logo
What you need to know about the 'Trumpet' texts being sent to millions of Australians

What you need to know about the 'Trumpet' texts being sent to millions of Australians

Daily Mail​30-04-2025
Trumpet of Patriots chairman Clive Palmer has spoken out after his party sent out a message to millions of Australians last week, leading many Aussies to ask the same question: How did he get my number?
Political parties are exempt from spam and privacy laws, and are able to send unsolicited text messages without an opt-out option. Anthony Albanese said on Wednesday he'd be 'happy' to ban the texts but added, 'I'm not sure that that fits with our democracy,' and wouldn't commit to a law change.
The spam text messages have caused a furore and led South Australian candidate Mark Aldridge to distance himself from Trumpet of Patriots and resign.
Party chairman Clive Palmer said the party had sent about 17 million text messages and received just 8000 complaints.
Mr Palmer said the number of complaints were 'not too bad' considering how many text messages were sent out.
'Those 8000 people I have concluded are unlikely to vote for us' he told The Daily Telegraph.
So how did Mr Palmer get your number?
'I haven't got anybody's number. There are a number of services that are available to send marketing text messages to the Australian population,' he said.
'They would've had many texts from the other parties … it's the same as giving out how-to-vote cards and things like that.'
Palmer also hit back at Mr Albanese, saying it was the major parties that had exempted politicians from spam laws.
'It was the Liberals and Labor that both voted in favour of legislation that allows political parties to SMS,' he told The Sydney Morning Herald.
Political parties likely get Australians' numbers from information brokers, the electoral role, or simply entering them at random.
Saturday's election is the last one without spending caps, and Mr Palmer is going all out, with leader Suellen Wrightson front and centre of the party's media campaign.
Though she has been billed as the country's next prime minister, Ms Wrightson has almost zero chance of winning the Labor-held seat of Hunter, NSW, in Saturday's election.
The point of Palmer's almost 100 political candidates is not necessarily to win, but to disrupt voting results for the major parties and publicise his agenda. The hastily-assembled candidates include a convicted conman and a boatbuilder who is facing weapons and stalking charges.
Policies include cutting immigration by 80 per cent, free university education and a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) like the one in Trump's administration.
Ms Wrightson was chosen as party leader after being involved with Palmer's political activities for about 12 years.
The Trumpet of Patriots website describes her as a 'former elected member of Cessnock City Council, seasoned political campaigner at state and federal level, and respected chronic disease management coordinator'.
She was elected to Cessnock City Council as a Liberal in 2012, but switched her allegiance to the Palmer United Party the following year.
In 2013 she ran in the third spot on the party's NSW Senate ticket in the federal election.
In 2016, she resigned from council in order to again run as a PUP Senate candidate for NSW, this time at the top of the party's ticket.
Ms Wrightson was back in 2019 campaigning for Palmer's party - renamed as the United Australia Party (UAP).
This time, she contested the seat of Warringah against the likes of Tony Abbott and Zali Steggall in the 2019 election.
Her most recent role with the UAP was as chief of staff for Senator Ralph Babet, currently the party's only federal elected representative.
'Suellen Wrightson was employed as my chief of staff, but resigned to run as a candidate in the Federal Election,' Senator Babet told Daily Mail Australia.
'Suellen is courageous and principled. She is focused on restoring freedom, faith and national pride. She will build a better future for all Australians.'
Daily Mail Australia has contacted Ms Wrightson for comment.
Cutting government waste
This is central to the party's identity and is a clear echo of the Elon Musk-run department of government efficiency or DOGE in the US.
In fact, Mr Palmer name-checked the X and Tesla owner.
'Our biggest policy is to cut government waste, much as Elon Musk is doing in the United States,' he said.
However, actual details about how the Trumpet of Patriots would go about slimming down government bureaucracy in Canberra were thin on the ground.
Mr Palmer suggested his party planned to trim the red tape in the 'same way as Musk'.
'We plan to have a team of people...who can go through the procedures in Australia that sees more and more of the public sector having more and more of our capital,' he added.
'You've got to realise the public sector doesn't create wealth and it's the private sector that does. So the more money we've got in the private sector creating jobs, wealth and growth the bigger taxation and the better taxation base we've got.'
Recognising only two genders
In a carbon copy of the US President, Mr Palmer said his new party would only recognise two genders - male and female.
'We don't want men in women's sports and we don't want males dressed as females confusing our children in our schools,' Mr Palmer said.
