&w=3840&q=100)
Trump considering new sanctions on Russia, removing all limits on Ukraine's weapons: Reports
Amid frustration with Vladimir Putin's rejection of peace offers and continued attacks, US President Donald Trump is considering imposing new sanctions on Russia and removing all limits on Ukraine's use of weapons in the war, according to reports. read more
In a sign of growing frustration with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump is considering imposing new sanctions on Russia and removing all limits on Ukraine's use of weapons in the war, according to reports.
The developments come at a time when Trump has increasingly expressed frustration with Putin over continuous rejection of peace proposals, dismissal of peace talks, and increasing missile and drone attacks in recent days that have killed dozens in Ukraine. Trump on Sunday said Putin has 'gone absolutely crazy' and has no idea 'what the hell' happened to him.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump further said, 'I'm not happy with what Putin is doing. He's killing a lot of people, and I don't know what the hell happened to Putin.'
Hours after Trump's remarks, Putin launched the largest aerial attack on Ukraine so far with 257 missiles and drones that killed at least 12 people and injured dozens. Since last weekend before the Trump-Putin call, Russia has launched around 1,000 missiles and drones and have killed dozens in Ukraine.
Trump considering new sanctions on Russia: Report
Trump is considering imposing new sanctions on Russia out of frustration with Putin's lack of will to make peace in Ukraine, according to Wall Street Journal.
The newspaper reported that new sanctions are unlikely to include banking sanctions and it is also possible that Trump may not decide to impose sanctions at all.
If Trump walks back on sanctions again, it would be the latest instance of him issuing empty threats that don't mean nothing.
So far, Trump has not put any pressure on Putin despite the Russian leader rejecting every ceasefire proposal, peace offer, and defying Trump's personal calls to curtail attacks on civilians and come to the negotiating table. Instead, Trump has rewarded Russia by accepting Putin's demands and opening talks for a bilateral reset. Trump has also continued to trash Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the defender, for seeking to buy air defence systems and calling Putin names.
The Journal reported that the purpose of sanctions would be to pressure Putin into coming to the negotiating table.
The newspaper further reported that Trump is also getting tired from the lack of any meaningful progress in peace talks and may decide to end efforts altogether — he has already ended the erstwhile shuttle diplomacy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The end of mediation efforts would play into Putin's hands. One of the main reasons behind prolonging the conflict with participation in low-level peace talks is to tire out Ukraine's supporters.
Trump considering removing limits on Ukraine's use of weapons: Report
Kyiv Post has reported two senior Western officials as saying that Trump is 'seriously considering' removing all limits on Ukraine's use of Western weapons.
The development comes a day after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced that Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom had decided to remove restrictions on Ukraine's use of Western long-range weapons.
'All the previously imposed restrictions —whether already eased or not— are currently under the review as President [Trump] believes that the current status-quo does not serve our common interests of bringing Russia to the [negotiation] table,' one official told Kyiv Post.
If Trump actually green-lights the removal of all limits, it would mean that Ukraine could hit any target anywhere in Russia with Western weapons.
Jorge Rivero, a US-based Russia-Ukraine specialist, told Kyiv Post that the relaxation would allow Ukraine to 'target military installations within Russian territory, including airbases responsible for launching Geran-2 drones and strategic bombers that have conducted sustained strikes against Ukrainian cities'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Rivero further said, 'This policy shift could further authorize Ukrainian forces to engage Russian command and control nodes, as well as logistical arteries deep inside Russia, with precision-guided munitions."
So far, Ukraine was allowed to use Western weapons up to a certain range inside Russia. It was only in the final weeks of his presidency that previous US President Joe Biden allowed Ukraine to use Western weapons inside Russia.
To be sure, Trump has not neither donated nor sold any weapon to Ukraine so far. Instead, he has trashed Zelenskyy for wanting to buy Patriot air defence systems that are critical to taking down Russian missiles.
The Kyiv Post further reported an official as saying that Trump would finalise the decision on the issue as well as next phase of support to Ukraine after the administration's meetings with German officials this week.
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul is expected to visit the Washington DC this week.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Wadephul on Monday said that that Putin 'doesn't want peace, he wants to continue the war, and we cannot allow him to do that'. He sounded hopeful that the Trump administration would be onboard with the next round of sanctions being prepared by European countries.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tesla stock slides over 5% after Elon Musk criticizes Donald Trump, President says he's disappointed
Tesla Shares Drop Over 5% Amid Musk-Trump Fallout Donald Trump Is Very Disappointed With Elon Musk Live Events False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk Denies Being Consulted on the Bill Analysts Weigh In on Risks for Tesla FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Tesla shares dropped over 5% on Thursday after investors noticed the growing tensions between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and US president Donald Trump, as per a report. The slide comes as Musk openly criticized Trump's massive tax legislation, stirring speculation that the once-friendly relationship between them may be coming to an end, according to a Reuters who called himself Trump's 'First Buddy' and led the administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, took to his social media platform X to call the legislation a 'disgusting abomination,' as per the report. The Tesla CEO said, "It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team at great personal cost and risk," as quoted by responded by pointing out that Musk was upset because the bill would remove the electric vehicle mandates and said, "Don't know if we'll have a great relationship anymore," as quoted in the READ: Cargo ship carrying electric vehicles catches fire off Alaska – key points you need to know The US president also told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday that, "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem & he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate," as per a post shared by Musk on his X went on to respond to Trump's accusations on X, by saying, "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" as per Musk's X a portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management, Jed Ellerbroe told Reuters, "The budget bill contains bad stuff for Tesla with the end of the EV credits, and just generally his falling out with Trump has risks for Tesla and Elon's other companies," as quoted in the are worried because Elon Musk publicly criticized President Trump's tax bill as the tension might hurt Tesla's called it a 'disgusting abomination' and said it cancels out cost savings his government efficiency team worked hard to achieve.
