&w=3840&q=100)
How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State
Why does a nation with internal chaos and globally infamous for harboring terrorists keeps getting rewarded? Despite global acknowledgment of Pakistan's double-faced policies – begging for aid while exporting 'jihad' – the money keeps flowing. So what makes Pakistan the global community's 'spoiled child with a nuclear button'?
The answer is not economic. It is political, strategic and dangerously hypocritical. Let's get this straight:
Pakistan is not getting loans because it deserves them. It is getting them because the world is afraid of what will happen if it collapses. Its economy is in tatters. Pakistan's forex reserves dipped in 2023 below $3 billion – barely enough for three weeks of imports. The 2022 floods cost the country more than $30 billion in damages.
1. Too Nuclear to Fail: Pakistan's debt has ballooned to over $130 billion. If it defaults, global banks lose billions. It is financial blackmail that is working.
2. Location: Sitting between China, Afghanistan and Iran, the country holds strategic real estate. The West, especially the United States, does not want it slipping entirely into China's orbit.
3. A Loan with Strings: These are not freebies. IMF and ADB loans come with demands – raise taxes, cut subsidies and sell public assets. Western companies often swoop in to buy the leftovers.
Global lending institutions like the IMF and the ADB may present themselves as neutral bodies, but their actions suggest otherwise. They claim to operate on technical grounds, but do not blink twice when handing over billions to a country that fuels terrorism in Kashmir and harbors global fugitives.
And where is India in this equation? Despite protests after attacks like Pahalgam, New Delhi's influence is minimal. India's voting share in the IMF is small compared to the United States and Europe.
Meanwhile, Pakistan's removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022 made getting loans even easier.
The United States sees Pakistan as a pawn in its Afghanistan endgame. China, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is turning it into a client state. Loans are just the leash – a way to pull Pakistan closer when needed and push it when not.
Who Really Benefits?
Not the people of Pakistan. Experts like Sushant Sareen argue these loans fatten the Pakistani military, not fuel reforms. Former diplomat Kanwal Sibal warns that the IMF funding indirectly supports terror. Even former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani admits that the IMF is an ICU for Pakistan, not a cure.
These loans do not save Pakistan. They sustain it just enough to remain a useful mess. A mess that is allowed to fester because it serves the interests of those who pretend to fix it. Pakistan is not only playing the victim, it is gaming the system and the system is letting it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Review: Asia After Europe by Sugata Bose
In college, a professor often went on diatribes against Eurocentrism, the practice of viewing the world through the lens of the hegemonic West. While he earnestly taught us the prescribed syllabus for philosophy students, he bemoaned its overwhelming focus on Western philosophy at the expense of, say, Indian, Arab, or Chinese thought. The Asian future: Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang at the G20 Summit in New Delhi on September 9, 2023. (HT Photo) 288pp, ₹699; Harvard University Press However, even as he exhorted us to be aware of our Western blinkers, he acknowledged the impossibility of completely discarding them within our current modes of knowledge production and dissemination. After all, he was railing in English, the link language for us students from across India. But in doing so, he left us with an appreciation of the assumptions that constitute the bedrock of our worldview, what kinds of knowledge we privilege, and the indigenous thinkers and systems we remain unaware of. While this idea has a long lineage in academic circles, it has not always filtered down to the public sphere. In some cases, it has done so in a rather perverse manner. Take the case of the Indian extremists who use the idea of 'decolonisation' to justify parochialism and subjugate minorities. Ironically, their worldview and ideals derive heavily from European fascist ideology. So, in the very act of highlighting their identity in opposition to the West, they adopt European frameworks of identity and nationalism. That is why I think my professor would have approved of Sugata Bose's Asia After Europe: Imagining a Continent in the Long Twentieth Century. Through the works of scholars and political leaders across Asia and the interactions between them, it explores their visions of Asian solidarity and universalism, and the evolution of Asian thought, politics, and art. They not only challenged European colonial precepts, but also conceptualised alternatives to dominant European narratives and debates. In the book, we encounter Okakura Tenshin, José Rizal, Jamaluddin al-Afghani, and Benoy Kumar Sarkar, among other luminaries of the 20th century and earlier. These names might not be as familiar to non-scholars as some of the more notable ones who figure in Bose's account, such as Rabindranath Tagore and Chiang Kai-shek. Yet, they are no less fascinating. Rizal was a Filipino writer and nationalist, whom the Spanish colonial government executed in 1896. He became a unifying symbol of Asian resistance against Western imperialist domination. Okakura, a Japanese art critic and champion of Asian unity, travelled to India and had close links with Swami Vivekananda and Rabindranath Tagore. Al-Afghani, born in Iran, was a 'proponent of Islamic fraternity rather than Asian solidarity', though Bose emphasises that there was significant overlap between the two. Al-Afghani travelled across West and South Asia, and in the latter, stressed Hindu-Muslim unity against the British. Sarkar, an 'energetic, globe-trotting Indian intellectual', visited China and Japan, met