
Popular hair growth cream recalled over risk of 'serious injury or death from poisoning'
Sefralls Minoxidil Hair Generation Serum, sold in amber dropper bottles for $10 on Amazon, is being recalled because it is not in child-resistant packaging.
The US Consumer Product Safety Commission, which announced the recall, warned children could accidentally open and consume the minoxidil-laced fluid.
Scientists say that consuming just a few ounces of minoxidil, an over-the-counter medication approved by the FDA to reverse hair loss, can cause blood vessels to become dangerously relaxed, triggering extremely low blood pressure.
This can cause the heart to shut down, start beating erratically or go into heart failure, and cause death. It can also pose a serious hazard to pets if ingested.
About 21,300 units of the product have been recalled and were distributed in the US from June 2024 to June 2025.
No injuries or deaths have been reported to date.
Guangzhou Ariel Biotech, the Chinese company behind the product, has urged customers to immediately place recalled bottles out of sight or reach of children and contact them for instructions on how to destroy the bottles.
It is offering to send replacements to customers who pour the contents of the bottle into the trash, photograph it and send the image to the company.
Officials said customers could identify whether their minoxidil had been recalled by whether it mentioned 'Sefralls' and 'minoxidil' on the label.
The bottles sold also had a white and gold dropper and a white, black and gold label.
The recall is thought to affect every bottle of Sefralls Minoxidil Hair Generation Serum sold in the US.
In the recall notice on August 7, the CPSC wrote: 'The hair serum's packaging is not child-resistant, posing a risk of serious injury or death from poisoning if the contents are swallowed by young children.'
All bottles of minoxidil sold in the US are required to be child resistant under the 1970 Poison Prevention Packaging Act.
Officials included minoxidil in the act amid mounting concerns over the risk the drug posed to small children.
There are no publicly reported fatalities in the US to date among young children who accidentally consumed minoxidil.
Minoxidil has exploded in popularity in recent years, alongside hair loss drug finasteride, with about 13million Americans estimated to use the drug in 2024.
The US hair loss market has also surged in value, with estimates suggesting it will more than double from a value of $2.84billion to more than $5.26billion over the next decade.
The drug works by boosting blood flow to the areas surrounding hair follicles, which can stimulate hair regrowth and restore hair in previously bald patches.
It is formulated in low concentrations in hair loss treatments to achieve this effect safely, minimizing the risk to patients.
If consumed, doctors treat patients by administering large amounts of fluids and medications to raise blood pressure.
The FDA has only approved minoxidil as a drug for treating hair loss.
It is at least the second recall over minoxidil being sold in non-child safe bottles in as many months, after another recall was issued in late July for Aemerry Hair Growth Serums, which also was not sold in child-resistant packaging.
About 2,300 bottles of the hair growth serums were sold online at Amazon.com from March to June this year for about $22 each.
They were sold in black-tinted bottles with droppers for dispensing the serums and navy blue labels with blue and white lettering.
The front of the bottles read: 'Aemerry Clinically Proven To Help Regrow Beard 5% Minoxidil with Biotin.'
