‘No basis': Pilot groups reject claims of human error in Air India crash
Two groups of commercial pilots have rejected claims that human error caused an Air India plane crash that killed 260 people after a preliminary investigation found the aircraft's engine fuel switches had been turned off.
The Indian Commercial Pilots Association (ICPA) and the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA India) issued statements on Sunday after the release of the initial findings, which showed that fuel control switches to the engines of Flight AI171 were moved from the 'run' to the 'cutoff' position moments before last month's deadly impact.
The report sparked speculation by several independent aviation experts that deliberate or inadvertent pilot action may have caused the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner to crash soon after takeoff from Ahmedabad in western India.
Flight AI171 was headed to London's Gatwick Airport when it crashed on June 12.
The report on the crash, issued on Saturday by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the disaster but indicated that one pilot asked the other why he cut off the fuel and the second pilot responded that he had not.
After the switches flipped, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner immediately began to lose thrust and altitude, according to the report.
One pilot can be heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he had cut off the fuel. 'The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report said.
It did not identify which remarks were made by the flight's captain and which by the first officer or which pilot transmitted 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday' just before the crash.
No more details about the cockpit dialogue between the pilots were revealed.
The ICPA said it was 'deeply disturbed by speculative narratives, … particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide'.
'There is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage,' it said in a statement. 'It is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved.
'To casually suggest pilot suicide without verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession.' The ICPA was referring to a number of aviation experts suggesting engine fuel control switches can only be moved deliberately and manually.
United States-based aviation safety expert John Cox earlier said a pilot would not be able to accidentally move the fuel switches that feed the engines. 'You can't bump them and they move,' he told the Reuters news agency.
ALPA India, which has 800 members, also accused the investigative agency of 'secrecy' surrounding the investigation, saying 'suitably qualified personnel' were not involved in it.
'We feel that the investigation is being driven in a direction presuming the guilt of pilots and we strongly object to this line of thought,' ALPA India President Sam Thomas said in a statement issued on Saturday.
ALPA requested the AAIB be included as 'observers so as to provide the requisite transparency in the investigations'.
Meanwhile, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the probe into last month's crash is far from over and it is unwise to jump to any premature conclusions.
Wilson added: 'The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations, so I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over.'
The crash killed all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US government employee barred from leaving China, Washington says
A United States government employee has been prevented from leaving China after visiting the country for personal reasons, Washington has said. The employee of the US Patent and Trademark Office, an agency within the US Department of Commerce, was subject to an 'exit ban' while travelling in China in a 'personal capacity', the US Department of State said on Monday. 'The Department of State has no higher priority than the safety and security of American citizens,' a State Department spokesperson said in a statement. 'We are tracking this case very closely and are engaged with Chinese officials to resolve the situation as quickly as possible.' The statement comes after The Washington Post on Sunday reported that a Chinese-American man employed by the US Commerce Department was barred from leaving China after failing to disclose his work for the government on a visa application. The report, which cited four unnamed people familiar with the matter, said the employee had travelled to China several months ago to visit family. The Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post on Sunday reported that the man, a naturalised US citizen, was detained in Chengdu, Sichuan, in April over 'actions Beijing deemed harmful to national security'. The Post's report cited an unnamed 'source familiar with the matter'. The Chinese Embassy in Washington, DC, referred Al Jazeera to remarks made by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson, Guo Jiakun, on Monday, in which he said he had 'no details to share' on the case. 'China upholds the rule of law and handles entry and exit affairs in accordance with the law,' Guo said at a regular media briefing. Washington's confirmation of the exit ban comes after Beijing on Monday said it had blocked the departure of a US citizen employed by the banking giant Wells Fargo. China's Foreign Ministry said that Chenyue Mao, an Atlanta-based managing director, was subject to an exit ban due to her involvement in an unspecified criminal case. Washington and Beijing have long traded accusations of espionage and meddling in each other's domestic affairs. On Monday, the US Department of Justice said that a Chinese-born US researcher had pleaded guilty to stealing trade secrets, including blueprints for infrared sensors designed to detect nuclear missile launches and track ballistic missiles. Prosecutors said Chenguang Gong, a dual US-Chinese citizen, transferred more than 3,600 company files to his personal storage devices during his employment with a Los Angeles-based research and development firm. Before taking up work with the company, Gong had travelled to China several times to seek funding to develop technology with military applications, prosecutors said.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump administration declassifies Martin Luther King Jr assassination files
