‘Sucker for a good cause': Melbourne legal legends sign up for Palestinian student activists
But as they say in the classics, this ain't over yet.
The two unnamed students – another two were suspended over their October 2024 stunt – were given 30 days to appeal Johnston's decision and have already attracted some legal heavyweights. But there's just one teensy-tiny issue.
Legal eagle Greg Barns, no stranger to these matters, having acted as an adviser to Wikileaks ex-con Julian Assange, and in a lengthy list of right-on causes, has teamed-up with Victorian criminal law legend and former magistrate Rob Stary to add some heft to the students' legal crusade.
Stary's list of former clients is, well, quite something. We've got 'Jihad' Jack Thomas, who was the first Australian to be convicted under the post-9/11 terrorism laws, Assange – him again – and even Melbourne gangland figures Tony Mokbel and the late Carl Williams.
The high-profile legal pair are joined by fellow bar-table veteran Leonard Hartnett, who celebrates 50 years in the wig-and-gown game this year, and pro-Palestine legal sister act Bernadette and Ran Zaydan, who established their Watermelon Defence Fund, which, well, the name says it all. (The melon's colours match those of the Palestinian flag.)
Stary said he became involved after the other lawyers contacted him, but he told CBD he was approaching his task with some gusto. 'Always a sucker for a good cause,' he said.
And that teensy-tiny issue? Uni rules state that the students have no right of representation in the appeals process, so their near-basketball squad of legal advisers is, at this stage anyway, just that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
15 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Young, conspiracy-drawn teens are potential terrorists
The changing face of terrorism from horrific acts by extremist Islamist groups to radicalised young men under 18 tapping away at their keyboards in regional areas is prompting a review into who is a terrorist. The Independent National Security Legislation Monitor is looking at whether Australia's laws are fit-for-purpose, contain appropriate protections for individual rights, remain proportionate to threats and remain necessary. The Australian definition of a "terrorist act" has not changed since it was enacted in 2002. "Next year will be the 25th anniversary of 9/11 and that's the event that really shaped out understanding of terrorism," monitor Jake Blight told AAP. "When we made this law it was followed by the Bali bombings. These were international organisations that were well-funded and executed mass casualty events." Citing ASIO's most recent threat assessment released in February, Mr Blight said the typical profile of who is a terrorist has markedly shifted. "But now and especially since COVID, it's mostly young people, mostly acting along, they're radicalised online and with basic weapons or not even a really fully fledged plan," he said. "They're mostly Australian-born, they're male, they're minors and they're from families previously unconnected to extremism." The average age of those under investigation for violent extremism was 15. He said less than half the potential terrorist matters investigated by ASIO in 2024 were religiously motivated. Those under investigation were not just confined to major cities but were spread out across rural and remote communities. All involved lone actors or small groups, almost all involved minors and almost all individuals involved were unknown to ASIO or the police. None appeared to be directly inspired by conflict in the Middle East or directed by offshore extremists, the assessment found. More than 300 federal, state and territory laws contain offences, obligations and powers that rely on the 2002 definition, Mr Blight found in a 58-page issues paper. These included many exceptional powers and modifications to longstanding legal principles including keeping suspects in detention after serving their sentences and the ability to strip citizenship. "We need to make sure that our terrorism laws are effective but also consistent with our human rights obligations," he said. Mr Blight also cautioned that defining terrorism was a tricky legal minefield and that public figures needed to be careful in their language. "People use the word terrorism to describe horror or abhorrence, it's kind of a short-hand for the worst crime they can think of but that isn't legally accurate," he explained. "There are many terrible and terrifying crimes that are not terrorism." In January, an abandoned caravan packed with explosives discovered in northwest Sydney contained a list of addresses of Jewish institutions. Police did not officially designate the incident as a terrorist event, but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and NSW Premier Chris Minns labelled it a potential terrorist act. Australian Federal Police officials later said the fabricated caravan plot was a criminal con job.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Macron backs Albanese on Palestinian statehood in face of sharp criticism from Israel
