G20 pledges to reduce gender gap in workforce participation by 25% by 2030
Image: GCIS
G20 member states have reaffirmed their commitment to reducing the gender gap in labour force participation by 25% by 2030 under the newly launched Brisbane–eThekwini Goal, following a two-day Labour and Employment Ministers' Meeting (LEMM) hosted at Fancourt Hotel and Country Estate in George.
Speaking at the closing session, South Africa's Deputy Minister of Employment and Labour, Judith Nemadzinga-Tshabalala, said the renewed goal seeks not only numerical parity but also addresses the quality and conditions of women's employment.
'In 2014, under Australia's G20 Presidency, Leaders adopted the Brisbane Goal, committing to reduce the gender gap in labour force participation by 25% by 2025. Today, we acknowledge that progress has been uneven. While nearly all G20 countries have narrowed the gap since 2012, only about half are on track to meet the target by next year,' she said.
The new Brisbane–eThekwini Goal deepens the G20's resolve to close the gender gap and ensure meaningful participation for women across the global labour market.
'The gender goal urges G20 to go beyond numerical parity and interrogate the quality of women's participation: under what conditions, with what protections, and with what opportunity for advancement?' she added.
Key action points outlined under the renewed goal include promoting women's leadership in high-growth sectors like STEM, investing in affordable care infrastructure, addressing occupational segregation and informal work, supporting equal access to training and entrepreneurship, and ensuring fair parental leave and work–life balance policies.
The Deputy Minister emphasised that the commitment is rooted in international labour standards, particularly ILO Conventions focused on discrimination, employment policy, and the elimination of violence and harassment in the workplace.
'These instruments are central to protecting workers with family responsibilities and ensuring that care work is recognised, valued and decently remunerated,' she said.
The Brisbane–eThekwini Goal also introduces a second major target: reducing the unadjusted gender wage gap by 15% by 2035, measured against 2022 data, with a five-year review to potentially raise the target to 35%.
'To close the wage gap, we must enforce equal pay legislation, promote pay transparency, and tackle structural discrimination in wage-setting,' Nemadzinga-Tshabalala said.
She called for better gender-disaggregated data, stronger collective bargaining mechanisms, and support for initiatives such as the Equal Pay International Coalition (EPIC).
In closing, the Deputy Minister said the goal is more than a number—it is a principled pursuit.
'It is a call for courage, consistency and solidarity. As we leave this gathering, let us ensure that one's gender does not condition the dignity of work, and that our economies are measured not only by growth, but by justice,' she said.
IOL News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Minister Parks Tau to embark on crucial visit to Japan and India amid US tariffs saga
Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is expected to embark on a working visit to India and Japan. Image: GCIS Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is expected to undertake a working visit to Japan and India in the coming days, amid South Africa's struggle with the impending 30% tariffs from the United States. The visit aims to strengthen trade relations with these two key economic partners and explore new collaboration opportunities. On Wednesday, department spokesperson Kaamil Alli could not confirm the working visit, stating that nothing had yet been finalised. However, a senior government official confirmed plans for Tau to undertake the trip within the coming day, saying Tau and the Presidency have been in recent talks about the trip, which is now more crucial than ever due to the US tariffs saga. The official noted that Japan's recent deal with US President Donald Trump, which reduced tariffs on Japanese exports, including autos and auto parts, to 15%, is an important lesson for South Africa. South Africa, India, and Japan have enjoyed mutually beneficial relations. Japan is one of South Africa's key economic partners, with significant investments in various sectors, including manufacturing, mining, energy, and automotive, while India is part of BRICS. This will be the second Japanese visit for Tau, who accompanied Deputy President Paul Mashatile, Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, and International Relations Deputy Minister Thandi Moraka in March. The visit came after the Japanese government extended an invitation to the South African government to cement diplomatic relations between the two countries and explore new collaboration. A senior government official stated that the timing and delegation for Tau's upcoming trip to both countries remain unclear. However, the official emphasised the trip's heightened importance due to the ongoing US tariffs issue. He said after Japan had struck a deal with Trump, it was important that SA take a leaf from them. 'All I know is that the minister (Tau) and the Presidency have been in recent talks about the trip to India and Japan and how to weather this tariffs mess we are under…but it's not only that we have good relations with the country who both have a market here, especially in the motor industry,' the source said. In a recent trade agreement with the US, Japan successfully circumvented 25% tariffs by pledging investments. This deal lowers tariffs on Japanese exports, such as automobiles and automotive components, to 15% in return for Japan's commitment to investments and imports. The US tariffs, expected to kick in on August 8, could put approximately 30,000 jobs at risk in South Africa, according to Tau. He previously said the department had been working frantically to secure a trade deal with the US to avert the tariffs, but so far, no agreement has been reached. The Congress for South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) welcomed the news of the visit, saying the two countries were important to South Africa. 'India and Japan are major global economies and trading partners for South Africa… It's critical that these visits, plus others, are linked to increasing investment in South Africa to unlock growth and jobs and to opening export opportunities for South African companies, in particular agriculture, mining, motor, and other manufacturing sectors. 'Toyota is a major investor here, and we hope to see it and other Japanese companies expand their presence. Similarly for Tata and other Indian companies… Sourcing new export opportunities is key as we navigate the new tariffs announced by the US on South African exporters,' said Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks. Political analyst Dr John Molepo said the visit came at a crucial time for South Africa's economy. 'With the US tariffs looming, it is essential for South Africa to strengthen its trade relations with other key partners. He said the visit should yield tangible outcomes that will bolster trade, investment, and diplomatic relations between South Africa and these two countries.
