Russia, Ukraine launch drones before Zelensky-Trump summit
Fighting has continued to rage during a flurry of diplomatic moves to end Moscow's invasion.
KYIV - Kyiv and Moscow launched attack drones at each other on Aug 17, a day before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due in the US for talks with US President Donald Trump on ending three years of war with Russia.
Fighting has continued to rage during a flurry of diplomatic moves to end Moscow's invasion.
Kyiv's air force said Russia attacked Ukraine with 60 Iranian-made Shahed and other drones as well as an Iskander missile.
The governor of the embattled eastern Donetsk region, Mr Vadym Filashkin, said Russian attacks killed five people in the area on Aug 16.
In Russia, the defence ministry said Kyiv launched 46 drones at the country, mostly over border regions but also over the Nizhny Novgorod region east of Moscow, hundreds of kilometres from Ukraine.
The acting governor of the border Kursk region, Mr Alexander Khinstein, said a Ukrainian drone attack killed a man in his car.
The governor of the southern Voronezh region, Mr Alexander Gusev, said a railway worker was wounded by a drone in the region.
Ukraine has launched drones into Russia throughout Moscow's full-scale offensive, which has killed thousands of people and displaced millions.
Mr Zelensky is due in Washington on Aug 18,
three days after Mr Trump hosted Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska for talks.
Following the meeting with Mr Putin, Mr Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine
in favour of pursuing a peace deal – a position that Moscow has been pushing for.
Mr Putin launched the
Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and Moscow's forces now occupy large swathes of the south and east of the country. AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
23 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Asean can fend off blow from protectionism by boosting integration: Singapore Business Federation
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Singapore Business Federation chief executive Kok Ping Soon said the tools are all there and the opportunity for collective action has never been greater. SINGAPORE - Asean, the world's fourth-largest economy, does not have to take US President Donald Trump's tariff-induced chaos lying down. The regional grouping's members can instead close ranks and accelerate progress towards the long-stated goal of economic integration – which would boost intra-regional flow of goods, services and investments and create new jobs. An Asean that is a more homogenised market can then become a global production base, with strong trade and investment links with other major economies worldwide. This is the desired response that Asean can make, said Mr Kok Ping Soon, chief executive of the Singapore Business Federation (SBF), the Republic's apex business association with more than 32,000 companies under its fold. It would not only enable the grouping's members to mitigate any medium-term loss in economic growth, trade and investment potential, but also further strengthen the region's economy. He said Asean can boost economic integration by removing non-tariff barriers to trade, leveraging its fast-growing digital and green economy, and intensifying its trade and investment engagements with other trading blocs. 'I think the question is whether in the current climate, are we able to do more to strengthen the Asean regional economic integration. The answer must be absolutely yes. If not now, then when? The impetus (now) is even stronger,' Mr Kok told The Straits Times in an interview. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDR 2025 a rallying cry amid significant challenges facing Singapore, say analysts Opinion A 'we first' Singapore is the hardest policy for PM Lawrence Wong to deliver Singapore NDR 2025: The case for growing old at home in super-ageing Singapore Business Singapore key exports fall worse than expected in July as shipments to US plunge 42.7% Singapore N(T) students more likely to finish school, do as well in job market as N(A) peers: Study Singapore Singapore-developed device for diabetics measures long-term average blood sugar levels within 6 mins World Trump, tech and Texas: What's next for the US? World Ukraine weighs Trump's offer of security guarantees with caution Asean is a grouping of diverse economies, with some highly exposed to global trade while others remain mainly dependent on natural resources and labour-intensive industries. But put together, Asean in 2024 had an estimated gross domestic product (GDP) of US$4.13 trillion (S$5.31 trillion), accounting for 8 per cent of global trade, 5 per cent of manufacturing value-added, and in 2023 attracted 17 per cent of foreign direct investment, according to the Economic Research Institute for Asean and East Asia. The bloc has become China's top trading partner, Japan's second largest, the European Union's and South Korea's third largest, and the fourth biggest for the United States. Asean's diversity is part of its appeal, as it offers investment opportunities at various stages of the value chain and allows trade in a wide assortment of goods and services . But when it comes to intra-regional trade, the disparity between the economies becomes a source of inertia. Trade within Asean has been stagnant in the past decade at about 22 per cent of the region's total. That compares with 62 per cent for the EU and about 40 per cent for