4 months on, still no aid given to Kumbh stampede victim's family: Court raps UP
"It is alarming that the state authorities appear to have handed over the body of the wife of the petitioner to his son on February 5, 2025. Four months have passed and no part of the ex-gratia compensation announced by the state has been offered to the petitioner," the court said.The chief standing counsel submitted that since the petitioner has not raised that claim, the stage has not arrived for it to be considered.The court said, "Prima facie, we find the stand taken to be untenable and smacking of apathy to the plight of the citizen. It was the bounden duty of the State to pay compensation to the aggrieved families with the utmost grace and dignity."advertisement"Once the identity of the family of the deceased was known to the state, it appears to be a pretence and an excuse on part of the state to ask the aggrieved family who had come from far-off places to beg for money from the state for the irreversible loss suffered by the petitioner, certainly not on account of any fault committed by the deceased," the court added."The state remains the trustee of its citizens. It is not only obligated to protect their lives and keep them safe from avoidable losses, it remains obligated and duty-bound to offer remedies and care where such unintended loss may be suffered. It is undisputed that the management of the Kumbh Mela was in the hands of the state and no other authority," the bench said.In its order passed on Friday, the court directed the state authorities to file an affidavit disclosing full details of the total number of claims received for the payment of ex-gratia compensation; the number of claims decided and pending, together with the dates of receipt of such claims with minimal details of the claimants as also the date of their disposal.The court directed for the impleadment of multiple medical institutions and authorities in Prayagraj as parties to the petition and asked them to file affidavits disclosing all deaths and the details of the medical handling of victims between January 28 and the conclusion of the Maha Kumbh.advertisementAccording to the facts of the case, the petitioner's wife was injured in the stampede and was initially believed to be missing. Later, her body was handed over to her son from the mortuary of the Motilal Nehru Medical College in Prayagraj on February 5.The inquest report and the post-mortem or autopsy report were not prepared at that stage. Since the petitioner is a resident of Karaunda in Bihar's Kaimur (Bhabhua) district, he took his wife's body to his home district, where the inquest and autopsy reports were prepared.The court fixed July 18 as the next date of hearing in the matter.Tune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Uttar Pradesh#Maha Kumbh
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
CAG points out deviations from prescribed budgetary processes in Uttar Pradesh
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has questioned the Uttar Pradesh government's budget management procedures and pointed out deviations from the prescribed budgetary and accounting processes in the state. The CAG recommended that the state finance department should review the reasons for grants/appropriations remaining unutilised. (FILE PHOTO) Listing issues with budget management, the CAG has pointed out lapses in the regularisation of excess expenditure, classification of expenditure as revenue and capital, lump sum budgetary provisions, discrepancies in the depiction of centrally sponsored schemes, budget projections and gap between planning and execution. Under the provisions of Article 205 (1)(b) of the Constitution of India, if excess money has been spent on any service in a financial year (more than the amount granted for that service and for that year), the governor shall cause to be laid before the state legislative assembly a demand for such excesses. 'Excess disbursements amounting to ₹32,533.56 crore under 104 grants and 49 appropriations pertaining to the years 2005-2006 to 2023-2024 are yet to be regularised by the state legislature,' the CAG said in its report on the State Finances for 2023-24. The report was tabled in the state legislative assembly on Tuesday. The CAG further observed, 'Excess expenditure vitiates the system of budgetary and financial control and encourages financial indiscipline in management of public money and its non-regularisation is an infringement of the constitutional provision.' The CAG report pointed out misclassification between revenue and capital expenditure and as a result of misclassification of revenue expenditure as capital expenditure the revenue surplus was overstated by ₹283.39 crore in 2023-2024. The CAG report observed that lump sum provisions should not, as a rule, be made in the estimates except when the expenditure out of lump sum allotments is regulated by standing sanctions, instructions or rules. 'During the year 2023-2024, lump sum provisions of ₹11,022.30 crore crore were made under various heads of 17 grants without indicating scheme details. Out of these lump sum provisions, actual expenditure of ₹6474.16 crore (58.74 per cept of the provisions) was incurred,' the CAG report said. There have been discrepancies in the depiction of centrally sponsored schemes, the report said, noting that in the case of 22 programmes under the centrally sponsored schemes the specified funding pattern (central share, state share and financial institution) was not mentioned. The CAG report also observed, 'During 2023-2024, actual expenditure was ₹5,84,110.09 crore against provision of ₹7,72,484.07 crore. The overall savings of ₹1,78,373.98 crore were 23.39 per cent of total provision…' The CAG report gave details of the pattern of lower budget utilisation against the budget provisions in the past five years (2019-2024). The report said the budgetary provisions increased consistently during the period while actual utilisation remained in the range of 73% to 77% between 2019-2024. The CAG recommended that the state finance department should review the reasons for grants/appropriations remaining unutilised and take steps to make more judicious budget provisions in future. It also suggested that the reappropriations should be based on careful assessment of fund requirements.
