Downtown Boston zoning changes could allow buildings up to 700 feet tall
The skyline of downtown Boston could soon be getting a lot taller.
Zoning changes proposed for downtown, stretching from the Boston Common to the Rose Kennedy Greenway, would allow developers to construct new buildings up to 700 feet tall, or about 70 stories, in some areas. Closer to the Common, heights will be capped at 100 to 155 feet.
Currently, the tallest building in that area is Winthrop Center at 691 feet and 52 stories tall, which was completed last year.
The next-tallest is the Millennium Tower, at 684 feet and 60 stories; the South Station tower, currently under construction, will eventually reach 677 feet and 51 stories.
Almost immediately after the final draft zoning was released Thursday, downtown residents began airing their concerns about what it could lead to.
'This is not thoughtful, comprehensive planning - it is a high-rise tower gamble devoid of sound analysis and valid proof of concept,' a group of neighborhood organizations wrote in a shared statement Thursday evening. 'Furthermore, it will not yield meaningful on-site, truly affordable housing and stands to threaten the character of the neighborhood.'
The changes are part of Boston's PLAN: Downtown initiative, part of the larger overhaul of the convoluted zoning code.
The city has said the changes will allow for higher housing density, creating more homes to address the housing crisis. Any residential development will have to set aside 20% of the units created as affordable housing under the existing inclusionary zoning rules.
The original draft of the new zoning was released in January, and from the beginning, it received fierce opposition.
During the initial public comment period, hundreds of residents sent in letters, the vast majority railing against the proposal.
'To me, this plan represents the 'Manhattanization' of Boston, and (I) am strongly opposed to that happening in a city with a totally different history, character, and size from that of New York,' one downtown resident, Esther Messing, wrote in an email to the Planning Department, according to a compilation of public comment letters released by the city.
'We did not buy in a high-rise tower in the Seaport, we chose to be in a neighborhood that we committed to making more of a community,' wrote Anne Peacher, another downtown resident. 'This plan does the EXACT OPPOSITE of what we hoped.'
Under the newest version, the area will be broken up into two zoning districts, 'SKY' and 'SKY-LOW-D.'
The latter, consisting of the corridor closest to the Boston Common and another section closer to the waterfront, has lower maximum building heights to prioritize 'preservation of existing structures and scale' in areas with many historic buildings.
Since the initial January proposal, the map has been changed to include more areas in this district, including Park Plaza, the areas around Reader's Plaza and the Old South Meeting House and the Ladder Blocks along Washington Street.
In the newest draft, the SKY-LOW-D district also allows for planned development areas, a type of development project that introduces specialty zoning, usually more permissive than the existing zoning.
Planned Development Areas will only be possible on lots of at least 1 acre that include a city landmark, and must be predominantly residential.
In the remaining SKY district, building heights will be restricted by laws governing shadows on the Common and Federal Aviation Administration airspace rules, whichever is lower.
This means that in the area farthest from the Common, buildings can reach 700 feet, but as they get closer, the maximum height will decrease.
The Back Bay, Bay Village and Downtown Boston Neighborhood Associations, Beacon Hill Civic Association, Boston Preservation Alliance, Freedom Trail Foundation, Friends of the Public Garden, Revolutionary Spaces and other residents of the area, who released the statement Thursday, said they would be happy with a compromise that extended the lower height restrictions further but still allowed tall buildings further into the Financial District.
'Boston still bears the scars of misguided, top-down planning efforts that led to the destruction of the West End and portions of Roxbury and the South End,' they wrote. 'We cannot afford to repeat those mistakes.'