the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) members. And the reason for this is that while the bloc has over the years successfully eliminated most levies that are paid at the border, non-tariff barriers remain a hindrance. In 2019, the European Union-Asean Business Council estimated that there are about 6,000 non-tariff measures across the region – with many being potential barriers to trade. And this number continues to grow. Hinrich Foundation, a Singapore-based think-tank , found that Asean economies between 2015 and 2025 have put in place 9,873 non-tariff measures that have undercut the regional value chains and created obstacles to regional trade in a host of products. Mr Kok noted that licensing bottlenecks, inconsistent standards and customs procedures that require excessive documentation continue to weigh down intra-regional trade. He said pacts such as the Asean Trade in Goods Agreement – which is part of the Asean Economic Community Blueprint 2025 – can help, but not before they are rectified by member states. 'We really need to make a greater effort to remove some of these non-tariff barriers,' Mr Kok said. The same is true for the Asean Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA), which holds the key to unlock the region's true potential in trading digital services. 'A lot of attention is focused on trade in goods, because of the US tariffs,' he said. 'But it is the trade in services that is more exciting and multiplefold and for that, what businesses are looking for is the free flow of data, digital payment and digital identity.' Asean has already risen to become the world's third-largest digital services exporter, behind only the US and the UK. The World Economic Forum estimates that Asean's digital economy is on track to hit US$600 billion in gross merchandise value by 2030. Mr Kok said DEFA can help Asean economies claim an even larger share of global digital services exports and reinvigorate the region's start-up ecosystems. The region is already home to some of the fastest-growing unicorns, including Singapore's Grab, Sea Group and Lazada, Indonesia's GoTo, Bukalapak and Traveloka, Thailand's Ascend Money, Vietnam's VNG Corp's messaging app Zalo, and Malaysia's car marketplace Carsome. But to boost the competitive advantage of existing and upcoming unicorns and digital services exporters, Asean will have to address the regulatory fragmentation and non-tariff barriers, and push for interoperability of digital identities. Mr Kok said companies are looking for consistent standards for cross-border data flow, and digital payments as well. In 1998, the World Trade Organisation declared a moratorium on customs duties related to e-commerce transactions. That moratorium is set to expire in 2026. Trade experts fear that expiry of the moratorium would send a wave of protectionist measures worldwide, undermining Asean's digital value chains by increasing the costs of doing business. Hence, a speedy conclusion and ratification of DEFA by Asean members becomes even more critical. Related to digitalisation is also the transition to a green economy, which includes carbon trading and the Asean power grid for renewable energy transmission. Mr Kok said with the world economy fragmenting amid geopolitical and trade conflicts, the urgency and opportunity for collective action has never been greater. 'There is opportunity... but whether we can live up to it is a big question,' he said.
Business Times
23 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trade partners grow restless waiting for Trump's tariff breaks
[LONDON] UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared at a Jaguar Land Rover factory in May that his world-leading trade deal with US President Donald Trump included a cut in US tariffs on British steel to zero. More than three months later, steel lobbyist Peter Brennan was still waiting for that relief to become reality. Brennan, director of trade and economic policy at industry body UK Steel, said most members had seen US orders fall because of the uncertainty over America's 25 per cent import tax. One producer that makes particularly price-competitive products said that they'd be out of business by year-end if tariffs are not reduced to zero, he added. 'Concern is growing that finalising the deal on steel has fallen down the priority list both for the UK and US governments,' Brennan said last week. 'The will to close the deal may well be faltering on both sides.' Frustration and economic losses like those in the UK are growing in Japan, the European Union and South Korea. Those three made similar announcements over the past month: that Washington granted them leniency on auto exports in the haggling over the level of Trump's across-the-board tariffs that took effect Aug 7. But for the trio of car export powerhouses, which, unlike the UK face a 50 per cent duty on their steel and aluminium, the wait for Trump's concession continues while an American levy justified on national security grounds on imported Toyotas, BMWs, Hyundais and others remains at a crippling 25 per cent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'We are continuing to see damage, the bleeding hasn't stopped,' Japan's chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Friday in a reference to the country's car industry. 'We want the US to sign the executive order as soon as possible.' Spokesmen for the White House, the US Trade Representative's office and the Commerce Department did not reply to requests for comment. 'Forever negotiations' It was three weeks ago that EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen shook hands with Trump in Scotland over what she called an 'all-inclusive' tariff of 15 per cent that officials in Brussels later understood to be a ceiling that would also apply to cars. VDA, which represents Germany's car industry, is pressing for fast implementation to alleviate a 'considerable burden' on manufacturers and their suppliers. 'The deal between the EU and the US has not yet brought any clarity or improvement for the German automotive industry,' VDA president Hildegard Müller said on Thursday (Aug 14). 'The costs incurred run into the billions and continue to rise.' Cecilia Malmstrom, the former European commissioner for trade who's now a non-resident fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, cautioned that any delays may be purely administrative. But 'if nothing happens, there will be huge pressure on the European Commission to retaliate or to act in some way, especially from carmakers in Germany, Italy, France, Sweden and others', she said. 'There are so many other things that are vague in the EU-US deal, and in the others as well, so it is likely we will see forever negotiations and a lot of filibustering.' At a press briefing on Aug 14, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that Washington and Brussels are finalising a joint statement. 'The US has made political commitments to us in this respect and we look forward to them being implemented,' he said. Japan's uncertainty Less than a week before the EU's announcement, the US and Japan clinched a surprise deal on Jul 22 that lowered across-the-board tariffs and car levies to 15 per cent. So far, the broader duties have been implemented, but the added tax on autos remains at 25 per cent. Officials in Asia's No 2 economy are waiting for an executive order from Trump to bring down the car levies, as well as an official directive, like the EU already received, to clarify that the universal tariffs don't stack on top of existing duties. Akazawa has mentioned how a Japanese carmaker is losing 100 million yen (S$870,500) every hour due to the tariffs. Last month, Nissan Motor said that it foresaw a 300 billion yen hit from the lower tariff rate, down from a previous estimate of 450 billion yen. But chief executive officer Ivan Espinosa has warned of the difficulties in giving an accurate forecast as long as it's unclear when the tariffs will take effect and in what way. Akazawa flew to the US earlier this month to confirm that the US will be adjusting its executive order soon to remove the stacking and pay back overcharges on tariffs. Neither has yet to materialise. Hyundai, Kia Facing similar questions is South Korea, which announced a trade agreement with Washington on Jul 31. That pact would impose a 15 per cent tariff on imports to the US, including autos, alongside a US$350 billion Korean investment pledge focused on shipbuilding, and US$100 billion in energy purchases. The 15 per cent universal tariff took effect earlier this month under Trump's order, but like Japan, the sectoral auto tariff remains at 25 per cent. While South Korea's exports overall have stayed resilient in the first half of the year, thanks to front-loading by companies anticipating higher US tariffs, the value of car shipments to the US fell nearly 17 per cent, and steel exports dropped more than 11 per cent, trade data showed. South Korea's top automaker Hyundai Motor and affiliate Kia could face as much as US$5 billion in additional costs this year even under the new 15 per cent auto tariff, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Joanna Chen. While avoiding a 25 per cent levy will save more than US$3 billion, the duty squeezes margins amid softer demand and tighter subsidies, intensifying competition with Japanese automakers, Chen said. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung's planned summit with Trump on Aug 25, their first meeting since Lee took office in June, will test the durability of the US$350 billion investment pledge, as well as their alliance over sensitive issues such as defence spending, US troop levels and North Korea policy. 'Just overwhelmed' For Starmer and the UK, most aspects of the pact have now come into force, including a 10 per cent so-called reciprocal rate that's the lowest among all US trading partners. Yet Trump's 25 per cent tax on British steel still chafes amid the delays in cutting it. Among the issues to resolve is the US's insistence that steel should be melted and poured in the UK in order to qualify. That's a requirement which Tata Steel UK, one of the country's biggest producers, is no longer able to fulfil after closing down its blast furnace last year. Its new electric arc furnace is not due to be ready until late 2027. People familiar with the government's thinking are cautiously optimistic that they might be able to secure exemptions to the melt-and-pour rule, whereby steel imported from certain European countries before being further processed in the UK is allowed to qualify as British. 'It's not for lack of trying by the UK government,' said Tim Rutter, director of public affairs at Tata Steel. 'We hear that US departments are just overwhelmed.' A spokesperson for the UK Department for Business and Trade said officials will continue to work with Washington to implement the deal as soon as possible. Late on Friday in Washington, the US Customs and Border Protection agency issued new inclusions to steel and aluminium product lists for tariffs that take effect Monday, with some of the guidance affecting imports from the UK. Japan's Akazawa acknowledged that even with the UK, actual implementation of key parts of their deal took 54 days. As a result, he's said that it's 'not bad' if an executive order from the US comes by around mid-September. 'It's just further confirmation that negotiations never really end,' especially with more US tariffs coming for sectors including pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, said Sam Lowe, a partner at Flint Global in London and head of its trade and market access practice. BLOOMBERG
