
What you need to know about the 'Trumpet' texts being sent to millions of Australians
Trumpet of Patriots chairman Clive Palmer has spoken out after his party sent out a message to millions of Australians last week, leading many Aussies to ask the same question: How did he get my number?
Political parties are exempt from spam and privacy laws, and are able to send unsolicited text messages without an opt-out option. Anthony Albanese said on Wednesday he'd be 'happy' to ban the texts but added, 'I'm not sure that that fits with our democracy,' and wouldn't commit to a law change.
The spam text messages have caused a furore and led South Australian candidate Mark Aldridge to distance himself from Trumpet of Patriots and resign.
Party chairman Clive Palmer said the party had sent about 17 million text messages and received just 8000 complaints.
Mr Palmer said the number of complaints were 'not too bad' considering how many text messages were sent out.
'Those 8000 people I have concluded are unlikely to vote for us' he told The Daily Telegraph.
So how did Mr Palmer get your number?
'I haven't got anybody's number. There are a number of services that are available to send marketing text messages to the Australian population,' he said.
'They would've had many texts from the other parties … it's the same as giving out how-to-vote cards and things like that.'
Palmer also hit back at Mr Albanese, saying it was the major parties that had exempted politicians from spam laws.
'It was the Liberals and Labor that both voted in favour of legislation that allows political parties to SMS,' he told The Sydney Morning Herald.
Political parties likely get Australians' numbers from information brokers, the electoral role, or simply entering them at random.
Saturday's election is the last one without spending caps, and Mr Palmer is going all out, with leader Suellen Wrightson front and centre of the party's media campaign.
Though she has been billed as the country's next prime minister, Ms Wrightson has almost zero chance of winning the Labor-held seat of Hunter, NSW, in Saturday's election.
The point of Palmer's almost 100 political candidates is not necessarily to win, but to disrupt voting results for the major parties and publicise his agenda. The hastily-assembled candidates include a convicted conman and a boatbuilder who is facing weapons and stalking charges.
Policies include cutting immigration by 80 per cent, free university education and a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) like the one in Trump's administration.
Ms Wrightson was chosen as party leader after being involved with Palmer's political activities for about 12 years.
The Trumpet of Patriots website describes her as a 'former elected member of Cessnock City Council, seasoned political campaigner at state and federal level, and respected chronic disease management coordinator'.
She was elected to Cessnock City Council as a Liberal in 2012, but switched her allegiance to the Palmer United Party the following year.
In 2013 she ran in the third spot on the party's NSW Senate ticket in the federal election.
In 2016, she resigned from council in order to again run as a PUP Senate candidate for NSW, this time at the top of the party's ticket.
Ms Wrightson was back in 2019 campaigning for Palmer's party - renamed as the United Australia Party (UAP).
This time, she contested the seat of Warringah against the likes of Tony Abbott and Zali Steggall in the 2019 election.
Her most recent role with the UAP was as chief of staff for Senator Ralph Babet, currently the party's only federal elected representative.
'Suellen Wrightson was employed as my chief of staff, but resigned to run as a candidate in the Federal Election,' Senator Babet told Daily Mail Australia.
'Suellen is courageous and principled. She is focused on restoring freedom, faith and national pride. She will build a better future for all Australians.'
Daily Mail Australia has contacted Ms Wrightson for comment.
Cutting government waste
This is central to the party's identity and is a clear echo of the Elon Musk-run department of government efficiency or DOGE in the US.
In fact, Mr Palmer name-checked the X and Tesla owner.
'Our biggest policy is to cut government waste, much as Elon Musk is doing in the United States,' he said.
However, actual details about how the Trumpet of Patriots would go about slimming down government bureaucracy in Canberra were thin on the ground.
Mr Palmer suggested his party planned to trim the red tape in the 'same way as Musk'.
'We plan to have a team of people...who can go through the procedures in Australia that sees more and more of the public sector having more and more of our capital,' he added.
'You've got to realise the public sector doesn't create wealth and it's the private sector that does. So the more money we've got in the private sector creating jobs, wealth and growth the bigger taxation and the better taxation base we've got.'
Recognising only two genders
In a carbon copy of the US President, Mr Palmer said his new party would only recognise two genders - male and female.
'We don't want men in women's sports and we don't want males dressed as females confusing our children in our schools,' Mr Palmer said.
'All children should be entitled to a safe and normal environment in our schools and public toilets.
'All children must be entitled to decide who they are and what their sexual orientation is when they're adults, and not have it foisted on them before they have even commenced puberty.'
Trump signed an executive order recognising only male and female sexes just days after being sworn in as President.
Recalling Kevin Rudd
Mr Palmer also claimed he would recall former PM Kevin Rudd as the Australian ambassador to the US, following damaging revelations of the former prime minister's bad-mouthing of Trump.