Boston cornhole competition to raise money for performing arts scholarship
Feds put Boston and other cities 'on notice' over sanctuary laws
WATCH: Baseball team congrats Mass. teen for completing cancer treatment
Beloved New England gourmet grilled cheese brand opens new Boston spot
Man who rented apartments for Mass. high-end brothel network sentenced to prison
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Downtown Boston zoning changes could allow buildings up to 700 feet tall
The skyline of downtown Boston could soon be getting a lot taller. Zoning changes proposed for downtown, stretching from the Boston Common to the Rose Kennedy Greenway, would allow developers to construct new buildings up to 700 feet tall, or about 70 stories, in some areas. Closer to the Common, heights will be capped at 100 to 155 feet. Currently, the tallest building in that area is Winthrop Center at 691 feet and 52 stories tall, which was completed last year. The next-tallest is the Millennium Tower, at 684 feet and 60 stories; the South Station tower, currently under construction, will eventually reach 677 feet and 51 stories. Almost immediately after the final draft zoning was released Thursday, downtown residents began airing their concerns about what it could lead to. 'This is not thoughtful, comprehensive planning - it is a high-rise tower gamble devoid of sound analysis and valid proof of concept,' a group of neighborhood organizations wrote in a shared statement Thursday evening. 'Furthermore, it will not yield meaningful on-site, truly affordable housing and stands to threaten the character of the neighborhood.' The changes are part of Boston's PLAN: Downtown initiative, part of the larger overhaul of the convoluted zoning code. The city has said the changes will allow for higher housing density, creating more homes to address the housing crisis. Any residential development will have to set aside 20% of the units created as affordable housing under the existing inclusionary zoning rules. The original draft of the new zoning was released in January, and from the beginning, it received fierce opposition. During the initial public comment period, hundreds of residents sent in letters, the vast majority railing against the proposal. 'To me, this plan represents the 'Manhattanization' of Boston, and (I) am strongly opposed to that happening in a city with a totally different history, character, and size from that of New York,' one downtown resident, Esther Messing, wrote in an email to the Planning Department, according to a compilation of public comment letters released by the city. 'We did not buy in a high-rise tower in the Seaport, we chose to be in a neighborhood that we committed to making more of a community,' wrote Anne Peacher, another downtown resident. 'This plan does the EXACT OPPOSITE of what we hoped.' Under the newest version, the area will be broken up into two zoning districts, 'SKY' and 'SKY-LOW-D.' The latter, consisting of the corridor closest to the Boston Common and another section closer to the waterfront, has lower maximum building heights to prioritize 'preservation of existing structures and scale' in areas with many historic buildings. Since the initial January proposal, the map has been changed to include more areas in this district, including Park Plaza, the areas around Reader's Plaza and the Old South Meeting House and the Ladder Blocks along Washington Street. In the newest draft, the SKY-LOW-D district also allows for planned development areas, a type of development project that introduces specialty zoning, usually more permissive than the existing zoning. Planned Development Areas will only be possible on lots of at least 1 acre that include a city landmark, and must be predominantly residential. In the remaining SKY district, building heights will be restricted by laws governing shadows on the Common and Federal Aviation Administration airspace rules, whichever is lower. This means that in the area farthest from the Common, buildings can reach 700 feet, but as they get closer, the maximum height will decrease. The Back Bay, Bay Village and Downtown Boston Neighborhood Associations, Beacon Hill Civic Association, Boston Preservation Alliance, Freedom Trail Foundation, Friends of the Public Garden, Revolutionary Spaces and other residents of the area, who released the statement Thursday, said they would be happy with a compromise that extended the lower height restrictions further but still allowed tall buildings further into the Financial District. 'Boston still bears the scars of misguided, top-down planning efforts that led to the destruction of the West End and portions of Roxbury and the South End,' they wrote. 'We cannot afford to repeat those mistakes.' Boston cornhole competition to raise money for performing arts scholarship Feds put Boston and other cities 'on notice' over sanctuary laws WATCH: Baseball team congrats Mass. teen for completing cancer treatment Beloved New England gourmet grilled cheese brand opens new Boston spot Man who rented apartments for Mass. high-end brothel network sentenced to prison Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Anchorage leaders move to change 'site access' rules they say hamper new housing development
