VinFast Philippines secures official CAMPI membership
Ms. Mai Anh, CEO of VinFast Philippines (center left), and Mr. Rommel Gutierrez, President of CAMPI (center right), at the event celebrating CAMPI's 30th anniversary.
MANILA, PHILIPPINES - Media OutReach Newswire - 5 June 2025Founded in 1995, the Chamber of Automotive Manufacturers of the Philippines, Inc. (CAMPI) has been instrumental in championing the interests of the automotive sector, contributing significantly to the nation's economic growth. As of May 2025, the association accounts for more than 92 percent of Philippine auto sales.Committed to developing a viable and self-sustaining local industry, CAMPI works closely with the government and key stakeholders to shape policies, regulations, and standards that drive economic growth. Through its efforts, CAMPI promotes investment, job creation, skills development, technology transfer, environmental protection, and road safety across the sector.As a member of CAMPI, VinFast will work alongside other leading automotive players to help shape policies, programs, and industry standards that support innovation and sustainable growth.After a year since its market entry in the Philippines, VinFast has steadily expanded its presence with its portfolio of smart EV models, attractive sales offerings, and a continuously refined after-sales support system.With strong backing from Vingroup, Vietnam's leading conglomerate, and the strategic determination of Chairman Pham Nhat Vuong, VinFast is actively pursuing the development of a comprehensive "For a Green Future" ecosystem across Southeast Asia, placing strong emphasis on the collaborative growth of charging infrastructure and service networks. This framework, established successfully in Vietnam, is now being extended to promising markets such as the Philippines.With a diverse portfolio that includes the VF 3, VF 5, VF 6, VF 7, and VF 9, VinFast offers a broad range of sustainable mobility solutions. The VinFast VF 6, in particular, is poised to be a key driver for EV adoption in the Philippines, building on its strong performance in Vietnam and favorable reception in European markets. It presents an enticing and affordable option for Filipino consumers eager to embrace eco-friendly transportation.Hashtag: #vinfast
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
About VinFast
VinFast (NASDAQ: VFS), a subsidiary of Vingroup JSC, one of Vietnam's largest conglomerates, is a pure-play electric vehicle ("EV") manufacturer with the mission of making EVs accessible to everyone. VinFast's product lineup today includes a wide range of electric SUVs, e-scooters, e-bikes, and e-buses.
VinFast is currently embarking on its next growth phase through rapid expansion of its distribution and dealership network globally and increasing its manufacturing capacities with a focus on key markets across North America, