logo
Proposed national park celebrates César E. Chávez and the farmworker movement

Proposed national park celebrates César E. Chávez and the farmworker movement

Yahoo05-04-2025

Could a national park to recognize Latino icon and civil rights leader César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement be established soon?
That is what the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park Act, a bicameral legislation, aims to do.
U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Coachella) introduced this week — on César E. Chávez Day — a bill to preserve the nationally significant sites associated with César E. Chávez and the farmworker movement across California and Arizona.
This week, thousands of workers from across the state including farmworkers marched in Delano in Kern County in solidarity with immigrant workers and to denounce the Trump administration's mass deportation policies. The three-mile march commemorated Chavez's 98th birthday.
Chávez empowered Latinos and farmworkers to fight for fair wages, health care coverage, pension benefits, housing improvements, and other protections.
Padilla said establishing the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park 'would pay proper homage to César Chávez's tireless work for the dignity, respect, and equal treatment of workers — priorities facing immense threats under the Trump administration.'
'Our National Park system should memorialize the diverse legacy and culture of all Americans and give farm workers the recognition they deserve,' Padilla said.
According to Padilla's office the legislation would create the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park, which would include the existing the César E. Chávez National Monument, which includes La Nuestra Señora Reina de la Paz in Keene, California. The monument was established by President Barack Obama in 2012.
'I think recognizing the work that Cesar Chavez did, the sacrifices that he made, and the difference that he made in people's lives and farm workers lives, it's something that we should continue to do,' said Teresa Romero, president of United Farm Workers. 'He was a civil rights leader, and because of them, we are here today and continue to fight for farmworkers.'
The National Historical Park would include the following sites upon written agreement from sites owners: Forty Acres in Delano, California, the Santa Rita Center in Phoenix, and McDonnell Hall in San Jose. The Forty Acres site is where the historical 1965 grape strike took place in protest of the anti-immigrant climate against largely Latino communities.
The bill would conduct a National Historic Trail Study for the 'Farmworker Peregrinación National Historic Trail,' the 300-mile march route taken by farm workers between Delano and Sacramento in 1966.
In 2013, the NPS provided the Special Resource Study to Congress that evaluated over 100 sites significant to César Chávez and the farm labor movement in the western United States. The study included five potential management alternatives to protect those sites, and it recommended that Congress establish a National Historical Park that would incorporate nationally significant sites in California and Arizona related to the life of Chávez and the farm labor movement.
Ruiz, a son of farmworkers who grew up in the Coachella Valley, said 'it's vital that we amplify the voices of communities whose stories are too often left unheard.'
The bill, Ruiz said, 'aims to empower the National Park Service to honor and share these important stories, celebrating the diverse and vibrant history of our country.'
Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is cosponsoring the legislation, said Chávez 'expanded and defended the rights of farm workers through the power of organizing.'
'The designation of the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park recognizes the countless contributions he made which paved the way for better wages and working conditions for millions of farm workers,' said Schiff.
Many Latino, civil rights and labor organizations including UFW are in favor of the national park.
In 2008, Congress enacted bipartisan legislation from the late Arizona Sen. John McCain and former California congresswoman Hilda Solis to direct the NPS to conduct a special resource study of sites significant to Chávez and the farm labor movement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doechii Addresses the Los Angeles Protests During Her BET Awards Acceptance Speech
Doechii Addresses the Los Angeles Protests During Her BET Awards Acceptance Speech

Elle

time41 minutes ago

  • Elle

Doechii Addresses the Los Angeles Protests During Her BET Awards Acceptance Speech

Doechii used her platform in a major way at last night's BET Awards. After stunning on the red carpet in a Miu Miu set and cascading braids, the rapper won the first award of the evening, for Best Female Hip-Hop Artist. At the mic, she took the time to acknowledge the current protests against the ICE immigration raids in Los Angeles. She started off her speech by thanking BET and shouting out her fellow nominees, which included GloRilla, Cardi B, Doja Cat, Latto, Megan Thee Stallion, Nicki Minaj, Sexyy Red, and Rapsody, before turning the spotlight elsewhere. 'As much as I'm honored by this award,' she said, 'I do want to address what's happening right now outside of the building.' (The BET Awards took place at L.A.'s Peacock Theater). 'There are ruthless attacks that are creating fear and chaos in our communities in the name of law and order,' she continued. 'Trump is using military forces to stop a protest. And I want y'all to consider what kind of government it appears to be when every time we exercise our democratic right to protest, the military is deployed against us. What type of government is that?' She ended the speech by reflecting on using her platform. 'I feel it's my responsibility as an artist to use this moment to speak up for all oppressed people: for Black people, for Latino people, for Trans people, for the people in Gaza.' Read her full speech below:

Eurasia is the future — the US needs to get on board
Eurasia is the future — the US needs to get on board

The Hill

time42 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Eurasia is the future — the US needs to get on board

A major discovery of rare earth elements in central Kazakhstan earlier this year sent a jolt through global markets and policymaking circles, with early estimates suggesting it could place the country among the world's top three holders of rare earth reserves. As the Trump administration scrambles to secure alternatives to China's near-monopoly over these critical materials, used in modern technology such as smartphones, electric cars and computers, the spotlight is once again turning to a region long overlooked by Washington: the post-Soviet Turkic world. These Turkic nations — Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan — are unfamiliar to most Americans. Yet U.S. officials have long recognized the region's value, measured in energy, strategic minerals, rare earth elements and alternative supply routes. For many thorny reasons, Washington has failed to establish firm allies there. Diplomatic presence tells the story: while Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin have visited Central Asia 14 and 83 times, respectively, since taking office, no U.S. president has visited any Turkic nation besides Turkey. And now the U.S. has fallen behind. Russia, China and the European Union have all successfully made inroads in the Turkic world in recent years. Moscow, which has traditionally dominated the region, has largely taken control of Uzbekistan's gas industry, while partnering with Kazakhstan on gas and oil exports and nuclear technology for a planned power plant. In 2023, China increased trade with Central Asia by 27 percent from the year prior while signing strategic partnerships with Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan. And the EU recently held a large summit with Central Asian countries in Uzbekistan, announcing it would invest $12 billion in the region. These global powers understand the stakes. Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan together hold 6.5 percent of global gas reserves. Turkmenistan ranks sixth worldwide in gas, and Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan are major oil producers. And over the past several months, Astana has massively exceeded OPEC-plus production targets without signs of slowing. But most important today is the region's supply of minerals and rare earth elements. Besides Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan also has significant reserves and recently invested $2.6 billion to develop mineral extraction. Both Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan also have large reserves of strategic minerals with military, economic and technological uses, like gold, uranium, copper, tungsten, silicon, lithium and titanium. Given Central Asia's large reserves, Washington should invest in refining and mining rare earth elements, to break Beijing's dominance. Refining is particularly important, as these countries lack the ability to refine important strategic minerals like lithium, uranium, nickel and cobalt and often do so in China or Russia. To pave the way for such investment, Congress should consider granting the Turkic world Permanent Normal Trade Relations status. Besides having valuable resources, the region plays an important role in supply routes. During the height of the ancient Silk Road's importance, the Turkic world glued the continent together, serving as a thoroughfare between China, India and Europe. Today, it may be resuming its historic role as a bridge between the East and West, as the Middle Corridor gains in popularity — a transit route from East Asia to Europe bypassing both Russia and Iran. U.S. officials have spoken of the importance of the Middle Corridor in the past, and last year, Washington and Europe signed a Memorandum of Understanding to further develop the route. Such developments give the U.S. a clear opportunity. Should Washington start seriously developing the corridor, it would give Kazakhstani energy a bypass through Azerbaijan while weakening Russia's hold on Kazakhstan. An important step would be brokering a final peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan, widening the corridor and giving an alternative to Georgia, which has become closer to Russia in recent years. Many Turkic leaders, including former Kazakhstani President Nursultan Nazarbayev, former Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev and former Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev, have spoken about decreasing their outward reliance by forming a Turkic bloc. The bloc would represent a total of roughly 175 million inhabitants, with a GDP of some $1.9 trillion — about 95 percent of the Russian GDP, and a growth rate 2 percent higher than the global average. Currently, Turkic countries have deepened cooperation through the Organization of Turkic States. Should Turkic countries increase cooperation further, they will be better able to dictate their own terms. Although Turkey was once expected to lead a unified Turkic bloc, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's Islamist policies and Ankara's focus on the Arab world have alienated key regional powers. The secular Turkic governments are wary of ideological influence, and of becoming subordinate to Ankara. This has led to a leadership vacuum — although possibly not for long. After the conclusion of the 2020 Karabakh war with Armenia, Azerbaijan has begun to position itself along with Kazakhstan as a leader of the Turkic world. Both countries hold the largest reserves of energy and minerals and are most crucial to trade routes. Azerbaijan is located on the very bottleneck between Iran and Russia that crosses the Middle Corridor. Kazakhstan's location makes it the most feasible country for Chinese products to cross over to Europe. The U.S. must take the Turkic world seriously, and soon — not just in words, but with a presidential visit, sustained investment and a new Silk Road strategy. Joseph Epstein is director of the Turan Research Center, a nonpartisan research program at the Yorktown Institute focused on the Turkic and Persian worlds.

