Raise taxes or gas bills to save net zero, Miliband urged
To ensure his flagship policy succeeds, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) said the Energy Secretary needs to remove green levies from household power costs.
However, to pay for this, it said the levies should be shifted onto gas bills or covered by general taxation. The quango stopped short of saying which one it preferred.
The recommendation was part of a new report demanding a rethink of power bills across the UK amid mounting scrutiny of Mr Miliband's bid to hit net zero by 2050.
The quango said it was concerned that high electricity prices were preventing households from buying heat pumps and electric cars, which in turn was holding back the green energy transition.
As a result, it said ministers 'should remove policy costs and levies from electricity bills' and shift the burden elsewhere.
Green levies have proven increasingly controversial in recent years as they have been added to bills to help support wind, solar and other renewables projects.
Independent estimates suggest there are around a dozen levies adding £18bn a year to power bills, with the CCC claiming they must be removed to help ease the financial burden on consumers.
It said: 'Making electricity cheaper, through rebalancing prices to remove policy levies from electricity bills, is a key recommendation the committee have made to the UK Government.'
The request forms part of a broader warning that the UK is making too little progress on meeting its carbon emission reduction targets.
This is a particular problem in Scotland, which has set itself a target of hitting net zero by 2045 – five years before the rest of the UK.
To achieve, the CCC said that 1m Scottish homeowners must be persuaded to replace their oil and gas boilers with heat pumps by 2035
Over the same period, it said 1.8m Scottish drivers also needed to replace their petrol and diesel cars or vans with electric vehicles.
Similar adoption rates are also required in the rest of the UK, as the CCC said that by 2040, half of UK homes should have a heat pump, compared to around 1pc in 2023.
'This requires the annual rate of heat pump installations in existing residential properties to rise from 60,000 in 2023 to nearly 450,000 by 2030 and around 1.5m by 2035,' it said.
However, the CCC said this transition will never happen unless levies are removed from power bills.
The cost of those levies was totted up for the first time in two reports published this month, one by energy analyst Kathryn Porter and the other by the Renewable Energy Foundation (REF), a charity.
Ms Porter calculated that 10 subsidies were adding £18bn to bills, while REF reached a total of £12bn.
Ms Porter said: 'Ed Miliband claims that renewables are cheap and will lead to lower bills. This sounds great, but unfortunately is not true.
'The UK has the highest industrial electricity prices in the world and the fourth highest domestic electricity prices, with many of the costs paid by consumers resulting from policy choices [levies] designed to support renewable generation.'
The CCC said it had modelled two alternative ways of replacing the levies on power bills.
One would be to move the charges solely on to gas bills, which would drive up the running costs for gas boilers and cookers.
The second approach would see the cost of energy levies added to general taxation.
However, a spokesman stressed that it did not have a preference on the best way of raising money: 'We aren't policy prescriptive about where these costs go – there are lots of different ways this could be done.
'The overall point we're making is that cheaper electricity will mean that using electric products – for both households and businesses – will become cheaper.'
Critics say the better solution would be to cut subsidies overall.
John Constable, director of REF, said: 'The CCC proposes to 'make electricity cheaper' by moving subsidy costs from energy bills to taxes.
'Of course, this does not actually make electricity cheaper, it just forces somebody else to pay, in this case taxpayers who are already at breaking point. The economically and morally correct solution is to cut the subsidies to renewable generators.'
Richard Tice, Reform energy spokesman, added: 'The great renewable con is rapidly being exposed as more expensive.'
A government spokesman said: 'Our clean power mission is the route to energy security, protecting families by bringing bills down for good and creating good jobs.
