Severe storms cause damage across Austin area
Severe storms caused damage and flooding across Austin
Shoal Creek flooded in central Austin
Austin-Bergstrom, Texas State Capitol saw broken glass
AUSTIN, Texas - Severe storms on Wednesday night caused damage and flooding across Austin.
What we know
Multiple places were damaged or flooded across Austin, including in North Austin, Central Austin and at the airport.
The Austin Fire Department reported it was responding to a rescue call in the 7500 block of the southbound service road of Mopac at Greystone Drive.
AFD says the caller reported that the "gas station pumps roof has collapsed and is on a car".
AFD later said everyone was out of the vehicle with unknown injuries.
Austin-Bergstrom International Airport reported broken doorway glass near TSA Checkpoint 1 due to high winds.
No one was hurt and teams responded to clean up the glass.
Video from Michael Hill-Mateo shows Shoal Creek flooding in Austin due to the storms.
ATXFloods showed that Shoal Creek at N Lamar Boulevard was closed briefly Wednesday night.
Video from Scott Braddock of the Quorum Report shows damage at the Texas State Capitol.
Some of the glass near the top of the rotunda was broken. A large pane was seen hanging over the railing.
The Source
Information in this report comes from a variety of sources, including the Austin Fire Department and the Austin airport.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Parents of Camp Mystic flood victims testify on camp safety reform in the Texas Senate
Parents of young girls who died in last month's flooding in the Texas Hill Country are in Austin this Wednesday to testify about proposed flood safety legislation for camps and campgrounds. Wednesday's hearing is the first time parents of the victims are speaking to the Legislature publically. Last week they met in private with Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and House Speaker Dustin Burrows at the Texas Capitol and the Governor's Mansion. 27 girls died early on the morning of July 4, when their cabins were inundated with floodwaters. After an introduction from the committee chairman and a review of some aspects of the legislation, the first parents sat at the witness table to testify. Michael McCown, the father of 8-year-old Linnie McCown said his family trusted Camp Mystic with Linnie' life, but the trust was broken "in the most devastating way." "I still remember standing near Bubble Inn the morning of July 5 amidst the wreckage of camp, looking at the cabins, and asking myself, 'How? Why? How could these girls vanish into the night without anyone having eyes on them, while cabins literally just 20 yards away had no casualties. What went wrong?'" McCown said. CiCi Williams Steward, mother of Cile Steward testified next. Cile is one of two flood victims whose body has not been found. CiCi Williams Steward said her daughter marked the third generation of her family to attend Camp Mystic. "Cile's life ended, not because of an unavoidable act of nature, but because of preventable failures. On her fifth day of camp, the beginning of what should have been a magical first summer, our Cile was swept away, along with other bright, beautiful girls. She was stolen from her family, from her future, from the world she lit up with her independence and spunk." Steward said. "This legislation cannot bring back our daughters, but it is the beginning of change that must occur so this tragedy never happens again. It is the start of a promise that their lives, and their deaths, will mean change. It is an effort to ensure that no other family suffers as we all have," she said. The parents are members of a group called the Campaign for Camp Safety, which was formed after the devastating flooding to advocate for an investigation into what happened, as well as policy reforms. Their initial recommendations include: Wednesday's meeting of the Select Committee on Disaster Preparedness and Flooding is the public hearing for Senate Bill 1, which covers safety for both youth camps and campgrounds. According to the bill's author, it incorporates significant feedback from the families of children lost at Camp Mystic. The legislation includes stricter permitting requirements for summer camps; they would no longer be able to operate with cabins located in a 100-year floodplain. Camp Mystic not only had cabins in the 100-year floodplain, but a handful of others were in a regulatory floodway, even closer to the river. Camps will also need to have safety plans approved by the state, hold trainings for staff and volunteers and procedures to communicate with emergency responders, local authorities and parents.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Phil sued by Christian broadcaster for ‘reprehensible conduct' in $500 million deal: ‘Years-long fraudulent scheme'
The fraught bankruptcy proceedings for Dr. Phil McGraw's 'anti-woke' Merit Street Media have taken another dramatic turn as his broadcasting partner is suing the company and McGraw for fraud and breach of contract. The lawsuit filed by the Trinity Broadcasting comes just a month after Merit Street filed for bankruptcy and sued the Christian television network, accusing TBN of 'sabotage' because it 'reneged on its obligations and abused its position as the controlling shareholder of Merit Street.' Meanwhile, the countersuit by TBN – which was filed in Texas court Tuesday – comes as Dr. Phil and his production company Peteski attempted to halt the Chapter 11 proceedings for the year-old Merit Street, claiming the legal costs of going bankrupt were too expensive. The effort to halt the bankruptcy follows the Professional Bull Riders accusing Dr. Phil of engaging in a 'bad faith' Chapter 11 filing as the bull-riding league tries to collect on the $181 million it claims is owed to them by Merit Street. 'The response to TBN legitimately and lawfully defending itself from Peteski and McGraw's bad-faith attacks is to cry foul because they do not like the true facts that they themselves now regretfully put at issue before this Court, revealing McGraw's true illicit intent and wrongful conduct which he self-described as a 'gangster move' and as '11th-hour poker,'' TBN and its attorneys state in the complaint. 'TBN now asserts its affirmative claims against Peteski and McGraw related to the years-long fraudulent scheme that they developed and executed to fleece TBN, a not-for-profit corporation, to enrich McGraw, his associates and affiliates,' the lawsuit alleges. 'TBN is confident that the truth will set it free, and result in Peteski and McGraw being held accountable for their reprehensible conduct.' Merit Street has accused TBN of failing to live up to the terms of their agreement, specifically citing the inability to secure national television distribution for the Dr. Phil-led channel. 