intellectuals and politicians there, and extensively documented his journeys and geopolitical insights. The book succinctly captures attempts to forge an Asian identity and consciousness, visions of Asian solidarity, and the schisms caused by intra-Asian wars and conflicts. It provides a refreshing account of Asian histories in relation to each other, often without the Western lens that most works on the continent adopt. Asia has now bypassed other regions as the largest producer, exporter, importer, and consumer of goods. With many heralding the 21st century as the Asian century, Bose's book highlights what potential connections and collaborations between Asian nations could look like. He also explores what it would take for the continent to chart a future that 'expands and not destroys the aspirations of humanity'. In the preface, the author says that he has written the book 'in an accessible literary style for a broad readership'. Indeed, interesting anecdotes, such as about Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru rushing to help Chinese First Lady Madame Chiang put on her shoes during a visit to Shantiniketan, make Bose's historical exploration and arguments engaging. While the book largely eschews jargon and does not require an intimate knowledge of 20th-century history, it would have been good if it had provided more context for the non-scholar. Take, for example, the idea of Asia vis-a-vis Europe. While European nations' collective participation in the European Union and free movements across borders in the Schengen zone have lately reinforced the notion of the continent as a unified entity, it is an idea with a long history. Of course, plenty of myth-making and propaganda over centuries have helped shape it. For example, Europeans assert their antecedence in Greek and Roman empires, while conveniently glossing over how Arab scholars mediated their engagement with these civilisations. They claim the continent is built on Enlightenment ideals (natural law, liberty, rationalism, tolerance, etc.) despite their history of colonisation and perpetuating atrocities on the rest of the world. So, while the notion of Europe might be perverted and self-serving, there is some narrative underpinning it, no matter how flawed. What would an analogous conception of Asia look like? Can one find — or invent — common features among its disparate nations? Are there any unifying links between countries thousands of miles apart, say, Japan and Jordan? There are no clear answers, more so given that the idea of Asia as a singular landmass is also an arbitrary European construct. Historian Sugata Bose (Samir Jana/HT Photo) Nevertheless, the author explores several responses to these questions, such as Sarkar's 'three-fold basis of Asiatic Unity' and pan-Asian art and cultural initiatives, among others. While these are quite illuminating, I wish he had further investigated the meta-critiques regarding what constitutes Asia, especially the continent's conceptions that do not merely rely on Europe as a frame of reference. Besides, the book predominantly focuses on Japan, India, and China, with only fleeting references to the other countries that make up the continent. Would an idea of Asia defined largely by these three regional powers be representative of the entire region? Or would it replicate the hegemonic influence of wealthy western European nations over the idea of Europe? A deeper exploration of these debates would have helped better contextualise Bose's cogent and insightful account. Syed Saad Ahmed is a journalist and communications professional. In 2024, he was selected as a Boston Congress of Public Health Thought Leadership Fellow. He speaks five languages and has taught English in France.
India Today
7 minutes ago
- India Today
From grey list to digital hawala: Pakistan's dirty trick to keep Jaish alive
Pakistan has played a dirty trick to push itself out of the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2019, the Pakistani government implemented a National Action Plan to remove itself from the FATF list. Under this, Pakistan presented a complete plan to the FATF. As part of this, Pakistan claimed it had curbed Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) by taking control of its Markaz, monitoring the bank accounts of JeM chief Masood Azhar, his brothers Rauf Asghar and Talha al-Saif, and banning cash transactions. By 2022, FATF removed Pakistan from the grey according to intelligence reports, Pakistan's spy agency ISI and JeM have now found a new way to raise money — through Pakistani digital wallets like EasyPaisa and MONEY FOR 313 MARKAZFollowing the Pahalgam attack, the Indian Army launched 'Operation Sindoor' on 7 May. JeM's headquarters Markaz Subhanallah and four other training camps -- Markaz Bilal, Markaz Abbas, Mahmona Zoya and Sargal -- were destroyed. After the strike, the Pakistan government announced funds to rebuild these centres. Now, intelligence inputs suggest JeM has launched an online fundraising campaign via EasyPaisa to raise 3.91 billion Pakistani rupees to establish 313 new training centres across Pakistan. Instead of bank accounts, donations are now being directed to the digital wallets controlled by Masood Azhar's family members, allowing Pakistan to maintain the claim that JeM's funding has been IS BEING SENT THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIAJaish-e-Mohammed has activated its cadres to raise funds. According to intelligence reports, posters, videos and even a letter from Masood Azhar are being posted through proxy accounts linked to JeM and its commanders on platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp. These appeals state that JeM is building 313 markaz and requires 12.5 million Pakistani rupees (1.25 crore) for each centre. The fundraising drive is targeting not just people in Pakistan but also Pakistanis abroad and their sympathisers, urging them to IS GOING TO THE WALLET OF THE MASTERS OF JAISHAccording to intelligence reports, JeM's fundraising campaign is linked to several large digital