Watch: Senator Alex Padilla forcibly removed, handcuffed at Kristi Noem's news conference; Democrats call it 'shameful abuse of power'
(Source: X)
In a chaotic scene on Thursday, Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed, pushed to the ground and handcuffed during Homeland Security Secretary
Kristi Noem
's news conference in Los Angeles.
The incident was captured on video and has sparked national outrage and renewed criticism of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
The California representative interrupted Noem's event to raise questions about recent immigration raids that have triggered protests across the state and the country. Tensions flared after Noem said that federal forces were not retreating but instead planned to intensify operations to "liberate" the city from its "socialist" leadership.
'I'm Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla shouted as a Secret Service agent grabbed him by the jacket and shoved him out of the room. A scuffle ensued in the hallway, where he was seen on his knees before being pushed to the floor and restrained by several officers.
'Hands off!' he yelled during the altercation.
The Department of Homeland Security later defended the actions of officers, claiming Padilla 'chose disrespectful political theatre' and did not identify himself.
However, the video clearly shows him stating his name and position. DHS also said that Padilla 'was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply,' adding that officers 'acted appropriately.'
Padilla explained he was seeking answers about 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' after receiving no response to prior inquiries. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question… I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day labourers,' he said.
Such treatment of a sitting senator drew immediate condemnation from fellow Democrats. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called it 'despicable' and said, 'We need immediate answers to what the hell went on.' Kamala Harris described the event as 'a shameful and stunning abuse of power.'
Meanwhile, Noem later told Fox LA she had a 'great' conversation with Padilla but criticised his behaviour as inappropriate. The White House accused the senator of 'grandstanding.'
Republicans defended Noem, with House Speaker Mike Johnson accusing Padilla of 'charging' at her and suggesting the act was worthy of censure. Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress are now demanding an investigation into the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump orders 500,000 immigrants' deportation from 4 countries: ‘Get out'
The Trump administration has launched a sweeping crackdown on a key Biden-era immigration policy. The Department of Homeland Security has announced that over 500,000 immigrants, mostly from Haiti, Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, who were granted temporary legal entry under a humanitarian parole program will now be ordered to leave the United States. Show more Show less
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
US consumer sentiment jumps for first time in 2025, says UMich report; tariff pause and steady prices lift confidence
US consumer sentiment improved in June for the first time in six months, according to preliminary data released Friday by the University of Michigan, offering signs of economic stabilization as inflation remains subdued and trade tensions with China temporarily ease. The university's closely watched Consumer Sentiment Index jumped to 60.5 in June from 52.2 in May — a 16% rise that marks the sharpest increase in a year. The rebound follows five consecutive monthly declines and lifts the index from its second-lowest level in the survey's nearly 75-year history. Despite the uptick, sentiment remains down 20% compared with December 2024. "Consumers appear to have settled somewhat from the shock of the extremely high tariffs announced in April and the policy volatility seen in the weeks that followed,' said Joanne Hsu, director of the survey, AP reported. 'However, consumers still perceive wide-ranging downside risks to the economy.' The improvement comes after President Donald Trump postponed a sweeping round of tariffs on imports from roughly 60 countries in April and subsequently reached a truce with China last month. While tariffs remain elevated by historical standards, the White House has signaled a willingness to pause escalation pending further talks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like CVS Is Silent About This 87¢ ED Med – Here's the Truth Health Alliance by Friday Plans Undo The Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index — a separate metric released late last month — also showed improvement after five straight monthly declines, with analysts attributing the shift to easing fears over inflation and trade policy unpredictability. Official inflation data released earlier this week showed consumer prices rising 2.4% year-on-year in May, up slightly from 2.3% in April. While tariffs are expected to put further pressure on prices in the second half of the year, inflation remains close to the Federal Reserve's 2% target for now. Sentiment remains sharply divided along political lines. Republicans, who broadly support Trump's economic policies, continue to express stronger confidence than Democrats, whose views had been more optimistic under the Biden administration. However, sentiment improved across party lines in June, including among independents. Inflation expectations among consumers also declined in June — a development likely to be welcomed by the Federal Reserve ahead of its policy meeting next week. Economists view such expectations as a key variable in inflation dynamics, as fears of rising prices can influence wage demands and spending behavior. The Fed is widely expected to leave its benchmark short-term interest rate unchanged at approximately 4.3% when it meets next week, as policymakers monitor the evolving impact of trade policy and inflationary risks on the broader economy. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
'No specific power for President over election': Federal judge blocks Trump's executive order on voting laws; says it oversteps presidential powers
A federal judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's controversial executive order aimed at reshaping US election procedures, ruling that it likely violates the Constitution and infringes on states' authority over elections. US District Judge Denise J. Casper in Massachusetts granted a preliminary injunction against the March 25 directive, siding with a coalition of Democratic state attorneys general who argued that the order was an unconstitutional attempt to override state election laws. 'The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,' Judge Casper wrote in her ruling. Trump's order sought to enforce several sweeping changes to federal elections, including mandating documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, rejecting mail-in ballots not received by Election Day, and linking federal election grants to states' compliance with the new rules. The states challenging the order said it 'usurps the States' constitutional power and seeks to amend election law by fiat.' The Biden administration, which inherited the litigation, did not support Trump's order. However, Trump and his allies have maintained the directive is necessary to secure elections, with the White House at the time defending it as 'standing up for free, fair and honest elections.' Casper said the states had shown a 'likelihood of success' in their legal challenges and acknowledged their concerns about the administrative and financial burden the order would impose. She also noted that federal registration forms already require voters to affirm their US citizenship and that noncitizen voting is already illegal under federal law. This marks the second judicial blow to Trump's order. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., had earlier blocked parts of the directive, including the proof-of-citizenship mandate. The order was rooted in Trump's long-standing claims of voter fraud — assertions that have repeatedly been debunked by independent reviews and multiple state-led investigations. After losing the 2020 election, Trump has continued to promote baseless allegations about election integrity, including false claims about voting machines and illegal ballots. Critics argue the executive order threatens to disenfranchise voters, particularly in states like Oregon and Washington that rely heavily on mail-in voting. In a separate legal challenge, these states pointed out that the order would bar the counting of hundreds of thousands of ballots postmarked on time but received after Election Day. In Washington alone, more than 300,000 such ballots arrived late in 2024. Trump's order had found support among Republican election officials in some states, who said it could help prevent voter fraud and provide access to federal data for purging outdated voter rolls. But constitutional experts have warned that the president lacks the authority to impose such nationwide election rules — a power reserved for states, with Congress able to intervene only in federal elections. During a court hearing earlier this month, Department of Justice attorney Bridget O'Hickey argued the order aimed to create consistent standards across states and dismissed concerns about cost or feasibility as speculative. She also suggested that late-arriving ballots might be tampered with, although Judge Casper noted that such ballots already require a postmark before or on Election Day, and any received afterward with later postmarks are not counted. Friday's ruling leaves the future of Trump's order uncertain and bolsters state officials' efforts to maintain control over their own election procedures.