'These failures by TBN were neither unintended nor inadvertent,' Merit Street alleges in its complaint. 'They were a conscious, intentional pattern of choices made with full awareness that the consequence of which was to sabotage and seal the fate of a new but already nationally acclaimed network.' However, TBN – which at one point owned 70 percent of Merit Street – counters that it was McGraw who created a 'false sense of urgency' when he approached the broadcaster about cutting ties with CBS and starting up his own network. All the while, TBN alleges, the MAGA-boosting TV psychologist lied about viewership numbers, advertising revenues, back catalogs and production costs in order to quickly secure a highly lucrative $500 million, 10-year deal from the network. 'Among other things, McGraw falsely represented to TBN that CBS would pay him $75 million per year to renew his contract and TBN must (1) immediately sign some form of binding agreement with Peteski and (2) immediately pay him $20 million as a gesture of good faith to show TBN's ability to pay and commitment to the deal,' the complaint states. 'Anything less, McGraw claimed, would be a 'deal killer.' TBN relied on McGraw's false assurances and proceeded with the requested urgency.' Dr. Phil, who had hosted a syndicated television show for roughly 20 years at that point, also told Trinity that he 'wanted to change networks because of what he perceived to be CBS's censorship,' explicitly saying: 'I don't want snot nose lawyers telling me what I can and can't say on TV.' McGraw also allegedly said that he was looking to move his show from California to Texas, where TBN is located, in order to lower production costs by avoiding California regulations and cutting payroll by ridding himself of union-based employees. At the same time, in order to further entice Trinity into a deal, Dr. Phil represented that he owned the entire 21-year media library for his syndicated show and that TBN would have access to it at no additional cost. However, according to the complaint, McGraw hired dozens of employees from his previous show despite the agreement to slash production costs. On top of that, TBN alleges, Peteski – which owned the other 30 percent of Merit – failed to make payments on its interest in the company. While the agreement called for Dr. Phil to produce 160 90-minute episodes of his new primetime show to be aired on Merit Street, TBN claims McGraw never made good on that promise, instead keeping the program in its current hour-long format. A spokesperson for McGraw, meanwhile, stated that the host recorded 214 new episodes of Dr. Phil Primetime, adding that 'to say otherwise is absolutely false.' Elsewhere in the complaint, Trinity claims that McGraw demanded more money – despite TBN already expending tens of millions of dollars establishing his show on the new network – after the broadcaster asked to use the library content to fill out airtime on Merit Street. 'This, among other things, prompted TBN to press McGraw to live up to his representation that he would contribute the Dr Phil Show library to Merit Street,' the lawsuit states. 'Despite his previous representations, McGraw and his attorneys at Manatt informed TBN for the first time that McGraw would not contribute any old episodes of the Dr. Phil Show to Merit Street for Peteski's 30% or otherwise,' the complaint continues. 'Instead, McGraw brazenly demanded that TBN pay him $100 million to obtain a 50% interest in the media library.' As for Merit Street's bankruptcy, which was filed last month, TBN says the Chapter 11 proceedings weren't approved by its board members while accusing McGraw of plotting to use the bankruptcy to start a new media venture and snag the license for his show. Meanwhile, the bankruptcy judge presiding over the case said on Tuesday that the Chapter 11 proceedings will continue for now, adding that the court will decide on September 2 whether to dismiss the filing or convert it to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. 'The judge has initially sided with Trinity Broadcasting Network and Professional Bull Riders, stating that Merit Street is at fault for delaying the case by resisting discovery and it is therefore not going to fund what Trinity and PBR call a 'giant litigation war chest' for the company's professionals,' Sarah Foss, Head of Legal at Debtwire, explained to The Independent. 'The discovery resistance may be tied to reputational concerns from Dr. Phil, and what might be revealed in text messages or emails that come out in the discovery process,' Foss continued, adding: 'Notably, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy denied a request from Merit Street's bankruptcy counsel, Sidley Austin, to withdraw from the case before that hearing, despite being owed $3.7m in unpaid legal fees and a lack of funds to pay the lawyers for their work representing the company at the hearing.' Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
In Uvalde massacre lawsuit, Meta lawyer argues Instagram isn't responsible for gunmaker's posts
A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued Tuesday. Nineteen children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he said. In one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?' The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's phone. Plaintiffs say minors can access gun content on Instagram Meta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any products. Katie Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defense's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.' 'They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said. Linsley said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022. 'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley said. The plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's website. When the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said. Linsley said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in effect. The families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.' Case hinges on social media's responsibility for content creation Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. 'The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all,' Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.' Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post. 'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. … They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.' The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such strategies. Last month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his attack. Lawyers for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defense's motion. The defense claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the amendments. The judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case.
