
Criminal charges needed for misconduct, apologies and compensation are inadequate
The Bersih steering committee said criminal charges must be pursued, failing which it would risk sending the wrong message to the public.
Bersih was responding to the apology issued by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner Azam Baki on the 16th anniversary of Teoh Beng Hock's death yesterday.
Azam also said MACC was prepared to offer a goodwill contribution to the family to support the welfare and educational needs of Teoh's son.
The MACC chief commissioner said Teoh's death had led the commission to introduce a series of reforms aimed at safeguarding individuals involved in its investigation.
In an immediate response Teoh's family rejected the apology, saying it was insincere.
"As long as the culture of impunity within law enforcement agencies is not eradicated, those who abuse their power will continue to find ways to evade justice, and reforms will ultimately be cosmetic or nothing more than empty talk," Bersih said in its statement, adding that even after Teoh's case, deaths in custody have increased.
Bersih reiterated its call for the government to respond positively to the Teoh family's demands and review the decision of No Further Action (NFA).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Authorities cannot threaten whistleblowers, Albert Tei urged to report
KUALA LUMPUR: Any individual who comes forward to provide information on any improper conduct cannot be blocked or threatened by any party, including the authorities. Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran said this was because the authorities should protect whistleblowers under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711). 'I have taken note of Albert Tei's lawyer today, regarding the allegation that Albert Tei had contacted the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) regarding a corruption scandal but was warned by MACC officers not to appear in public or he would face problems. 'This is a very serious allegation and is completely unacceptable... I would like to advise the individual named Albert Tei to immediately file a report regarding this issue with the Royal Malaysian Police and the MACC Complaints Committee under Section 15 of the MACC Act 2009 (Act 694) by naming the MACC officers involved in the allegation. 'I give full assurance that the MADANI Government will not compromise on issues of threats like these, and that stern action will be taken if the allegation is found to be true,' he said when winding up the debate on the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in Parliament on Tuesday (July 22). The bill was later passed with a majority of votes in agreement after being debated by 24 Members of Parliament (MPs). During the debate on the bill, several MPs raised the issue of a media report today regarding a statement by Albert Tei's lawyer, Mahajoth Singh, who claimed that his client was warned by the MACC not to come forward before he exposed the mining scandal in Sabah. Regarding the Whistleblower Protection Committee in the amendment to the bill, Kulasegaran said the government would ensure that the committee's membership was free from conflicts of interest and of a high calibre. He said that among the proposed members would be parties with knowledge and expertise in the aspect of whistleblower protection, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) or civil society organisations (CSOs), as well as academic experts. 'This will ensure independence, transparency, no conflict of interest, and checks and balances in the implementation of the committee. 'This Whistleblower Protection Committee is a stop-gap measure only, temporarily until a central agency is established, namely the Ombudsman Malaysia, which will take over the functions and duties of this committee with additional powers, including receiving complaints from whistleblowers covering improper and harmful conduct. 'The Ombudsman Malaysia will also monitor the results of investigations carried out by this enforcement agency, and any reporting to Parliament is very welcome for transparency purposes and will be implemented when the central agency is established,' he said, adding that standard operating procedures, including timelines will be detailed and set during the establishment of the Ombudsman Malaysia. Earlier, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said when tabling the bill for the second reading said that the Whistleblower Protection Committee is responsible for obtaining and coordinating statistics and data related to disclosures and complaints received by enforcement agencies. She said, however, that all statistics, data or information submitted to the committee cannot include any confidential information protected under Section 8, to ensure that there is no information leakage issue. 'This directly guarantees that the identity of the whistleblower remains protected as provided for in Section 6 of this act, thus ensuring that public confidence in the whistleblower protection system continues to be maintained,' she said. She added that statistics showed that from 2011 to 2023, a total of 74,614 complaints related to improper conduct were received and investigated, while 1,139 people were recognised as whistleblowers and given protection. The session continues today. - Bernama


