Fossil Shows a Sharp-Toothed Mammal That Thrived Among Dinosaurs
Scientists last month described the prehistoric mammal in The Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. They named it Novaculadon mirabilis, from novacula, the Latin word for razor.
'The premolars form quite a sharp cutting edge,' said Steven Sweetman, a paleontologist at the University of Portsmouth in England and an author of the paper. The species was probably omnivorous, with teeth designed for processing vegetation but also possibly meat.
Novaculadon, about the size of a mouse, came from an order of mammals called multituberculates. They are named for the round 'tubercles,' or outgrowths on their teeth. They were among the most successful groups of ancient mammals yet discovered, living alongside dinosaurs during the Mesozoic Era. Though unrelated to mice and rats, they most likely filled a similar role as an easy food source for larger predators while also dispersing seeds and controlling insects, all the while avoiding the weighty footfalls of roaming sauropods.
The Novaculadon specimen was discovered in a rock on the Dorset beach. Its full jawbone was found with the majority of its teeth intact, including a robust incisor and premolars, though it lacked the molars. Scientists used X-ray computed tomography to digitally isolate the teeth without the risk of damaging the delicate fossil.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Record warm seas help to bring extraordinary new species to UK waters
The UK's seas have had their warmest start to the year since records began, helping to drive some dramatic changes in marine life and for its fishing communities. The average surface temperature of UK waters in the seven months to the end of July was more than 0.2C higher than any year since 1980, BBC analysis of provisional Met Office data suggests. That might not sound much, but the UK's seas are now considerably warmer than even a few decades ago, a trend driven by humanity's burning of fossil fuels. That is contributing to major changes in the UK's marine ecosystems, with some new species entering our seas and others struggling to cope with the heat. Scientists and amateur naturalists have observed a remarkable range of species not usually widespread in UK waters, including octopus, bluefin tuna and mauve stinger jellyfish. The abundance of these creatures can be affected by natural cycles and fishing practices, but many researchers point to the warming seas as a crucial part of their rise. "Things like jellyfish, like octopus... they are the sorts of things that you expect to respond quickly to climate change," said Dr Bryce Stewart, a senior research fellow at the Marine Biological Association in Plymouth. "It's a bit like the canary in the coal mine - the sorts of quite extraordinary changes we've seen over the last few years really do indicate an ecosystem under flux," he added. Harry Polkinghorne, a keen 19-year-old angler, described how he regularly sees bluefin tuna now, including large schools of the fish in frantic feeding frenzies. "It's just like watching a washing machine in the water," he said. "You can just see loads of white water, and then tuna fins and tuna jumping out." Bluefin tuna numbers have been building over the past decade in south-west England for a number of reasons, including warmer waters and better management of their populations, Dr Stewart explained. Heather Hamilton, who snorkels off the coast of Cornwall virtually every week with her father David, has swum through large blooms of salps, a species that looks a bit like a jellyfish. They are rare in the UK, but the Hamiltons have seen more and more of these creatures in the last couple of years. "You're seeing these big chains almost glowing slightly like fairy lights", she said. "It just felt very kind of out of this world, something I've never seen before." But extreme heat, combined with historical overfishing, is pushing some of the UK's cold-adapted species like cod and wolf-fish to their limits. "We're definitely seeing this shift of cooler water species moving north in general," said Dr Stewart. Marine heatwave conditions - prolonged periods of unusually high sea surface temperatures - have been present around parts of the UK virtually all year. Some exceptional sea temperatures have also been detected by measurement buoys off the UK coast, known as WaveNet and run by the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas). And the record 2025 warmth comes after very high sea temperatures in 2023 and 2024 too. The Met Office says its data from the end of June 2024 to now is provisional and will be finalised in the coming months, but this usually results in only very minor changes. "All the way through the year, on average it's been warmer than we've really ever seen [for the UK's seas]," said Prof John Pinnegar, the lead adviser on climate change at Cefas. "[The seas] have been warming for over a century and we're also seeing heatwaves coming through now," he added. "What used to be quite a rare phenomenon is now becoming very, very common." Like heatwaves on land, sea temperatures are affected by natural variability and short-term weather. Clear, sunny skies with low winds – like much of the UK had in early July - can heat up the sea surface more quickly. But the world's oceans have taken up about 90% of the Earth's excess heat from humanity's emissions of planet-warming gases like carbon dioxide. That is making marine heatwaves more likely and more intense. "The main contributor to the marine heatwaves around the UK is the buildup of heat in the ocean," said Dr Caroline Rowland, head of oceans, cryosphere and climate change at the Met Office. "We predict that these events are going to become more frequent and more intense in the future" due to climate change, she added. With less of a cooling sea breeze, these warmer waters can amplify land heatwaves, and they also have the potential to bring heavier rainfall. Hotter seas are also less able to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which could mean that our