'We will continue to work together with all the devolved governments to deliver our clean energy superpower mission and accelerate to net zero in a way that treads lightly on people's lives.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump has been on a roll for the ages — but blowback could be looming
Nearly seven months into his second term, President Donald Trump is riding high on far-reaching policy wins and unchallenged personal power plays, barging into every corner of American life to impose his will and worldview. But his presidency may be about to enter a new phase, as the policy and political consequences of his relentless pace begin to unfold and the lives of Americans and millions overseas feel the impact of his relentless ambition. He's done everything, quickly, and all at once. He's obsessed with slaying his biggest dragons — like global free trade — and more homespun goals that most presidents might not bother with — like reinstating a Presidential Fitness Test in schools or putting his architectural stamp on the White House. His trade push is classic Trump. He imposed the most punitive tariffs on imports since the Great Depression — based on a lifelong personal obsession with an economic theory mocked by experts. He says he's reviving manufacturing — but the sector lost a combined net 14,000 jobs in May and June, according to federal data. And the tariffs — a tax on everyone who buys goods — could spike inflation. The president has been as good as his word and secured the southern border, honoring a promise that helped him win back the White House. But will Americans now recoil at his draconian deportation methods as federal agents in masks sweep their neighbors off the streets and the administration builds armed camps to hold undocumented migrants? Trump scored a legislative triumph by passing his 'big, beautiful bill' and extending his first-term tax cuts. The White House insists the measure will unleash roaring economic growth and job creation. But how will this giveaway to the rich look if it shuts down rural hospitals and thousands of people lose Medicaid? Trump's Health and Human Services secretary, Robert Kennedy Jr., is vowing to 'Make America Healthy Again.' But the risks are enormous, especially if Kennedy's cancellation of a half-billion dollars in funding on inoculations like the ones that ended the Covid-19 pandemic expose the US to a new public health crisis that could cost thousands of lives. Trump is meanwhile poised for his most consequential foreign policy move yet, as he hosts Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday to try to repair his failed bid to end the Ukraine war. A breakthrough could save thousands of lives and might even deliver his longed-for Nobel Prize. But if he caves to Putin's demands, Trump could make a historic error that paves the way to future Russian expansionism and shatters his White House-conjured image as 'the president of peace.' Flexing power on dubious grounds There's a common thread running through most of Trump's actions — whether it's browbeating political enemies and weaponizing the legal system or forcing trade concessions out of small and vulnerable nations. He's always assessing his leverage over an adversary and seeking to impose his personal will. But while showcasing American might can be effective, Trump is also alienating allies who were force multipliers of US global power. What happens the next time America wants help from its friends — for instance after a 9/11-style attack? Will disaffected populations allow leaders he bullied to rush to America's defense? Trump meanwhile may also be pushing angry allies into the arms of a new superpower — China. And his failure so far to wring trade concessions out of a Beijing that keeps dealing its rare-earth metals trump card may render his broader trade agenda hollow. Trump's gambles are huge and risky. Perhaps many will pay off. But history is full of presidents who misread their mandate and overreached. If some of Trump's most ambitious policies trigger adverse results, the coming months could show whether political gravity will assert itself. The president is already underwater in polls. His approval rating is in the mid-to-low 40s in most surveys. And the administration's failure to quell the scandal over its refusal to release the Jeffrey Epstein files has meanwhile exposed a split in Trump's base for the first time. A perilous national moment could arrive if public opinion turns sharply against Trump and Republicans seem about to pay the price in next year's midterm elections. This, after all, is a president who believes he has almost unlimited power and tried to steal an election he lost in 2020. Trump's growing authoritarian streak shines through his unlocking of vast executive powers through dubious national emergencies. His assaults on the judiciary, the media, universities and officials in previous administrations already threaten the principles of republican government. This comes a year before he presides over the 250th anniversary of the American revolution, which shook off the unaccountable whims of kings — whom Trump increasingly resembles. The president is already hedging against a political backlash. Some of his recent moves, including the firing of the government official who presides over unemployment data and his attempt to craft five new US House seats from an unprecedented mid-cycle gerrymander in Texas, look like attempts to subvert reality and to avoid paying the political price if the economy goes sour. Trump's most remarkable political transformations Tariffs are the most stunning example of Trump's success in changing political and economic convention. America spent decades building a global free trade system. Trump has destroyed it in a matter of weeks. 