Is this the future of app-building? Google Opal lets you go from idea to web app instantly
Unlike traditional coding, which usually demands a working knowledge of at least one programming language, Opal lets users start by typing a simple description of the app they want. The system processes these instructions and produces a functional web app, giving the user a visual overview of how information moves through the app from start to finish. The interface here is clean and easy to follow. Users see steps and outcomes in a way that removes much of the confusion typical of normal code editors.
Once an app is created, the editing does not have to stop. Opal offers a set of tools in its editor that let users update their prompts, add steps, or try out different logical flows right in the visual workspace. There is no need to write or rework blocks of code. The changes update the app in real time and quickly show the results in the development panel. For those who want to work with something already made, Opal includes a gallery of existing apps. Users can open these, study how they work, and remix them to make something new. This approach encourages sharing and keeps the process moving in a creative direction.
After an app is ready, Opal makes it easy to publish and share. Users get a public link that others with Google accounts can use to test, give feedback, or use the app themselves. The sharing function works well for teams, classrooms, or anyone looking to build and distribute small, practical web tools.
One of Opal's main strengths is that it takes away the fears people often have about coding. The visual display and direct use of language are there to help those unfamiliar with programming take their ideas from thought to working tool without any intimidating obstacles. At the same time, experienced users can focus more on the actual logic and design of the app rather than getting stuck with technical setbacks.
Many companies have recently invested in similar tools to lower the barriers to app creation for everyday users. Google Opal now joins other platforms, like those from Canva and Figma, that focus on direct, prompt-based and visual workflows. These tools all try to include more people in the tech space, making new app ideas possible for those with little or no coding history.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
AI agents may replace human workers and also go wrong
We are entering the third phase of generative AI. First came the chatbots, followed by the assistants. Now we are beginning to see agents: systems that aspire for greater autonomy and can also work in 'teams' or use tools to accomplish the most complex tasks. The latest hot product is OpenAI's ChatGPT agent. This combines two pre-existing products (Operator and Deep Research) into a single more powerful system which, according to the developer, 'thinks and acts'. These new systems represent a step up from earlier AI tools. Knowing how they work and what they can do – as well as their drawbacks and risks – is rapidly becoming essential. From chatbots to agents: ChatGPT launched the chatbot era in November 2022, but despite its huge popularity the conversational interface limited what could be done with the technology. Enter the AI assistant or copilot. These are systems built on top of the same large language models that power generative AI chatbots, only now designed to carry out tasks with human instruction and supervision. Agents are another step up. They are intended to pursue goals (rather than just complete tasks) with varying degrees of autonomy, supported by more advanced capabilities such as reasoning and memory. Multiple AI agent systems may be able to work together, communicating with each other to plan, schedule, decide and coordinate to solve complex problems. Agents are also 'tool users' as they can also call on software tools for specialised tasks – things such as web browsers, spreadsheets, payment systems and more. A year of rapid development: Agentic AI has felt imminent since late last year. A big moment came last October, when Anthropic gave its Claude chatbot the ability to interact with a computer in much the same way a human does. This system could search multiple data sources, find relevant information and submit online forms. Other AI developers were quick to follow. OpenAI released a web browsing agent named Operator, Microsoft announced Copilot agents, and we saw the launch of Google's Vertex AI and Meta's Llama agents. Earlier this year, the Chinese startup Monica demonstrated its Manus AI agent buying real estate and converting lecture recordings into summary notes. Another Chinese startup, Genspark, released a search engine agent that returns a single-page overview (like what Google does now) with embedded links to online tasks such as finding the best shopping deals. Another startup, Cluely, offers a somewhat unhinged 'cheat at anything' agent that has gained attention but is yet to deliver meaningful results. Not all agents are made for general-purpose activity. Some are specialised for areas. Coding and software engineering are at the vanguard here, with Microsoft's Copilot coding agent and OpenAI's Codex among the frontrunners. These agents can independently write, evaluate and commit code, while also assessing human-written code for errors and performance lags. Search, summarisation and more: One core strength of generative AI models is search and summarisation. Agents can use this to carry out research tasks that might take a human expert days to complete. OpenAI's Deep Research tackles complex tasks using multi-step online research. Google's AI 'co-scientist' is a more sophisticated multi-agent system that aims to help scientists generate new ideas and research proposals. Agents can do more; do more wrong: Despite the hype, AI agents come loaded with caveats. Both Anthropic and OpenAI, for example, prescribe active human supervision to minimise errors and risks. OpenAI also says its ChatGPT agent is 'high risk' due to potential for assisting in the creation of biological and chemical weapons. However, the