Villagers in Welsh beauty spot win battle to get £40,000 fence dubbed the 'Great Wall of Clydach' knocked down
The 200-metre long six-foot high steel fence, dubbed the 'Great Wall of Clydach', was installed within Brecon Beacons National Park in April.
It was put up by the council at a cost of £40,000 to block access to the road amid fears the face of Gilwern mountain could collapse on cars and pedestrians.
Now County Hall officials have agreed to take down the fence - and will spend another £20,000 for its removal.
The roadside structure, nearby to the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Blaenavon, was widely criticised for blocking views of the surrounding idyllic mountains and valleys.
Locals described the fence, made of galvanised steel with sharp spikes on top, as 'disgusting' and slammed the council for a lack of public consultation.
Clive Thomas, who was born in Clydath, told MailOnline: 'We've got a lovely back garden, and it's just an eyesore. When the sun is on it and everything, it just looks out of place.'
Meanwhile, long-term resident Simon Elliott ,said: 'There was no consultation with anyone. The fence has been put up with no understanding at all of what the area is.
'All it needed was a low-level fencing to stop any cattle or people going over the edge into the quarry.'
Local fury at the 'Great Wall' even prompted more than 120 villagers to gather at Clydach village hall in protest.
During a heated meeting in late April, residents insisted that the fence was a safety hazard, with abseilers using it to tie their ropes to.
Expressing her outrage, local resident Marit Meredith said: 'We weren't consulted about the fence at all.
'It's been noted that climbers are using the fence to fasten their ropes to which is unsafe.
'It's the appearance and it could cause an accident. It's over two metres high. Abseilers, they could actually kill themselves.'
Ms Meredith also alleged there were peregrine falcons - a rare species of bird - nesting below the fence, which were being 'disturbed' by its presence.
However, officials at the time insisted that the fence was designed to be a nine-month temporary measure.
They also claimed that it had been erected along along Pwll Du Road, which has been closed to traffic for five years, over legitimate fears it could collapse imminently.
It came after a rockfall in 2023 led to a council report that suggested the path should be closed off to both people and vehicles.
A highways chief further explained that while planning permission was not required for the fence, the national park had been informed.
Now, Monmouthshire County Council has agreed to remove the fence and replace it with a shorter structure that will 'blend in' with the surroundings.
Stock proof fencing is set to be used instead, with the posts at either end of the road set to be reduced in height and painted a 'suitable colour'.
Simon Howarth, an independent county councillor, said he was pleased with the council's U-turn decision, but added that 'we shouldn't have got here' and that the huge costs could have been avoided.
He added: 'Overall we are where we should have started, but around £50,000 to £70,000 worse off.'
Cllr Howarth also said he was glad that the council were intending to allow access to the backside of the fence, between it and to the mountainside for cyclists and pedestrians.
A Monmouthshire County Council spokesman said: 'Following a positive meeting, the local community and the council agreed with the proposal to reduce the height of the back line of the palisade fencing, replacing it with stock proof fencing and painting the reveals and pillars with a suitable colour to blend in with the landscape.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Police pay rise: Officers' salary to increase 4.2% in England and Wales
Police officers are set to get a 4.2 per cent pay rise for police officers in England and Wales. The increased salary, which has been approved by the government, will apply to all ranks up to and including chief superintendent. It will also be backed by £120 million of extra funding from the Home Office. The Police Federation said the pay award 'barely treads water' with the current rate of inflation and equates to 'a Big Mac per shift'. The pay rise puts the starting salary for a police constable at £31,163, typically going up to £50,257 after six years, while the average salary for a chief superintendent will be £98,500. Allowances for on-call, away from home and hardship will increase by £10 and London weighting will go up by 4.2 per cent. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Our brave police officers work day and night, often making enormous sacrifices, to keep us safe. 'This government is proud to back them in doing so and today's pay award is a clear signal of our gratitude, and our determination to ensure they are properly rewarded for their service.' Brian Booth, deputy national chairman of the Police Federation, said: 'Today's pay award of 4.2% barely treads water, with inflation currently at 4.1%. 'We note that chief constables argued for a pay rise of just 3.8%. We welcome the government's decision to reject that position and instead listen to the strong case we have been making on behalf of police officers across the country. 'However, after more than a decade of real terms pay cuts, this award does little to reverse the long-term decline in officers' living standards or address the crisis policing faces. 'A pay rise worth the price of a Big Mac per shift won't stop record levels of resignations, record mental health absences, or the record number of assaults on officers.' The federation, which represents more than 145,000 officers, will now ask its members whether they want to accept or reject the award. The National Police Chiefs' Council's lead for pay and conditions, Philip Wells, said: 'We are pleased that the pay review body recognised the evidence that was presented by chief constables and the pay award that has been announced today is what we believe our officers deserve and reflects the nature of the work they are required to undertake to keep our streets safe. 'Today the Home Secretary also announced an extra £120 million towards funding the pay award. 'With more than 85% of police spend being on pay costs, it is vitally important that additional costs for pay are fully funded if we are to maintain services and be able to continue to invest in areas such as neighbourhood policing and technology.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on statues: new monuments reflect changing values and reinvigorate the public realm