'We're taking in trillions of dollars,' Trump said in an interview with CNBC last week, speaking of revenues flowing into the government from import duties. But while Trump never admits it, the ultimate price for tariffs will be paid by American consumers who are already tired of the higher cost of groceries and housing. The administration says the global economy will adjust to tariff rates starting at 10% and rising much higher for some countries — and that every American will be better off. So far, Trump has escaped the worst consequences of reforms opposed by almost every economist. 'Right now, the tariffs are not necessarily creating the kind of economic chaos that I think was forecast,' Kristen Soltis Anderson, a Republican pollster and strategist and CNN political commentator, said on 'State of the Union' on Sunday. But things will change if higher prices filter down to consumers. 'It is hard to message your way out of a situation … if prices are really going up, if these retailers are saying, 'We have been absorbing some of this for a little while, but we're going to have to stop.' There is a real potential for political blowback.' Trump has been on a dayslong victory lap, touting trade deals after intimidating partners like Japan, Indonesia and the European Union into agreements that lopsidedly benefited the US. But the small print of such deals suggests they are less impressive than they seem. Hundreds of billions of dollars in promised foreign investment in the US is questionable. Foreign governments can't force firms to spend in the US. And most of the deals do not, as Trump claims, throw open protected sectors of foreign markets to US goods. At best, they include pledges for the US and its trade adversaries to work together to find solutions. And while trade with the US is tariffed — other nations can still trade freely among themselves, meaning they have an incentive to find non-American markets. Another perilous area for Trump is over immigration — his signature issue that twice helped him win the presidency but led to extreme enforcement efforts that alienated moderates in his first term. The approach has been even more punitive in his second. Flights of undocumented migrants have left for El Salvador and an oppressive prison. The due process rights of some migrants have been infringed. And the administration plans more migrant camps like the already notorious 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Florida. This has been accompanied by performative toughness to appeal to Trump's most hardline voters. But Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, a border-state Democrat, warned Sunday that Trump had gone too far. 'The border security issue under President Biden was not working. And I pushed the administration on that,' Kelly said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'But we have now swung drastically in another direction. And I don't think this is what the American people want either.' In a CNN poll last month, 55% of respondents said the president had gone too far when it comes to deporting immigrants living in the US illegally. That number has climbed 10 points since February. Majorities also oppose the construction of big detention centers to hold arrested migrants and the billions of dollars in spending that was included in Trump's big policy bill. Passing that bill was Trump's greatest legislative achievement of his two terms. It was more impressive given the GOP's tiny House majority. But it's also one of the most unpopular things Trump has ever done. Roughly 6 in 10 Americans oppose the bill and a majority expects it will hurt the economy. Trump is a singular politician, and he's been helped by a Republican Party that marches to his tune and a Democratic Party that doesn't have one. But unless Trump shattered political logic while he was breaking the mold of the presidency, a reckoning could be looming. What happens next will define how history remembers his second term.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's mental decline is on vivid display as he rages about Epstein, windmills
It was nice of Donald Trump to travel to Scotland and show our European allies firsthand that the United States is led by a self-absorbed and deeply weird man in obvious mental decline. Over the span of a weekend, the U.S. president's addled brain raced about like a dull-witted Labrador attempting to outsmart squirrels. He went on lengthy diatribes about windmills. He ranted about the ungratefulness of starving children. He forayed into nonsensical conspiracy theories regarding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal consuming his administration, while laughably saying upon arriving in Scotland on July 25: 'I'm not focused on conspiracy theories.' Trump's head, based on his overseas babbling, is 90% conspiracy theories and 10% brain cells. Coverage of Trump's Scotland trip doesn't show the extent of his rambling The trip was largely a taxpayer-funded chance for the grifter in chief to promote his Scottish golf properties, which in the realm of 'things Trump can do that no other president would ever get away with' barely registers as a blip. It was also a chance for him to talk 'deals' with the European Union and the United Kingdom, with a 'deal' being something resulting in trade tariffs that will negatively impact American consumers. Or as Trump likes to call it, 'Winning.' Opinion: MAGA is realizing Trump lies. How can they trust anything he says on Epstein? News coverage tends to trim Trump's voluminous prattling into digestible sound bites that sound vaguely sane. But if we care about a president's lack of mental acuity – and I've been told by many that we do – it's worth sticking your head in the high-pressure stream of nonsense that shoots out every time Trump opens his face hole. Trump shows he's laser-focused on the scourge of windmills On July 25, Trump deplaned in Scotland and immediately showed reporters he was armed with weapons-grade non sequiturs. 