Letters to the Editor: What Californians are saying about the National Guard's deployment to L.A.
Letters to the Editor: What Californians are saying about the National Guard's deployment to L.A.

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: What Californians are saying about the National Guard's deployment to L.A.

To the editor: I've lived in Los Angeles long enough to know that this city weathers fire, quake and fury and still manages to bloom. We grow food in our backyards, paint our pain on walls and find beauty in the struggle. But right now, there's a pressure in the air thicker than smog, a national fear winding through our streets, and its name is Donald Trump ('National Guard arrives in Los Angeles as fallout from immigration raids continues,' June 8). The helicopters overhead aren't just news choppers anymore. They're echoes of something ancient and dangerous: Fascism rising on American soil. I never thought I'd say this in my lifetime, but we're watching a man try to bring down a republic with the smug grin of a game show host who already knows the final answer. President Trump, you can stop now. Turn on your TV. Watch what you've done. You will not be remembered as a patriot. You will not be remembered as a liberator. You will be remembered as the worst leader this country has ever produced. A divider. A destroyer. We write, we paint, we protest and we plant seeds of hope in cracked concrete. But we are exhausted. We need moral leadership, not messianic delusion. What do we tell our children when their leaders praise dictators, vilify the press and mock the weak? That chaos is power? That empathy is weakness? Mr. Trump: History is not on your side and neither is Los Angeles. Patsy Pitts, South Los Angeles .. To the editor: It is important to remember that the president who sent the National Guard to Los Angeles because the administration 'has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence' is the same president that incited the insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, declined to take steps to stop the attack on our Capitol or protect members of Congress and, as soon as he took office in 2025, pardoned everyone (more than 1,500 people) indicted or sentenced for the attack. Approximately 140 law enforcement officers were injured with more than $2.7 million in damage to the Capitol. He is sending a message. Marcia Scully, Whittier .. To the editor: Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass have not told the L.A. disruptors to go home because these politicians fear alienating an important voting bloc. If Trump does nothing, there will be the creation of no-go zones throughout our country, in which local groups bring parts of major cities to a halt in order to impose an illegal immigration political agenda. If Trump attempts to restore order, rioters — like those on college campuses — will increase their pressure to demonstrate who has power in this country. It really is necessary to send in the troops. Otherwise, we are headed toward a variant of mob rule. Julia Lutch, Davis, Calif. .. To the editor: The last time a president called in the National Guard without a request from a governor was in 1965 in Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights demonstrators. This current action by the president is not to protect civil rights or even legal rights. The troops' wearing of masks indicates a complete lack of training and accountability. In other words, unrestrained gangs with the backing of POTUS. Joanne Weckbacher, Burbank .. To the editor: Protests by the undocumented and their supporters without permits are futile and stupid. The resulting arrests and detentions are inevitable. Law enforcement is only doing their job and the protesters are breaking the law in trying to stop them. If the undocumented and their supporters want to make a statement, boycott their workplaces in agriculture, construction, the garment industry or housekeeping in hotels, nationwide. Those industries are fully aware just how dependent they are on those who toil to keep the profits rolling in. Elliott H. Boone, Long Beach .. To the editor: Now that the Trump administration has launched open warfare against the values of Californians, the most effective response would be resistance that is massive and, above all, passive. When thousands of people in the streets lie down and play dead in a blocking action against whatever action military forces attempt, those forces have no good options to defeat the people. Roughing protesters up will only recruit more to the cause. This will take discipline on the part of the resistance, but the conscience of the average American will recoil at the sight of peaceful protesters being subjected to violence. Mahatma Gandhi prevailed against the British and won a subcontinent without firing a shot. The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. helped defeat white supremacy using nonviolence. This is a pivotal moment in history that will be squandered if the resistance resorts to violence. Where the cause is righteous, good trouble demands massive peaceful protest to win. Alan B. Posner, Santa Barbara .. To the editor: I stand with those of the city who are protesting against Trump's intervention into California's autonomy. I am proud of you and your efforts. To those who committed acts of vandalism including burning cars, deep shame upon you. To those who remained peaceful, report those who committed crime. It deeply hurts your cause when the weak-brained commit stupidity. Mat Lakota, Oroville, Calif.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store