'It's time to bring Kevin Rudd back from Washington,' Mr Palmer said.
'There's not too many ambassadors in Washington that have insulted the president of the United States.
'Kevin Rudd ranks alone in that and Australia needs an elected representative in Washington that can support our nation in a time of toil, in a time where our living standards are declining and when our people are hungry.'
Mr Rudd has in the past labelled the President a 'village idiot', a 'traitor to the West' and 'the most destructive president in history'.
Trump has previously signalled his disapproval of Mr Rudd, branding him 'nasty'.
'I don't know much about him. I heard he was a little bit nasty,' Trump told GB News last year.
'I hear he's not the brightest bulb, but I don't know much about him. If he's at all hostile, he will not be there long.'
Feeding the hungry
Mr Palmer has long campaigned to raise awareness about the hunger crisis in Australia.
But his solution to the food crisis is also apparently rooted in cutting government waste.
'There's over 3.7 million Australian households in this country that don't have enough food, that can't afford it because of the cost of living that the Labor Party has brought upon them because of the excess spending and waste in our public service, we find Australian children going to be at night hungry,' Mr Palmer said.
The billionaire claimed he had donated $5million to Foodbank to help feed struggling families.
'I was personally concerned about it, that's why I donated $5million because I want to encourage other Australians, other billionaires who do nothing all day but sit on their a**e put money in,' he said.
'But it hasn't had that effect. People tend to like to keep their money so I think the government should step in there.'
Capping immigration
Mr Palmer, who is Australia's sixth richest person, with an estimated wealth of nearly $23billion, also hinted that the Trumpet of Patriots would seek to cap immigration.
'Too much immigration destroys our infrastructure, roads, schools and hospitals, creates congestion and the destruction of communities,' he said.
'Australia should be for all Australians living here. Trumpet of Patriots will put Australians first and make Australia great again.'
Building high-speed rail networks into major cities to enable cheaper housing
In perhaps his most left-field policy announcement, Mr Palmer pointed to policies brought in by the Japanese government to tackle their housing crisis.
'When you look at some of the solutions that were adopted by the Japanese government when the same thing happened in Tokyo and Yokohama was to put a fast train just 120km outside of Tokyo and to develop cheaper land for their population where they could all commute to the city within 20 minutes,' he said.
Mr Palmer said this would allow young people to put a foot on the housing ladder.
This was supported by Ms Wrightson, who added: 'We can solve the housing crisis by (building) fast trains from our capital cities to regional Australia to open up affordable land for housing with a 20-minute commute to the CBD.
Investing in Australian manufacturing
Asked whether he would seek to emulate Trump's punitive tariffs would impact Australia's steel production, Mr Palmer said 'I don't think so'.
'I think we need more steel production in Australia, we need more manufacturing in Australia,' he added.
'We export so much iron to China and japan they use that for their manufacturing base and they become the world's largest manufacturer.
'We want jobs in Australia. We've got substantial iron ore deposits, substantial coal deposits, bauxite, copper, molybdenum - those minerals should be developed here.'
He also called for Australia's steel mills to be brought into the 21st century with new technology.
'It makes sense to invest in our country,' he said.
Free speech
When questioned whether spending $123million to gain only one seat was a wise use of money, Mr Palmer claimed it was.
'It's a good use of my money because at the last election we spent $100million saying that the Covid vaccine was not safe and effective and it's proven not to be safe and effective,' he said.
'One in five million Australians didn't have the vaccine. That's $20 each based on your calculations and that was a good investment.'
He added: 'I'm more than happy to spend my funds on something protective, defending the rights of free speech and whatever is required to be spent it will be spent.'
Asked if he would be running at the election, Mr Palmer claimed he was 'too old' and would only serve as a 'functionary'.