No injuries or deaths have been reported to date, and consumers are being urged to throw out the bottles.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's efforts to defund Planned Parenthood threatens US healthcare system, study suggests
Planned Parenthood clinics treated people who rely on Medicaid at more than 1.5m visits in 2024, new research published on Wednesday shows. But the reproductive health giant's ability to treat those patients is now in jeopardy due to Republicans' efforts to 'defund' Planned Parenthood by kicking it out of Medicaid. Donald Trump's tax and spending package, passed in July, bans Planned Parenthood from receiving reimbursements from Medicaid, the US government's insurance program for low-income people. After Planned Parenthood sued over the ban, a judge temporarily stopped it from taking effect. If the ban moves forward, experts warn that it could cripple the entirety of the US healthcare social safety net. 'Planned Parenthood has filled a very important role in the reproductive healthcare safety net for people living on low incomes,' said Kari White, executive and scientific director at Resound Research for Reproductive Health. White was the lead author on the research paper released on Wednesday. 'Other providers have counted on them to do so. They just don't have the capacity to step in and fill the place that Planned Parenthood has had in the safety net.' In particular, White said, people will probably struggle to access contraception. After Texas started to ice Planned Parenthood out of its Medicaid program more than a decade ago, placements of contraceptive implants and IUDs – two of the most effective methods of birth control – fell by more than a third in counties that had a Planned Parenthood clinic. That indicated that those who had used Medicaid to obtain contraception at Planned Parenthood were no longer doing so. Provision of injectable contraceptives also fell; among people who used it, births covered by Medicaid rose by almost a third. Republicans have long sought to defund Planned Parenthood over the organization's commitment to providing abortions. But Planned Parenthood does not rely on Medicaid to fund its abortion provision as it is already illegal to use federal dollars, including Medicaid, to pay for the vast majority of abortions. The 1.5m visits documented in Wednesday's research paper, which was published in the medical journal Jama, only include visits for reasons other than abortion. More than 80 million people in the US use Medicaid, and 11% of female Medicaid beneficiaries who are between the ages of 15 and 49 and who receive family-planning services go to Planned Parenthood, according to an analysis by the non-profit KFF, which tracks healthcare policy. But defunding Planned Parenthood will probably hit blue states hardest, since they are home to larger numbers of Medicaid beneficiaries. About 50% of the people who visit Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties, which operates clinics in California, use Medicaid in some way, experts told the Guardian. If the defunding moves forward, the affiliate would lose roughly $50m, or half of its budget. It already went without Medicaid reimbursements for about five weeks earlier this year. 'It was a really stressful time for my staff. They have fees and bills to pay. And some of them probably were wondering if they would still have a job,' recalled Dr Janet Jacobson, the affiliate's medical director and vice-president of clinical services. 'It's hard not to take federal legislation that basically comes out and names you and threatens you and tries to defund you personally.' Jacobson is particularly worried about the future of a program at Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties that screens about 100,000 patients annually for sexually transmitted infections. Between July 2024 and June 2025, the affiliate uncovered more than 1,500 positive tests for syphilis, as well as almost 400 cases of trichomoniasis in pregnant women. Both STIs – which often do not have symptoms in their early stages – can have devastating consequences for pregnant women and their babies, such as preterm birth and birth defects. 'They haven't been able to ban abortion outright, so they're trying to take away the money for services like cancer screening, STI testing, birth control, and essentially trying to shut us down that way so that we can't provide abortion,' said Nichole Ramirez, senior vice-president of communication and donor relations at Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. 'They're taking away this vital care from mostly underserved communities. They're willing to have an increase in STIs, have a potential increase in cancer rates so that they can try to get rid of abortion.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
One in four US adults with diabetes used a GLP-1 drug last year, survey finds
Aug 14 (Reuters) - More than one in four U.S. adults with diabetes used one of the injectable medicines that target the GLP-1 protein last year, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Thursday. The wildly popular and effective GLP-1 drugs Mounjaro from Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab and Ozempic from Novo Nordisk ( opens new tab are approved in the United States for treating type 2 diabetes. They are sold as Zepbound and Wegovy, respectively, for weight loss and are being tested for other conditions. Use of the injectable drugs was highest among adults with diabetes aged 50–64 at 33.3%, reflecting the more significant disease burden in this group, the report said. A quarter or 25.3% of adults with diabetes aged 18 to 34 reported using a GLP-1 drug, while the adoption rate was 20.8% among those 65 and older. The data are from a nationally representative annual survey of U.S. adults aged 18 and older that was conducted in person and with follow-up by phone in 2024. In 2024, for the first time, participants in the annual survey who had diabetes were asked if they were using the Lilly or Novo blockbusters or other GLP-1 drugs to lower blood sugar or lose weight. The drugs mimic the activity of a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels, slows digestion and helps people feel full for longer. Drugmakers Lilly and Novo have faced criticism about the cost of the treatments, which carry a list price of about $1,000 for a month's supply. Roughly 31% of survey participants who reported using insulin also reported using GLP-1 drugs, as did about 28% of patients who were using oral drugs to control their blood sugar, according to the report, indicating that these treatments are being integrated into combination regimens. Hispanic adults with diabetes had the highest rate of GLP-1 use, at 31.3%, followed by Black non-Hispanic and White non-Hispanic adults, at 26.5% and 26.2%, respectively, the survey found. Only 12.1% of Asian non-Hispanic adults with diabetes used the drugs, which may reflect disparities in access or adoption of the therapies.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