planet heats up more quickly. The sea warmth is already posing challenges to fishing communities. Ben Cooper has been a fisherman in Whitstable on the north Kent coast since 1997, and relies heavily on the common whelk, a type of sea snail. But the whelk is a cold-water species, and a marine heatwave in 2022 triggered a mass die-off of these snails in the Thames Estuary. "Pretty much 75% of our earnings is through whelks, so you take that away and all of a sudden you're struggling," explained Mr Cooper. Before the latest heatwave, the whelks had started to recover but he said the losses had forced him to scale back his business. Mr Cooper recalled fishing trips with his father in the 1980s. Back then, they would rely on cod. "We lost the cod because basically the sea just got too warm. They headed further north," he said. The precise distribution of marine species varies from year to year, but researchers expect the UK's marine life to keep changing as humans continue to heat up the Earth. "The fishers might in the long term have to change the species that they target and that they catch," suggested Dr Pinnegar. "And we as consumers might have to change the species that we eat." Additional reporting by Becky Dale and Miho Tanaka A simple guide to climate change Sharks and oysters set to thrive in warmer UK waters UK sea temperatures soar after exceptionally warm spring Intense Med Sea heatwave raises fears for marine life Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to keep up with the latest climate and environment stories with the BBC's Justin Rowlatt. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Are Women's Ideas Missing From The Future Of Innovation?
By Isabel Fernandez Mateo, Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, London Business School In the world of science and technology, we like to believe that the best ideas rise to the top. That innovation is a meritocracy. That inventors, driven by the promise of progress and profit, will naturally seek out the most promising research, regardless of who wrote it. But what if that is not the case? New research suggests that gender bias may be quietly shaping the future of innovation. A study I co-authored with Michaël Bikard and Ronak Mogra – Standing on the Shoulders of (Male) Giants: Gender Inequality and the Technological Impact of Scientific Ideas - recently published in Administrative Science Quarterly, found that scientific papers authored by women are significantly less likely to be cited in patents than those authored by men. In other words, when inventors look for ideas to build on, they are more likely to pick ones that come from men . This is not just an academic issue. Patent citations are a key sign that a scientific idea is being used to develop new technologies. If women's work is being overlooked, it means their ideas are less likely to shape the tools, treatments, and technologies of tomorrow. We started by analysing more than 10 million scientific papers published between 1980 and 2020. Across fields and decades, the pattern was clear: women's research was cited less often in patents. Even after accounting for things like the prestige of the journal, the author's experience, and the commercial relevance of the work, the gap remained. To dig deeper, we looked at what we call 'paper twins', cases where different teams of scientists independently published essentially the same discovery around the same time. These rare instances gave us a unique opportunity to compare how inventors responded to nearly identical ideas. The result? The papers led by men were cited more often in patents than their female-led counterparts. We also ran an experiment. We showed 400 doctorial degree holders a scientific abstract and randomly assigned either a male or female name to the author. Participants spent more time reading the abstract when they thought it was written by a man. They also rated it as more important. This suggests that the problem goes beyond visibility or access. It is also about perception. Even among highly educated readers, there seems to be an implicit bias that leads them to value men's ideas more. That has serious consequences, not just for the careers of individual scientists, but for the direction of innovation itself. If inventors are less likely to engage with research authored by women, valuable ideas may be missed. And because women scientists are more likely to focus on issues that disproportionately affect women, such as certain health conditions, this disparity could mean fewer innovations in areas that urgently need attention. Yet, despite these barriers, many women have made extraordinary contributions to science and technology, proving that when their ideas are recognized and taken seriously, they can change the world. Katalin Karikó, a Hungarian-born biochemist, played a central role in the development of mRNA vaccine technology. Her pioneering work laid the foundation for the COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. For years, her research was overlooked and underfunded. Today, it is credited with helping to save millions of lives. Her story is a powerful reminder that transformative scientific ideas can be undervalued until circumstances demand their recognition. Frances Arnold, a Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry, pioneered the use of directed evolution to engineer enzymes with new and improved functions. Her work has had wide-ranging applications, from biofuels to pharmaceuticals, and has helped bridge the gap between academic discovery and industrial innovation. Jennifer Doudna, another Nobel laureate in Chemistry, co-discovered CRISPR Cas9, a gene editing technology that has revolutionised biotechnology. Her research has not only transformed basic science but is now being used in drug development and holds promise for treating genetic diseases. Tu Youyou, a Chinese pharmaceutical chemist, discovered artemisinin, a powerful anti-malarial drug that has saved millions of lives. Her work, which earned her the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, is