logo
Singapore relationship with UK is ‘one of certainty' amid global disruption: Melvyn Ong

Singapore relationship with UK is ‘one of certainty' amid global disruption: Melvyn Ong

Straits Times6 days ago

British F-35B fighter jets and Royal Navy Merlin helicopters on the flight deck of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales on June 24. ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG
SINGAPORE – The Republic's relationship with the United Kingdom is one of certainty as 'the world around us loses their heads,' said permanent secretary for defence development Melvyn Ong.
Amid the geopolitical uncertainties and the disruptions in the world, it is important to try to find this in relationships, said Mr Ong at the opening of a defence industry trade show on board the UK aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales.
Mr Ong, a former defence chief, said: 'The certainty in our relationship with the UK is one such thing that we continue to rely on, and the fact that we're able to stand here as the world around us loses their heads, is testimony to abiding friendship and abiding relationships and abiding trust.'
Some 30 UK businesses were gathered in the cavernous hangar of the 284m-long vessel – the flagship of a multinational UK-led strike group, which docked at the Marina Bay Cruise Centre on June 23.
The group is on an eight-month deployment to ensure the stability of the Indo-Pacific called Operation Highmast, which departed from Britain in April, with the ships sailing from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
Also speaking at the opening, British Minister of State for Defence, Lord Vernon Coaker, said the carrier's hangar makes an ideal setting to showcase some of the UK and Singapore's world leading technology and the innovation of their defence companies.
This event falls in the same month that the UK published a strategic defence review, which names Singapore as a key partner, he noted.
He said: '(This) reflects our commitment to developing our defence cooperation and inter-operability as Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA) partners. The review makes clear that our policy of Nato first does not mean Nato only.'
Singapore and the UK, along with Malaysia, New Zealand and Australia, are members of the FPDA, which will convene for the annual Bersama Lima drills in September. The HMS Prince of Wales is scheduled to join the exercise – the first aircraft carrier to do so since 1997.
The visit is a rare opportunity for the industry and new technology companies to represent themselves, said Mr Marcus Ralphs, enterprise commercial lead for Whitespace, an artificial intelligence (AI) company whose technology is being used on the HMS Prince of Wales.
The company provides an AI platform for organisations with higher security needs, like militaries.
The visit is is hugely valuable to show that UK and Singapore industry players can partner effectively not just as individual companies but collectively, he said on the sidelines of the event.
Ms Natasha Pheiffer, regional managing director for British multinational aerospace, defence, and security company BAE Systems, said the company is very pleased to contribute to the carrier strike group's deployment and the visit to Singapore.
British F-35B fighter jets on the flight deck of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales, docked at the Marina Bay Cruise Centre on June 24, 2025.
ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG
She said: 'With world-class equipment across the fleet, we had the opportunity to promote our capability to our colleagues and friends in Singapore and beyond.'
British Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Peter Kyle said at the sidelines of the event that the UK is here to show its partners around the world that British companies are available for them to partner with as well.
He said: 'When you look at the global economy, the high growth sectors: space automation, AI, health technology, climate technology, drones – these are all areas where Singapore has real expertise, and Britain is leading the world in many of these areas. So there are some great opportunities for us to come together and fully seize the moment.'
Some work is already being done ahead of the drills in September.
Speaking to the media at a doorstop earlier that day, the commander of the carrier strike group, Commodore James Blackmore, said he is meeting senior leaders from the Republic of Singapore Navy on this visit.
He said: 'We increasingly recognise that as we go forward, the two navies need to be able to operate together.'
(From left) Captain Will Blackett, Commodore James Blackmore and Captain Colin McGannity speaking to the press on the flight deck of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales, docked at the Marina Bay Cruise Centre.
ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG
Some preparations are happening during this deployment, he added.
This will allow the two countries to bring their navies together when the carrier is back for Bersama Lima, he said.
He said: 'That's where we'll see all of those five navies coming together and air forces and working seamlessly during that exercise, that then gives us the confidence that we know we can all dock in and work together.'
The carrier is set to leave Singapore on June 29.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cayman Islands' same-sex civil partnership law upheld by UK court
Cayman Islands' same-sex civil partnership law upheld by UK court

Straits Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Cayman Islands' same-sex civil partnership law upheld by UK court