'All children should be entitled to a safe and normal environment in our schools and public toilets.
'All children must be entitled to decide who they are and what their sexual orientation is when they're adults, and not have it foisted on them before they have even commenced puberty.'
Trump signed an executive order recognising only male and female sexes just days after being sworn in as President.
Recalling Kevin Rudd
Mr Palmer also claimed he would recall former PM Kevin Rudd as the Australian ambassador to the US, following damaging revelations of the former prime minister's bad-mouthing of Trump.
'It's time to bring Kevin Rudd back from Washington,' Mr Palmer said.
'There's not too many ambassadors in Washington that have insulted the president of the United States.
'Kevin Rudd ranks alone in that and Australia needs an elected representative in Washington that can support our nation in a time of toil, in a time where our living standards are declining and when our people are hungry.'
Mr Rudd has in the past labelled the President a 'village idiot', a 'traitor to the West' and 'the most destructive president in history'.
Trump has previously signalled his disapproval of Mr Rudd, branding him 'nasty'.
'I don't know much about him. I heard he was a little bit nasty,' Trump told GB News last year.
'I hear he's not the brightest bulb, but I don't know much about him. If he's at all hostile, he will not be there long.'
Feeding the hungry
Mr Palmer has long campaigned to raise awareness about the hunger crisis in Australia.
But his solution to the food crisis is also apparently rooted in cutting government waste.
'There's over 3.7 million Australian households in this country that don't have enough food, that can't afford it because of the cost of living that the Labor Party has brought upon them because of the excess spending and waste in our public service, we find Australian children going to be at night hungry,' Mr Palmer said.
The billionaire claimed he had donated $5million to Foodbank to help feed struggling families.
'I was personally concerned about it, that's why I donated $5million because I want to encourage other Australians, other billionaires who do nothing all day but sit on their a**e put money in,' he said.
'But it hasn't had that effect. People tend to like to keep their money so I think the government should step in there.'
Capping immigration
Mr Palmer, who is Australia's sixth richest person, with an estimated wealth of nearly $23billion, also hinted that the Trumpet of Patriots would seek to cap immigration.
'Too much immigration destroys our infrastructure, roads, schools and hospitals, creates congestion and the destruction of communities,' he said.
'Australia should be for all Australians living here. Trumpet of Patriots will put Australians first and make Australia great again.'
Building high-speed rail networks into major cities to enable cheaper housing
In perhaps his most left-field policy announcement, Mr Palmer pointed to policies brought in by the Japanese government to tackle their housing crisis.
'When you look at some of the solutions that were adopted by the Japanese government when the same thing happened in Tokyo and Yokohama was to put a fast train just 120km outside of Tokyo and to develop cheaper land for their population where they could all commute to the city within 20 minutes,' he said.
Mr Palmer said this would allow young people to put a foot on the housing ladder.
This was supported by Ms Wrightson, who added: 'We can solve the housing crisis by (building) fast trains from our capital cities to regional Australia to open up affordable land for housing with a 20-minute commute to the CBD.
Investing in Australian manufacturing
Asked whether he would seek to emulate Trump's punitive tariffs would impact Australia's steel production, Mr Palmer said 'I don't think so'.
'I think we need more steel production in Australia, we need more manufacturing in Australia,' he added.
'We export so much iron to China and japan they use that for their manufacturing base and they become the world's largest manufacturer.
'We want jobs in Australia. We've got substantial iron ore deposits, substantial coal deposits, bauxite, copper, molybdenum - those minerals should be developed here.'
He also called for Australia's steel mills to be brought into the 21st century with new technology.
'It makes sense to invest in our country,' he said.
Free speech
When questioned whether spending $123million to gain only one seat was a wise use of money, Mr Palmer claimed it was.
'It's a good use of my money because at the last election we spent $100million saying that the Covid vaccine was not safe and effective and it's proven not to be safe and effective,' he said.
'One in five million Australians didn't have the vaccine. That's $20 each based on your calculations and that was a good investment.'
He added: 'I'm more than happy to spend my funds on something protective, defending the rights of free speech and whatever is required to be spent it will be spent.'
Asked if he would be running at the election, Mr Palmer claimed he was 'too old' and would only serve as a 'functionary'.
At one stage, Mr Palmer misspoke and incorrectly referred to the party as the 'trumpet of parrots'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves: will she scrap tax free pension lump sums?
Rachel Reeves: will she scrap tax free pension lump sums?

