Restriction zones will ‘unduly influence' release of offenders, warns PCC
Sexual and violent offenders could be restricted to certain locations and tracked with technology, and would face jail time for breaching the conditions under new proposals.
Until now exclusion zones exist to stop perpetrators from going to where their victims live.
The measure comes as the Government plans to overhaul the prison system to curb overcrowding, which could see violent and sexual offenders released from jail earlier, and for more criminals to serve sentences in the community.
Tens of thousands of offenders would be tagged, prompting concerns from the victims' commissioner for England and Wales over the Probation Service's ability to cope with rising numbers.
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Police and Crime Commissioner Donna Jones said that the new restriction zones were 'welcome' but 'caution is needed'.
Ms Jones added: 'I'm concerned they will unduly influence the Government's decision on which offenders to release under its Early Release Scheme.
'I would like clarification over the length of sentence violent offenders will receive if they're recalled to prison.
'The current 28 days put in place by the Government as an emergency measure to free up prison places is clearly not a deterrent.'
The Ministry of Justice has been approached for comment.
The mother of a woman who was killed by her estranged husband said she is praying he is given a restricted zone if he is released.
Joanna Simpson, 46, was killed by her estranged husband Robert Brown in 2010 when he attacked her with a claw hammer in the family home.
Brown was sentenced to 24 years in prison for manslaughter and a further two years for an offence of obstructing a coroner in the execution of his duty.
Ms Simpson's mother, Diana Parkes, said she was 'delighted' about the new plans to restrict the movement of domestic abuse perpetrators.
Discussing her daughter's killer, Ms Parkes told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'He's coming up for parole in January, I just heard yesterday.
'So hopefully when he comes out, we pray that he will be put in a restricted zone with a tag.'
Ms Parkes, who was made a CBE for services to vulnerable children suffering from domestic abuse and domestic homicide, added: 'It's essential that victims of violent crimes should not live in fear when their perpetrators come out of prison on licence to serve the rest of their sentence, as it does at the present time.
'The perpetrator knows exactly where the victims are as they have exclusion zones, which are supposedly safe areas for the victims, but of course, the perpetrators know where they are and the minute they come out of their exclusion zone, the perpetrators could grab them or hurt them.
'Everyone has to worry all the time about where the perpetrator is when they live their normal life, because we're never told where they are at the moment.'
Brown killed his millionaire wife one week before the finalisation of their divorce.
He buried her body in a pre-dug grave in Windsor Great Park and confessed to police the following day.
He was cleared of murder after a trial, but admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, with a psychiatric report saying he suffered from an 'adjustment disorder'.
The Government has announced £700 million of funding until 2028/29 for the Probation Service to back up its reforms, as well as the recruitment of 1,300 new probation officers by March 2026.
For the new restriction zones, probation officers will work with survivors to decide on banned locations for perpetrators, and will carry out detailed risk assessments.
Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones announced the new measure at the charity Advance in London on Friday.
The victims minister said perpetrators will be GPS-monitored to have real-time data about where they are going, and will be subject to 'virtual boundaries' which if breached could mean they go to prison.
She said: 'We're putting really strong safeguards attached to these so that we can give victims and survivors the confidence to carry on with their everyday lives.
'We're going to be outlining more details on this as well, as we're bringing in the legislation in the autumn.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
31 minutes ago
- Press and Journal
Nicola Sturgeon admits in new book she got it wrong on oil and gas - as Aberdeen paid the price
Nicola Sturgeon has admitted the SNP over-inflated promises about oil and gas in the independence campaign, just before a collapse hit Aberdeen and the north-east hard. The former first minister looks back at policies and pledges central to the regional economy in an extract from her new memoirs, called Frankly. The much anticipated book relives the events running up to the crucial vote on Scotland's future in September 2014. In it, she reflects: The publication of the book comes just as government figures were forced again to respond to falling North Sea revenue and a widening financial deficit. In her book, Ms Sturgeon looks back more than 10 years when prices were riding high. 'The numbers we had used in the referendum White Paper to illustrate an independent Scotland's fiscal position had been heavily dependent on oil revenues,' she writes. 'And, of course, we had based these on the optimistic estimates that Alex had insisted on. 'I didn't know then that a total collapse in the oil price was just around the corner. 'In early 2015, this caused significant political and practical problems. The practical came from the impact on the economy of Aberdeen and the north-east, which is heavily reliant on the oil and gas supply chain. 'As the major companies started to shed jobs and curtail activity, the effects were quickly felt across the region.' As first minister, Ms Sturgeon set up a taskforce but powers were limited and political opponents sensed opportunity. 'To have the price of a barrel of crude fall to around 40 US dollars when we had relied on a figure of well over 100 US dollars in the referendum blew a massive hole in the credibility of our argument,' she added. 'I resolved then that in any future referendum, we must not allow the strength of the independence prospectus to stand or fall on the volatile value of oil, especially as it is a finite commodity. 'We needed to show how Scotland's economy would be sustainable in the long term without it.' On Wednesday morning, the volatility of North Sea revenue and government policies were again under scrutiny with the publication of annual revenue and spending. It coincides with another push for independence under First Minister John Swinney. The difference between revenue and public sector spending, including capital investment, was a deficit of 11.7% of gross domestic product in Scotland. When excluding the North Sea, there was a deficit of 14.4% of GDP – equal to £30.6 billion. The Scottish Government has faced criticism for delays to an energy strategy and lack of vocal support for oil and gas. Much of the crucial policy power rests at Westminster where the Labour government is under pressure to address a windfall tax on profits. Russell Borthwick, chief executive at Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said: 'If the UK Government continues to tax the industry at 78%, then we face an accelerated industrial decline, we will lose our world class supply chain to other parts of the word, and our oil and gas imports will continue to soar, syphoning tens of billions of pounds out of the UK economy. 'However, there is another future, one where we commit to sourcing the oil and gas we require as a nation from the North Sea, supporting jobs, public services and – crucially – creating the bridge required to a just transition while we build out renewable energy projects.' Responding to the new figures, Scottish Government Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour's inheritance tax must be scrapped