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Outline emerges of Putin's offer to end his war in Ukraine, World News
LONDON - Russia would relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine and Kyiv would cede swathes of its eastern land which Moscow has been unable to capture, under peace proposals discussed by Russia's Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump at their Alaska summit, sources briefed on Moscow's thinking said. The account emerged the day after Trump and Putin met at an airforce base in Alaska, the first encounter between a US president and the Kremlin chief since before the start of the Ukraine conflict. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is due to travel to Washington on Monday (Aug 18) to discuss with Trump a possible settlement of the full-scale war, which Putin launched in February 2022. Although the summit failed to secure the ceasefire he said he had wanted, Trump said in an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had "largely agreed". "I think we're pretty close to a deal," he said, adding: "Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'." The two sources, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said their knowledge of Putin's proposals was mostly based on discussions between leaders in Europe, the US and Ukraine, and noted it was not complete. Trump briefed Zelenskiy and European leaders on his summit discussions early on Saturday. It was not immediately clear if the proposals by Putin were an opening gambit to serve as a starting point for negotiations or more like a final offer that was not subject to discussion. Ukrainian land for peace At face value, at least some of the demands would present huge challenges for Ukraine's leadership to accept. Putin's offer ruled out a ceasefire until a comprehensive deal is reached, blocking a key demand of Zelenskiy, whose country is hit daily by Russian drones and ballistic missiles. Under the proposed Russian deal, Kyiv would fully withdraw from the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions in return for a Russian pledge to freeze the front lines in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the sources said. Ukraine has already rejected any retreat from Ukrainian land such as the Donetsk region, where its troops are dug in and which Kyiv says serves as a crucial defensive structure to prevent Russian attacks deeper into its territory. Russia would be prepared to return comparatively small tracts of Ukrainian land it has occupied in the northern Sumy and northeastern Kharkiv regions, the sources said. Russia holds pockets of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions that total around 440 square km, according to Ukraine's Deep State battlefield mapping project. Ukraine controls around 6,600 square km of Donbas, which comprises the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and is claimed by Russia. Although the Americans have not spelled this out, the sources said they knew Russia's leader was also seeking - at the very least - formal recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, which Moscow seized from Ukraine in 2014. It was not clear if that meant recognition by the US government or, for instance, all Western powers and Ukraine. Kyiv and its European allies reject formal recognition of Moscow's rule in the peninsula. They said Putin would also expect the lifting of at least some of the array of sanctions on Russia. However, they could not say if this applied to US as well as European sanctions. Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil - which is subject to a range of Western sanctions - but might have to "in two or three weeks." Ukraine would also be barred from joining the Nato military alliance, though Putin seemed to be open to Ukraine receiving some kind of security guarantees, the sources said. However, they added that it was unclear what this meant in practice. European leaders said Trump had discussed security guarantees for Ukraine during their conversation on Saturday and also broached an idea for an "Article 5"-style guarantee outside the Nato military alliance. Nato regards any attack launched on one of its 32 members as an attack on all under its Article 5 clause. Joining the Atlantic alliance is a strategic objective for Kyiv that is enshrined in the country's constitution. Russia would also demand official status for the Russian language inside parts of, or across, Ukraine, as well as the right of the Russian Orthodox Church to operate freely, the sources said. Ukraine's security agency accuses the Moscow-linked church of abetting Russia's war on Ukraine by spreading pro-Russian propaganda and housing spies, something denied by the church which says it has cut canonical ties with Moscow. Ukraine has passed a law banning Russia-linked religious organisations, of which it considers the church to be one. However, it has not yet started enforcing the ban.