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has released more than 230,000 pages of files relating to the 1968 assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. In a statement issued on Monday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard called the release 'unprecedented' and cited the president's commitment to 'complete transparency'. Trump signed an executive order after taking office, declassifying documents relating to the assassinations of King, former President John F Kennedy and former Senator Robert F Kennedy. King's records had been under a court-imposed seal since 1977, when the FBI first gathered them and turned them over to the National Archives and Records Administration. The National Archives released records from John F Kennedy's November 1963 assassination in March and files related to the June 1968 murder of Robert F Kennedy in April. King was assassinated in April 1968 in Memphis, Tennessee. James Earl Ray was convicted of the murder and died in prison in 1998, but King's children have expressed doubts that he was the assassin. His family, including his two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, were given advance notice of the release and had their own teams reviewing the records ahead of the public disclosure. Those efforts continued even as the government unveiled the digital trove. In a lengthy statement released on Monday, the King children called their father's assassination a 'captivating public curiosity for decades'. But the pair emphasised the personal nature of the matter and urged that 'these files must be viewed within their full historical context'. During his lifetime, the civil rights leader had been the target of an 'invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign' orchestrated by then-FBI director J Edgar Hoover, they said in a joint statement. The FBI campaign was intended to 'discredit, dismantle and destroy Dr. King's reputation and the broader American Civil Rights Movement,' they said. 'These actions were not only invasions of privacy, but intentional assaults on the truth.' It was not immediately clear on Monday whether the release would shed any new light on King's life, the civil rights movement or his murder. Timing of release raises eyebrows Besides fulfilling the intent of his January executive order, the latest release serves as another alternative headline for Trump as he tries to mollify supporters angry over his administration's handling of records concerning the sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself behind bars while awaiting trial in 2019, during Trump's first presidency. Trump last Friday ordered the Department of Justice to release the grand jury testimony but stopped short of unsealing the entire case file. On social media, users accused the administration of releasing King's files as an attempt to distract from criticisms over its handling of the Epstein files. This is shameful. Instead of honoring the Trump administration's promise to release the Epstein files, DNI Tulsi Gabbard is trying to distract the public by dredging up discredited FBI smears against Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., against his family's wishes. Weaponizing… — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) July 21, 2025 Bernice King and Martin Luther King III did not mention Trump in their statement on Monday. As of late Monday afternoon, the administration had not commented on the release. The King records were initially intended to be sealed until 2027, until Justice Department lawyers in June asked a federal judge to lift the sealing order ahead of its expiration date.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Microsoft cyberattack hits 100 organisations, security firms say
A sweeping cyber espionage operation targeting Microsoft server software has compromised about 100 different organisations over the weekend. Two of the organisations that helped uncover the attack announced their findings on Monday. On Saturday, Microsoft issued an alert about 'active attacks' on self-hosted SharePoint servers, which are widely used by organisations to share documents and collaborate within others. SharePoint instances run off of Microsoft servers were unaffected. Dubbed a 'zero-day' because it leverages a previously undisclosed digital weakness, the hacks allow spies to penetrate vulnerable servers and potentially drop a backdoor to secure continuous access to victim organisations. Vaisha Bernard, the chief hacker at Eye Security, a Netherlands-based cybersecurity firm which discovered the hacking campaign targeting one of its clients on Friday, said that an internet scan carried out with the Shadowserver Foundation had uncovered nearly 100 victims altogether – and that was before the technique behind the hack was widely known. 'It's unambiguous,' Bernard said. 'Who knows what other adversaries have done since to place other backdoors.' He declined to identify the affected organisations, saying that the relevant national authorities had been notified. The Shadowserver Foundation confirmed the 100 figure and said that most of those affected were in the United States and Germany and that the victims included government organisations. Another researcher said that, so far, the spying appeared to be the work of a single hacker or set of hackers. 'It's possible that this will quickly change,' said Rafe Pilling, director of threat intelligence at Sophos, a British cybersecurity firm. A Microsoft spokesperson said in an emailed statement that it had 'provided security updates and encourages customers to install them'. It was not clear who was behind the ongoing hack. The FBI said on Sunday it was aware of the attacks and was working closely with its federal and private-sector partners, but offered no other details. Britain's National Cyber Security Centre said in a statement that it was aware of 'a limited number' of targets in the United Kingdom. A researcher tracking the hacks said that the campaign appeared initially aimed at a narrow set of government-related organisations. Potential targets The pool of potential targets remains vast. According to data from Shodan, a search engine that helps to identify internet-linked equipment, more than 8,000 servers online could theoretically have already been compromised by hackers. Those servers include major industrial firms, banks, auditors, healthcare companies and several US state-level and international government entities. 'The SharePoint incident appears to have created a broad level of compromise across a range of servers globally,' said Daniel Card of British cybersecurity consultancy, PwnDefend. 'Taking an assumed breach approach is wise, and it's also important to understand that just applying the patch isn't all that is required here.' On Wall Street, Microsoft's stock is about even with the market open as of 3pm in New York (19:00 GMT), up by only 0.06 percent, and has gone up more than 1.5 percent over the last five days of trading.
