logo
Lyle and Erik Menéndez have been resentenced with parole, bringing them a step closer to release. What to know about their murder case.

Lyle and Erik Menéndez have been resentenced with parole, bringing them a step closer to release. What to know about their murder case.

Yahoo14-05-2025

Lyle and Erik Menéndez have been resentenced to 50 years to life in prison with parole.
The resentencing came months after Netflix released a hit true crime drama about the brothers' '90s trial.
Here's what has happened with their case since.
Erik Menéndez and Lyle Menéndez could be one step close to being released from prison after they were resentenced to 50 years to life with parole on Tuesday.
The brothers were sentenced to life without parole in 1996 for murdering their parents, José Menéndez and Kitty Menéndez, in 1989.
Their story resurfaced in the public discourse after Netflix released a documentary and a true crime drama series about the case last year.
The drama, "Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menéndez Story," became an instant hit and stayed at the top of Netflix's most-watched chart for two weeks, while the documentary, "The Menéndez Brothers," which came out days later, featured new interviews with the siblings.
A title card at the end of the documentary briefly mentions that the brothers filed a habeas corpus petition in May 2023 to vacate their murder convictions. But both Netflix projects leave out most details about the brothers' attempts to appeal their sentences.
The brothers admitted to killing their parents before their first trial, so the jury was tasked with understanding why.
While the prosecution argued the pair wanted their parents' money, the brothers said that they acted in self-defense because their father physically and sexually abused them, enabled by their mother. They said they feared their father would eventually kill them.
The brothers' first trial ended in 1994 with a hung jury. In the second trial, Judge Stanley M. Weisberg limited testimonies related to the brothers' abuse claims and removed the jury's option of voting on a manslaughter charge. The jury chose that the brothers were guilty of murder in the second trial.
The brothers petitioned an appeal in 2023, which journalist Robert Rand, who has reported on their case since the '90s, shared on X. The petition included a letter Erik Menéndez sent to his cousin Andy Cano a year before the murders, where he writes that he is avoiding his father and alludes to being afraid of him.
The petition also includes a declaration from Roy Roselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, who was signed to the record label where José Menéndez was an executive. He said José Menéndez drugged and raped him when he was a teenager, and made him perform sexual acts on two other occasions.
The brothers' attorney hoped this would prove they were defending themselves against abuse to get the lesser charge of manslaughter.
This new evidence was released partway through the production of "Monsters" and "The Menéndez Brothers," which may explain why it wasn't included.
"The Menéndez Brothers" producers Ross Dinerstein and Rebecca Evans told The Hollywood Reporter in October 2024 that they worked on the documentary for four years and wrapped shooting in 2023.
Evans said: "The habeas was filed in 2023, and so for us, when we were making the documentary, we felt like, we're not here to litigate a case. We're not here to present evidence, or new evidence in that way, alongside the attorneys. Our feeling was that this was a story that took place then, and this was all of our research on it."
"Monsters" was also likely written before May 2023, even though the production was delayed due to the writers' and actors' strike in 2023.
"Monsters" co-creator Ryan Murphy told Variety in September 2024: "I believe in justice, but I don't believe in being a part of that machine. That's not my job. My job as an artist was to tell a perspective in a particular story."
He added that the series was "the best thing that has happened to the Menéndez brothers in 30 years" because it rekindled public interest in their case.
But Laurie L. Levenson, a law professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, told Business Insider in October 2024 that a true crime series must present solid evidence to make a difference in a courtroom.
"In terms of it being the best thing that ever happened, only if it leads to evidence to actually overturn the case, which I still think is a real upward battle," she said.
On October 3, 2024, George Gascón, the Los Angeles County District Attorney, told a press conference that his office was reviewing the brothers' case.
Later that month, the LA County District Attorney's office told Business Insider in an email that the "process was already underway" before "Monsters" premiered, and a hearing was set for November 29.
On October 24, 2024, Gascón told a press conference that he had moved the decision date because his office was "flooded with requests for information" after "Monsters" premiered.
"I decided to move this forward because, quite frankly, we did not have enough resources to handle all their requests, and one of the things that I thrive to do in this office is to be very transparent in everything that we do," he said.
Gascón said that he would recommend the brothers be sentenced to 50 years to life and be eligible for parole immediately.
"I came to a place where I believe that under the law, resentencing is appropriate, and I am going to recommend that to a court tomorrow," Gascon said.
Gascón said it was right that the brothers were convicted of murder, but that he believed they had been rehabilitated in prison.
In a resentencing memo filed on October 24, 2024, deputies in the DA office's resentencing unit wrote that the Menéndez brothers "have demonstrated they no longer present a public safety risk" and that their "current sentence is no longer in furtherance of justice."
The resentencing is separate from the brothers' petition to vacate their sentences, meaning they'd still have to appear before a parole board to argue their case before being freed.
The same day, Gascón told CNN that he disagreed with the petition's argument and thought resentencing was more appropriate.
"I think that the conviction was appropriate given what was there," Gascón said.
In October 2024, Gascón also supported the Menéndez brothers' petition to Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, for clemency, which was separate from the court hearings. Newsom has full power to reduce their sentence or grant a pardon, which means the brothers now have three paths to freedom.
Gascón wasn't re-elected and the resentencing hearing was pushed back to allow the new DA, Nathan Hochman, to review the evidence.
In February, Hochman told a press conference that his office asked the court to deny the Menéndez brothers' habeas corpus petition. He said he believed the evidence they presented wasn't new, wasn't relevant to their self-defense claims, and did not meet the legal standards for petitioning.
The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition, an initiative that includes the brothers' family members and is advocating for their release, told ABC News at the time that Hochman's comments dismissed the brothers' abuse.
"We are profoundly disappointed by his remarks, in which he effectively tore up new evidence and discredited the trauma they experienced," the coalition said. "To say it played no role in Erik and Lyle's action is to ignore decades of psychological research and basic human understanding."
In March, Hochman told a press conference that his office was motioning to oppose the brothers' resentencing, saying they had not fully accepted responsibility for their crimes because they continued to say they acted in self-defense. Hochman also said the brothers have made 20 lies before and during their trial and only admitted to four of them.
The judge, Michael Jesic, denied the motion, so the court continued the resentencing hearings.
Amid the drama, Newsom also requested the brothers' parole board in February to carry out a "comprehensive risk assessment" investigation into whether the brothers pose "an unreasonable risk to the public" if they are released.
A hearing was held on May 9 to discuss the parole board's risk assessment. ABC News reported that the assessment found that the brothers pose a moderate risk to the community if released because they broke multiple rules in prison.
But on Tuesday, Jesic approved the brothers' resentencing, meaning they can now appeal to a parole board to be released. This process can take years, but the brothers continue to pursue the petition and clemency cases, which could speed up their release.
ABC News reported that the brothers' hearing for the clemency case is on June 13.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diddy's Ex-Girlfriend Testifies To Participating In 'Sleazy' Freak Offs, Crying During 18-Hour Session
Diddy's Ex-Girlfriend Testifies To Participating In 'Sleazy' Freak Offs, Crying During 18-Hour Session