At one stage, Mr Palmer misspoke and incorrectly referred to the party as the 'trumpet of parrots'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
2 days ago
- Scottish Sun
Moment LA cops shoot reporter on live TV while Brit photographer is hospitalised by rubber bullet during street anarchy
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the moment a TV journalist was shot live on air as she reported on the violent immigration riots in Los Angeles. Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi was covering the protests for Nine News when she was blasted at close range by a rubber bullet, collapsing in agony mid-broadcast. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Lauren Tomasi was reporting live from the streets of LA amid the violent protests in the city 2 The Australian reporter was shot with a rubber bullet by riot police live on air Credit: X 'The LAPD are moving in on horseback and firing rubber bullets at protesters,' Tomasi told viewers, as loud bangs echoed across Downtown LA. Suddenly, a police officer swung his weapon towards her, and a cloud of smoke erupted near the correspondent. Caught on camera, Tomasi doubled over in pain, live on air. 'You just f***ing shot a reporter!' a furious protester screamed at police, as others rushed to help the injured Aussie. Despite the shocking moment, Tomasi managed to yell back, 'I'm good, I'm good.' Her network later confirmed she was 'left sore but otherwise unharmed' by the impact — but the image of a journalist being targeted has already sparked outrage. It comes after a British photojournalist was rushed to hospital for emergency surgery when a 'sponge bullet' tore through his thigh during the same night of violence. Nick Stern, 60, from Hertford, said he had made himself clearly visible as a member of the press when he was shot while photographing a standoff between protesters and riot cops. 'I felt this horrific shooting pain impacting my leg. I felt down immediately and felt this large lump … protesters came to help and I was just saying, 'Sit me down, sit me down'… then I blacked out,' he told The Times. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Aussies unleash after Scott Morrison receives top accolade in King's Birthday Honours: 'Baffles me'
Australians have lashed out after Scott Morrison was awarded the highest accolade in the King's Birthday Honours List. The former prime minister, who led the nation for four years from 2018 to 2022, was recognised for his 'eminent service to the people and the parliament of Australia, particularly as prime minister'. A Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) is the highest award of the Order of Australia honours system. It is followed by Officer of the Order (AO), Member of the Order (AM), and Medal of the Order (OAM). Former prime ministers are typically honoured in the King's Birthday awards, but the 30th prime minister's recognition sparked widespread criticism. Mr Morrison's term as prime minister was overshadowed by multiple controversies, including his secret appointment to several ministerial portfolios, involvement in the Robodebt scandal, and his widely criticised remark during the 2019 Black Summer bushfires: 'I don't hold a hose, mate'. On Monday, Australians took to social media to blast the former PM. 'If you get a shiny trinket just because your a*** has occupied the PM's chair then what is that trinket worth?' one Australian wrote on X. 'Someone should have intervened to deprive Australia's worst ever Prime Minister of this award.' 'It baffles me that we award public servants for doing the job they were paid for. I understand if they do something 'special', but politicians very rarely do,' another added. 'Morrison certainly did nothing 'special'. Not to mention the retirement package that they all enjoy.' 'It's demeaning of the honour system to be giving this cruel, disingenuous s***-bag any honour,' a third added. One Aussie kept a close tally of Mr Morrison's missteps. 'You lied to the public. Repeatedly. You appointed yourself to five secret ministries. Then claimed it was no big deal,' they wrote. 'You prayed the virus away, outsourced the vaccine rollout, then took credit when premiers fixed your mess. 'You fled to Hawaii during a bushfire crisis. Then blamed your daughters. 'Oh Scotty. Even your religion's ashamed of you. Jesus turned water into wine. You turned democracy into a private members club for gas executives.' Some Australians said Mr Morrison was 'underrated'. 'Respect, well deserved,' one wrote. 'Well deserved, Scomo is very underrated and deserves a lot more respect than what he is given,' another said. Since the establishment of the Order of Australia in 1975, every ex-prime minister has been appointed a Companion except Paul Keating. He declined because he believed the honours should be reserved for those whose community work went unrecognised. Mr Morrison's honour specifically points to his 'notable contributions to global engagement, to leadership of the national Covid response, to economic initiatives, and to national security enhancements, especially through leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS'. He received significant support during the early days of the pandemic, with an April 2020 Newspoll revealing he had the highest satisfaction rating for any prime minister since Kevin Rudd in 2009. But by the end of his second term, he had become the most unpopular major party leader since at least 1987, according to an Australian National University study. The King's Birthday Honours List names 581 people in the General Division of the Order of Australia, including academics, ex-sport stars, leaders and creatives. 'These honours recognise the selfless service, integrity, achievement, creativity, and care that flourish across our country,' Governor-General Sam Mostyn said. Fourteen people were appointed to the highest honour, AC. Baz Luhrmann and Catherine Martin, best known for their work on films including Moulin Rouge, The Great Gatsby and Strictly Ballroom, received the accolade for their service to the arts. Environmental scientist Mark Howden, who served as a vice chair on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, was also appointed to AC alongside business leader Jennifer Westacott and NASA climate science centre co-director Graeme Stephens. Bangerang and Wiradjuri woman Geraldine Atkinson has been named an Officer (AO) of the Order of Australia for her work with Indigenous communities and reconciliation.