'This immigration is killing Europe,' he said, racistly. 'And the other thing, stop the windmills killing the beauty of your countries.' Two days later, he sat with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, who looked like she would love to be elsewhere, and uncorked this: 'And the other thing I say to Europe, we will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States, they're killing us. They're killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains. And I'm not talking about airplanes, I'm talking about beautiful plains, beautiful areas of the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place, it's a horrible thing. It's the most expensive form of energy; it's no good. They're made in China, almost all of them. When they start to rust and rot in eight years, you can't really turn them off, you can't bury them, they won't let you. But the propellers, the props, because they're a certain type of fiber that doesn't go well with the land, that's what they say. The environmentalists say you can't bury them because the fiber doesn't go well with the land; in other words, if you bury it, it will harm our soil. The whole thing is a con job.' OK. That was a thing nobody asked for. It's also filled with lies – wind isn't the most expensive form of energy, and windmills last far longer than eight years. But who would expect honesty from someone rambling like that? Again with the windmills? Heck, just let the old man cook. And Trump wasn't done with windmills. On July 28, during his meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the president said: 'It destroys the beauty of your fields, your plains, and your waterways, and look out there – there's no windmills. But if you look in another direction, you see windmills.' Are the windmills in the room with us right now, Mr. President? Propose prosecuting Beyoncé? Check! Babble incoherently? Check! Trump did take a break from talking crazy over the weekend to post something crazy on social media, writing July 26 that pop star Beyoncé should be prosecuted for a nonexistent $11 million payment from Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. So that happened. And it's not ideal. On July 27, alongside von der Leyen, Trump was asked how he feels about the images of starving children in Gaza, to which he said: 'That whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know, was given many years ago, said that they could have peace. That didn't work out too well. When Israel gave that up, whoever was the prime minister at the time, who I know, who it was, but it was not exactly a very clever thing to do. Because that was given so that they finally have peace, but it's actually made the situation worse. But we'll see what happens. I think Iran is acting up. We have a lot of people acting, we have Venezuela acting up in a different way. They continue to send people that we rebuff to our border. They continue to send drugs into our country, Venezuela. They've been very nasty.' Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So when shown images of starving children in Gaza, Trump feels the place is a mess because an Israeli prime minister whose name he DEFINITELY knows but isn't going to say gave up the Gaza Strip so there could be peace but that made things worse and Iran is acting up and, hey, let me tell you about Venezuela, which is about 7,000 miles away from Gaza. Opinion: Trump is unpopular, polls show, and he's building an America most Americans hate Republicans would have impeached Biden if he talked like Trump Had Joe Biden said something like that when he was president, Republicans would have either impeached him or ordered him locked in a room at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. It got worse when Trump was asked if Israel should be doing more to allow food into Gaza to help the aforementioned starving children. The president's few remaining brain cells decided to focus on how ungrateful all those starving people are: 'We gave $60 million two weeks ago, and nobody even acknowledged it, for food. It's terrible, you know, you really at least want to have somebody say thank you. No other country gave anything; we gave $60 million two weeks ago for food for Gaza. Nobody acknowledged it, nobody talks about it. And it makes you feel a little bad when you do that, and you have other countries not giving anything, none of the European countries, by the way, nobody gave but us, and nobody said, 'Gee, thank you very much,' and it would be nice to have at least a thank you.' During his meeting with Starmer, Trump apparently forgot he had been talking about the Gaza Strip the day before and said: 'We do have to take care of the humanitarian needs on what they used to call the Gaza Strip. You don't hear that line too much anymore. You don't hear the Gaza Strip. But it is the Gaza Strip. Amazing.' Yes. Amazing. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Trump can't stop talking about the scandal. Trump's mental dullness led him to keep talking about the Epstein scandal he wants everyone to stop talking about, effectively telling the world the Epstein stuff is 'not a big thing,' but probably involves former Democratic President Bill Clinton and a former president of Harvard University and 'hedge fund guys' and was probably made up by Democrats who probably put fake stuff in the Epstein files but then, I guess, didn't use any damning information against Trump before the election. He also gave a third explanation for why he stopped being friends with Epstein and said of the convicted sex offender's notorious island: 'I never had the privilege of going to his island.' The privilege? Spoken like a man whose mind has turned to mush. So nice of Trump to share his cognitive decline with the world. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Scotland trip shows Trump's mental decline in real time | Opinion