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Rachel Reeves: will she scrap tax free pension lump sums?

Older savers could see more of their pensions taxed as the Treasury explores new limits 💸 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Pensioners over 60 could face lower tax-free lump sums from their pension pots Current cap is £268,000; proposals could reduce it to around £40,000 The change aims to raise up to £2bn to help plug a £50bn government shortfall Larger pension pots would be most affected; smaller savings likely see little impact Any final decision is expected in the Autumn Budget, likely between late October and early November 2025 Pension savers over 60 could soon face tighter limits on how much they can withdraw from their retirement pots without paying tax. That's as Chancellor Rachel Reeves considers changes aimed at plugging a multi-billion-pound gap in public finances. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But what exactly might the changes look like, and how could they affect pensioners going forward? Here is everything you need to know about it: What could change? Currently, retirees can take up to 25% of their pension pot tax-free, capped at £268,000. Any withdrawals above this are subject to income tax, offering flexibility for those looking to cover big expenses, pay off debts, or gift money to family. But officials are now reviewing whether lowering this tax-free threshold could raise as much as £2 billion a year for the Treasury, as reported by The Daily Telegraph. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor Rachel Reeves during a speech at Siemens Healthineers in January 2025 in Eynsham, England (Photo: Peter Cziborra -) | Getty Images The idea has been floated amid growing concerns over a projected £50 billion shortfall in government finances. Experts warn that without changes, the Chancellor may need to revisit borrowing rules or hike taxes elsewhere. Pensions Minister Torsten Bell has previously proposed lowering the tax-free lump sum limit to £40,000, a significant drop from the current cap. While such a move could generate additional tax revenue, it also raises questions about the long-term planning of people who rely on pensions as their primary source of retirement income. What could it mean for your money? For older savers, any reduction in the tax-free lump sum could have a tangible impact on retirement planning. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Those approaching or already in retirement may have been counting on the ability to access a substantial chunk of their pension to fund home improvements, cover healthcare costs, or help adult children financially. A lower limit could mean more withdrawals are taxed at their regular income tax rate, potentially reducing the amount available for these plans. Any changes to the tax-free lump sum would would primarily affect larger pension pots - those with more modest savings may see little impact. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How likely is a change? While Treasury sources have called a cut to the lump sum 'unlikely,' economists suggest it is on the table alongside other options, such as a 'mansion tax' on capital gains from high-value property sales. According to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), the Chancellor faces a £41.2 billion shortfall to meet her fiscal rules. To restore a modest £10 billion buffer in forecasts, the government must raise £51.1 billion overall, leaving no easy options. Targeting pension tax relief is seen as one of the more viable avenues, alongside potential changes to property taxation. But a Treasury spokesman emphasised that growing the economy remains the Government's priority. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible,' they said, adding that income tax, National Insurance, and VAT rates remain protected. When is the Autumn Budget? Reeves is expected to outline any concrete changes at a future Budget. The Autumn Budget 2025 has not been officially scheduled yet, but following tradition, it is most likely to be delivered in late October or early November 2025. It is broadly expected to fall between October 28 and November 4. For now, homeowners and buyers alike will be watching closely, as this shift could reshape one of the biggest financial transactions of our lives. The second budget under Chancellor Reeves is expected in a couple of months, and all eyes are on whether she will break a key manifesto promise not to raise taxes for working people.

Rachel Reeves: will she scrap tax free pension lump sums?
Rachel Reeves: will she scrap tax free pension lump sums?

Scotsman

time7 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Rachel Reeves: will she scrap tax free pension lump sums?