How have we managed to create a world where a dwindling band of taxpayers is funding a growing number of able-bodied people to live relatively comfortably on benefits without even being required to look for work? As the welfare bill balloons, the Government has to find more money because its own MPs will not let it cut payments or tighten the rules. Since the Chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised not to increase borrowing or add to the taxes of so-called 'working people' she is forced to look elsewhere, notably at pensions and savings. Now she is targeting inheritance tax (IHT) to plug holes in the finances ahead of an autumn Budget. Treasury officials have been told to examine greater restrictions on gifting money and assets. The tax burden is at its highest for nearly 80 years. Taxpayers who are by no means rich are dragged into paying higher rates by the pernicious freezing of allowances. The minority of earners who contribute the most in taxes have gone along with this in the expectation of being able to help their children with any accumulated wealth left to them by a rapacious state. If the morality of this tax is questionable, tougher rules are not even politically advantageous. Polling shows it is probably the most unpopular tax of all, even among people who are unlikely to have to pay it. It would be a desperate act to tighten the rules further, but Ms Reeves is cornered. IHT is a tax on the prudent and family-minded. It involves being taxed when you die on wealth that was taxed while being accumulated in life, and therefore discourages wealth creation and retention. In drawing up their new policies, the Tories should commit to its abolition.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK could fail to meet commitment to spend 80% of foreign aid on gender equality projects
Ministers are considering scrapping a commitment to spend 80% of foreign aid on projects supporting gender equality, the Guardian has learned. Critics warned the move could worsen the impact of Donald Trump's rollback of funding for diversity and aid projects abroad, which has affected maternal and reproductive health services in developing countries. The Conservative government committed in 2023 to ensuring that 80% of the Foreign Office's bilateral aid programmes have a focus on gender equality by 2030. Labour ministers reaffirmed the commitment earlier this year. Stephen Doughty, a junior Foreign Office minister, said ministers would continue to work towards the target in March, even after the government had announced it was cutting international aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP to spend more on defence. Under the target, 80% of aid spending must go to programmes that have gender as a component by 2030, though it does not need to be the main focus. David Lammy, the foreign secretary, told MPs last month that he could not 'commit to decisions made by the last government' and it was 'for us to look at this afresh'. The government spent £15.3bn in aid in 2023, the latest year for which final figures are available. Of this, £10bn was bilateral aid spent directly on projects in developing countries, instead of multilateral institutions such as the UN. Provisional figures suggest that the UK's aid spending fell to £14.1bn in 2024, an 8% decrease on the previous year, with £11.3bn going to bilateral aid. A government impact assessment said in July that the government's aid cuts meant that in Africa – where half of the UK's bilateral aid goes – spending was being reduced in women's health and emergency response in countries including the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. The assessment warned that 'reductions to health spending risk an increase in disease burden and ultimately in deaths, impacting in particular those living in poverty, women, children and people with disabilities'. It also said that there would be cuts to girls' education programmes in countries including Ethiopia, Sierra Leone and Nigeria and to projects encouraging women's participation in peace processes, with specific conflicts including Ukraine and Sudan supported at a reduced scale. Critics warned that scrapping the 80% commitment could compound the impact of the US and UK aid cuts and exacerbate what feels like 'a global war on women'. Labour has promised to prioritise women and girls in government including by promoting sexual and reproductive health and rights abroad, and tackling gender-based violence. Harriet Harman, the former acting Labour leader, was appointed UK special envoy for women and girls in March 2025. Sarah Champion, the Labour chair of the international aid committee, said: 'The UK's commitments to women and girls are not just words on a page, they're a lifeline that gives hope to some of the poorest and most vulnerable on the planet. 'The Trump administration immediately cut all international maternal and reproductive health support, and just last month, burned contraception it had bought for low-income countries. Now is the time for the UK to step up our commitment to gender programming, not step away. 'When we look at conflicts, climate impact and nutrition it is always women and girls who bear the brunt. Our aid programming gives them hope and opportunities in what feels like a global war on women. We can't take that away from them now.' Alex Farley, a policy manager at Bond, the UK network for NGOs, said that 'at a time when women's rights globally are under attack and the US has been gutting all gender equality and diversity programming, it's definitely very worrying to see the UK following suit.' 'Gender equality programming has already been put at disproportionate risk in the government's cuts to UK aid. Upholding the 80% commitment, alongside stand-alone gender programmes, is really important for the UK to send a signal showing that it's committed to tackling gender inequality rather than stepping back.' Amelia Whitworth, head of policy, campaigns and youth at Plan International UK said: 'Anti-gender movements are growing, humanitarian and climate crises are intensifying, and girls and women are being hit hardest. In a world where girls' rights are being rolled back, the UK has to hold the line. 'With USAID slashing over 80% of its programmes – including funding for gender and DEI initiatives – and European donors retreating, the need for the UK to uphold its gender equality commitments has never been greater.' An FCDO spokesperson confirmed that the government was 'carefully reviewing the viability of existing commitments' after cutting aid spending to 0.3%. 'As the foreign secretary has said, women and girls are a fundamental priority,' the spokesperson said. 'From appointing a dedicated special envoy for women and girls to improving energy access for 15 million women worldwide, the UK has demonstrated how integrating gender equality into its international work can transform lives. We will continue to champion the rights of women and girls globally and ensure that gender equality is embedded across all the department's priorities.'