wallets. These include:A SadaPay account in the name of Talha Al Saif (Talha Gulzar), registered with the phone number of Haripur district commander Aftab EasyPaisa wallet is run by Masood Azhar's son, Abdullah EasyPaisa account belonging to Jaish commander Syed Safdar Shah in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Among these, more than 250 additional EasyPaisa wallets are reportedly TRANSACTED ANNUALLY THROUGH DIGITAL WALLETSAccording to intelligence reports, Masood Azhar's family operates 7–8 digital wallets at a time, replacing them every 3–4 months and transferring lump sums into new accounts. Large amounts are first deposited in a main wallet and then distributed in smaller sums to 10–15 other wallets for cash withdrawals or further transfers. Reports also indicate that Jaish-e-Mohammed activates at least 30 new wallets every month to make tracing the original funding source more around 80 per cent of JeM's funding flows through these digital wallets, with transactions amounting to 80–90 crore Pakistani rupees annually. The money is used to buy weapons, run training camps, maintain communications, purchase luxury cars and fund Masood Azhar's family. A large portion of these funds comes from Gulf has effectively become a 'digital hawala' for JeM. In addition to online donations, JeM commanders continue to collect funds in mosques every Friday despite the Pakistan boasts of FATF compliance, JeM thrives through digital platforms operating outside the banking system. EasyPaisa and SadaPay have become the nerve centres of Pakistan's terror financing.- EndsMust Watch
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Russia welcomes Wang Yi's visit and the positive turn in India-China ties
Russia has welcomed Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's visit to India and the positive turn in India-China relations, a senior Russian diplomat said here on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). Addressing a press meeting at the Russian Embassy, senior Russian diplomats further said that India-Russia energy trade has not been impacted by U.S. President Trump's penalty tariffs targeting India, and that Russia currently supplies more than 40% of India's total crude oil demands. They also said that Russia would step up cooperation in India's defence sector and participate in the development of jet engines and the multi-layered air-defence system – Sudarshan Chakra. 'We welcome the very successful visit by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi,' said Roman Babushkin, Chargé d'affairesat the Russian Embassy, highlighting the need for stronger ties among members of the BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). The senior Russian official, accompanied by Russia's Deputy Trade Commissioner in India, Evgeny Griva, said that BRICS member countries can come up with a collective response to the tariffs imposed by Mr. Trump. He further described the additional tariff imposed on India as 'illegal' and 'unlawful' tools that 'disrespect national interests'. He highlighted the need for closer cooperation among countries in the Global South to deal with global challenges. Russian President Vladimir Putin would visit New Delhi as part of the annual Russia-India summit though the dates are yet to be finalised. The remarks from the Russian embassy set the political, military and economic backdrop of India-Russia relations as External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar reached Moscow to hold a conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The enhanced conversation between senior officials of India, China and Russia is balancing the uncertain trade relations between India and the U.S. Following the start of the Ukraine crisis, Russia had reconfigured its economy by becoming a major supplier of energy to China and India, and a positive turn in India-China ties aligns better for Russia's global moves and sets the stage for a major meeting along the RIC – Russia-India-China – format. However, the Russian official declined to give a timeline for a Russia-India-China summit, saying that such a meeting would take place at the 'right time', though he said the leaders of the three nations will meet in Tianjin, where the Heads of State Council meeting of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) would take place during August 31-September 1. 'You will never see sanctions imposed by Russia or within BRICS organisations where we collectively participate. Non-United Nations sanctions and secondary sanctions are illegal. They only serve to weaponise the economy. Despite sanctions, the Russian economy is growing. It means that you cannot exclude from the global economy a big and important country such as Russia with its tremendous energy, industrial and human potential,' said Mr. Babushkin describing BRICS as a 'stabilising force'. The senior Russian diplomat urged Indian producers to reach out to the Russian market in view of the tariffs from the U.S. that tighten access to the American market. He described the energy ties between India and Russia as having remained unaffected by tariffs and sanctions from the U.S. and the EU, as India-Russia energy trade uses a 'very special mechanism' to bypass Western sanctions. He added that India currently receives more than 40% of its total crude oil supplies from Russia and hinted at discounts in India's purchase of Russian crude saying that a '5% swing is possible subject to negotiation'. The senior official said, 'Russia is a partner of choice for India's defence sector', and that it has been working on the Make in India vision since the 1980s. He assured that Russia will participate in future jet engine projects as well as in building the Sudarshan Chakra, the multi-layered missile defence system that was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Independence Day speech. Mr Babushkin highlighted the S400 air defence system and said these systems underwent 'very successful battle test' during Operation Sindoor when India fought a brief war with Pakistan in May.