New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Chennai corporation sanitation workers protesting against privatisation forcefully evicted by police
Hours after the Madras High Court, on Wednesday, directed the State to take action to remove the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) sanitation workers, who have been protesting at the Rippon Building since August 1, police moved in to evict them from the place. As of the latest reports, the eviction has begun. Tension prevailed as workers protesting against privatisation were evicted by the police. The workers chanted "Jai Bhim" and decried the "police atrocity" as they courted arrest. "Several police vehicles reached the location where the sanitation workers have been protesting against the resolution of the Corporation Council to outsource sanitation work soon after the court order on Wednesday afternoon," Prashanth of Left Trade Union Centre (LTUC) said. Advocate Kannan of UUI and DAA said that nearby roads were blocked around 10 pm on Wednesday and that buses had been brought. Activist Shalin Maria Lawrence said, "We have 3000 people, of whom 2000 are sanitation workers; 90 per cent of them are women with kids, and elderly women, and they are Dalits. Food trucks have been blocked since Tuesday afternoon, and most of them are hungry. But they are firm that they will not leave the situation is tense and volatile." She added that when all these things were happening, Chief Minister M K Stalin was watching the preview of Rajinikanth's Coolie. "I have never seen such an insensitive CM in Tamil Nadu," she said.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
State amended nine varsities' laws to bypass binding UGC regulations: T.N. Governor
The Tamil Nadu Governor and the University Grants Commission (UGC) found themselves in the Supreme Court in agreement with a petitioner who had challenged the State government's authority to amend nine Acts, which took away the Governor's power to appoint Vice-Chancellors (VCs) in State universities. The petitioner in question, advocate K. Venkatachalapathy, had previously convinced the Madras High Court on May 21 to pass an interim order staying the amended Acts which clothed the State government, and not the Governor, with the power to appoint the VCs. The State, represented by senior advocate A.M. Singhvi and P. Wilson, had responded to the interim order by approaching the Supreme Court. The apex court had issued notice to Mr. Venkatachalapathy; the Union government; the UGC; the Tamil Nadu Governor; and the Human Resources and Development Ministry. In a counter-affidavit, the Governor replied that the amendments made by the State government were deliberately meant to 'bypass' binding UGC Regulations. 'The legal framework mandates the process be in conformity with binding UGC Regulations, which the State government sought to bypass through the amendment Acts. The amendments to the university Acts cannot override binding constitutional norms or Central legislation. The allegations of delay in appointing the Vice-Chancellors are a result of States' administrative decisions,' the Governor responded. Similarly, the UGC also blamed the State of Tamil Nadu for violating the procedure for appointment of VCs. The State, it argued, by exercising its legislative competence, bestowed the powers of appointment of Vice-Chancellor upon the government, thereby violating the procedure for appointment of Vice-Chancellor prescribed under Clause 7.3 of UGC Regulations, 2018. 'The powers of the UGC, as regards maintenance of standards of higher education, are very broad in nature and are applicable equally to all universities. The petitioner's [State government] oblique attempt to circumscribe the powers of the UGC is misconceived and is clearly an afterthought and is misplaced,' the UGC stated. The State has argued that the High Court ordered a stay despite the Supreme Court, in an April 8 judgment, declaring that the Bills were granted 'deemed assent' by the Governor. The State government had notified the Acts following the judgment. It contended there was a strong presumption of constitutionality against laws passed by the legislature. The State said its appeal had raised questions of law with wide ramifications pertaining to the issue of federalism and State autonomy to establish, regulate and administer State universities under Entry 32 List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution along with the issues pertaining to judicial impropriety and discipline in keeping a hands-off approach.
