logo
Carla Denyer accuses Labour of failing to challenge Reform UK's net zero ‘lie'

Carla Denyer accuses Labour of failing to challenge Reform UK's net zero ‘lie'

The Guardian10-05-2025

The Labour government is standing back and letting Reform UK 'sell the lie' that net zero will harm working people, Carla Denyer, the Greens' co-leader has said as she prepares to step back from the role she has held for four years.
Denyer, who will not contest this summer's party leadership re-election process, told the Guardian that she wanted to focus on her Bristol Central constituency, and to campaign on particular issues, including a net zero policy shaped to the needs of workers.
Next week, she plans to table a private member's bill setting out 'just transition' to net zero. While it has no chance of getting the parliamentary time required to pass, Denyer said she wanted to try to seize the initiative back from Nigel Farage's party.
'At a time like this, when Reform are unfortunately managing to sell the lie that tackling climate change is somehow going to be bad for ordinary people, it's really important that we Greens challenge that – and I am worried the Labour government is backsliding on climate policy,' Denyer told the Guardian.
While Keir Starmer has publicly defended net zero targets, Denyer pointed to repeated speculation about the position of Ed Miliband, the energy and climate change secretary, and comments by Tony Blair that the strategy to phase out fossil fuels was 'doomed to fail'.
'My worry at the moment is that the government are sort of lurching from crisis to crisis on this,' Denyer said.
'One of the real responsibilities and opportunities of having four Green MPs in parliament is that we can hold the government to account on climate and nature policies, and make the case really strongly that tackling the climate crisis absolutely can and should be done with people, not to people, and they need to plan their industrial strategy on that basis.'
Her bill will set out that net zero plans must be agreed with workers, and that every UK-listed company in the oil and gas industries must come up with a transition plan to meet emissions targets, which would include training or redeployment for staff.
Denyer's decision not to stand again breaks up the Greens' most electorally successful leadership duo. She and Adrian Ramsay, who is also now an MP, took over in 2021 with the stated aim of building up the party's base of MPs and councillors. Two years later, they spelled out the four Westminster seats to be targeted – all of which were won.
'I definitely don't claim sole credit, but yes, in mine and Adrian's time as co-leaders, we're very proud of our record,' Denyer said. 'We stood for election on a platform of getting the Green party into a serious election-winning machine, and we've achieved that.'
Shortly before Denyer announced her intention not to stand again, Zack Polanski, the Greens' deputy leader, said he was challenging her and Ramsay for the leadership of the party in England and Wales.
While Polanski praised their record, he implicitly criticised their approach as too cautious, saying the Greens should be more combative, and seek to become a mass membership 'eco-populism' movement.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Denyer, who argued her style had been less cautious than 'relentlessly focused', pushed back slightly against this argument, while accepting that the Greens had 'been on a bit of a journey in terms of how we communicate our ideas effectively'.
Recent Green electoral success, she said, 'shows people do appreciate that the Green party does politics differently – and broadly speaking I don't think most Brits like the kind of politics where they're just watching politicians taking chunks out of each other'.
As well as net zero, Denyer plans to campaign for more social housing and rent controls for private tenancies, and to help the party further build up its Westminster base.
While refusing to predict how many MPs the Greens could win at the next election, Denyer noted that the party had not just won four seats last July but came second in 40 more:
'Adrian and I are clear that it is absolutely possible for Greens to succeed in the system we've got. We've demonstrated that over the last four years, and I think that there is every possibility that we can make further significant gains at all levels of government over the next few years.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said employers should be able to decide if their staff can wear burkas in the workplace. Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'

Minister dismisses US misgivings over Chinese 'super embassy' in London - as Tories warn of 'espionage base'
Minister dismisses US misgivings over Chinese 'super embassy' in London - as Tories warn of 'espionage base'

Sky News

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Minister dismisses US misgivings over Chinese 'super embassy' in London - as Tories warn of 'espionage base'

A minister has dismissed reported US misgivings about plans for a Chinese "super embassy" near London's financial districts. Peter Kyle told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips that security concerns will be "taken care of assiduously in the planning process". According to The Sunday Times, the White House has warned Downing Street against the proposed massive embassy at Royal Mint Court. The site is between financial hubs in the City of London and Canary Wharf and close to three data centres, raising concerns about espionage risk. Asked for the government's view on the risk, Mr Kyle said: "These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process. "But just to reassure people, we deal with embassies and these sorts of infrastructure issues all the time. "We are very experienced and we are very aware of these sorts of issues constantly, not just when new buildings are being done, but all the time." He added that America and Britain "share intelligence iteratively" and if they raise security concerns through the planning process "we will have a fulsome response for them". However, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said he shared the US's concerns. He told Trevor Phillips: "I agree with the United States. We think it is a security risk in the government. "The Conservatives were very clear. We should not be allowing the Chinese to build the super embassy. It is likely to become a base for their pan-European espionage activities." He added that underneath the sites are cables connecting the City of London to Canary Wharf and these could be intercepted. China has been attempting to revise plans for the Royal Mint building, opposite the Tower of London, since purchasing it in 2018. The proposal for the embassy, which would be China's largest in Europe, was previously rejected by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. However, Beijing resubmitted it in August after Labour won the election, and the plans were "called in" by Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister and housing secretary. It means that an inspector will be appointed to carry out an inquiry into the proposal, but the decision ultimately rests with central government rather than the local authority. Two large protests were held at the site in February and March, which organisers claimed involved thousands of people.

UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store