A dozen officers took part in the 2018 arrest of a Bucks player. Only one was put on a list of officers with credibility issues.
It was one of the highest-profile police misconduct cases in recent years.
In 2018, Milwaukee police officers arrested then-NBA player Sterling Brown, taking him to the ground and using a Taser. The encounter started over a parking violation.
The case cost one Milwaukee officer their career, resulted in discipline or retraining for 10 others and left taxpayers on the hook for a $750,000 settlement.
The officer who lost his job, Erik Andrade, was disciplined for social media posts he made after the arrest.
Those posts showed racial bias, according to the Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office, which added him to a list of officers with credibility concerns, findings of dishonesty or bias, or past criminal charges.
None of the other officers involved, even those who were suspended, landed on the list.
That includes a supervisor who admitted that he wrongly told Internal Affairs he saw a gun in Brown's car that night.
The case illustrates the decision-making behind who gets placed on a 'Brady/Giglio' list in Milwaukee County. Such lists take their name from two landmark U.S. Supreme Court rulings and help prosecutors fulfill their legal obligations to share information favorable to the defense.
Veteran defense attorneys and some outside legal experts have argued the Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office criteria for including officers on the list is too narrow, depriving defendants of crucial information.
WHERE TO WATCH: TMJ4 News latest report on 'Duty to Disclose' to feature Sterling Brown case at 6 p.m. April 8
District Attorney Kent Lovern has maintained his office is fulfilling its legal obligations.
In the case of Andrade, Lovern, then-chief deputy district attorney, went a step further and said prosecutors should no longer use Andrade for testimony in any future case. That decision factored heavily in Andrade's firing.
Brown's attorney, Mark Thomsen of Gingras, Thomsen and Wachs, still questions why Andrade is on the list, while the higher-ranking sergeant who made an inaccurate statement to Internal Affairs is not.
Thomsen said the sergeant appeared to lie to internal investigators and that should get him a spot on the Brady list.
'The goal of our justice system is not to send innocent people to jail, which means you've got to trust the people that are making the allegations,' Thomsen said.
Two sergeants were involved in the arrest of Brown, who at the time was a rookie for the Milwaukee Bucks.
One of them was Sgt. Jeffrey Krueger.
Krueger grabbed Brown during the arrest and takedown outside a Walgreens on the city's south side. He did not order the Taser to be used against Brown. That order was given by the other supervisor present, Sgt. Sean A. Mahnke.
Police body camera footage showed Brown staying calm and polite as the officers became increasingly confrontational during the interaction. The video contradicted early draft reports from officers, including Krueger, that described Brown as "aggressive."
In an Internal Affairs interview, Krueger described how he shined a flashlight in Brown's car, which was parked across two handicapped spots. Krueger said he saw a paper target with bullet holes and then looked at another sergeant, Mahnke, peering into the car.
'It clicked all at once,' Krueger told internal investigators. 'Uh, it started making a lot more sense. OK, you know this guy was agitated with Officer (Joseph) Grams, um, he got really agitated with me looking into his vehicle.'
'And now I see this gun,' he said.
Police did not find a gun in the car or on Brown.
During a deposition in the civil lawsuit, Thomsen questioned Krueger about his assertion that he saw a gun. Krueger asked to see the police records before answering.
'Oh, it was – yeah. That – I did not see a gun. No,' Krueger said, according to a transcript of the deposition.
'So if you never saw a gun, why are you telling internal affairs that you saw a gun, sir?' Thomsen asked.
'I must have misspoke and nobody caught it,' he replied.
To Thomsen, the reason the sergeant said he saw a gun was obvious: He wanted to justify the force used on Brown by implying there was a threat.
'When he said it, he knew it was a lie,' Thomsen claimed in an interview. 'That's not a mistake. Nobody makes that kind of mistake, not a sergeant with all the experience in the world.'
In addition, the internal investigators questioning Krueger knew no gun had been found, Thomsen said.
Krueger received a 10-day suspension for failing to be a role model for professional police service during Brown's arrest. He did not respond to an interview request from TMJ4 News for this story, and the Milwaukee Police Department declined a separate request to interview him.
