Ex-Wisconsin justice poised to lose law license over 2020 election review
April 8 (Reuters) - A former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice who led a Republican review of the state's 2020 election results has agreed to surrender his law license after he was accused of violating Wisconsin's professional rules for lawyers.
The former justice, Michael Gableman, filed a stipulation, opens new tab with the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) on Monday to suspend his license for three years. The agreement requires approval from the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which has final say on all disciplinary matters.
Gableman said in the filing that a November 2024 complaint OLR filed against him provides "an adequate factual basis in the record" and that he "cannot successfully defend against" the allegations.
A spokesperson for OLR declined to comment. An attorney for Gableman, who served on the state high court from 2008 to 2018, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos hired Gableman in June 2021 to investigate alleged voter fraud in Wisconsin's 2020 presidential election. Vos later fired Gableman in August 2022.
In March 2022, Gableman called on Wisconsin lawmakers to dissolve the state's bipartisan election commission, and suggested decertifying the results of the 2020 election. Democrat Joe Biden beat Republican Donald Trump in the battleground state by nearly 21,000 votes, according to recounts and a state audit affirming the result.
Gableman allegedly violated multiple professional rules during his investigation. He repeatedly made false statements, such as accusing city officials of refusing to cooperate with his investigation when they actually did, according to OLR's complaint. He also made disparaging remarks about his opposing counsel and a state judge.
The Wisconsin State Assembly paid $2.3 million for Gableman's investigation.
The attorney regulators also said Gableman violated confidentiality rules related to his representation of Vos while participating in failed efforts to have him recalled in the spring of 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
16 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
president donald trump deploys national guard california
"Presidents set precedents and this one is escalatory, incendiary, and could come back to haunt all Americans," Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said June 8. Trump's order gives 2,000 soldiers the authority to protect federal property like office buildings but no power to arrest civilians, according to a spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command, which is directing the operation. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also has put an active-duty Marine unit on orders to prepare to deploy to California. The 300 members of the California National Guard who deployed Sunday to three sites in Los Angeles appeared to face little in the way of organized opposition, according to a Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Their presence was a performative show of force, the official said, as their authority is clearly restricted. Most of the Guard soldiers are military police officers whose day jobs typically are in civilian law enforcement. They understand the need for restraint, the official said. If they see a protester vandalize federal property, a Social Security Administration office, for example, they can detain the suspect and turn them over to local police. Trump's order fell short of invoking the Insurrection Act, an 18th century law that gives the president authority to use the military to enforce federal law, suppress a rebellion or protect a group's civil rights if the state does not do so. It was last invoked in 1992 during by President George HW Bush at the request of California's governor in response to riots after police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King had been acquitted. Trump and Hegseth's unilateral action over Newsom's objection sets dangerous precedent, Reed said in a statement. "It is crucial that decisions of this magnitude are made with transparency, restraint, and respect for constitutional balance," Reed said. "The President and Defense Secretary should immediately stand down these troops and Congress should reject this dangerous overreaction."
The Herald Scotland
16 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sanders blasts Trump on 'authoritarianism' for sending troops to LA
The protests come as the Trump administration has taken stronger actions to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants. Demonstrators allege the administration's immigration enforcement has violated civil and human rights. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on June 7 that Trump signed a memo deploying the guardsmen "to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester." Both California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, however, have criticized the move, saying it would only escalate tensions in the area. "I would say that to a large degree, the future of this country rests with a small number of Republicans in the House and Senate who know better, who do know what the Constitution is about, and it's high time they stood up for our Constitution and the rule of law," Sanders said. Oklahoma Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin, meanwhile, defended the president's move to Bash, arguing that the situation is not under control. The Department of Homeland Security said that some protesters have hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings. Video footage of some of the protests showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks, lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. "The president has made it very clear. If the governor or the mayor of the city isn't willing to protect the citizens of his state or the city, then the president will. The American people elected him to restore the law and order back to our streets," Mullin said. Contributing: Reuters
The Herald Scotland
16 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
California governor accuses Trump of 'acts of a dictator'
Gavin accused Trump of "inciting and provoking violence," "creating mass chaos" and "militarizing cities." "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President," Newsom said. The two men have long been at odds. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, who Trump has nicknamed. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said in the post. The two have repeatedly clashed, most recently in late May, when Trump threatened to cut California's federal funding after a transgender high school athlete qualified for the state championship. "Large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently," Trump said at the time, if California fails to follow an executive order he signed Feb. 5 seeking to bar transgender student athletes from playing women's sports. Newsom, a Democrat with presidential aspirations, has also sparred with Trump over tariffs, fighting fires and the management of water and environmental resources, though he has also criticized his own party.
