
Glendale mixed-use project Envision Encore clears City Council hurdle
A major rezoning decision by Glendale City Council paves the way for high-density housing and commercial space near popular attractions.
Story Highlights Glendale City Council approved rezoning for "Envision Encore" project
Project includes high-density housing, commercial uses and potential hotels
A Worker Power representative expressed concerns about hotels, affordable housing
A new mixed-use project in Glendale passed its first hurdle with City Council Tuesday.
Council approved the rezoning of a 39-acre site just across the I-10 from State Farm Stadium for a project dubbed 'Envision Encore,' which is set to include high-density multifamily housing, commercial uses and potentially hotels.
The project does not yet have a developer associated with it. The property owner is Porter Fields LLC, which traces to an address in Yuma, according to Maricopa County records. The applicant for the rezoning was the city of Glendale.
During the April 22 Council meeting, a representative from social welfare organization Worker Power expressed concerns with the hotel aspect and lack of affordable housing in the city.
'We question the proposed inclusion of hotels. Why not keep the commercial development related to services that residents will directly benefit from, like the mentioned cafes and daycare centers, and maximize the amount of housing for the community," said Margaret Schultz with Worker Power.
Worker Power has been politically active in the Phoenix area for the past few years, leading opposition to projects such as the VAI Resort and the arena development efforts from the now-defunct Arizona Coyotes hockey team.
Sought-after site near other Glendale attractions
On March 27, Glendale's planning and zoning commission recommended that Council rezone the site at the southwest corner of 99th Avenue and Ballpark Boulevard from agriculture to planned area development, along with a minor plan amendment from land zoned for a business park to entertainment mixed-use.
The city envisions the mixed-use project as one 'that will complement and enhance the sports and entertainment district,' Senior Planner Alex Lerma told the planning commission.
Attractions in the district include the Tanger Outlets, Desert Diamond Arena and popular hangout spots such as a new two-story Thirsty Lion location and the Tiger Woods-backed golf entertainment concept PopStroke.
The site is also surrounded by several other planned developments. A business park is currently under development to the north. A Top Golf location is directly to the east, along with the new Andretti Indoor Carting and Games facility set to open this month. Dick's Sporting Goods is also expected to develop its new concept, Dick's House of Sports, to the northeast of the planned project site.
Other mega entertainment projects nearby include the VAI Resort, which has faced several delays but is expected to include Arizona's largest hotel upon completion. Next door, the Mattel Adventure Park is set to include roller coasters and a Barbie Dream House upon completion, which is scheduled for the end of 2025.
And next to State Farm Stadium, another 62-acre entertainment mixed-use development from Peoria-based Plaza Cos. is underway.
Sign up here for the Phoenix Business Journal's free newsletters, and download our free app for breaking news alerts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Council of EU imposes steep tariffs on Russian and Belarusian agricultural goods
The Council of the European Union has adopted new tariffs targeting agricultural products and fertilisers from Russia and Belarus that were not previously subject to additional duties. Source: press service for the Council, as reported by European Pravda Details: The measures aim to lessen European countries' reliance on imports from Belarus and Russia, as well as to cut down on Moscow's budget and its capacity to fund its war against Ukraine. Furthermore, it has the potential to boost EU output. "The implementation of these tariffs will be closely monitored to ensure that the EU fertiliser industry and farmers are protected. The tariff increases on fertilisers will take place gradually, over a transition period of three years," the EU Council stated. With the entry into force of these changes on 1 July 2025, EU tariffs will apply to all agricultural products from Russia. The categories subject to the new tariffs cover about 15% of all agricultural imports from Russia to the EU as of 2023. For fertilisers from Russia, in 2023, the categories to which duties were applied accounted for 25% of imports in this sector, approximately 3.6 million tonnes worth €1.28 billion. Background: At the end of May, the European Parliament supported the introduction of tariffs for these categories of products from Russia and Belarus. These tariffs are expected to effectively stop the import of these goods to the EU. Tariffs on most agricultural products from Russia and Belarus have been in force in the EU since July 2024. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!


Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Lakeshore sets sights on tighter controls for greenhouse developments
The Municipality of Lakeshore is advancing new policies aimed at regulating the expansion of commercial greenhouses, introducing a suite of stricter requirements and studies intended to protect surrounding communities and the environment. During a recent meeting, Lakeshore Council voted in favour of modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 18 (OPA 18), a long-debated planning document that outlines the municipality's approach to large-scale greenhouse development. The changes come in response to ongoing concerns from residents about the industry's rapid growth and its associated impacts, particularly in rural areas. Council's updated recommendations focus on placing new limits on where greenhouses can be built and require a series of assessments to better manage potential consequences related to odour, lighting, water usage, and infrastructure stress. While greenhouse operations have become more common across southwestern Ontario, Lakeshore's leadership has made it clear that proactive planning is needed to maintain the municipality's rural character and quality of life. If approved by Essex County Council—the upper-tier authority responsible for Official Plan oversight—the changes would introduce significant buffers between future greenhouse developments and sensitive areas. These include a 1,000-metre setback from all secondary settlement areas, a 550-metre setback from residential properties, and a 5,000-metre setback from the Hallam Observatory, a local scientific research site. These setbacks are part of a broader package of land-use restrictions intended to minimize disruptions caused by greenhouse lighting and odours—frequent complaints from neighbouring property owners. In addition to location limits, proposed greenhouses would be required to undergo several technical assessments before approval is granted. These include a master drainage study to assess watershed systems and mitigate erosion and flood risks, a water quality study to evaluate downstream effects during and after greenhouse construction and operation, and a financial and community impact study to determine how each project could affect local infrastructure and social well-being. 'Greenhouses have been a concern for many of our residents, and we're happy to see our vision for a comprehensive regulatory regime take shape,' said Mayor Tracey Bailey. 'While we have recognized that we are not able to stop greenhouses altogether, these measures ensure that our residents, as well as Lakeshore's rich agricultural land, are protected.' The changes to OPA 18 have been in development for more than two years. Originally submitted to the County of Essex in early 2023, the amendment has gone through multiple rounds of public consultation and revision. In February 2023, Lakeshore Council hosted a statutory public meeting to gather feedback from residents and stakeholders on potential zoning and planning bylaw changes related to large greenhouse farms. Following public input, Council directed administration to revise the policies to include stronger protections, such as eliminating odour and light pollution, enhancing waste management protocols, and expanding required buffer zones. Further discussions in October 2024 led to additional refinement of OPA 18. At that time, Council reaffirmed its stance against unregulated greenhouse sprawl and requested new components for the amendment, including annual monitoring of regional greenhouse trends, evaluation of future water main expansions, and an analysis of agricultural land values and market demand. Council also deferred a decision on whether to proceed with a greenhouse business park, a centralized zone where large-scale greenhouses could be clustered and better serviced by shared infrastructure. That study remains under review, with administration expected to report back after Essex County makes its final determination on OPA 18. With Lakeshore's endorsement now in place, the revised amendment returns to Essex County Council for a final decision. If adopted, the new rules will significantly shape how and where greenhouse operations can grow within the municipality. 'This is about managing growth responsibly,' said Bailey. 'We're taking the steps necessary to ensure future development in Lakeshore is respectful of its communities and supports our long-term vision for sustainable agriculture and healthy neighbourhoods.' A final staff report with updates on the potential greenhouse business park and future implementation timelines is expected later this year. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Citi Field's casino team lobbying against Bally's ahead of key Council vote
NEW YORK — A bid to build a casino in the Bronx became the subject of dueling lobbying efforts Tuesday, hours ahead of Bally's last shot to overcome a key hurdle in the City Council. The proposal for a casino at the former Trump golf course at Ferry Point — now called Bally's Golf Links — needs an added layer of approval from the state Legislature since the site is classified as public parkland. Before Albany lawmakers can take up that measure, the Council must pass a resolution permitting the move. Bally's last shot to secure that so-called home rule message before the end of Albany's legislative session is during the Council meeting Wednesday. Cue the eleventh-hour drama. As the Bronx bidder tried to whip votes in favor of the resolution, and over the objections of the local lawmaker representing the area, the team behind a competing casino bid backed by Mets owner Steve Cohen embarked on a lobbying effort of its own, according to several people familiar with the calls. 'Their large army of lobbyists is going very hard,' said one Council member familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to speak freely. Council Member Kristy Marmorato, who represents the area, presents a major challenge for Bally's: She is resisting its plans for a gaming facility in her district, according to people familiar with her position. That's made the company's effort to win over some of her fellow lawmakers more difficult, as they'd be breaching unwritten protocol by overriding a colleague on a local matter, the people said. Marmorato did not return requests for comment. Karl Rickett, a spokesperson for Metropolitan Park — the name of Cohen's proposed complex at Citi Field, which would include a casino — declined to comment. Meanwhile, other Council members have expressed reservations that if Bally's won a casino license, it would have to pay $115 million to the Trump Organization, per the companies' purchase agreement reported by the New York Times. Bally's is one of eight bidders competing for one of three New York City-area casino licenses. The field has narrowed in recent months as other bidders — including Related Companies, which had planned a gaming facility at Hudson Yards — have scrapped casino plans amid political headwinds. Late into Tuesday evening, the Council still lacked enough votes to approve the home rule for Bally's, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. That could change by the time the Council is scheduled to vote on Wednesday, and Bally's team was working Tuesday to turn around its fortunes. The state legislative session ends on Thursday, and casino applications are due to the state by June 27. The home rule resolution would simply allow the state Legislature to act, rather than automatically guaranteeing the allowance of a casino on the site. Bally's needs a separate city land use approval to compete in the state-led licensing process. The Metropolitan Park proposal recently won its required state parkland measure, known as alienation, in Albany. A Bally's spokesperson did not return a request for comment on its competitor's lobbying push.