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa seeks to postpone R167 million damages case until inquiry completion
President Cyril Ramaphosa has earlier signed a proclamation for the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to determine whether attempts were made to prevent the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa has called on the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to pause the R167 million constitutional damages case filed by families of victims and survivors of apartheid-era atrocities. He argues that the case should be delayed until the judicial commission of inquiry concludes its work, ensuring that all relevant facts are fully established before proceeding. Ramaphosa has earlier signed a proclamation for the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to determine whether attempts were made to prevent the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes. Advocate Tim Bruinders SC, arguing on behalf of Ramaphosa and the government, said it is vital that all the facts first be established before the constitutional damages case is served before court. He said the commission will shed more light on why, and to what extent and by whom, efforts or attempts were made to influence or pressure the South African Police Service or the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to stop investigating or prosecuting TRC cases. According to Bruinders, it is at this stage impossible for Ramaphosa and the government to issue an affidavit in the constitutional damages case if the facts are not clear. 'In fact, we do not know at this stage what the true facts are,' he said. Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen questioned whether it is not the prerogative of the applicants (the survivors and families) to proceed with their constitutional damages case as they deem fit. Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen listening to the arguments of Advocate Matthew Chaskalson SC on Wednesday during President Cyril Ramaphosa's application for a stay of the constitutional damages case brought by the families of apartheid era victims. Image: Zelda Venter Bruinders responded that the facts must first become clear - something which a commission can establish by calling witnesses - before a court could decide on damages. 'These are families who have the sympathy of the government. They don't have closure. This is a concern for any government, but the facts must still be explored,' he said. Bruinders added that the government wanted the truth as to why these cases were not investigated and prosecuted. But it first needed the facts. Judge Janse van Nieuwenhuizen also questioned whether it was not possible for the court hearing the constitutional damages claim to deal with the cases of each of the 25 families and to establish the facts then. But Bruinders said as witnesses usually do not testify in motion court proceedings, such as this, the commission of inquiry is in a better position to establish the facts, as it has the tools to investigate the issues. Advocate Matthew Chaskalson SC, for the families, implored the judge not to stay the constitutional damages case. He said the families have been waiting for between 30 and 50 years for justice. Chaskalson added that the commission of inquiry can go on for months before it makes any recommendations. He pointed out that the commission can only make recommendations, which are not binding on the president. He accused the president of not wanting to choose where he stands in this matter. In asking that the case not be delayed, Chaskalson said the applicants and their legal teams are confident that they have a good case in the constitutional damages matter. Judgment is reserved. Cape Argus
Daily Maverick
15 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
African media must follow the money and treat AI as a story about power, not tech
Scott Timcke is a senior research associate with Research ICT Africa. He is affiliated with the University of Johannesburg's Centre for Social Change and the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. A gap has emerged in global discussions about AI governance during South Africa's G20 presidency. This is the role of independent media as democracy's watchdog in an age of concentrated digital power. The Media20 (M20) initiative – an independent civil society initiative that mirrors official G20 engagement groups for business, think tanks and civil society, among others – has identified this gap through a recent set of policy briefs, in particular, one on AI, Africa and the G20. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The findings point to a conundrum. Just as AI systems increasingly shape economic, social and political outcomes across Africa, the media's capacity to scrutinise these developments is being undermined by the very forces they should be monitoring. The triple challenge facing African media Three interconnected challenges demand urgent G20 attention. First, AI development remains concentrated among a handful of global technology companies, creating concentrations of transnational power that national regulatory mechanisms struggle to govern effectively. When decisions made in Silicon Valley boardrooms can determine whether African farmers receive crop recommendations or students access educational content, the stakes for democratic oversight come into relief. Second, Africa occupies a structurally disadvantaged position in the global AI economy. While African workers earn just $1-$3 per hour, labelling images that enable billion-dollar AI applications like autonomous vehicles, they remain locked out of the more profitable layers of the AI technology stack. This digital extraction mirrors historical patterns of resource exploitation where raw materials flow outward while value-added benefits remain elsewhere. Third, and perhaps most critically, journalism covering AI governance suffers from significant knowledge gaps. Too many reporters treat AI developments as 'technology stories', focusing on capabilities and breakthrough narratives, rather than examining the deeper 'power and policy stories' that reveal governance implications and labour impacts. This framing obscures the real questions: Who controls these systems? How are decisions made? What is the impact on ordinary Africans? Democracy under pressure This oversight becomes particularly concerning given Africa's deteriorating information ecosystem. Since 2022, foreign-sponsored disinformation campaigns have targeted at least 39 African countries, exploiting structural vulnerabilities including limited media literacy and declining press freedom. Meanwhile, governments increasingly distort 'fake news' or 'misinformation' laws to suppress dissent, while internet shutdowns undermine freedom of expression and access to information. The surge in information manipulation coincides with AI systems increasingly shaping critical sectors such as agriculture, health, education and governance itself. When algorithmic decision-making affects everything from loan approvals to university admissions, independent oversight becomes more crucial than ever. Yet the technical complexity of AI systems often shields corporate practices from public scrutiny, while the global nature of AI companies complicates jurisdictional oversight. The M20's democratic vision The M20 initiative seeks to interact with official G20 engagement groups and advocate for media recognition as a core pillar of sustainable financial development, human rights and global cooperation. This approach recognises that effective AI governance cannot emerge from purely technocratic solutions; it requires robust democratic accountability mechanisms. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The initiative's recommendations for G20 consideration include establishing AI governance transparency standards that mandate algorithmic impact assessments for government AI deployments, supporting independent AI oversight mechanisms through funding streams for media organisations to develop AI governance expertise, and promoting African AI tools that serve local languages and contexts rather than marginalising them. Most importantly, the M20 calls for strengthening media freedom through concrete benchmarks for press freedom and information integrity, including sanctions for governments that weaponise disinformation legislation against journalists. Reframing the story For African media organisations, the challenge lies in developing the technical literacy needed to cover AI governance effectively, while maintaining editorial independence from potentially unsustainable and biased AI services. If done correctly, they can reframe AI coverage to focus on power dynamics rather than 'technological wizardry'. This means following the money and data in AI systems, particularly examining how African data contributes to AI development and whether economic benefits flow back to African communities. It means developing systematic approaches to covering government use of AI in service delivery and security agencies, with attention to transparency and citizen impact. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Most crucially, it means challenging corporate narratives about AI benefits with independent verification, particularly examining outsized claims about the ability of AI solutions to achieve development goals. A continental imperative The stakes extend beyond journalism itself. AI systems are reshaping Africa's relationship with the global economy, determining whether the continent remains locked into extractive relationships or develops genuine technological sovereignty. The African Union's Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy, endorsed last year, recognises this imperative. But implementation requires the kind of sustained, critical oversight that only independent media can provide. As recent reports indicate a decline in press freedom across major democracies, with significant economic pressures on news organisations, the M20's mission becomes even more acute. Effective AI governance requires collaborative networks that share resources and expertise across borders, recognising that the forces shaping Africa's digital future operate on a global scale. For African media, this means that embracing their role as democracy's watchdog becomes more vital in an era of concentrated digital power. The question is whether Africa's journalists are ready to tell the real story of AI; not as a tale of technological progress, but as a fundamental question of power, democracy and self-determination. DM