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Diddy's Ex-Girlfriend Testifies To Participating In 'Sleazy' Freak Offs, Crying During 18-Hour Session

More alleged details of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' personal life are exposed as witnesses testify regarding his romantic relationships and freak offs. On Thursday, (June 5), an ex-girlfriend of Combs, who is identified as 'Jane', testified that during their three-year relationship, a majority of intimate encounters involved other men. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the woman explained that her relationship with the Harlem native began with lush vacations and only the two of them in bed. As their relationship progressed, Jane claimed it started to involve drug use and escorts as Combs initiated the 'freak offs.' She also testified that 90% of their sexual encounters involved other men. 'I just thought that it was a night of fun; I didn't think that we'd be doing it again,' she explained. 'I just wanted to satisfy my partner.' In her testimony, she further detailed how she became trapped in the relationship due to Combs providing for her financially and informed the jury, 'I felt obligated to perform because my partner was paying my rent.' According to Rolling Stone, Jane Doe returned to the stand on Friday and continued to reflect on her account during her time with the 55-year-old. 'It's dark, sleazy, and makes me feel disgusted with myself,' she claimed to have told Combs in 2023 about not wanting to participate in the freak offs. 'I don't want to play this role anymore. I'm so much more than this,' and 'I feel like it's the only reason you have me around and pay for the house.' That same year, she alleged to have agreed to participate in a 'sober' party, despite Combs still using cocaine and ecstasy. During this freak off, Jane Doe claimed that she vomited, however, the Bad Boy Records founder dismissed her health concerns. 'Sean came in and I told him I had just thrown up,' she testified. 'And he was like, 'That's good, you'll feel better. Let's go, the third guy is here.'' TMZ reports that she also testified to crying during two freak offs, the first one being a surprise session when she thought she would have a one-on-one night with Combs. The session, she claims, lasted 18 hours and took place at the Waldorf Hotel in Beverly Hills early in their relationship. The second time she burst into tears was after a 'hotel night' while she was in the shower, high on drugs. Combs is charged with one count of racketeering conspiracy; two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, and has pleaded not guilty. Earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian warned the Grammy-winner that he could be removed from the courtroom for 'absolutely unacceptable' behavior after allegedly making facial expressions towards the jury. The trial is expected to last all of June and into July. More from Judge Warns Diddy He Could Be Kicked Out Of Court For His "Absolutely Unacceptable" Behavior Bryana Bongolan, Cassie's Friend, Testifies Diddy Threatened Her Life And Said "I Can Kill You" 50 Cent Reacts To Cam'ron Asking Male Sex Worker About His Son's Mother, Daphne Joy

