Government employees can take 60 days leave to care for elderly parents
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court reserves verdict on Delhi-NCR stray dogs case – Key updates and public reaction
Supreme Court on stray dogs: The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on the ongoing Delhi-NCR stray dogs case after a hearing on Thursday, 14 August. The matter relates to a plea challenging the earlier court order issued on 11 August, which directed the relocation of all stray dogs in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) to shelter homes. Background of the Stray Dogs Controversy On 11 August, a two-judge bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan observed that the rising number of dog bite incidents had created an 'extremely grim' situation. They ordered the permanent relocation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR 'at the earliest.' This decision triggered strong opposition from animal rights groups and residents. Following these protests, the case came before a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria, which decided to reserve the order after hearing multiple sides of the argument. Court's Concerns Over Inaction by Authorities During Thursday's hearing, the Supreme Court pointed out that the root cause of the issue lies in the inaction of local authorities in implementing the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules. The bench remarked, 'Rules are made by the Parliament, but they are not being enforced. This lack of implementation has created a situation where humans are suffering from attacks, while animal lovers are concerned about the welfare of dogs.' The court stressed the need for a balanced approach to protect both public safety and animal welfare. Withdrawal of Suo Motu Case On 13 August, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai withdrew the suo motu case on stray dogs from the bench of Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan. This allowed fresh hearings before a different bench. Government and NGO Arguments Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, criticised some individuals who publicly claim to be animal lovers but engage in contradictory behaviour. Meanwhile, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for an NGO dedicated to dog welfare, called the situation 'very serious' and sought an immediate stay on the 11 August order. PETA India's Stand The Indian branch of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) strongly opposed the order, labelling it 'impractical, illogical, and illegal.' They warned that removing community dogs from their natural surroundings could lead to 'chaos and suffering' for both the animals and residents. People's Reaction to the Supreme Court's Stray Dog Order The Supreme Court's order has sparked mixed reactions among citizens: One social media user commented, 'Whether someone eats chicken or not has nothing to do with their right to care for stray dogs. Compassion is not an all-or-nothing equation. You can consume meat and still believe in humane treatment of animals.' Another person expressed both relief and concern, saying, 'Happy and sad at the same time. Why not extend the ban to all strays, including cows?' A traveller shared, 'I've been to France, Italy, Switzerland, Japan, America, Russia, UAE, Israel, Sri Lanka, and many other countries, but I never saw street dogs there. Is there more love for them only in India?' A neutral perspective came from one user suggesting, 'Both sides are wrong. The best solution is to neuter and vaccinate dogs while building proper shelters for their gradual removal from the streets.' Another user explained, 'A reserved order means the judge has finished hearing arguments but will take time to write and deliver the final judgment later.' What Happens Next? With the order now reserved, the Supreme Court will take time to review the case details before delivering its final decision. This judgment is expected to have a significant impact on Delhi-NCR stray dog management policies, influencing both public safety and animal welfare in the region. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court reserves order on plea challenging removal of stray dogs from streets of Delhi NCR
The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (August 14, 2025) reserved its order on an interim plea seeking a stay on its August 11, 2025, suo motu directive ordering the removal of stray dogs from the capital's streets and their confinement in shelters within six to eight weeks. 'Local authorities are not doing what they should be doing. They should be here taking responsibility,' a Bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath and also comprising Sandeep Mehta and N.V. Anjaria underscored. However, the top court declined to grant a stay on the directions issued to civic bodies by a Division Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan. During the proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Union Government, said most fatalities from dog bites and rabies involved children and called for an urgent resolution to the escalating public health risk posed by stray dogs. 'Nobody is an animal hater. Children are dying. This issue needs to be resolved, not to be contested,' he said. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for an NGO which looks after dogs, said the situation was 'very serious' and the matter needed to be argued in depth. He pressed for a stay on some of the directives in the August 11 order, contending that they contravened the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, which prohibit relocation of strays from their original place of habitation. Senior advocate A.M. Singhvi, appearing for one of the petitioners, argued that the August 11, 2025, order 'puts the horse before the cart,' as there were no adequate shelters to accommodate the strays. He added that the directive contravenes earlier Supreme Court rulings mandating strict adherence to the ABC Rules, 2023, in rehabilitating stray dogs. The suo-motu case, initially heard by a Bench led by Justice J.B. Pardiwala, was later reassigned by Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai to a three-judge Bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath. On August 13, 2025, a lawyer apprised the Chief Justice of a May 9, 2024, order to treat stray canines with compassion. The CJI had agreed to list the case after this oral mentioning. Taking cognisance of increasing instances of stray dog attacks on children, including infants, Justice Pardiwala had said authorities should 'at the earliest start picking up stray dogs from all localities, more particularly the vulnerable localities of the city as well as areas on the outskirts.' However, the directive sparked widespread outrage among animal rights activists, public figures, and welfare organisations, who argued that the region lacks sufficient facilities to accommodate an estimated eight lakh stray dogs. They warned that the large-scale capture of so many animals could result in logistical chaos and lead to acts of cruelty.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
AAP leader Raghav Chadha shares video on day in the life of a Member of Parliament: ‘Day starts at 6 and ends at…'
Raghav Chadha, Aam Aadmi Party leader and Rajya Sabha MP, recently gave his followers a peek into what a normal working day looks like for him when Parliament is in session. In an Instagram reel titled 'A Day in the Life of a Member of Parliament,' he walked viewers through his schedule, which, he said, kicks off as early as 6 am. 'As a member of parliament, when the Parliament is in session, the day is full of action and activity,' he says as the video begins. The video shows him starting the morning with a steaming cup of tea and a deep dive into the day's news. Chadha says he reads seven to eight newspapers daily, from English publications like Hindustan Times, The Times of India, The Indian Express, and The Hindu to Hindi dailies including Amar Ujala, Dainik Jagran, Punjab Kesari and Hindustan. Parliament proceedings, he explained, start at 11 am with Zero Hour, where MPs get 'three uninterrupted minutes to speak' if their topic is chosen. That's followed by Question Hour from 12 to 1 pm, when ministers respond to selected questions from members. A lunch break runs from 1 to 2 pm. Post-lunch, Chadha says, 'the legislative business of the government begins,' which means bills are tabled and subjected to 'detailed discussion, dialogue and debate.' The final hour of the day is dedicated to Special Mentions, issues of urgent public importance that MPs submit in writing to be read out in the House. In the caption, he wrote: 'Our day begins before the Parliament does. A cup of chai, a stack of newspapers, and preparation for the debates ahead.' A post shared by Raghav Chadha (@raghavchadha88) The reel, which has crossed four million views, has drawn praise for its rare, behind-the-scenes look. One viewer commented, 'Always wanted to know this… thanks for such informative video.' Another wrote, 'We need our MPs to share useful knowledge like this to everyone! Very nice. Thanks!' Someone else remarked more critically, 'I guess… more than half of the MPs probably don't even know what their job is or what the purpose of attending a session is.'