May 29—The Anchorage mayor's office and members of the Assembly are pushing for a package of changes to zoning rules that they say are impeding development and stalling new housing construction the city desperately needs. "Anchorage needs to build more housing, but some of our tools are broken. To build the future we want, first we need to fix our tools," Mayor Suzanne LaFrance said in a statement released alongside two influential members of the Assembly, a signal the administration is aligned with legislators on the measure. The ordinance from the administration, Assembly Vice Chair Anna Brawley and member Daniel Volland is 51 pages of technical adjustments to a set of policies loosely labeled "site access." Those are the rules scattered throughout Title 21, the building code, that cover requirements for various access routes people use to get into their homes and other buildings. "The proposal is complex but could be summarized as a simplification of standards for driveways, parking areas, and building frontages, with an emphasis on flexibility while providing for better physical definitions of private property and the street," according to a staff report from the municipality's Planning Department. The proposed reforms, which are up for public testimony in June, came out of a monthslong working group that brought together developers, planners, community advocates, elected officials and others to address building rules that were hindering new projects. "I would characterize this one less as 'unlocking a bunch of new housing.' This is fixing something that isn't working in the code now," Brawley said in an interview. Over the last several years, elected officials from all different political backgrounds have been trying to change planning and zoning rules in ways that make it easier to build new residential units. But not all those adjustments have worked. Brawley said there are big sections of the building code that are so technical, cumbersome, and hard to understand that simply parsing it has become a delay for builders. "If the code is too complicated to read, then it's not working," Brawley said. The new proposal simplifies code around site access development. It also grants more administrative discretion for the many instances where projects, especially in-fill development and new multifamily structures, involve nuances and variables that are hard to completely square with written regulations. "What problem were we trying to solve here?" asked Daniel Mckenna-Foster from the city's Long-Range Planning Division during a February meeting hosted by the Federation of Community Councils. "It's really about the interaction between private properties and the how people get from one to the other." Many of the requirements addressed in the new ordinance have been on pause since the Assembly passed a moratorium on implementing them several months ago. That pause is set to expire this November. The working group proposal, which was endorsed by the Planning and Zoning Commission in March before it went along to the Assembly, would replace the previous site access rules. "It is more expensive and challenging than ever to build housing in Anchorage," said Tyler Robinson, Vice President of Cook Inlet Housing Authority, in a statement released after the working group made it's recommendations. "The changes to code introduced by the Site Access ordinance fundamentally broke our ability to provide more housing to the community — from single-family homes to large apartment buildings." LaFrance has made housing a policy priority for her administration, emphasizing that the municipality and Assembly need a multi-prong approach to add 10,000 new housing units in the coming decade. The administration, along with allies on the Assembly who are pushing for better development strategies, say one piece of that is promptly scrapping policies that aren't working. "This is fixing problems we already know about, this isn't new policy," Brawley said of the new proposal. "I think it's both the product and the process we wanted to highlight." The Assembly will hear public testimony on the ordinance at its June 10 meeting.
