logo
Queen Camilla in stitches as royal fan shows off unusual tribute on body

Queen Camilla in stitches as royal fan shows off unusual tribute on body

Daily Mirror5 days ago
Her Majesty has been shocked by a very dedicated royal fan, who showed off a huge tattoo of Camilla's royal cypher on his leg during a visit to the Sandringham Flower Show
Queen Camilla saw the funny side as she met a royal fan who has had her royal cypher tattooed on his leg - and revealed that one of her police officers has one too. Phil Smith, 61, from Northampton pulled up his shorts to show Her Majesty his latest royal inking, telling her that it had "bloody hurt", prompting her to laugh uproariously.

She then turned to one of her police protection officers and said: "Look, he's got one too." Mr Smith said afterwards that he had been writing to Camilla since before her marriage to the King as he thought 'she was great' and that she frequently responded.


He has a total of four large tattoos along the outer side of his left leg, starting with Queen Elizabeth's royal cypher and including both Charles and Camilla's individual ones.
His latest - situated on the top of his thigh - is of their joint royal cypher and took about an hour and a half to do. He waited at the front of the crowd at the Sandringham Flower Show today to show the Queen.
He said after their meeting: "I just think she's fabulous and have got to know her a bit. We just hit it off. I love the R oyal Family and she in particular has got a good sense of humour. She frequently responds. I waited to see her to show her my latest [tattoo] and she laughed. She said one of her security men has also had it done too."

He said he thought it was of their joint royal cypher and the police officer was there with her that day. He added: "Honestly, she's just great. We exchange letters. She knew who I was. She asked how long it [the latest one] took and I told her about two and a half hours. But I told her this one bloody hurt. She just finds it hilarious. She pulled her police officer's sleeve and said 'look, it's catching on!'"
The King and Queen made their annual visit to the Sandringham Flower Show held in the grounds of the Norfolk royal residence, where they marvelled at exhibits, toured stands and met hundreds of well-wishers in their final large scale joint public engagement before they begin their summer holidays. The event attracts around 20,000 visitors each year.

They arrived in Queen Victoria's Carriage- a special doorless carriage - to be greeted by committee members and presented with flowers by Isabelle Franklin, seven, who won the 2023 Under 11's Cup and her brother, Jack, who won last year's 11-15 age group. A choir and band from Springwood High School also sang the National Anthem.
Looking relaxed in a smart suit alongside his wife, who wore a black and white flower print dress, Charles, 76, seemed delighted to be there again after being forced to miss last year's event due to his cancer treatment. Many in the crowds commented on how delighted they were to see him back.

The King asked one young winner about what she had won her cup for, telling her: "I must say it's very impressive. And at least you've now had some rain."
The couple first stopped off at Peter Beales Roses, where they were both presented with beautiful blooms by Olivia Bell, ten, and Camilla sympathised about the recent warm weather being a horror for keen gardeners like themselves. "Oh the weather, everything is wilting!" she exclaimed. "At least it [the rain] has come at the right time."
Camilla, 77, chatted happily about her new Battersea rescue puppy, Moley, who didn't accompany her last week on a visit to the famous dogs and cats rescue centre in London after seeing a display of dog-themed cakes.

"I'm sorry we couldn't bring Moley to the engagement last week," she said. Asked whether it has just been too hot, she replied: "Well yes, and she's very naughty. I think I only have one shoe left. Those are the best ones." "I think it's called character," she was told and smiled. Outside huge crowds clapping, and occasionally giving three cheers for the king, had gathered to greet them. "I'm so proud of you," said one well-wisher to him.
Another gave him flowers with a big card on saying his name. "For me? Oh thank you," the king said, delighted. Another told him: "Lovely to see you back here." Lewis Kirkby handed the King a card and told him: "It's an invitation to our wedding. Do come!" Accompanied by his fiancé, Lisa Moore, he said afterwards that they were getting married in Kent on July 31.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals
The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals

Queen Elizabeth II was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew. The Duke of York's mischievous behaviour towards his mother was revealed by Robert Lacey in his book Battle Of Brothers. His practical jokes included putting itching powder inside his mother's bed and creeping behind a member of the Queen's Guard and tying their shoelaces together. The prince's most dramatic stunt involved climbing on the roof of the palace to change the direction of the TV aerial so the Queen could not watch her favourite horserace from Sandown Park. Despite his naughty actions, it is likely that Andrew was able to get away without any repercussions due to his coveted position as the late Queen's favourite son. Their close relationship was believed to have been because of the timing of Andrew's birth during the Queen's reign. The Duke of York was born in 1960, eight years after the Queen was crowned, while Charles and Anne had been toddlers when their mother became the monarch. This meant that, during their formative years, Elizabeth was busy on royal tours and learning to navigate her new role as Queen. But by the time Andrew was born, she had grown into her role much more and was therefore able to take a much active role in his, and younger brother Edward's, upbringing. For example, Elizabeth was able to even pick up the two boys from school in her own car and even attend sports days. A royal insider previously told the Telegraph, that Elizabeth liked Andrew because he was 'straightforward' and could make her 'laugh and raise the family's spirits'. On the other hand, she found Prince Charles 'emotionally complicated'. Meanwhile, Andrew's military service during the Falklands Wars was a source of great pride for his parents and made the prince the darling of the press. However, Prince Philip had a much less warm relationship with Andrew. Royal author Ingrid Sewell wrote in her book, My Mother And I, that Philip 'berated' Andrew for being 'pointless' and he believed the Duke of York 'failed to reach all his family's expectations'. In stark contrast to his relationship with the Queen, Andrew is known to have a more distant relationship with his older brother, with Charles going as far to claim in 2019: 'The problem with my brother [Andrew] is that he wants to be me.' Royal aides have gone as far as to claim that Andrew 'looked down on Charles' and 'thought he would make a much better king than his eldest brother'. His rude behaviour also extends to members of royal staff, with an aide telling royal expert Tom Quinn in his book, Gilded Youth, that Andrew 'was always curt to the staff and dismissive of them – he treated them as if we were living in the Middle Ages.' In 2022, Andrew was accused of 'overbearing' and 'verbally abusive behaviour' towards Palace staff. Former royal protection officer Paul Page has claimed he personally made three separate complaints to the Palace during the time he worked in the Royal Protection Command from 1998 until 2004. Speaking to The Sunday Mirror, Mr Page said that he is aware of 'at least a dozen' other reports made by colleagues about the Duke of York. 'The Palace has a problem because there are instances and evidence of Prince Andrew being overbearing and verbally abusive,' he told the newspaper. Mr Page alleged his complaints during his time working for the Palace were ignored because senior courtiers wanted to avoid agitation. While for many years Andrew was celebrated as the royal family's 'scallywag', Lacey wrote that the Prince's 'dubious choice of business contacts' have 'came to shadow his reputation'. This culminated in Andrew stepping down from his role as a working member of the royal family following his infamous interview with BBC Newsnight about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. More recently, there was further controversy when it was uncovered that he unknowingly struck up a friendly relationship with an alleged Chinese spy. It was even reported that Andrew extended an invitation to the man, known as H6, to visit Buckingham Palace. The man was later banned from Britain by the Government on national security grounds. Since stepping down, Andrew has been involved in an ongoing scuffle with Charles over the Royal Lodge. Located in the leafy countryside surrounded by greenery, the Royal Lodge, which Prince Andrew shares with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, is just three miles from Windsor and 25 miles from London. Charles reportedly wants his younger brother to move out of the lavish 30million Royal Lodge, which has been in the family for centuries, and into Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. But moving Andrew hasn't been easy, as a 75-year contract he signed in 2003 means that he can continue living there, as long as he can afford the cost of upkeeping the 30-room mansion. Speaking of Andrew's potential move to Frogmore in January this year, Royal expert Ingrid Seward said: 'It's going to cost him a tenth of what it costs him at Royal Lodge, but that's not how Andrew thinks. He has serious delusions of grandeur and he thinks he needs to live in a house like that. 'If King Charles wants him to leave Royal Lodge, well he's going to have to use persuasion, because legally he can't move him out as he's rented it from the Crown Estate. 'If he can't keep up the roof and the outside and all the things a big house needs, he could be in contravention of his lease and that's the only way he could be moved out.'

From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells
From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells

He's known to many for his high-profile trial where he was cleared after being accused of stealing and selling items belonging to Princess Diana 's estate - as well as for appearing as a contestant on I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here! Paul Burrell joined the household of Prince Charles and Diana at Highgrove House in 1987 after working as the Queen's footman, later becoming the Princess' butler and remaining in this role until her death. Burrell became a close confidante of the Princess - but the family's perception of him soured shortly after Diana's passing in 1997. William and Harry accused Burrell of a 'cold and overt betrayal' after he published his memoir A Royal Duty - which contained a raft of private revelations. According to Harry's witness statement in his High Court battle with Mirror Group Newspapers, the Prince took the view that his mother's former butler was an attention-seeking, self-interested 'two-faced sh**'. And now the man Diana once called her 'rock' is set to release a third 'intimate' memoir, promising to reveal stories he felt he couldn't share while the late Queen was still alive. His book The Royal Insider – with a picture of himself and Diana on the cover – is due out in September. The Princes are now bracing themselves for what he might reveal as he vows to 'speak candidly about the tensions that simmered' during his time at the Palace – 'including the breakdown of Charles and Diana's marriage and his own complex relationship with Princes William and Harry'. The publishers, Sphere, said: 'It is only in the wake of the Queen's passing Burrell feels he can finally tell his story in full.' Burrell's was woken in January 2001 by police officers who asked if he had any items from Kensington Palace in his home. He was arrested and his home was raided, revealing rooms filled with paintings, drawings, china and photographs that clearly belonged to Diana. Other items included signed photographs of the Princess, her daily personal notes to William at school and clothes belonging to her - including a blue-ribboned hat she'd worn during her visit with Prince Charles to South Korea in 1992. That year, Burrell was charged with theft of a total of 310 items, reportedly worth £5million, which were said to have been stolen from Kensington Palace, the Princess' former London home. He denied any impropriety and maintained the items were given to him by Diana. The case against him had proceeded on the basis that he had not told anyone that he had kept items belonging to the Princess. But the prosecution barrister said that it had emerged that Burrell had met with the Queen privately in December 1997 where he mentioned that he had taken some of the Princess's papers for safekeeping. In April of that year, the police outlined the possible charges and said that they were investigating whether Burrell had been selling some of the items. Later in September, a letter from Burrell's solicitor requested a meeting to discuss Burrell's life and service with the Royal Family, but this was declined as The Queen was not actively involved with the case. In the autumn of 2001, The Queen's private secretary was told informally that the police had told Charles that they had evidence that Burrell had been selling items from the Princess's estate. However, in the following year this was made clear during the trial that, contrary to their earlier advice, the police had no evidence that Burrell had been selling the items in question. On October 25, 2002, the Queen, Charles and Prince Philip had driven together to St Paul's for a memorial service for the victims of the Bali bombing. Driving past the Old Bailey, she asked why a crowd was standing outside. Charles answered that Burrell was on trial. The Queen was apparently unaware that he was being prosecuted. Then she mentioned that, some years before, Burrell had sought an audience with her to explain that he was caring for some of Diana's papers, and she had agreed that he should do so. Given the importance to the prosecution case of the question of whether or not Burrell had told anyone that he had taken items from Kensington Palace, the relevance of this information was realised and quickly drawn to the attention of the police. The front page of Daily Mail is pictured from September 11, 2006, featuring Rebecca English's report that Paul Burrell was accused of 'stooping to an unprecedented low' by claiming Princess Diana's sons had failed to defend her memory The prosecution barrister, William Boyce QC later told the Old Bailey: 'In all the circumstances, the prosecution has concluded that the current trial is no longer viable because it has proceeded on a false premise that Mr Burrell had never told anyone that he was holding anything for safekeeping. 'The prosecution consider that if the defence were to apply for the jury to be discharged, although it would be a matter for My Lady, the prosecution could not oppose that application'. After hearing submissions from the prosecution and defence, the judge dismissed the jury and told Burrell he was free to go on November 1, 2002. If the trial had continued, the former butler would have been called to give evidence and may have faced questioning about his time in the Queen's employment as well as Princess Diana's. Outside the court, Mr Burrell said: 'The Queen has come through for me. I'm thrilled, I'm so thrilled.' In his tell-all memoir Spare, Harry described how he learned of Burrell's book about Diana when he was working as an unpaid farmhand in Australia aged 19 in 2003. He wrote that he received a package from Buckingham Palace, which was full of memos from the Palace communications team about 'a delicate matter'. 'Mummy's former butler had penned a tell-all which actually told nothing,' he said. 'It was merely one man's self-justifying, self-centring version of events. 'My mother once called this butler a dear friend, trusted him implicitly. We did too. Now this. 'He was milking her disappearance for money. It made my blood boil.' Harry wrote that he wanted to fly home to 'confront' Burrell but Charles and William talked him out of it, saying all they could do was 'issue a united condemnation'. Burrell hit back at criticism from Harry in Spare, saying he doesn't recognise 'the young man I see today'. Appearing on Australian breakfast show Sunrise, Burrell said: 'I first met him in his mummy's tummy. I don't recognise the young man I see today. That's not the boy I knew. 'What I see now is an angry, petulant, privileged prince who is constantly blaming other people and not taking accountability on his part.' Before A Royal Duty was published, Princes William and Harry issued a joint statement calling the book 'a cold and overt betrayal.' While Harry and William rarely see eye-to-eye these days and a joint statement is unlikely, the upcoming publication will likely bring back unhappy memories of the period surrounding their mother's death for the two men.

Orioles national anthem performer goes viral with astonishing rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner
Orioles national anthem performer goes viral with astonishing rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Orioles national anthem performer goes viral with astonishing rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner

Baltimore Orioles fans were treated to a very different version of the national anthem on Sunday, when a performer whistled the tune of The Star-Spangled Banner at Camden Yards. The Orioles cruised to a 5-1 win over the Colorado Rockies on Sunday to improve to 47-58 for the season. Before the game, Chris Ullman came out on to the field to perform the national anthem. He is four-time international whistling champion and he showed off his skills at Camden Yards. The performance quickly went viral, with fans on social media calling Ullman 'amazing' and even the 'GOAT' (Greatest Of All Time). 'This performance really blew us away,' the Orioles wrote alongside the video on Instagram. He was also given a huge ovation by fans inside the stadium. But it is not the first time that Ullman has performed at Camden Yards. In May 2024, he whistled the national anthem before the Orioles secured a 6-1 win against the Boston Red Sox. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Baltimore Orioles (@orioles) Ullman previously serenaded former president George W. Bush and vice president Dick Cheney in a private concert in the Oval Office. He has also performed at events involving the Charlotte Hornets, Washington Wizards, Washington Nationals and Duke men's basketball team. His journey to Camden Yards began when he was a teenager and would whistle 'incessantly' while on his paper round. According to his website, Ullman now whistles 'Happy Birthday' to more than 650 people a year. He is also the president of Ullman Communications, a 'strategic advisory firm'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store