
Inside Kelly Services Tech And AI Journey With CIO Sean Perry
Sean Perry, Chief Information Officer of Kelly Services, oversees global technology for a company dedicated to connecting job seekers with opportunities across multiple sectors. "We help people on a daily basis find meaningful work," Perry shared. "To be able to leverage technology to deliver that is something that has been a great enjoyment throughout my career."
Kelly Services has a diversified portfolio, including professional and industrial staffing as well as fast-growing education, science, engineering and technology sectors. The company generates approximately $4.3 billion in annual revenue. Under Perry's leadership, the company is driving forward with a modernization initiative that updates legacy systems and integrates cutting-edge solutions, all while preserving the company's mission of making work accessible and fulfilling.
A CIO's Strategy for Long-Term Tech Evolution
Perry's purview encompasses every aspect of global technology at Kelly. "If it plugs in and it's not working, it's IT," he joked. But his responsibilities go much deeper, focusing on long-term modernization during a time of rapid technological transformation. 'We're trying to make good decisions that'll last 10 years,' he explained. 'What worked four years ago isn't necessarily going to help us today.'
A core focus has been integrating recently acquired companies. "Engaging those acquisitions and bringing them onto the Kelly core eliminates friction," Perry said. "We're also rethinking our applicant tracking, CRM and ERP systems, tools that have existed for a long time and now need modernization."
Learning from Acquisitions and Building Stronger Foundations
Kelly's acquisition of Motion Recruitment in April 2024 exemplifies the CIO's open approach to innovation. Perry praised Motion for its forward-thinking architecture when he said, 'They had implemented Workday, connected it to Bullhorn and added a CRM. It was a fresh, modern tech stack.'
Kelly CIO Sean Perry
Rather than enforcing top-down integration, Perry emphasized mutual learning. 'The 'Kelly Core' might need to change to accommodate this more capable technology,' he noted. He acknowledged challenges in scaling a system designed for a smaller private equity-backed company but noted that 'the Core is all there,' providing a leg up in their transformation journey.Institutionalizing AI through Governance and Grace
AI has become a key enabler of Kelly's modernization. Perry described the AI Council's three-pronged approach: legal and compliance, external opportunity scouting and internal process evaluation. 'You had this sea of change coming in,' he said, 'and the Council had already built a model for how to assess and measure opportunities.'
One of the most impactful outputs was Grace, a lightweight AI interface built internally. 'We support close to 5,000 users on about $700 a month of AI spend,' Perry revealed. Grace allows employees across the organization to experiment with AI without needing individual accounts. It also collects data to surface popular use cases. 'For example, reformatting a resume is a common task,' he offered. 'We built that functionality directly into Grace.'
The Power of Contextual AI and Emerging Opportunities
Perry is now spearheading an initiative to embed AI contextually into SaaS applications used by Kelly. 'Grace as a separate website was a good first step,' he said. 'But now we're working on embedding it in the actual tools people use, like Bullhorn or Workday.'
The goal is to eliminate friction—copying and pasting between systems—and to deliver assistance at the moment it's needed. 'Shouldn't AI work like a digital adoption platform? Always available and in context?' Perry asked. The prototype, already demonstrated internally, is aimed at providing proactive, intelligent support across platforms.
Reflections from Amazon and a Product-Led IT Mindset
Perry had prior CIO experience, spending 13 years as the CIO of Robert Half International. In between that experience and his current role, however, he spent took an unusual turn as Senior Manager of Technical Program Management at Amazon. Perry's time at Amazon left a lasting impression. Working on both Kindle and Halo, a health and fitness tracking service and devices that was discontinued in 2023, he learned the discipline of customer-centric product development that company is famous for. "Amazon taught me to step back and ask, 'What's the customer problem I'm trying to solve?' rather than 'What feature should I build next?'
He has since brought that philosophy to internal product development at Kelly, introducing planning processes inspired by Amazon's OP1 methodology. "We had each team write six-page documents about their wins, challenges and priorities," he said, highlighting another famous practice that Jeff Bezos introduced at Amazon years ago. "It surfaced common pain points and helped us align more effectively."