Yahoo
15-05-2025
- Yahoo
Albuquerque adopts new rules, fines for 'problem motels' amid public safety push
May 14—Albuquerque motels with a track record of crime, code violations, or unpaid taxes in Albuquerque will soon face fines, restrictions on guest occupancy, and new record-keeping rules under a bill passed by the City Council. The measure comes as Albuquerque continues its crackdown on motels it deems problematic, typically for code violations or because the motel sees a lot of criminal activity. The city has so far shut down six motels. The ordinance would allow the city to place additional hotels and motels on something like a provisional plan, according to Planning Department Director Alan Varela. "The ordinance is very clear. It is targeted at problematic properties. This, hopefully, is a small minority of properties out there," Varela said. The bill was passed on a 5-4 vote on May 5, with Councilors Joaquín Baca, Dan Champine, Nichole Rogers and Louie Sanchez voting against it. A spokesperson for Mayor Tim Keller's office said he intended to sign the bill into law in the coming week, and it would take effect within the month. Opposition to the bill at City Council varied. Rogers' concern was how the measure would affect unhoused people seeking a room for a night. Sanchez's concern stemmed from amendments that softened the blow to unhoused people. Specifically, Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn introduced an amendment that inserted "if available" before some of the requirements for tenants to show a government issued identification and provide an address. Fiebelkorn said that, without her amendments, the ordinance would force out unhoused people who might lack identification or a permanent address. Sanchez objected to that idea and voted against both of Fiebelkorn's amendments. "Overall, I think this bill will be beneficial to the citizens of Albuquerque," Sanchez said. What does the bill do? The ordinance would create three triggers for a motel to be subjected to "enhanced operational requirements," or "the bad list," as councilors called it. Those triggers are failure to make lodgers' tax or hospitality fee payments to the city for three consecutive months, at least three violations of any city ordinance within a 12-month period, or at least one violation of the city's Nuisance Abatement Ordinance. Varela said these triggers were chosen because they're often warning signs for motels with problematic activity. "What we've noticed, especially in the last year when we've started shutting down these most problematic hotels in town — all of them at one point were very legitimate operations, probably in very good condition and a good and safe place for guests to stay," Varela said, adding that these three issues would crop up as warning signs. Varela said the city does not know how many motels might meet the criteria, and added that it will not seek out problematic motels. "Code enforcement does all of its investigations based on complaints," Varela said. "We do not drive around the city, putting our noses into businesses that are not on the complaint list." Once on the bad list, the city can issue civil fines of up to $500 per day, place liens on the property or prohibit occupancy. Additionally, motels on the bad list must keep information about their guests for 45 days, so the city can review it. That information includes a copy of the guest's photo ID if available, or if not available, a picture of the guest's full face; vehicle information like make, model and license plate number; and information about the source of payment. The rationale behind this, Varela said, is to give police information. "Each of the hotels that have been shut down so far has had some elements, whether it's a large element or maybe to just a minor degree, of human trafficking," Varela said. "And some of these items are designed entirely to help prevent human trafficking or make it much more difficult to do." Angelo Metzger, code compliance manager, added that many properties are also repeat code violators, leading to potentially dangerous conditions for tenants. One of the most recent motels that Metzger's office shut down was the Court John Motel at 2700 Fourth NW in the North Valley. In that case, the Albuquerque Police Department reported 940 calls from within two blocks of the motel, with 16 battery cases, 26 reports of stolen vehicles, two shootings, three sexual assaults and six drug-related offenses, according to a news release sent when the motel was shut down. The motel was also accused of offering long-term stays to residents in rooms with failing plumbing, exposed wiring, pest infestations and structural damage, all while operating without a valid certificate of occupancy. Metzger told the Journal that these properties can call the city to help get back into compliance. "If you are having a problem with your property, please reach out to the city so we can go and assist you in getting it back to where it needs to be," Metzger said. Industry perspective Dhawal Kholwadwala, president of the Greater Albuquerque Hotel and Lodging Association (GAHLA), said his organization played a role in helping craft the bill and hopes to continue that role as enforcement begins. Kholwadwala said that GAHLA, which advocates for the interests of the hospitality industry, heard the bill was in the works and sought to get involved early. GAHLA agreed with the explicit goal of the bill, to make motels safer, but said some of the early details were concerning. "At the end of the day, we support trying to make the community safer," he said. For one, they got the name changed from the "Hotel and Motel Accountability Ordinance" to the "Distressed Lodging Property Ordinance." Kholwadwala said that mattered because the perception that this whole industry was somehow problematic was false. Kholwadwala said his organization plans to pay close attention to how the new law is enforced moving forward. Specifically, he said GAHLA will review how the city uses and enforces the rules around collecting a guestbook. "We just want it to be a fair process," Kholwadwala said.