Older savers could see more of their pensions taxed as the Treasury explores new limits 💸 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Pensioners over 60 could face lower tax-free lump sums from their pension pots Current cap is £268,000; proposals could reduce it to around £40,000 The change aims to raise up to £2bn to help plug a £50bn government shortfall Larger pension pots would be most affected; smaller savings likely see little impact Any final decision is expected in the Autumn Budget, likely between late October and early November 2025 Pension savers over 60 could soon face tighter limits on how much they can withdraw from their retirement pots without paying tax. That's as Chancellor Rachel Reeves considers changes aimed at plugging a multi-billion-pound gap in public finances. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But what exactly might the changes look like, and how could they affect pensioners going forward? Here is everything you need to know about it: What could change? Currently, retirees can take up to 25% of their pension pot tax-free, capped at £268,000. Any withdrawals above this are subject to income tax, offering flexibility for those looking to cover big expenses, pay off debts, or gift money to family. But officials are now reviewing whether lowering this tax-free threshold could raise as much as £2 billion a year for the Treasury, as reported by The Daily Telegraph. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor Rachel Reeves during a speech at Siemens Healthineers in January 2025 in Eynsham, England (Photo: Peter Cziborra -) | Getty Images The idea has been floated amid growing concerns over a projected £50 billion shortfall in government finances. Experts warn that without changes, the Chancellor may need to revisit borrowing rules or hike taxes elsewhere. Pensions Minister Torsten Bell has previously proposed lowering the tax-free lump sum limit to £40,000, a significant drop from the current cap. While such a move could generate additional tax revenue, it also raises questions about the long-term planning of people who rely on pensions as their primary source of retirement income. What could it mean for your money? For older savers, any reduction in the tax-free lump sum could have a tangible impact on retirement planning. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Those approaching or already in retirement may have been counting on the ability to access a substantial chunk of their pension to fund home improvements, cover healthcare costs, or help adult children financially. A lower limit could mean more withdrawals are taxed at their regular income tax rate, potentially reducing the amount available for these plans. Any changes to the tax-free lump sum would would primarily affect larger pension pots - those with more modest savings may see little impact. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How likely is a change? While Treasury sources have called a cut to the lump sum 'unlikely,' economists suggest it is on the table alongside other options, such as a 'mansion tax' on capital gains from high-value property sales. According to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), the Chancellor faces a £41.2 billion shortfall to meet her fiscal rules. To restore a modest £10 billion buffer in forecasts, the government must raise £51.1 billion overall, leaving no easy options. Targeting pension tax relief is seen as one of the more viable avenues, alongside potential changes to property taxation. But a Treasury spokesman emphasised that growing the economy remains the Government's priority. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible,' they said, adding that income tax, National Insurance, and VAT rates remain protected. When is the Autumn Budget? Reeves is expected to outline any concrete changes at a future Budget. The Autumn Budget 2025 has not been officially scheduled yet, but following tradition, it is most likely to be delivered in late October or early November 2025. It is broadly expected to fall between October 28 and November 4. For now, homeowners and buyers alike will be watching closely, as this shift could reshape one of the biggest financial transactions of our lives.

A WEALTH tax, inheritance fees and the end to the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount: Extraordinary push to change Australia - here's who would get hit
A WEALTH tax, inheritance fees and the end to the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount: Extraordinary push to change Australia - here's who would get hit

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

A WEALTH tax, inheritance fees and the end to the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount: Extraordinary push to change Australia - here's who would get hit

A left-leaning think tank has called for the Albanese government to consider levelling a two per cent 'wealth tax' on Australians earning more than $5million. In a submission to the government's three day economic roundtable, the Australia Institute recommended three 'simple' tax reforms to bolster the nation's finances. A wealth tax alone - which would exclude superannuation and the family home - would raise more than $41billion per year, the Institute said. The other suggested two reforms, aimed at tackling intergenerational inequality, were to revive the inheritance tax of the 1960s and scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax (CGT) discount. Australians receive a 50 per cent CGT discount when they dispose of an asset - for instance, if they sell property - if they have owned it for at least 12 months and are a resident for tax purposes. Researchers believe that these measures would raise an extra $10 billion and $19 billion respectively, meaning the Institute's three proposals would rake in a grand total of $70billion. The Institute claims the money would help pay for 'well-funded schools and hospitals; decent, affordable housing for all; a world-class NDIS; a fair welfare system and dozens of other things'. Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, said that these were not 'radical ideas' and countries like the UK, US and Japan all had inheritance taxes. 'Australia is a low-tax country that does not do a good job of taxing wealth,' Mr Grudnoff said. 'It is one of the few developed economies in the world which has neither a wealth tax nor an inheritance tax.' 'Correcting this would raise huge amounts of extra revenue for essential services and ease growing inequality in Australia. 'Even if you were to exempt the family home and superannuation, a 2 per cent wealth tax on people worth $5 million would raise $41 billion per year. 'If you limited it to just the 200 richest households in the country, it would still raise $12.5 billion per year.' He added: 'It's time to scrap the capital gains tax discount, for many reasons. 'Not only would it put downward pressure on house prices and reduce inequality, it would raise an extra $19 billion a year.' But AMP Chief Economist Shane Oliver said the plan would 'hurt the economy'. '"Tax the rich" sounds fine in theory, but all of those reforms will further increase the tax on high-income earners,' he told 'Our tax system is already skewed, it's already highly progressive.' Mr Oliver pointed to the fact that the top 10 per cent of income earners in Australia already pay almost 50 per cent income tax. He said these tax reforms, while they would raise a lot of money initially, would be destructive in the long term. 'You might help the budget initially but you'll damage the economy long-term because there'll be less work incentive,' Mr Oliver added. 'Wealth tax I think is incredibly dangerous … You want Australians to feel confident to go out and start businesses and build up their wealth – that's how we get ahead.' A pair of university economists last week suggested that Australians pay capital gains tax on the family home in order to tackle the housing crisis. Peter Siminski from the University of Technology, Sydney, and Roger Wilkins from the University of Melbourne, say the longstanding capital gains tax exemption on the family home favours the rich and costs the government much-needed revenue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store