boxes). You've got wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto as standard, which is good for satnav functions as the native one feels graphically left behind. The screen works well, though – it's big and versatile, but can feel a bit laggy at times. The heated seats are fiddly to turn on and need too many jabs of the screen. Is it practical though? Between the front seats is a console/armrest that slides back and forth – it holds lots of stuff, but can wobble a bit if you hit a bump half-way round a bend. There's another glovebox-type drawer below the central screen and a flat floor below, which adds to the feeling of roominess but does mean things fly about if you've popped them in the passenger footwell. There's plenty of room in the back, though, with room for three. The boot is a decent size too, with a wide, flat opening. There's useful underfloor space in the FWD version – somewhere to put the charge cable, because there's no frunk.
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Nissan Ariya Driving, Engines & Performance
The 302bhp one has more of a spring in its step, and manages the 0-62mph sprint in 5.7 seconds. It's not going to squeeze the breath from your lungs, but there's significant out-of-corner power and strong A-road overtaking potential. Tractors, beware. Let's start with the cheapest powertrain – small battery, front driven. It means acceleration that's less in absolute terms than, say, a 2.0-litre non-sporty petrol crossover, but the point is – as with any EV – it's always there for you. No waiting for turbo boost or downshifts. So it's adequate unless you're being ambitious up hills. Still, there's good dry road traction even in the FWD version and it resists understeer unless you heave it into a tight bend, where you suddenly feel the Ariya's mass. In faster corners it's got a nice neutral feel. On a motorway it sits stable and true. The steering is progressively weighted in the normal drive mode, and accurate. Sports mode has an inconsistent weighting. Neither has any feel for the tyre grip, but that's par for this kind of car. Nope. As with any other EV, neither max regeneration nor e-pedal will give you any more miles to play with: they're just different ways of accessing the same retardation. Even in coasting mode, pressing the brake pedal starts by giving regen, and then when that's used up it brings the pads onto the discs. The brake pedal is nice and progressive, the regeneration and friction blending seamlessly. You can also switch to e-pedal drive, Nissan's system for upping the regen to the extent you'll come to a full stop without touching the brakes at all. It's relaxing in town, as you don't have to shuffle your foot constantly. The 4WD one is neutral under power, and is more involving to carve through medium-speed corners than most rivals. You can feel each tyre doing its work, as it uses the torque vectoring to quell understeer. Besides, its steering and brakes have less rubbery slack than the class norm. The bigger battery one with four-wheel drive can tow a 1,500kg braked trailer, which is unusual for an EV. Can't imagine what that does to your range, mind. Noted. Is it comfy? The ride is quite like a Qashqai's: fairly taut, with a bit of high frequency spring. It copes well with most undulations, and the tyres are normally quiet. But it doesn't like sharp ridges or potholes. Nissan pioneered Level 2 driver assist (fancy cruise control) with its ProPilot system, and it's fitted as standard on all but the entry-level Engage trim. Works well, keeping the car in lane and following the vehicle in front. New tweaks include capacitive sensors in the steering wheel so it knows your hands are on: no need to give a little 'I'm here' twitch every 15 seconds or so. That's a relief. Indeed. Also the steering assistance is calibrated more naturally: if you're in the middle lane overtaking a truck, it will move slightly to the right to keep further away from the truck. The car will slow down when the navigation knows a sharper curve is coming up. Talking of long journeys the DC intake is a reasonably brisk 130kW, well able to take advantage of rapid chargers. The base car charges at 7kW on home AC or public points, which means flat to full overnight. But you'd never go quite flat. With the bigger battery that will take 13 hours. And anyway the big battery also comes with a 22kW on-board charger, cutting it to about four hours on a public three-phase AC socket, increasingly common in car parks. What about the fast one? Ah, you mean the Ariya Nismo. It's based on the dual motor AWD version of the Ariya, only power is up to 429bhp, an increase of 128 horses. Torque remains the same at 443lb ft but it gets a new 60:40 rear bias, while zero to 62mph is seen off in five seconds flat. The steering and suspension have also been retuned, with a new front stabiliser bar and stiffer springs (by three per cent at the front, 10 at the rear). The brakes remain standard, although the ABS has been recalibrated, which in tandem with the grippier Michelin Pilot Sport EV tyres lowers stopping distances by eight per cent. Those tyres and the extra power give the range a good kicking though – you're down to 261 miles of WLTP here, and we got a disappointing 2.7 mi/kWh out of the car in mild weather, which works out at 235 miles of range. Not much to write home about then? The Nismo doesn't feel noticeably quicker than the regular dual motor Ariya, even in Nismo mode, which it needs to be in to unlock maximum power and the rear bias delivery. Nor does it offer any more dynamic engagement (or any more faux noise), so it's no more rewarding to drive. Hmm. And the ride – already quite firm on the standard car – is simply too harsh for a family crossover. It grips gamely round fast, flowing bends, aided by the fancy torque vectoring system, but it's very sensitive to road surfaces and prone to wheelspin. And you'll be quickly reminded that it's a 2.2-tonne behemoth if you throw it into a corner with too much gusto. At which point not upgrading the brakes feels like an oversight. Honestly, Nismo-Line might have been more apt.
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Are in wheel motors the next big thing?
Tech A simple idea could be on the verge of going mainstream... even though the concept was invented back in 1901 Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading In wheel motors are on the verge of real applications. That's a terrible pun: the Verge motorcycle has one. It looks dramatic, with no central hub or axle. Verge is part of Donut Lab, a Finnish builder of motors in the shape of donuts. The idea is wonderfully simple. A normal motor's rotor, the spinning bit, is inside, with its output shaft emerging from the centre. The stator, the coil windings that don't turn, is fixed to the outer casing. A wheel motor flips that layout inside out. The rotor is on the outside diameter, in unit with the wheel rim and so driving it. The stator is fixed to the suspension. The large diameter means much more torque than usual, so there's no need for the reduction gears that come with inboard motors. Advertisement - Page continues below No gears, no driveshafts, and so less friction and complication and weight. On a RWD car – as the Renault 5 Turbo 3E will be – each rear wheel has its own torque control for ultra capable torque vectoring and all sorts of drift modes. Better yet, there are exciting possibilities for design and packaging. Removing the centre-mounted motor and gears and diff and driveshafts will leave fresh space for batteries, luggage or crash zones. So the car can be rangier, roomier and shorter in overhang. You might like There is one obvious objection, but it turns out to be far less significant than I'd guessed. Wheel motors look heavy, and unsprung rotating mass is bad for dynamics. But actually these power dense motors weigh little. And a decade ago, with another pioneer Protean's wheel motors in mind, Lotus Engineering did a study on a Ford Focus MkII. Drivers tested it before and after the engineers added unsprung mass – 15kg rotating and 15kg static – to each corner. Handling, grip, ride, steering and refinement all suffered. But in the opinion of Lotus, nothing that couldn't be regained by normal suspension tuning. Besides – and this is me talking not them – if a car is RWD, then the front wheels and suspension stay as is. Which minimises the effects on steering weight and feel, and response difference due to extra gyroscopic interference. Advertisement - Page continues below Mind you, given the big manufacturers have invested squillions in EV platforms with central motors, world domination is some way off for this new invention. I say new. Wheel motors were first used in the Lohner-Porsche hybrid in... 1901. Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