A Future Fueled by AI and Human Potential
Looking ahead, Perry is excited about the rapid evolution of AI. 'Capabilities that seemed impossible six months ago are now within reach,' he said. But he's mindful of the uneven distribution of understanding and success with AI. 'Some developers are building full-stack solutions with AI in hours while others are still struggling to fix bugs introduced by AI-generated code.'
Ultimately, Perry is betting big on context-aware AI. 'We're discovering use cases everywhere, even in internal audit,' he noted. 'Now we have more justification to invest because we can see real usage and value. Our challenge is how quickly we can move from prototype to production because the potential to empower our workforce is enormous.'
Peter High is President of Metis Strategy, a business and IT advisory firm. He has written three bestselling books, including his latest Getting to Nimble. He also moderates the Technovation podcast series and speaks at conferences around the world. Follow him on Twitter @PeterAHigh.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of benefiting from billions in U.S. government contracts while paying little to no federal taxes. Warren Accuses Musk Of Dodging Taxes On Monday, Warren took to X, formerly Twitter, and said that "Elon Musk's SpaceX is worth over $350 BILLION – after receiving billions in government contracts – but could be paying LESS in taxes than you." She blamed Donald Trump's tax reforms, saying Republicans "rigged the tax code with loopholes for billionaire corporations" and demanded "no more corporate handouts." Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Her remarks followed a New York Times report that SpaceX has avoided paying federal income tax on about $5 billion in taxable income since its founding in 2002 by using a legal tax strategy known as a net operating loss carryforward. The provision, expanded indefinitely under Trump in 2017, lets companies offset future income with earlier losses. Musk Previously Defended Tesla's Tax Strategy Musk currently has a net worth of $375 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index, making him the wealthiest individual on Earth. In February earlier this year, Musk and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) VP of Finance Sendil Palani denied claims that Tesla evaded taxes, saying that the company legally carried forward past losses under IRS provisions. At the time, Musk acknowledged Tesla didn't pay U.S. federal income tax for several years, including 2024, since most profits come from overseas sales, but highlighted the need for comprehensive tax reform to address excessive Revenue Soars, Taxes Stay Low Documents reviewed by the publication show that more than 75% of SpaceX's revenue in 2020 and 2021 came from federal contracts. Despite that reliance on taxpayers, SpaceX paid only minimal taxes — including $483,000 to foreign governments and $78,000 in state taxes in 2021. SpaceX's business is also booming. Revenue is expected to reach $15.5 billion in 2025, double the $7.4 billion reported in 2023. Starlink, its satellite internet service, now generates more revenue than its rocket division, with 2.5 million users and $8 billion in 2023 sales. Warren Broadens Criticism Of Musk Warren has previously also targeted Musk over what she describes as conflicts of interest and misuse of government influence. In June, her office released a report titled "130 Days of Elon Musk," alleging more than 100 abuses of power during his time as a Trump administration adviser. She has also criticized the Pentagon for awarding Musk's AI startup xAI a $200 million contract just days after its chatbot Grok was caught making antisemitic remarks. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo Courtesy: Sheila Fitzgerald On UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc.