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
How Emotional Intelligence Can Solve The Matrix Management Problem
Matrix organizations present well-known challenges: difficulty influencing across reporting lines, navigating unclear direction from multiple stakeholders with competing priorities, and driving growth and performance without traditional authority structures. When you add in exponential change and AI's impact, these challenges are multiplied. The conventional wisdom? Throw soft-skills workshops at the problem. But Beth Hoban, Vice President of Talent Management at LMI, a 2,700-person digital solutions provider for the government, had a different approach. When she systematically built 'power skills' (i.e., emotional intelligence across relationships) into daily operations—not through formal training events, but through embedded systems—everything got better. At LMI, Hoban is responsible for developing talent in one of the most complex organizational structures imaginable: a matrix organization where employees report to both project managers and capability leaders, deploy across multiple government markets, and navigate constant change in federal contracting. I recently had the opportunity to ask Hoban about several of the ways LMI enables leaders to develop their 'power skills.' Frequent PM Touchpoints Most organizations approach skills development through intensive multi-day workshops. Hoban takes a different approach: embedded learning that happens within daily work. "We, at this point in time, are not doing the classic, let me take you out for three days to go teach you how to talk to each other,'" she explains. "We want multiple checkpoints throughout the year to really embed and reinforce it." The approach includes weekly forums where program managers can ask questions, learn new technical skills, and practice difficult conversations. When teams face challenges like contract losses, Hoban provides individual coaching to the PMs, too. Three-Question Performance Management When it comes to performance management, Hoban eschews the traditional, complex annual review ritual. Instead, LMI built their entire performance culture around three simple questions that Hoban says they use in "all of our career conversations": "It's a really simple methodology that we repeat over and over and talk about in the flow of work. It's changed the way we're having conversations," Hoban says. Her philosophy is straightforward: "People can't meet expectations for their leaders if they don't know what they are." The approach recognizes a fundamental truth about human nature. "I always ask people, 'Raise your hand if you came to work today to be totally mediocre,'" Hoban notes. "And no one raises their hands—we're here because we want to be of service and we want to do great work." The Systems Approach That Scales What makes LMI's approach work isn't any single program—its systems thinking. Hoban describes herself as "a systems thinker" who focuses on creating what she calls multiple options in critical subject areas. "It's more about creating options in certain buckets and having toolkits. For lack of a better analogy, it's almost a menu," she explains. "Here are some tools and resources that we have at different phases of your career and to counter different problems." These include everything from EQ assessments for specific situations to leadership development for senior teams. The tool is determined by the question: What problem are we trying to solve for? What's the insight we need to get to? The Mission Connection Perhaps most importantly, LMI grounds all of this in mission. As a company serving government clients, every employee can connect their daily work to national security, veteran healthcare, or other critical objectives. Hoban emphasizes the importance of embedding LMI's vision throughout the organization: "How does every single person working here see themselves in the mission? One of my favorite things to ask our leaders is, 'Tuesday afternoon at 2 o' clock in your staff meeting, how are you role-modeling this?" This mission orientation provides what she calls a "bearing point" during times of constant change—a fixed reference when everything else is shifting. The Bottom Line Matrix organizations are becoming the norm in tech and consulting, but they're also where traditional management breaks down. As AI automates more knowledge work, the organizations that thrive will be those that master human relationships. But this isn't about sending people to communication workshops or posting values on the wall. It's about building systems that embed power skills into daily work, create multiple touchpoints for feedback and development, and connect individual growth to organizational mission. Hoban's system approach yields impressive results. While most organizations struggle with AI-driven transformation, LMI actually saw attrition decrease during their 2020 transition from not-for-profit to for-profit status—precisely when employee turnover typically spikes. Hoban references a quote from futurist Alvin Toffler that captures the challenge: "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn." In an AI-powered world, that learning agility—combined with the uniquely human ability to connect, collaborate, and build trust—becomes your only sustainable competitive advantage. Kevin Kruse is the Founder + CEO of LEADx, an emotional intelligence training company. Kevin is also a New York Times bestselling author. His latest book is Emotional Intelligence: 52 Strategies to Build Strong Relationships, Increase Resilience, and Achieve Your Goals.