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said she had 'deep concern' over the military plan and put this view to Abbas in a phone call on Monday. Meloni believed the Israeli decisions 'appear to be leading to further military escalation' in the Gaza Strip, her office said, and she described this as 'unjustifiable and unacceptable'. The Italian prime minister has argued against recognising Palestine at this point because of her concerns about the timing. 'I am very much in favour of the State of Palestine, but I am not in favour of recognising it prior to establishing it,' she told the Italian media last month. Her comments on the Israeli plan to take Gaza City signal the growing concerns in Europe about Netanyahu and his military strategy, amid warnings about starvation, civilian casualties and lack of medical care in the territory. Israel's Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sharren Haskel, slammed Australia for planning to recognise a Palestinian state when Hamas was refusing to return the last 50 hostages it took in the October 7 attack. 'Fifty of our hostages remain in Hamas's dungeons of torture, being starved to death – being forced to dig their own graves,' she said, in a reference to a video of hostage Evyatar David released last week. 'Yet the Australian government has decided now is the right time to reward the monsters of October 7 with recognition of a Palestinian state.' The Times of Israel reported that Hamas senior leader Ghazi Hamad said last week that the moves to recognise a Palestinian state were the result of 'the fruits' of the October 7 attacks. 'Why are all the countries recognising a Palestinian state today? Before October 7, did any country dare recognise a Palestinian state?' Hamad said on Al Jazeera. Loading 'The fruits of October 7 are what caused the entire world to open its eyes to the Palestinian issue – and they are moving toward it with force. That is, that the Palestinian people are a people who deserve a country.' Albanese has declared that Hamas must have no place in a Palestinian state, a position also taken by European leaders, while also saying the Australian decision on Monday was predicated on assurances that Palestine would accept Israel's right to exist. Haskel cited the Hamas interview to accuse the Australian government of rewarding a terrorist organisation that committed the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust. 'This decision by Australia won't change anything in Israel or Gaza, but let's be quite clear, this is all about domestic politics, not peace,' she said. Palestinian critics of the Australian decision, including several cited by this masthead, also argued the formal recognition of statehood would not change anything in the war in Gaza.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Victorian underquoting laws: Expert calls on Allan government to release review
The Victorian Greens said they would this week introduce a bill to parliament requiring the reserve price of a property to be disclosed before auction day, in a bid to stop buyers unwittingly forking out thousands of dollars on inspection reports for homes they can't realistically afford. The REIV is calling on the government to start fresh consultation on how to improve fairness in the property sector. The peak real estate lobby group is also now backing mandatory pre-auction disclosure of reserve prices by sellers, in a significant policy pivot announced on Monday. Premier Jacinta Allan earlier this month. Credit: Eddie Jim 'Reserve price disclosure isn't just backed by consumer advocates, even the Real Estate Institute of Victoria and leading property industry figures support it,' said Greens public and affordable housing spokeswoman Gabrielle de Vietri. 'With the public and industry on board, Labor has no excuse to delay.' Premier Jacinta Allan said she would seek advice on that proposal and also the merits of a model that would result in those selling their home providing prospective buyers with a free pest and building inspection documents. 'We are open to looking at what we can do to make the property market fairer for everyone,' Allan said. She described underquoting as a 'pretty shabby practice, which is why we're cracking down on it and made it illegal'. Enzo Raimondo, pictured in 2014 when he led the REIV. Credit: Fairfax Raimondo said he couldn't disclose the recommendations made by him and his property market review co-author, consumer advocate Carolyn Bond, due to a confidentiality agreement. But he confirmed the 2022 report did include recommendations he believed would reduce the prevalence of underquoting. 'We spent months on it. We interviewed consumers, we interviewed industry groups, we interviewed agents, and there's some, I think, excellent recommendations on the issue of reserve price [disclosure],' he said. 'It's odd that the review, which is meant to assist, hasn't been released … I can only speak for myself and not the other panel members, but I was certainly disappointed that it wasn't released and at least debated openly on what should occur.' When asked if there was any reason not to make the report public, Allan said the report was a cabinet document, and she was more focused on 'acting now, leading the nation in cracking down on illegal underquoting'. Raimondo said the review received fairly consistent feedback from the public that agents were providing price guides that were off the mark. He said while agents would use the excuse that they're not property valuers, they generally worked in the same sector for a long period and should know their market. The use of three comparable properties to justify price guides was being manipulated by agents and the criteria around this needed to be tightened up, Raimondo said. 'In Victoria, it's not a bad system. It's just that it's not being used correctly,' he said. Start the day with a summary of the day's most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