Key Points Quantum computing offer an intriguing opportunity given its potential to revolutionize many industries. D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. are early-stage businesses with promising innovations. However, both companies are seeing volatile sales across quarters, and neither is profitable. 10 stocks we like better than D-Wave Quantum › The quantum computing sector offers an exciting new area to invest in. Quantum machines can perform sophisticated calculations beyond the capabilities of current classical computers. This tech could transform industries such as medicine and artificial intelligence. But among the bevy of businesses in the field, which are worthwhile long-term investments as the nascent industry grows? Two to consider are D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) and Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT), which also refers to itself as QCi. Between D-Wave and QCi, one looks like the better quantum computing stock. Read on for an exploration of both businesses to understand which one and why. Untangling D-Wave Quantum's business performance D-Wave produces income primarily through subscriptions to its quantum systems via the cloud and professional services to support customers in the use of its technology. In 2025, D-Wave's sales have been on a roller coaster. It generated $15 million in the first quarter after selling one of its quantum computers. In Q2, revenue was $3.1 million, a 42% increase from 2024's $2.2 million as the company picked up $1 million to upgrade the device sold in the first quarter. This sales volatility could continue for some time as D-Wave grows its business. An encouraging sign is 92% year-over-year growth in its Q2 bookings to $1.3 million. Bookings represent customer orders received in the quarter that are expected to produce revenue when the orders are fulfilled. However, D-Wave isn't turning a profit. Its Q2 operating loss of $26.5 million was a 42% increase from the previous year. That's a concerning trend given its Q2 revenue of just $3.1 million. Fortunately, D-Wave has stockpiled a record high $819.3 million in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet. It exited Q2 with total assets of $843.6 million versus total liabilities of $149.3 million. This enables the company to maintain operations in the short term on its path to revenue growth. Quantum Computing Inc.'s budding business QCi uses light particles, called photons, to perform calculations in its quantum computer chips. It sells these chips, other hardware, and professional services to generate revenue. The company is in an early stage of its business lifecycle with sales coming primarily from research grants and proof-of-concept projects. As a result, its sales are small, and prone to substantial swings. For example, in 2024, QCi generated revenue of $373,000, a 4% year-over-year increase. But through the first half of 2025, sales plunged 52% to $100,000. QCi's technology has the potential to generate long-term revenue growth. Photons can be used in a wide range of light sensing, imaging, and other optical applications. Nevertheless, until QCi can gain traction with a larger group of customers, sales will continue to struggle. And that does not bode well for its business viability, because the company is not profitable. The company exited Q2 with an operating loss of $10.2 million against revenue of $61,000 as research and development costs more than doubled year over year to $6 million. QCi's saving grace is that, like D-Wave, it amassed a large war chest to fund operations in the short term. Q2 total assets were $426.1 million with cash and equivalents of $348.8 million. Total liabilities in the quarter were $30.1 million. Deciding between D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. In choosing between D-Wave Quantum or QCi, an important consideration is share price valuation. Since both are not profitable, the way to get at this is using the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue generated over the trailing 12 months. The chart shows QCi's P/S multiple is far above D-Wave's, and the disparity is so great, QCi shares look overpriced. Consequently, D-Wave stock is the better value. This, combined with promising sales and bookings growth, makes D-Wave a more attractive investment than its rival. At QCi's current phase of development, it's a highly speculative stock given the low revenue, high costs, and limited commercial sales. This doesn't mean D-Wave shares are a bargain, since its sales multiple is quite high as well. Another factor to consider is that the quantum computing industry is in its early stages. Quantum computers are prone to calculation errors, because the atomic particles in these machines are sensitive to the slightest environmental disturbances, such as a minor temperature change. So while D-Wave is the better choice versus QCi, any investment in a pure-play quantum computer company is a risk. And it could take years before a scalable quantum device is possible. Some estimates predict that won't happen until 2040. Given these factors, only investors with a high risk tolerance should consider investing in D-Wave. Should you invest $1,000 in D-Wave Quantum right now? Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,466!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,633!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,077% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc. was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lowe's to buy Foundation Building Materials for $8.8 billion to boost contractor business
(Reuters) -Lowe's Cos said on Wednesday it has agreed to buy interior building products distributor Foundation Building Materials for nearly $8.8 billion, stepping up its expansion into the professional builder market. Shares of the home improvement chain rose 4.3% in premarket trading as the company also beat second-quarter profit estimates. Lowe's and rival Home Depot are leaning on deals to bolster their businesses that serve contractors and builders, a key growth area, amid softness in the do-it-yourself segment. Lowe's acquired Artisan Design for $1.33 billion in April, while Home Depot in late June decided to buy specialty building products distributor GMS for about $4.3 billion. The company raised its total annual sales forecast to a range of $84.5 billion to $85.5 billion, compared to its prior expectation of $83.5 to $84.5 billion. It earned $4.33 per share on an adjusted basis in the quarter, exceeding estimates of $4.24, according to data compiled by LSEG. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data