company has not published the data behind this claim, so it is difficult to judge. But the kind of risks agents may pose in real-world situations are shown by Anthropic's Project Vend. Vend assigned an AI agent to run a staff vending machine as a small business – and the project disintegrated into hilarious yet shocking hallucinations and a fridge full of tungsten cubes instead of food. In another cautionary tale, a coding agent deleted a developer's entire database, later saying it had 'panicked'. Agents in the office Nevertheless, agents are already finding practical applications. In 2024, Telstra heavily deployed Microsoft copilot subscriptions. The company says AI-generated meeting summaries and content drafts save staff an average of 1–2 hours per week. Many large enterprises are pursuing similar strategies. Smaller companies too are experimenting with agents, such as Canberra-based construction firm Geocon's use of an interactive AI agent to manage defects in its apartment developments. Human and other costs: At present, the main risk from agents is technological displacement. As agents improve, they may replace human workers across many sectors and types of work. At the same time, agent use may also accelerate the decline of entry-level white-collar jobs. People who use AI agents are also at risk. They may rely too much on the AI, offloading important cognitive tasks. And without proper supervision and guardrails, hallucinations, cyberattacks and compounding errors can very quickly derail an agent from its task and goals into causing harm, loss and injury. The true costs are also unclear. All generative AI systems use a lot of energy, which will in turn affect the price of using agents – especially for more complex tasks. Build your own agents: Despite these ongoing concerns, we can expect AI agents will become more capable and more present in our workplaces and daily lives. It's not a bad idea to start using (and building) agents yourself, and understanding their strengths, risks and limitations. For the average user, agents are most accessible through Microsoft copilot studio. This comes with inbuilt safeguards, governance and an agent store for common tasks. For the more ambitious, you can build your own AI agent with just five lines of code using the Langchain framework. (The writer is associated with La Trobe University)
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
AP signs MoU with YouTube, Tezaract to launch ‘Creator Academy'
Vijayawada: The state govt signed an MoU with YouTube and Tezaract USA Inc. for the establishment of a 'Creator Academy'. The agreement was signed in the presence of the minister for ITE&C and HRD, Nara Lokesh, in Singapore on Tuesday. The academy will serve as a centre of excellence for creative content development. According to the MoU, Google will support the curriculum, technology, and expertise, while Tezaract will handle infrastructure and daily operations. YouTube will provide industry knowledge, channel support, and training to help students grow their digital presence. The MoU was signed by Teja Dharma, president of Tezaract, and Bhaskar Katamaneni, secretary for IT, GoAP, in the presence of Lokesh and others. "I am confident that this partnership with YouTube will unleash and harness the creative energies of Andhra Pradesh's youth and make us leaders in the digital economy. This will empower India's creative economy," said Lokesh. On the third day of the Singapore tour, Lokesh also met Google Cloud's director, Drew Brains, and requested the setup of a chip designing centre in AP. As Google already signed two MoUs with AP for setting up a data centre and for skill development in AI, Lokesh requested the establishment of a chip design facility away from China and Taiwan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In the meeting with the managing director of Murata Electronics Pvt Ltd, Hiroyuki Niwa, Lokesh explained the opportunities to set up electronics component manufacturing facilities in Andhra Pradesh. With a dedicated policy offering attractive incentives and better connectivity with ports and airports, AP is ideal for electronics manufacturing, said Lokesh. Later, he also met Carrier executive director, Arun Bhatia, and requested the setup of a cold chain logistics hub in AP. As ST Tele Media Investments plans to double its operations in India, Lokesh requested the setup of a green energy data centre in Visakhapatnam, which is poised to become a data city with a slew of investments into the sector, including Google. Lokesh met ST Tele Media Investments (India) head, Ritu Mehlawat, and requested collaboration with Andhra Pradesh. Lokesh said that the state govt is keen to make AP a strategic destination for the Asia market. He said that the govt is ready to extend full cooperation to companies willing to invest in IT, electronics, and semiconductors.
Economic Times
8 hours ago
- Economic Times
Palo Alto Networks in talks to buy CyberArk in deal worth over $20 billion: Report
Agencies Nikesh Arora, CEO, Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks is in talks to acquire CyberArk Software in a deal that could value the Israeli cybersecurity firm at more than $20 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. Shares in CyberArk rose about 13%, while Palo Alto Networks' stock fell roughly 2%. The Santa Clara, California-based company could finalise a deal for CyberArk as soon as later this week, the report said. CyberArk declined to comment on the report when contacted by Reuters. Palo Alto did not immediately respond. Cybersecurity deal activity has been robust in recent years as large corporations have increased spending on security tools. Google-parent Alphabet said in March it would buy Israeli cybersecurity startup Wiz for about $32 billion. Rising competition among all-in-one cybersecurity platforms has reshaped the industry, making several companies attractive takeover targets for larger rivals and private equity firms. As of Monday's close, CyberArk had a market capitalization of $19.3 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.