More than 400 people suspected to have died from extreme heat in Arizona county
More than 400 people are suspected to have died from extreme heat in Maricopa county, Arizona, so far this summer, according to official figures, as the brutal current heatwave enters its 12th day. August is on track to be the hottest on record, with temperatures hitting at least 110F (43C) every day apart from one so far. As of 11 August, at least three daily records had been broken including an all-time monthly high of 118F (48C), as well as several night-time record temperatures, according to Isaac Smith, meteorologist at the National Weather Service (NWS) in Phoenix. The current extreme heat warning issued by the NWS is the fourth and longest of the summer thus far, and will extend at least through Wednesday night with temperatures forecast to hit 110F. Increased cloud cover and possible thunderstorms will then bring a brief respite towards the weekend but another very hot spell is forecast by the start of next week. Maricopa county is home to Phoenix, the fifth largest and hottest major US city, as well as several smaller urban hubs dotted amid the Sonora desert including Scottsdale, Tempe and Mesa. Midway through the hot season, the current official death count – including suspected and confirmed heat-related fatalities – is about 30% lower than this time last year, the second deadliest on record. In 2025, the county medical examiner's office has so far confirmed only 35 heat deaths – 17 directly caused by exposure to high temperatures, and 18 cases where heat contributed to the fatality, including by exacerbating chronic medical conditions or the effects of alcohol or methamphetamine. Another 369 suspected heat-related deaths remain under investigation, according to the county's heat surveillance dashboard which is updated weekly. June and July were a little cooler than recent years, despite topping 115F on multiple days, which at least partially explains the lower death toll. Improved access and extended hours at city cooling centres may also be playing a role, according to Dr Nick Staab, the county's chief medical officer. First responders and hospitals have reportedly gotten better at treating heatstroke and other temperature-related emergencies. Yet despite the encouraging numbers, Maricopa county is still on track to be the deadliest place for heat in the US after New York City, the country's largest metropolis, where heat contributes to 525 deaths on average each year. 'With this many cases still under investigation and it only being mid-August, there's a lot that could still happen,' Staab told KJZZ, the local public radio station. Heat-related deaths have soared in Maricopa county over the past decade, with 645 in 2023 compared to 61 in 2014. The county has become increasingly unlivable for many amid record-breaking heatwaves driven by the global climate crisis, unchecked urban sprawl and an affordable housing crisis – which combined with patchy mental health and substance misuse services has contributed to a growing unsheltered population. Last year, heat deaths fell for the first time in a decade to 608, according to official figures, but the city and county have since come under fire for alleged undercounting. A recent investigation by the local TV station ABC15 identified multiple cases in which heat was discounted as a factor despite the person dying in extreme temperatures. 'People are dying awful, preventable deaths that are not being accounted for in the official figures. We need more consistency and transparency if we're going to wrap solutions around this public health crisis,' said Stacey Champion, a community advocate campaigning for more standardized counting of heat-related deaths in Arizona. Neither the city nor the county responded immediately to questions surrounding the official death toll. Heat is the deadliest weather phenomenon. But every heat death is preventable, and often indicates a lack of access to adequate shelter, cooling and/or health, addiction and social services. So far this year, three-quarters of heat-related deaths have occurred outside, where temperatures in the most built-up, least shady parts of Phoenix can be 20 or 30F higher on the sidewalk than the NWS's airport weather station. Unhoused people account for 40% of deaths, while substance misuse contributed to two-thirds. June was the 11th warmest on record, and July the ninth hottest. The city, county and state have sought to tackle the increasingly unlivable summer environment through tree canopy initiatives, cooling technologies and an expansion of cooling centres among other policies – in part with the help of Biden-era programs and funds. But there is little or no hope of ongoing federal support under the Trump administration, which is dismantling environmental justice programs, climate change research and mitigation efforts, as well as access to healthcare, food stamps (Snap) and other social safety nets. Currently one in four heat deaths in the county occur indoors, and energy costs are predicted to rise significantly under Trump which risks making Maricopa county and beyond even more deadly as summers get hotter. Meanwhile firefighters are struggling to control at least five major wildfires across the state, which have so far burnt about 180,000 acres. Hot, dry and windy conditions are fuelling the flames in Arizona – as well as fires in California, Utah, Colorado and large swathes of Canada.