Proposed national park celebrates César E. Chávez and the farmworker movement
That is what the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park Act, a bicameral legislation, aims to do.
U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Coachella) introduced this week — on César E. Chávez Day — a bill to preserve the nationally significant sites associated with César E. Chávez and the farmworker movement across California and Arizona.
This week, thousands of workers from across the state including farmworkers marched in Delano in Kern County in solidarity with immigrant workers and to denounce the Trump administration's mass deportation policies. The three-mile march commemorated Chavez's 98th birthday.
Chávez empowered Latinos and farmworkers to fight for fair wages, health care coverage, pension benefits, housing improvements, and other protections.
Padilla said establishing the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park 'would pay proper homage to César Chávez's tireless work for the dignity, respect, and equal treatment of workers — priorities facing immense threats under the Trump administration.'
'Our National Park system should memorialize the diverse legacy and culture of all Americans and give farm workers the recognition they deserve,' Padilla said.
According to Padilla's office the legislation would create the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park, which would include the existing the César E. Chávez National Monument, which includes La Nuestra Señora Reina de la Paz in Keene, California. The monument was established by President Barack Obama in 2012.
'I think recognizing the work that Cesar Chavez did, the sacrifices that he made, and the difference that he made in people's lives and farm workers lives, it's something that we should continue to do,' said Teresa Romero, president of United Farm Workers. 'He was a civil rights leader, and because of them, we are here today and continue to fight for farmworkers.'
The National Historical Park would include the following sites upon written agreement from sites owners: Forty Acres in Delano, California, the Santa Rita Center in Phoenix, and McDonnell Hall in San Jose. The Forty Acres site is where the historical 1965 grape strike took place in protest of the anti-immigrant climate against largely Latino communities.
The bill would conduct a National Historic Trail Study for the 'Farmworker Peregrinación National Historic Trail,' the 300-mile march route taken by farm workers between Delano and Sacramento in 1966.
In 2013, the NPS provided the Special Resource Study to Congress that evaluated over 100 sites significant to César Chávez and the farm labor movement in the western United States. The study included five potential management alternatives to protect those sites, and it recommended that Congress establish a National Historical Park that would incorporate nationally significant sites in California and Arizona related to the life of Chávez and the farm labor movement.
Ruiz, a son of farmworkers who grew up in the Coachella Valley, said 'it's vital that we amplify the voices of communities whose stories are too often left unheard.'
The bill, Ruiz said, 'aims to empower the National Park Service to honor and share these important stories, celebrating the diverse and vibrant history of our country.'
Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is cosponsoring the legislation, said Chávez 'expanded and defended the rights of farm workers through the power of organizing.'
'The designation of the César E. Chávez and the Farmworker Movement National Historical Park recognizes the countless contributions he made which paved the way for better wages and working conditions for millions of farm workers,' said Schiff.
Many Latino, civil rights and labor organizations including UFW are in favor of the national park.
In 2008, Congress enacted bipartisan legislation from the late Arizona Sen. John McCain and former California congresswoman Hilda Solis to direct the NPS to conduct a special resource study of sites significant to Chávez and the farm labor movement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
Senate Adds Guardrails in an Effort to Force Trump to Obey Spending Bills
Top Republicans and Democrats in the Senate, alarmed by President's Trump's moves to withhold funding approved by Congress, have teamed up to add new safeguards to next year's spending bills that would ensure the Trump administration allocates federal dollars as lawmakers intend. The little-noticed moves are part of a quiet escalation in the battle between the legislative and executive branches over federal spending powers. Ahead of a Sept. 30 deadline for funding the government, the bipartisan leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee have said they must take extra steps to assert their authority over the allocation of government dollars, after the Trump administration has repeatedly questioned and defied congressional instructions on spending. 'In the past, the agency and department secretaries have always, or almost always, followed that guidance,' Senator Susan Collins, the Maine Republican who leads the committee, said in an interview. 'But in this administration, it is clear that we need to move far more of that language on how the money should be spent into the bills themselves.' The changes may not survive negotiations with the House, where Republicans have been far more deferential to Mr. Trump. And they may not have a chance to be enacted, given the White House's determination to have its way on spending. But proponents say that at the very least, the safeguards could strengthen the position of Congress in future legal battles over funding. The guardrails are largely technical and include putting instructions into legislative text that would have previously been spelled out in nonbinding reports. For example, officials say that detailed tables on spending for major agencies such as the Justice Department and the Department of Health and Human Services are now being added to the text of the bills themselves, to try to assure that the funds are used for their specified purposes. The guardrails also include significant new requirements for reporting to Congress on terminating contracts and grant awards, as well as for making substantial reductions in the federal work force. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Slow Demise Of Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) was created through the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 and is designed to provide loan forgiveness to individuals who work in public service. The program allows federal student loan borrowers who work in government or for nonprofits to have the remaining balance on their student loans forgiven after making 120 qualifying payments - 10 years. To be a qualifying payment, a borrower must work for a qualifying employer, make payments under a qualifying repayment plan, and send in a certification of their employment. Since PSLF was created by law, it cannot simply be ended without Congress passing a new law. However, over the last year, there have been consistent attempts to weaken the program. And it's sparking concern for the future. While PSLF remains on the books, these administrative actions and policy changes are slowly narrowing the scope of the program. Parent PLUS Borrowers Lose Access After 2026 One of the most significant changes to PSLF is the treatment of Parent PLUS Loans. Under current rules, parent borrowers can qualify for PSLF if they consolidate their Parent PLUS Loan into a Direct Consolidation Loan and enroll in the Income-Contingent Repayment Plan (ICR). However, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) ends this path in 2026. New parent PLUS Loans taken out after July 1, 2026 can only repay their loans under the Standard Repayment Plan - cutting off access to a qualifying repayment plan for PSLF. Existing Parent PLUS Loan borrowers may still qualify if they take certain actions before June 30, 2026. They must consolidate their loans and have the consolidation completed before June 30, 2026. They must also enroll in (and make at least one payment under) an income driven repayment plan prior to July 1, 2028. There's also a big catch: parents cannot take out a new Parent PLUS Loan again after July 1, 2026 or else all their existing loans will lose access. This puts roughly 3.5 million parent PLUS loan borrowers at risk of losing access to PSLF, according to the most recent Federal Student Aid data. Negotiated Rulemaking Could Change Qualifying Employers While the changes to Parent PLUS Loans are already in effect, there's also a potential change coming to the definition of a qualifying employer. The Department of Education recently released their final rule to add a new qualification to qualifying employers: they cannot engage in "substantially illegal purposes". While the headline sounds fair, the actual scope of the rule is creating a lot of concern. The term "substantial illegal purpose" is defined to include: The end arbiter of which employers fall into these categories is the Department of Education. There could also be collateral damage from these definitions. As the Department noted in their final rule, some employers use the same EIN for a variety of organizations - all of which would be subject to losing access to PSLF if one employer is found in violation. As such, many worry that PSLF could become a political tool. New Policy Memo For The Future Finally, a think tank is advocating that Republicans take up a new budget reconciliation process and finish what the OBBBA started. One of 'asks' in the memo is the dismantling of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. It's important to note that this memo isn't law, and it doesn't appear to have any official support yet in Congress, but it's clear that there are some organizations that are looking to end the PSLF program. Bigger Picture: Will Public Service Loan Forgiveness Exist In Name Only? Since PSLF was created by law, it cannot be dismantled overnight by executive orders, rulemaking, or budget reconciliation bills. However, the continual addition of exclusions and pending changes raise an uncomfortable question: what does Public Service Loan Forgiveness mean if borrowers can't actually qualify? For public service employees like teachers, police officers, firefighters, and members of the armed forces, PSLF was designed as an incentive to remain in lower-paying but socially valuable jobs. By narrowing the scope of eligibility, policymakers are weakening that incentive and potentially discouraging participation in fields that are already facing shortages. It's important to remember that Public Service Loan Forgiveness is not gone. It's also not going anywhere in the near term. Congress would have to repeal the statute to eliminate it completely. But the slow march of administrative changes suggests a different kind of ending: one where the program exists on paper but serves fewer borrowers each year.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New poll shows Texas voters are divided on Trump's redistricting plan to boost GOP
A new poll shows Texas voters are divided on President Donald Trump's redistricting plans to add five more GOP seats to Congress, according to a new poll. The new Emerson College poll found that 36% of Texas voters supported the proposal to redraw Texas' congressional districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Another 38% said they opposed the effort and 26% said they were unsure, according to the poll. Among Republicans, 58% supported the proposal, 30% were unsure, and 12% opposed it. For Democrats, only 15% supported the move, 16% were unsure, and 70% opposed it. The effort was also unpopular among independent Texas voters, with just 24% of the group approving of the proposal. Another 33% said they were unsure and 43% said they opposed the move. When asked if Republicans in Texas are 'entitled to five more congressional seats,' referring to Trump's statement on the matter, 40% of voters agreed while 38% of voters disagreed. Another 22% did not have an opinion, according to the poll. The poll was conducted Aug. 11-12 among 1,000 registered voters in Texas. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. The poll comes as Texas Democrats fled the state earlier this week to halt the Texas GOP's efforts to redraw the congressional maps. According to the Associated Press, the Democrats will return to the state once Texas Republicans end a special session and California releases its own redrawn map proposal. Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott still intends to push through new maps that would give the GOP five more winnable seats before next year's midterm elections. House Speaker Dustin Burrows has said that if Democrats don't return the next time lawmakers reconvene on Friday, the session will end and the governor will immediately begin another one. Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of his first presidency, when the 2018 midterms restored Democrats to a House majority that blocked his agenda and twice impeached him. It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to