'Dept. Q' Filming Locations: All Of The Scottish Backdrops From Edinburgh To East Lothian
'Dept. Q' Filming Locations: All Of The Scottish Backdrops From Edinburgh To East Lothian

Elle

timean hour ago

  • Elle

'Dept. Q' Filming Locations: All Of The Scottish Backdrops From Edinburgh To East Lothian

Currently holding Netflix's second position is Dept. Q, Scott Frank's intensely sharp crime thriller which sees a police detective in tasked with the responsibility of forming a unit of officers to solve a cold murder cases. Adapted for TV and based on the book series by Danish writer Jussi Adler-Olsen, the story was initially located in Copenhagen within the books, however Frank decided to swap the Scandinavian scenery for Scotland, earning the increasingly popular series countless fans not only for its stellar storytelling, but also its refreshing backdrop in Edinburgh and East Lothian. To find out exactly where filming took place, keep on reading below. FIND OUT MORE ON ELLE COLLECTIVE Much of the series takes places throughout the streets of Edinburgh, Scotland's capital city, many of its landmarks can be seen in a number of episodes, for example we see St Mary's Episcopal Church, the Royal Mile and the City Chambers. As well as this, at the beginning of the series, we see a glimpse of the shootout which scarred Carl and resulted in the death of his fellow officer. This takes places in a housing estate in The Calders, in Wester Hailes. In addition to this, scenes that show the outside of Carl's home were filmed in Link's Place, in Leith. If you've already watched the series, you'll know that Merritt and William's house was pretty luxe. This was filmed in Lysander House in Dirleton, which used to be a former radar station, but was transformed to portray the wealthy couple's home. Another East Lothian location featured in the series was the Staggs Bar in Musselburgh, which was shown when Carl and Akram meet the journalist who vocalises a number of accusations against Sam Haig. ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE.

Harvey Weinstein Says He Has ‘Regrets' and ‘Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: ‘But Never Illegal, Never Criminal'
Harvey Weinstein Says He Has ‘Regrets' and ‘Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: ‘But Never Illegal, Never Criminal'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein Says He Has ‘Regrets' and ‘Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: ‘But Never Illegal, Never Criminal'

Harvey Weinstein gave a rare interview as he awaits the verdict in his New York sex crimes retrial, saying that he has 'regrets' that he 'acted immorally' but claiming that it was 'never illegal.' In an exclusive phone conversation on Fox 5's 'Good Day New York,' anchor Rosanna Scotto asked the former Hollywood producer and convicted sex offender what he thought of the women who had testified against him, and if he has any regrets. 'I think Arthur said they had 4 million reasons to testify, as in dollars,' Weinstein said, referring to his lawyer Arthur Aidala. More from Variety Harvey Weinstein's New York Retrial Closes With Prosecutors Urging Jury to 'Let Him Know the Rules Apply to Him' Ahead of Deliberations Harvey Weinstein Was the 'One Being Abused,' Defense Says in Retrial Closing Argument; Prosecution Calls Him 'No Victim' Harvey Weinstein Doesn't Plan to Testify at New York Retrial 'I have regrets that I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, and I acted immorally,' Weinstein continued. 'I put so many friends through this and hurt people that were close to me by actions that were stupid, you know what I mean? But never illegal, never criminal, never anything.' Weinstein, who was found guilty on three of seven charges in an L.A. sexual assault trial in 2022 and sentenced to 16 years in prison, is being retried in New York after his previous convictions in the state were overturned in 2024. He has been charged with two counts of committing a 'criminal sexual act' in the first degree and one count of third-degree rape. Closing arguments in the retrial wrapped on Wednesday, and jury deliberations began on Thursday. Scotto also asked Weinstein why he decided not to testify in the retrial. Though he said he 'wanted to,' Weinstein added that Aidala 'said to me that the jury was very feeling strongly, that the jury understood our case and would be sympathetic to our case and that the DA would try to rip me apart if I took the stand.' Weinstein continued, 'I'm not afraid of the DA, but this was the best advice and this is the advice you often hear: don't take the stand if you don't have to.' Listen to Weinstein's full interview on 'Good Day New York' here. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: Animated Program — Can Netflix Score Big With 'Arcane,' 'Devil May Cry' and the Final Season of 'Big Mouth?' What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store