The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
How did you get my number? Inside the shadowy world of data brokers
Priya Dev has a clue on how political spam ended up in her inbox during the 2025 federal election campaign. Like many Australians, Dev endured an unwanted flood of Trumpet of Patriots text messages – Clive Palmer has admitted to sending 17m of them. But it was email spam from one of the major political parties that she thought she could do something about. Political parties are exempt from privacy law, so they have no obligation to tell individuals how they find your data, and there is no way to opt out. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email But the Australian National University data science academic had a clue: the emails were addressed to a fake name she had used for online purchases years ago – a name also used when she received spam from one of the minor political parties in 2020. 'It looks like it's come from a transaction,' she says. 'It would likely be some sort of online e-commerce transaction, or energy transaction or something like that.' Tracking down how organisations gain access to individual contact information is 'really hard with political parties because they just ignore you,' Dev says. 'If I can find out the origin of my data from this mission, it would be really amazing.' It's the second time Dev has attempted to track how someone got her data, working through the labyrinthine web of data brokers who – often without our awareness – buy and sell information on the public to advertisers or others who want to know more about us. Last year, after receiving dozens of unwanted calls, Dev was able to track who held her phone number back to real estate giant CoreLogic Australia, who told her they had been able to legitimately buy her data from another data broker firm in 2023, who had bought her data from another data broker in 2016. That company told her it obtained her data through a 2014 marketing campaign and had probably passed on her information to at least 50 other companies. Dev's experience is not an isolated one. Crikey reported in April that a child's email address that was signed up for a charity fundraiser more than a decade ago received Liberal party political spam at the most recent election. The answer to how marketers and others find out your contact details and other personal information is a complicated one. Katharine Kemp, an associate professor who leads the public interest law and tech initiative at the University of New South Wales, says it often occurs through a data-matching service that joins up your personal information across different service providers who then sell that via data brokers. Kemp said she had the experience where a mortgage broker had called her asking if she was in the market for a mortgage – she suspects they got her information from a real estate agent during an open house visit. But finding out how they got that information can often be hard, Kemp says. When she asks those who contact her where they got her details, 'they will obfuscate or sometimes just immediately hang up or … give a silly answer, and then when you press them, they very quickly end the call.' The federal privacy commissioner, Carly Kind, describes the data broking industry in general terms as 'very opaque', with 'a very complex value chain of personal information'. 'So because people don't really know what's going on, they're not really empowered to complain about it,' she says. 'I think people find it creepy, the way in which their personal information has been passed around through data brokers and ends up in places that they don't expect.' One global data broker organisation has described its work as 'enabling the exchange of information between businesses in the consumer interest and in the support of Australian corporates and small businesses,' according to a 2023 submission to the Australian consumer watchdog's inquiry into data brokering. The kinds of information collected includes names, addresses, age, browsing behaviour, purchasing behaviour, financial status, employment, qualification, tenancy history and other socioeconomic and demographic information. A Australia report last year found the types of data bought and sold by brokers could include location and movements over time, sexual interests, financial concerns, banking and utility providers, personal problems, gambling or drinking habits, and recent online purchases. Data broker companies include credit reporting companies, fraud and identity verification companies, news corporations, property companies, tenancy data brokers, marketers, loyalty programs, and social media platforms. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found in its report last year on data brokering that privacy policies used by companies to allow the sharing of data can use 'ambiguous language', making it hard for consumers to identify who their data is being shared with and for what purposes. They also make it harder, the report found, for people to figure out who holds their data and to opt out of its collection. The average number of words in a typical privacy policy is 6,876 and it would take 29 minutes to read, the report found. Research conducted as part of the report found 74% of Australians are uncomfortable with the idea of their personal information being shared or sold. Some companies seek to downplay concern and privacy obligations – such as providing data held on a person by request – by de-identifying the data collected on consumers. Consumer group Choice found last year data brokers claimed to not hold data on consumers who were members of their loyalty programs, with names taken off the data held. Kind, the privacy commissioner, says the assertion that de-identified data may not be considered personal information under the Privacy Act could be 'creative interpretation' of the law by the companies collecting such data. The ACCC said de-identified data still carries risks of consumers being identified when combined with data points from other sources. Kind, speaking generally and without naming any companies in particular, said many Australians would find some of the practices of some data brokers to be 'quite uncomfortable to say the least, and often veering on affronting or outrageous'. 'The data is changing hands numerous times. So it is a very complex space, and I think undoubtedly, a big chunk of it is legitimate and in compliance with the [privacy] act. But that's quite fuzzy – where that stops and where less legitimate activity starts.' The ACCC report did not make any recommendations, but supported the implementation of strengthened privacy laws in Australia. Kind says the ACCC's work has cleared the way for her office to begin looking into the practices of the sector, saying the Privacy Act today 'has many elements which could be applied to data brokers to rein in their practices'. 'It's an issue that I'm keen to prioritise and my regulatory team is currently looking into potentially using our powers in this space,' Kind says. Dev says there needs to be a debate about extending the privacy obligations to political parties, which would force them to be transparent with the public about how they acquire personal data. The exemption means that political parties do not have to respond to her requests about what data they hold on her, Dev says. Kemp says she thinks there is some prospect of tighter rules around data brokering, but there will be no appetite from politicians to change the law on political party obligations. 'But I don't think we should give up on it as an issue in an area that requires reform.'