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'
During a meeting in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, President Donald Trump remarked that it might be better to allow Ukraine and Russia to 'fight for a while' before stepping in to separate them and pursue peace. Comparing the conflict to a quarrel between two young children who despise each other, Trump said he had conveyed this analogy to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their phone conversation the previous day. Chancellor Merz, seated alongside Trump, emphasised their shared condemnation of the ongoing war, describing it as 'terrible' and highlighting Trump's role as a key figure capable of ending the bloodshed. However, Merz was clear that Germany firmly supports Ukraine, noting that Kyiv targets only military objectives and not Russian civilians. 'We are trying to get them stronger,' he added. This marked the first in-person meeting between the two leaders, who exchanged pleasantries including a gift from Merz to Trump—a gold-framed birth certificate of Trump's grandfather, Friedrich Trump, who emigrated from Germany. Their discussions were expected to cover a range of issues including the war in Ukraine, trade relations, and NATO defence spending. Since assuming office on 6 May, Merz and Trump have spoken several times by phone, with German officials describing the relationship as 'decent' and Merz seeking to avoid the antagonism that characterised Trump's dealings with his predecessor, Angela Merkel. Merz, a conservative with a strong business background and former rival to Merkel, has been active in diplomatic efforts surrounding Ukraine, travelling to Kyiv shortly after taking office and hosting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin last week. A White House official indicated that Trump planned to raise topics such as Germany's defence spending, trade, Ukraine, and concerns over 'democratic backsliding,' suggesting that shared values like freedom of speech have deteriorated in Germany and should be restored. Merz responded by saying he was open to discussing German domestic politics but stressed that Germany generally refrains from commenting on American internal affairs. Under Merz's predecessor, Olaf Scholz, Germany became the second-largest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the United States. Merz has pledged to maintain this support and recently committed to assisting Ukraine in developing long-range missile systems free from range restrictions. Despite his comments on letting the conflict play out, Trump did not rule out sanctions, warning that 'when I see the moment where it's not going to stop … we'll be very, very tough,' signalling that sanctions could be imposed on both Ukraine and Russia. Domestically, Merz's government is intensifying efforts to strengthen the German military, a campaign initiated by Scholz following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Trump, who criticised Germany during his first term for failing to meet NATO's 2% GDP defence spending target, is now demanding that allies increase their contributions to at least 5%. The upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands later this month is seen as a crucial opportunity for Germany to commit to this higher spending level.
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
41 minutes ago
- India.com
How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State
New Delhi: Pakistan is broke. Its economy is shattered. Foreign reserves are vanishing. Yet it keeps getting blank cheques. Weeks after the International Monetry Fund (IMF) handed it over $1 billion in emergency funds plus an additional $1.3 billion in loans, the nuclear-armed state got another $800 million from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). India protested. The world ignored. And it is not the first time. Why does a nation with internal chaos and globally infamous for harboring terrorists keeps getting rewarded? Despite global acknowledgment of Pakistan's double-faced policies – begging for aid while exporting 'jihad' – the money keeps flowing. So what makes Pakistan the global community's 'spoiled child with a nuclear button'? The answer is not economic. It is political, strategic and dangerously hypocritical. Let's get this straight: Pakistan is not getting loans because it deserves them. It is getting them because the world is afraid of what will happen if it collapses. Its economy is in tatters. Pakistan's forex reserves dipped in 2023 below $3 billion – barely enough for three weeks of imports. The 2022 floods cost the country more than $30 billion in damages. 1. Too Nuclear to Fail: Pakistan's debt has ballooned to over $130 billion. If it defaults, global banks lose billions. It is financial blackmail that is working. 2. Location: Sitting between China, Afghanistan and Iran, the country holds strategic real estate. The West, especially the United States, does not want it slipping entirely into China's orbit. 3. A Loan with Strings: These are not freebies. IMF and ADB loans come with demands – raise taxes, cut subsidies and sell public assets. Western companies often swoop in to buy the leftovers. Global lending institutions like the IMF and the ADB may present themselves as neutral bodies, but their actions suggest otherwise. They claim to operate on technical grounds, but do not blink twice when handing over billions to a country that fuels terrorism in Kashmir and harbors global fugitives. And where is India in this equation? Despite protests after attacks like Pahalgam, New Delhi's influence is minimal. India's voting share in the IMF is small compared to the United States and Europe. Meanwhile, Pakistan's removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022 made getting loans even easier. The United States sees Pakistan as a pawn in its Afghanistan endgame. China, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is turning it into a client state. Loans are just the leash – a way to pull Pakistan closer when needed and push it when not. Who Really Benefits? Not the people of Pakistan. Experts like Sushant Sareen argue these loans fatten the Pakistani military, not fuel reforms. Former diplomat Kanwal Sibal warns that the IMF funding indirectly supports terror. Even former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani admits that the IMF is an ICU for Pakistan, not a cure. These loans do not save Pakistan. They sustain it just enough to remain a useful mess. A mess that is allowed to fester because it serves the interests of those who pretend to fix it. Pakistan is not only playing the victim, it is gaming the system and the system is letting it.