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Man charged with laundering RM933k
SHAH ALAM: A Johor Immigration Department senior officer is facing five money laundering charges involving a total of RM933,295. Nas Suffian Nasrun, 41, pleaded not guilty to committing the offences between 2022 and 2024. He entered the plea before Sessions court judge Datuk Mohd Nasir Nordin after the charges were read to him. According to the first charge, Nas Suffian has directly engaged in money laundering transactions involving RM224,840, transferred from a man's account to his mother's bank account through 29 online transactions between Nov 1, 2023 and May 29, 2024. He is also accused of receiving RM297,600 in proceeds from unlawful activities, transferred from the same individual's bank account to his personal account through 29 transactions between Oct 19, 2022 and Aug 8, 2024. The man is also charged with transferring RM113,375 from his account to an account of another individual in 32 transactions between April 16, 2023 and Nov 2, 2023. The accused is also charged with transferring RM209,080 from the bank account of a company he operates to his personal account through 55 online transactions between July 29, 2022 and July 1, 2024. He is also accused of transferring RM88,400 from his mother's account to his own through 17 transactions between Nov 5, 2023 and Sept 23, 2024. All five offences are alleged to have been committed at two bank branches in Kota Damansara and Kajang. The first charge falls under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (Act 613), while the remaining charges are under Section 4(1)(b) of the same Act. If found guilty, the accused can be jailed up to 15 years and fined at least five times the amount of the laundered money, the value of the proceeds from unlawful activities at the time the offence was committed, or RM5mil, whichever is higher. Deputy Public Prosecutor of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), Siti Amirah Muhammad Ali, proposed bail at RM800,000 with additional conditions imposed. However, lawyer Muhammad Zaim Rosli requested a lower amount, citing that his client has to support five school-going children, Bernama reported. The court then set bail at RM100,000 for all charges, with conditions, requiring the accused to report monthly to the MACC, surrender his passport and refrain from interfering with prosecution witnesses. The case will be mentioned on Sept 12. Bernama also reported that a security manager pleaded not guilty in the Kuantan Sessions court here to a charge of using a false document in a procurement process in 2022. Nur Mohamad Fariz Abu Bakar, 36, from Petaling Jaya, Selangor, entered the plea before judge Sazlina Safie. He is accused of using a forged quotation for RM29,000, dated Aug 26, 2022, as genuine in a procurement application to supply cleaning products to the Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (Risda) in Pahang, Terengganu and Kelantan for one year. The offence allegedly took place at Risda Security and Services Sdn Bhd here on Aug 30, 2022. The charge, under Section 471 of the Penal Code and punishable under Section 465, carries a maximum sentence of two years' jail, a fine, or both, if convicted. During proceedings, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) prosecuting officer Suriawani Abdul Rahim proposed bail at RM12,000 with one surety. However, the accused, who was unrepresented, requested a lower amount, saying that he was the sole breadwinner for his wife, three children and mother. The court set bail at RM5,000 with one surety and fixed Aug 25 for document submission and the appointment of a lawyer.


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
MACC seeks forfeiture of RM169mil from Ismail Sabri
KUALA LUMPUR: The Sessions Court here has fixed Oct 1 to hear an application by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in its bid to forfeit more than RM169mil in cash belonging to former prime minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob. Sessions Court judge Suzana Husin set the date during case management here yesterday. Lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, who represented Ismail Sabri, informed the court that the respondent needed more time to reply to the application. The court then instructed the respondent to file an affidavit by Aug 13 and the prosecution to file affidavit-in-reply by Sept 3. Deputy public prosecutor Ifa Sirrhu Samsudin and Alis Izzati Azurin Rusdi appeared for the prosecution. On July 7, the MACC, represented by the deputy public prosecutor as the applicant, filed the application and named Ismail Sabri's former political secretary, Datuk Mohammad Anuar Mohd Yunus and the former prime minister as first and second respondents. In the application, the MACC is seeking a court order to forfeit cash seized from the first respondent for the Malaysian government, including RM14,772,150, S$6,132,350, US$1,461,400, 3mil in Swiss Francs, €12,164,150, ¥363,000,000, £50,250, NZ$44,600, 34,750,000 Emirati Dirham and A$352,850. The application was made under Section 41(1) of the MACC Act 2009 after it was satisfied that the money kept by Mohammad Anuar belonged to Ismail Sabri and was linked to an offence under Section 36(2) of the same Act. The MACC also applied for other court orders deemed suitable by the court.