City Council voting on Good Cause Eviction Law on Wednesday
BINGHAMTON, N.Y. (WIVT/WBGH) – After introducing the controversial legislature just over a month ago, the Binghamton City Council will vote on the Good Cause Eviction Law during Wednesday's meeting.
The City Council announced on Tuesday that voting is on this week's Business Meeting agenda. In a statement, the council thanked the public for their questions, comments, and support, maintaining its belief that local government should be transparent and participatory. City Council also reiterated that its decision to move Good Cause Eviction Law forward is a reflection of the current housing crisis which its members believe warrants urgent action.
In December, Councilman Nate Hotchkiss submitted the bill which establishes Good Cause Eviction Protections, limiting the circumstances under which landlords in Binghamton can evict tenants.
New York State passed a law in 2024 allowing municipalities to opt into the protections which give renters the right to renew their leases when they expire and limits the amount of rent increases unless they can be justified.
Public reactions to Good Cause Eviction at Binghamton town hall
After proposing the bill, Hotchkiss said that 59% of Binghamton renters are cost burdened meaning they spend more than 30% of their monthly income on housing. 38% pay more than half of their income.
The vote was originally scheduled for December 18 but was postponed after the council faced pushback from the public as well as local leaders including Mayor Jared Kraham.
The Binghamton City Council issued the following statement on Tuesday:
Proposal of Good Cause Eviction sparks controversy
'After extensive consideration, Binghamton City Council members would like to notify the public that Good Cause Eviction law will be on the Business Meeting agenda to be voted on tomorrow night.
We are deeply grateful to everyone who participated in our Town Hall earlier this month and for the many who sent comments and questions or joined us at neighborhood association meetings for further conversation. It remains the firm belief of this Council that local government should be transparent and participatory. We will continue to host opportunities for community members most affected by legislation being considered in City Hall to share their support or express their concerns.
We also appreciate the legislators in Rochester, Ithaca, Albany and elsewhere who were willing to offer insight into the impact of Good Cause in their cities and make recommendations regarding its implementation. With 12 municipalities across the state having already expanded tenant protections in this way, we look forward to collaborating and learning from our collective experience.
To directly address inquiries consistently brought up in community conversations, we want to be clear that Good Cause Eviction law does not remove the right of landlords to reobtain possession of their properties or to increase rent within a reasonable margin. The rights of landlords to consider evictions for nonpayment, property damage, or other lease violations remain unaffected while protections that prohibit arbitrary eviction or exorbitant rate hikes are ensured.
This Council's decision to move Good Cause Eviction law forward is a reflection of our conviction that what has become a housing crisis for too many Binghamton residents warrants urgent action. Study after study has found that chronic displacement within the City has contributed to increases in student mobility, household and neighborhood instability, and homelessness. Municipal leadership has been 'forming committees' and commissions and task forces to discuss local housing inequities for over a decade yet more than 1200 individuals and over 700 families with children faced homelessness in Broome County last year. 'Pressing pause' or 'putting a pin' in this conversation is the kind of inaction that got us here. It will not get us out.
This Council also fully acknowledges that reducing displacement is only one piece of an effective approach. Aggressively addressing the deficits in available homes for residents who have been left behind while student and luxury housing development soared remains our long-term focus. In addition to prevention, we will continue to introduce policies to preserve existing stock and produce more deeply affordable housing.
Thank you for trusting us to prioritize expanding opportunities for every Binghamton resident to have a safe, stable place to call home.'
Debate continues over Binghamton's Good Cause Eviction proposal
Good Cause Eviction was first implemented in New York City and has recently been passed in 12 municipalities across the state including Rochester, Albany, and Ithaca.
New York State Police identify human remains found near Chemung River
Trial continues for alleged Jeffrey Aissa killer
City Council voting on Good Cause Eviction Law on Wednesday
No school Wednesday? Here's why public schools are off across New York State
Binghamton begins demolition of former Anzaroot properties
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Harvey, Illinois Ald. Colby Chapman returns to City Hall after latest arrest
Just days after an alderman in the south Chicago suburb of Harvey was arrested and charged with a felony, she was back at a Harvey City Council meeting. Ald. Colby Chapman (2nd) chalks the charges up to political retaliation by the mayor. Harvey Mayor Christopher Clark says no such thing is happening. The allegations stem from an April city council meeting where Chapman was removed from the meeting and charged with misdemeanors that were later dropped — but now she is faced with a felony from that same encounter. On Monday night, Chapman was back at Harvey City Hall. "Our city needs men who lead with integrity, love and courage," Chapman said at a City Council meeting. Late last week, Chapman turned herself in to Harvey police on a felony charge. In April, Mayor Clark said Chapman was disruptive at least three times, and asked the Harvey City Council to censure and remove her. Chapman was charged with misdemeanors for this encounter with officers. The charges were dropped last week by the Cook County State's Attorney's office. But a day later, the State's Attorney's office approved a new felony charge against Chapman of aggravated battery to a police officer for the same April incident. "This is my fourth time arrested, third time jailed," Chapman said. Chapman has been arrested before for incidents at City Hall. The charges have all later been dismissed. Chapman is a frequent critic of the mayor, and said she believes the mayor has unfairly targeted