Asked about Krueger's claim of misspeaking, Police Chief Jeffrey Norman said he did not have enough information to discuss the issue. Norman was not chief at the time of Brown's arrest.
In a follow-up email, the Police Department said none of the officers involved in Brown's arrest were disciplined for an integrity issue except for Andrade. Because of that, no other officers were referred to the district attorney's office for potential inclusion on the Brady list.
In an interview, Lovern, the district attorney, said people can and do misspeak, and later realize they were incorrect. He stressed he was speaking generally and not about any specific case, including Krueger's.
'That doesn't mean those were dishonest statements,' Lovern said. 'That doesn't mean that that earlier statement was somehow lacking integrity.'
"And there has to be an allowance for the fact that, frankly, people will make misstatements. People will have to correct the record later," he said, adding: "That's just the world we live in. That's just life."
Thomsen said he believed Krueger's words to Internal Affairs were not just a misstatement.
"When the sergeant who's supervising is able to say to Internal Affairs a lie, and everybody knows it's a lie, and keeps their job, what message does that send institutionally?" Thomsen asked.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Only one Milwaukee officer from Bucks player's arrest is on Brady list
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
11 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Cops beat, tase man having diabetic emergency when he can't respond, NC suit says
Three officers are accused of beating, tasing and arresting a man who couldn't speak or respond to their commands because he was in diabetic shock, according to a North Carolina lawsuit. Now, the man is suing the officers with the Spruce Pine Police Department, the police chief and the town itself, saying the officers violated his civil rights by using excessive force and failed to provide aid during a medical emergency, according to the federal lawsuit filed June 5. The man says he was a law enforcement officer himself and worked as a K-9 officer for the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction. McClatchy News reached out to the defendants named in the filing for comment June 10 but did not immediately receive a response. Arrest during a medical emergency The man, who had been living with diabetes since he was 9 years old, was driving home from seeing his now-wife on Feb. 16, 2024, when he noticed his blood sugar levels dropping, according to the lawsuit. He stopped at a Walmart to get some food, then he wandered around the store before returning to the parking lot, where he sat in his car for over 30 minutes in diabetic shock, the lawsuit says. A Walmart employee came over to the car and asked if he had a pickup order, but he struggled to communicate, so the worker left and alerted a supervisor, who came out and noted the driver was 'twitching' and 'unable to speak,' according to the filing. They asked him to move his car out of the pickup area, but he couldn't, the lawsuit says. The employees called the police for a welfare check, and two Spruce Pine officers arrived and tried to speak with him as well, according to the filing. He couldn't communicate or show his identification as requested, then a third officer arrived and told him to get out of the car because he was under arrest for trespassing, according to the filing. The lawsuit says the officers should have recognized the man was having a medical emergency and provided assistance, but instead, the filing accuses them of opening the car door and pulling him out. In a 'three-on-one assault,' the officers 'threw him to the ground' and told him to put his hands behind his back, which he couldn't do, according to the filing. One of the officers is accused of hitting him at least 11 times while the man was on the ground, then a second officer used his Taser twice to 'drive stun' him, which is a technique sometimes used to make an arrestee comply, according to the lawsuit. The officers handcuffed him and searched his vehicle, but found no evidence of drugs, alcohol or weapons, the filing says. One officer eventually gave him food and a soda, helping him recover from the episode, then he was released from custody and went to a hospital, according to the lawsuit. 'It is well-settled law, policy, custom and tradition that police officers do not brutally beat and humiliate someone in medical distress,' the filing says. Legal fallout The man said the incident left him with lasting trauma and nightmares, as well as damage to his reputation, until the charges were dropped eight months later. According to the lawsuit, the man's employer, the Department of Adult Correction, conducted an internal affairs investigation as a result of his arrest. He said the incident also landed him in a law enforcement database that prevented him from being hired for a position at another sheriff's office. He is suing the officers on accusations of excessive force, failure to render medical aid, gross negligence, false arrest, malicious prosecution, battery and libel. The lawsuit also accuses the police chief and the town of Spruce Pine of failing to have adequate policy and training on use of force, Taser use and rendering medical aid. The District Attorney for the 35th Prosecutorial District declined to press charges against the officers following an investigation, WLOS reported. 'While, with the benefit of hindsight, the failure to involve medical personnel to evaluate (the man's) condition on scene given his apparent symptoms is cause for concern, that omission does not rise to the level of a violation of the criminal law,' District Attorney Seth Banks said, according to WKYK. The man is seeking punitive damages. Spruce Pine is a 50-mile drive northeast from Asheville.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