Efforts to ensure that modern values are reflected in public sculpture began well before the Black Lives Matter protests five years ago. Those demonstrations saw the statue of the Bristol slave trader Edward Colston dragged from its pedestal and dumped in the harbour, while multiple Confederate monuments were removed from cities in the southern US. Statues in Britain have gradually reflected evolving social values. A statue of the suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst was unveiled in Westminster in 1930, two years after women were finally granted the vote on equal terms to men. Nelson Mandela joined Winston Churchill in Parliament Square in 2007. The nurse Mary Seacole became the first named black, Caribbean woman to be honoured with a UK statue in 2016. In the same year, the Monumental Welsh Women campaign was established. It set itself a target of five statues, and has only one to go. But are statues of individuals out of step with democratic sensibilities? Rather than raise subscriptions to cast models of great men and women from the past, contemporary backers of public art often opt for different styles and forms – for example, the giant statue of an anonymous black woman that was recently displayed in New York's Times Square. Called Grounded in the Stars, this was the work of a British artist, Thomas J Price. In other cases, enthusiasts continue to fundraise for traditional, lifesize statues of individuals. While the vast majority of such statues in Britain represent men (many of them aristocrats), the highest-profile recent campaigns have been for memorials of women. According to the Public Statues and Sculpture Association, there are currently 147 statues of named, non-royal women. Among them is Jane Taylor, who wrote the lullaby Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star, and since last year has stood with her sister Ann on the high street in Colchester, Essex. Another is Mary Anning, the pioneering fossil hunter, who can be seen striding towards the seafront with her dog in Lyme Regis, Dorset. In Brighton, the Mary Clarke statue appeal aims to erect a statue of this overlooked women's suffrage campaigner by the same sculptor, Denise Dutton. Clarke, who was Mrs Pankhurst's sister, died on Christmas Day 1910 after being force-fed in prison and has no memorial anywhere. Permanence can be problematic: statues erected in one era may celebrate traits later condemned. But it is refreshing to see the achievements of women celebrated, and municipal statuary become more representative of a diverse nation – and less dominated by the aristocratic and imperialist values of the past. Campaigns for new outdoor monuments are generally spearheaded by those with a strong commitment to a place as well as a person. When they succeed, these projects can boost confidence in the local public realm. Amid a tortuous debate about the statue of Cecil Rhodes in Oxford – which remains in place in spite of a lengthy campaign to remove it – Bristol's anti-Colston protesters proved that direct action can decisively alter the built environment. It also sparked an unprecedented public reckoning with the legacies of slavery in Britain in the months after – with the removal or alteration of almost 70 tributes to enslavers and colonialists. One that went was a statue of slaveholder Robert Milligan in east London. Next year, its spot will be filled with a sculpture by the artist Khaleb Brooks. Called The Wake, the bronze shell will stand as a memorial to transatlantic slavery's millions of victims. Symbolic change isn't a substitute for tackling today's inequalities. But it's still meaningful.
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Green Party members start choosing new leadership
Voting has opened in the Green Party of England and Wales leadership party co-leader Adrian Ramsay has teamed up with another MP colleague, Ellie Chowns, after Carla Denyer decided not to stand for party's 60,000-strong membership will choose between the Ramsay and Chowns ticket and the party's current deputy leader Zack Polanski, who is also a member of the London who had joined the party before midnight on Thursday can vote on the leadership between now and Saturday, 30 August, with results announced on Tuesday, 2 September. Ramsay and Chowns, a former MEP, are emphasising their "decades" of political experience and encouraging members to back them "to turn values into power".Self-described "eco-populist" Polanski has instead urged members to vote for change, with "bold leadership that can cut through" on the national stage, from a gay, Jewish leader who can help the party to "scale up and diversify".Polanski characterises the current leadership as timid, failing to take the fight to Labour and Reform UK - and of communicating in a way that "has not cut through in the way we should".Ramsay and Chowns have accused Polanski of risking the party's achievements so far, which include quadrupling their number of MPs, from one to four, and doubling their councillors over the past four years, with a "polarising, strident" a lengthy thread on X, Ramsay also suggested Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana's new as-yet-unnamed party "blows Zack Polanski's leadership pitch out of the water".Drama has flared a couple of times during campaigning, notably during an LBC interview where Ramsay struggled to say whether he liked Polanski for an agonisingly long initially said "we've worked together" before being pressed for a yes or no answer and adding: "I've enjoyed working with Zack over the last few years, of course".As interviewer Iain Dale responded "ouch", Polanski said: "I really like Adrian, so that does hurt."Pressed further, Ramsay said: "I've worked with Zack effectively, I like working with Zack, I like Zack, I don't understand what the issue is here."The Green Party holds leadership elections every two years, but last year's scheduled poll was delayed so as not to clash with the 2024 general some other parties, the leader or co-leader has less of a role in setting policy, which is voted in by the membership, and is more focused on vision, strategy and communication, "ensuring a coherent and compelling message".A Green Party spokesperson said: "Since nominations opened, the contest has engaged party members and the wider public through a series of in-person and online hustings, and media appearances."Now, paid-up party members will be electing a leadership team to take the party to a new level, offering real hope and real change as the old, failed two-party system fragments."Green members will also vote in a deputy leadership election this month, choosing either one or two candidates from a list of nine, depending on whether a single leader or two co-leaders are elected. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