her. Mayor Clark denies any allegations of political retribution. "When the State's Attorney's office has an opportunity to make full review of the entirety of what happened on Monday, April the 28th, I think that they'll make a good decision, favorable," Chapman said. Back inside Harvey City Hall, some residents came to the defense of Chapman. "I'm sick and tired of you arresting Colby Chapman," said Harvey resident Mazurk Irvin. Meanwhile, some fellow aldermen accused chapman of grandstanding. "This is not a way to run a city," Irvin said. Mayor Clark said the video of the April City Council incident speaks for itself, and shows Ald. Chapman striking a police officer. The mayor added that the charges should send a clear message that no one is above the law. "For the next six months to the end of 2025, I'm hopeful that there will be no more arrests; that nobody will be silenced because they talked," said Chapman. The day Ald. Chapman turned herself in last week, she announced her candidacy for mayor. Chapman has also filed a civil lawsuit against the mayor.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Axon says it's no longer in talks with Scottsdale to expand its HQ
The Brief Tech company, Axon, known for its body cams and Tasers, is no longer working with the city of Scottsdale to expand its headquarters. Earlier this year, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs signed a bill that allowed for the company's expansion, but the city and residents fought back. The project, Axon says, will move forward, but won't be negotiating with the city to amend part of its plan. SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. - Axon ended its talks with Scottsdale regarding plans to expand its headquarters, citing a "toxic environment." Axon President Josh Isner met with Scottsdale Mayor Lisa Borowsky on Monday, June 9 and released a statement, saying, "Unfortunately, Axon is withdrawing from negotiations with the City of Scottsdale. The internal politics of the City Council currently make it impossible to reach an agreement. I have never seen such a toxic environment in my life. We put a great deal on the table and we tried our best." Mayor Borowsky responded by saying, "I appreciate Axon's efforts to come to the table and engage in meaningful dialogue regarding the future of their development. Their team was willing to make concessions to their existing plan, which I appreciate. Unfortunately, there were too many hurdles to overcome in order to move an agreement forward successfully. I remain hopeful that future negotiations result in a win-win agreement that work for the community and keeps this vital employer right where it belongs — in Scottsdale." Axon will stay in Scottsdale, and it will expand its HQ. It had been trying to come to some sort of agreement with the city to reduce the number of housing units it planned to build for its employees. But now, Axon says it will go back to its initial plan, which included nearly 2,000 units. The backstory In April, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs approved SB1543, giving the tech giant the go ahead to expand its headquarters. She said it would provide more than 5,500 jobs and is projected to generate an estimated $38 billion in economic impact in the next decade. On April 19, Mayor Borowsky posted to X, "I am disappointed with the way the Axon Bill has played out, culminating with the Governor signing this awful legislation—-without any discussion with representatives of #Scottsdale, knowing the impact it will have exclusively on our communities. I stand with the people of Scottsdale in opposition to the legislature's unconstitutional overreach. The city is evaluating all legal remedies in response. We must protect the character of our community and our voters' right to the legally obtained referendum process." When Gov. Hobbs approved the bill, it meant major companies that build corporate headquarters in Arizona would be entitled to build housing for its employees. Axon CEO Rick Smith said he wanted to build 1,900 new apartments for its employees. A group named Taxpayers Against Awful Apartment Zoning Exemptions (TAAAZE) were against the expansion from the very beginning. "It's not necessary for him to override the will of the Scottsdale voters and to basically put a thumb in their eye, when they have made it clear over the last couple of elections, both by who they elected, and by the referendums, that they don't want another 2,000 apartments," TAAAZE's Bob Littlefield previous told FOX 10.


Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
"No Kings!" anti-Trump protests planned around Utah
Protestors are taking to Utah's streets on Saturday in what organizers expect will be the largest single-day anti-Trump rally since the start of the administration. Why it matters: The widespread movement will run counter to President Trump's multimillion dollar military parade in D.C. "No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance," organizers wrote. "From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism." The intrigue: Although no anti-Trump rally in Utah has matched the size of the "Hands Off!" protest on April 5, the movement is growing to smaller cities in more conservative parts of the state. Zoom in: At least 11 marches and rallies were scheduled throughout Utah as of Monday. Salt Lake City: 10am at the U's Marriott Library Plaza and 6pm at Pioneer Park. Ogden: 1pm at Union Station. Heber City: 11am at City Hall. Provo: 9am at 445 W. Center Price: Noon at 350 E. Main Ephraim: 11am at the former Kent's Market parking lot Moab: 9:15am at Swanny City Park Boulder: 11am at the town park Kanab: 10am at Jacob Hamblin Park St. George: 2pm at Vernon Worthen Park What they're saying:"Donald Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday," the No Kings website said. "Real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." By the numbers: Millions of people are estimated to protest in more than 1,500 cities across all 50 states, organizers said. Context: Trump's military parade coincides with his 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. The Army expects to spend $25 million to $45 million, an estimate that doesn't include Secret Service or law enforcement. Trump has been pushing for a military parade since his first term. Yes, but: There is no protest planned in Washington, D.C. That is "a deliberate choice to keep the focus on contrast, and not give the Trump administration an opportunity to stoke and then put the focus on conflict," said Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the groups coordinating the demonstration.