a reminder that scientific brilliance can emerge from outside the outside the dominant institutions of science.. And Grace Hopper, a pioneer in computer science, is credited with inventing the first compiler and played a key role in developing COBOL, a programming language still used in business and government systems today. Her legacy continues to shape the digital infrastructure we rely on. These women are proof that when their ideas are recognised and built upon, the impact can be profound. But they are also exceptions in a system that too often overlooks the contributions of women in science. So what can be done? For starters, inventors and research and development teams need to take a hard look at how they search for and evaluate scientific research. Are they relying too heavily on familiar names and networks? Are they unintentionally filtering out work from underrepresented groups? Academic institutions also have a role to play. They should consider how norms around authorship and communication may affect whose work gets noticed. And funding agencies and policymakers should support efforts to make the innovation pipeline more inclusive, from lab bench to patent office. The idea that innovation is a level playing field is a powerful one. But it is not always true. If we want to build a future that reflects the full range of human insight and creativity, we need to make sure we are not overlooking half the ideas on the table. Because the next big breakthrough might already be out there, just waiting for someone to take it seriously. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo, Adecco Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship; Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, London Business School Isabel Fernandez-Mateo holds the Adecco Chair at London Business School. As Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, she has taught in various degree programmes at London Business School, including the required core Strategic Management course for the full time MBA and Executive MBAs, as well as two electives: 'Building your Career Strategy' and 'People Analytics.' She also teaches in the PhD programme. An expert on how relationships influence career outcomes – particularly in hiring, job transitions, and career advancement, Professor Fernandez-Mateo also studies gender diversity in the executive labor market. In her recent work, she examines the organizational and social barriers that prevent women's access to positions of leadership. Her work has been published in leading academic journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, Management Science, and Organization Science. She is currently Department Editor of Management Science (Organizations Section).
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Just Figured Out Exactly How People Judge Your Body Count
It's no surprise that prospective partners judge us for how many people we've had sex with — but new research suggests that there are key factors that may impact just how judgmental they may be. Published in the journal Sciences Advances, a new paper out of Wales' Swansea University found that although many folks are still reticent to commit to those who have high "body counts" — popular slang for a person's number of previous sexual partners — many are willing to look past it if those numbers dwindled over time, suggesting they grew out of an interest in casual sex. In a wide-reaching survey of more than 5,300 people across 11 countries and five continents, the Welsh psychological researchers examined a diverse swathe of the global population's outlook on potential partners based on their sexual history. Some findings were unsurprising. Overall, people seemed to prefer that their potential paramours had fewer partners. Others contradicted popular narratives, such as the lack of a double standard between how people judged the number of partners men and women had across the 11 countries surveyed. And other results seemed to uncover mechanisms of judgment that might be intuitive, but haven't saturated popular culture in the same way. One experiment, for instance, involved showing study participants visual timelines meant to represent a theoretical partner's sexual history. The finding from that experiment was intriguing: even when different timelines included the same number of past partners, they were designed so that the concentration over time varied significantly, with some showing a lot more encounters early in life, others decreasing steadily over time, and others spread out evenly throughout. After examining the timelines, the study's subjects were asked how willing they would be to commit to or date seriously someone with each corresponding sexual history. Those whose number of new partners dwindled later in their lives were the clear winners. While it may seem overly judgmental to base one's willingness to commit on notches in a potential partner's bedpost, head Swansea researcher Andrew Thomas posited that these preferences are rooted in a deep-seated desire for stability. "People use sexual history as a cue to assess relationship risk," Thomas said in a statement about the research. "In our ancestral past, knowing someone's sexual history could help people avoid risks like [sexually transmitted infections], infidelity, emotional instability, or rivalry with ex-partners." Though there have been plenty of previous study showing that people prefer partners with lower body counts, this new research not only adds significant caveats to that preference, but also included respondents around the globe, from Japan and Brazil to Australia and Slovakia. (Notably, it does not appear that any people from the continent of Africa were surveyed.) In sum, the study offers a novel and nuanced look into how people actually feel about their partners' body counts — and one that suggests that many people are less judgmental about sexual history than we've been led to believe. More on sex psychology: Scientists Identify Ideal Amount of Boinking for Maximum Mental Health Solve the daily Crossword
