Terror threat to Singapore 'remains high', says home affairs report
While there was no current intelligence of an imminent attack against Singapore, the ministry said Islamic State uses propaganda to exploit the war in Gaza and local grievances to reinforce its narrative of armed violence.
Since the surprise attack by Hamas on Israel in October 2023, six Singaporeans have been found to support or were making preparations to take part in armed violence because of the conflict, said the report.
"Singapore and our interests continue to be viewed as attractive and legitimate targets by terrorist and extremist elements, due to our friendly relations with Western nations and Israel, the presence of iconic structures in Singapore, and our status as a secular and multicultural state," it said.
The ministry said a key threat was online self-radicalisation, in a variety of extremist ideologies, especially of youths.
Since 2015, Singapore has used the Internal Security Act against 17 youth aged 20. Most recently it was used against two teenagers - one planned to shoot mosques, the other planned to join Islamic State.
The law allows suspects to be held for lengthy periods without trial, or to be given a restriction order limiting travel and internet access, among other conditions.
The threat assessment report also said artificial intelligence was emerging as a terrorism enabler for "generating and translating propaganda, producing convincing synthetic multimedia, creating personalised recruitment messages at scale, and planning and developing attacks".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
30 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Dozens killed seeking aid in Gaza as Trump's special envoy meets Netanyahu
The White House has said that US special envoy Steve Witkoff will visit food distribution sites in Gaza, along with the American ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee. They said a new US plan to deliver humanitarian aid more quickly would be presented tomorrow. In the past two days, almost a hundred people have been killed trying to access aid. While President Trump said the fastest way to end the humanitarian crisis was for Hamas to surrender. A warning, there are distressing images in this report.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Even the Arab world is no longer reticent about the threat of Hamas
In a historic first, all 22 members of the Arab League called on Hamas to lay down its arms and end its rule in Gaza. In fact, despite their public condemnations during this war, most Arab countries have been on Israel's side and against Hamas since the start. They recognise the dangers posed to their own countries by Hamas, a proxy of Iran and offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, both of which represent existential threats to them. Hence Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the UAE helped defend Israel against Iranian missile and drone attacks last year. Some Arab countries have also provided other forms of military support to Israel during its war on Hamas, although these have been very much under the radar. While they recognise the security benefits Israel brings, none of that means that after decades of aggression against the Jewish state, Arab countries are now in love with it. Indeed, the New York Declaration signed yesterday at the UN, which condemned Hamas, was also sharply critical of Israel for its conduct in the war and actions in the West Bank. The declaration was made during a ministerial-level conference led by France and aimed towards generating progress on a two-state solution at the UN General Assembly in September. Not surprisingly the conference, which David Lammy attended, was boycotted by the US and Israel. Both countries understand that a two-state solution is not only impossible but also extremely dangerous. That's not because the Palestinian Arabs don't deserve self-determination. Nor is it due to Israeli nationalistic intransigence, but to the overriding need to defend itself. We saw what happened when a two-state solution was tried in Gaza. The whole place was turned by Islamic jihadists into an engine of war and resulted in the horrors of October 7. Is it reasonable to expect Jerusalem to repeat such a devastatingly failed experiment and extend it into the West Bank where the risks are far greater? When so many lives are at stake and Israel's very existence under threat, hoping for the best – as the likes of Starmer and Macron seem to be doing – is not going to cut it. They need to understand that the Israel-Palestinian conflict is not about land or Arab self-determination, it's a religious war to annihilate the Jewish state and always has been. The Palestinians have been offered their own state many times, including a proposal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to cede virtually all of the West Bank, build a tunnel connecting it to Gaza and relinquish Israeli sovereignty over East Jerusalem. Every single offer has been rejected. Even the so-called moderate Abbas, while begrudgingly recognising the existence of Israel, doesn't recognise its 'right to exist'– hence his continual demands for the 'right of return', code for swamping Israel with millions more Arabs with the intention of ending its existence. That same 'right of return' is also enshrined in the New York Declaration. The document calls as well for 'an independent, sovereign, and democratic Palestinian State'. Let's just pause on democracy. Abbas is in the nineteenth year of what was supposed to be a four-year term. He's promised elections many times but never held them because he knew he and his Fatah party would be ousted by Hamas. Polling shows Hamas remains the most popular political entity in the West Bank. During the times I have been there recently, most of the Arabs I met praised Hamas as the only feasible rulers. So, do the New York signatories want a democratic Palestinian state governed by the very people who brought Gaza to utter disaster? According to the French foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot, the Arab signatories to the New York Declaration 'clearly express their intention to normalise relations with Israel in the future' – conditional on concrete progress towards a two-state solution. Establishing diplomatic relations beyond the current Abraham Accords countries would be highly desirable of course. Indeed Saudi Arabia came close to normalisation before October 7, which was the reason Iran sent Hamas to invade and put a stop to it. But important though normalisation is for Israel, none of its benefits can trump the defence of its own people. The New York Declaration calls for a UN-mandated international force in Gaza after the war. That might be achievable, but given the history of such enterprises, there is no way Israel could cede overall security responsibility to anyone other than their own armed forces. The same goes for the West Bank. The IDF can therefore leave neither, which means there can be no sovereign Palestinian state. The Prime Minister of Israel has many tough decisions to make, but choosing between national survival and what Starmer and the New York Declaration seem to think is the inalienable right of the Palestinians to a state is not one of them. And although Starmer likes to demonise Netanyahu, that would apply just the same to any Israeli premier in the post October 7 world. Notwithstanding its condemnation of Hamas, the only effect of the New York Declaration will be to harden Palestinian resolve against Israel and encourage Hamas to keep fighting. They say so themselves. Following Starmer's proposal yesterday to recognise a non-existent state, a senior Hamas official wrote: 'International support for Palestinian self-determination shows we are moving in the right direction… Victory and liberation are closer than we expected.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime
The United States and Ecuador on Thursday signed a bilateral agreement aimed at strengthening their collaboration against transnational criminal networks. The agreement, signed during a visit of U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to the South American country, facilitates the exchange of information on suspected criminal offenders and risk assessments of cargo and travelers. Noem told reporters the efforts are 'crucial steps to improve security and ensure that migration is carried out within the framework of the law.' The deal with Ecuador comes as the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to bolster regional cooperation in its clampdown against immigration and transnational criminal groups, including Tren de Aragua, the Venezuelan gang designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the White House earlier this year. On Wednesday, Noem signed a similar agreement with Chile, which she visited as part of her latest tour of Latin America. That agreement allows Chilean officials to identify potentially dangerous migrants entering or exiting the country and share their fingerprints, iris scans and other biometric data with Homeland Security to prevent such individuals from traveling to the U.S. ____