LONDON - A Cayman Islands' law legalising same-sex civil partnerships was upheld by a London court on Monday, after a long-running legal battle, in a ruling hailed by campaigners. London's Privy Council, the final court of appeal for the British overseas territory, rejected an appeal that had argued the Caribbean islands' governor had no right to enact the bill, after lawmakers had rejected similar legislation. The change in the law came in 2020 following a landmark court case brought by a lesbian couple - Caymanian lawyer Chantelle Day and her partner Vickie Bodden Bush, a nurse - after they were refused permission to marry. While the Cayman Islands' courts ultimately ruled that the right to marry extended only to opposite-sex couples, they said that same-sex couples were entitled to legal protection "which is functionally equivalent to marriage". A bill was brought to parliament to put that protection into law, but lawmakers rejected it in July 2020 by nine votes to eight. Then-governor Martyn Roper then enacted the Civil Partnership Law that September, allowing same-sex civil partnerships, saying the action had to be taken to uphold human rights. Kattina Anglin, a lawyer based in the Cayman Islands, argued that Roper did not have the power to introduce the law under the Cayman Islands' constitution. But her case was rejected by the islands' courts and her final appeal was dismissed by the Privy Council. Campaign group Colours Caribbean, which backs the right for same-sex unions, said the ruling "brings much needed clarity that our Bill of Rights is enforceable regardless of the will of a majority in Parliament". Anglin's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside normal working hours. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

UK campaign group Palestine Action to challenge government ban
UK campaign group Palestine Action to challenge government ban

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

UK campaign group Palestine Action to challenge government ban

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather in protest against Britain's Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's plans to proscribe the \"Palestine Action\" group in the coming weeks, in London, Britain, June 23, 2025. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy/ File Photo LONDON - Pro-Palestinian campaign organisation Palestine Action said on Monday it had initiated legal proceedings to challenge the British government's intention to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. The proscription - expected to be laid before parliament on Monday - would make it a criminal offence to belong to the group, and was announced days after its activists damaged two British military planes in protest at London's support for Israel. Palestine Action previously condemned the government's move, calling it "an unhinged reaction", and said that London's High Court had granted the group an urgent hearing on Friday to consider permission for a legal challenge to the proscription. The group is seeking a court order to prevent the government from proscribing the group pending its case being heard, Palestine Action said. It includes written statements from human rights experts at Amnesty International and others that have expressed concerns "about the unlawful misuse of anti-terror measures to criminalise dissent". "The court's decision to grant an urgent hearing this week is indicative of the vital importance of what is at stake in this case, including the far-reaching implications any proscription of Palestine Action would have on fundamental freedoms of speech, expression and assembly in Britain," co-founder of Palestine Action, Huda Ammori, said. Under British law, the Home Secretary can proscribe a group if it is believed it commits, encourages or "is otherwise concerned in terrorism". The ban would put Palestine Action on a par with Hamas, al-Qaeda or ISIS under British law. The Home Office declined to comment on Palestine Action's legal challenge. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper previously said the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage" and that the government would not tolerate those who put national security at risk. Palestine Action has regularly targeted British sites connected to Israeli defence firm Elbit Systems as well as other companies in Britain linked to Israel since the start of the conflict in Gaza in 2023. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump says not offering Iran ‘anything', nor speaking to them
Trump says not offering Iran ‘anything', nor speaking to them

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says not offering Iran ‘anything', nor speaking to them

US President Donald Trump said he was not offering Iran anything nor talking to it. PHOTO: REUTERS Trump says not offering Iran 'anything', nor speaking to them WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said on June 30 he was not offering Iran anything nor talking to it 'since we totally obliterated' the country's nuclear facilities. 'I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama,' Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'Nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.' The statement comes as Iran's deputy foreign minister told the BBC that talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran. Mr Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality,' said Mr Takht-Ravanchi. 'Right now we are seeking an answer to this question. Are we going to see a repetition of an act of aggression while we are engaging in dialogue?' The US needs to be 'quite clear on this very important question', he said. The two countries were in talks over Tehran's nuclear programme when Israel hit Iranian nuclear sites and military infrastructure in June , with the US joining by bombing three nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan – on June 21. The deputy minister revealed to the BBC that the US had signalled it did 'not want to engage in regime change' by targeting Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Mr Takht-Ravanchi also said Iran should still be allowed to enrich uranium. 'The level of that can be discussed, the capacity can be discussed, but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment, and if you do not agree, we will bomb you, that is the law of the jungle,' he said. Israel claims that Iran's nuclear programme is close to producing a bomb, whereas Tehran says it is for peaceful purposes. It is not clear yet how much damage the strikes inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities, which Mr Trump has said were 'totally obliterated'. UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said Iran would probably be able to begin to produce enriched uranium 'in a matter of months'. Mr Takht-Ravanchi said he did not know how long it would take. Under a 2015 deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium below 3.67 per cent purity for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. Mr Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran responded by producing uranium enriched to 60 percent – above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store