WA joins 15 states suing over deregulation of rapid-fire gun devices
This story was originally published on Washington is joining a multi-state lawsuit targeting a specific type of gun trigger. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown announced on Monday that he's joining 15 other attorneys general in suing the Trump Administration and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) over their plans to allow the sale of forced reset triggers. 'Communities are less safe with these mass-shooting devices in circulation,' Brown said in a statement. 'Essentially deregulating them is another example of this administration being driven by extreme ideology rather than commonsense.' Forced reset triggers are devices that allow semi-automatic rifles to be fired more rapidly. The suit says returning the devices to market violates federal law, arguing they turn regular guns into machine guns. The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently settled with the maker of the triggers, Rare Breed Triggers, resolving previous lawsuits brought by the Biden Administration. The agreement states Rare Breed Tiggers 'will not develop or design FRTs for use in any handgun.' It also requires the ATF to return the triggers 'that it has seized or taken as a result of a voluntary surrender.' 'This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. 'And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety.' The federal lawsuit announced on Monday was filed in the state of Maryland. Attorney General Brown is joining New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Colorado, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and the District of Columbia. Read more of Aaron Granillo's stories here.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
PC thought she would die, sword attack trial hears
The jury at the Old Bailey trial of the man accused of the murder of schoolboy Daniel Anjorin heard a police officer weeping as she described the moment she was attacked by a man with a sword. Marcus Monzo, 37, denies murdering the 14-year-old and attempting to kill four others during a 20-minute series of attacks in Hainault, north-east London, in April last year. In a recorded police interview played in court, PC Yasmin Mechet-Whitfield told a colleague: "Don't let me die here. I thought I was going to die on that street, I thought he was going to come back and finish me off." She described how when she arrived at the scene she ran after Mr Monzo, who had a sword, as he went down an alleyway. Warning: this story contains details some may find distressing She was in front of her colleague PC Cameron King as she was the one armed with a Taser, the court heard. In tears, PC Mechet-Whitfield said: "I was shouting 'police officer with a Taser' and that's when he jumped out in front of me. I don't know where he came from." She was slashed four times with the sword as she stumbled to the ground, the jury heard. "I thought he'd just smashed me over the head and he smashed me again and again and that's when all the blood started coming and Cameron was shouting over the radio: 'Yas has been stabbed.'" She described how she looked at her hand and could see the bones. "I was in a pond of my own blood. Painful, intense pain really, really quickly." PC King shouted "officer stabbed, police officer stabbed", in footage played to the court. He did not have a Taser and his pepper spray had run out but he drew his baton and placed himself between Mr Monzo and PC Mechem-Whitfield as she was on the ground, the jury heard. Earlier on Tuesday, a paramedic who was called to the scene gave evidence. Stephanie Baisden told the court how "extremely terrifying" it was when Mr Monzo started attacking the ambulance with a sword. She said they saw Daniel lying in the road injured and, as she went to get the medical equipment from the back of the ambulance, her colleague started shouting, "drive, drive". She said she looked out of the window and the suspect was "holding a very large sword, a machete-type weapon". "He was trying to force it into our window," she said. "I could hear it hitting the windows and force it into the driver's seat where I was sitting. "It was extremely terrifying, I could hear shouting, it was an extremely stressful situation." In a statement to the court, her London Ambulance Service colleague, Lachlan Allan, said as the defendant tried to smash the window with his sword they managed to drive away to the end of the road. Mr Monzo also denies wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and possession of an offensive weapon relating to a kitchen knife. He previously admitted two counts of having an offensive weapon, namely two swords. The trial continues. Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to Hainault murder trial shown CCTV of fatal attack Hainault murder accused wanted to kill, court told HM Courts & Tribunals Service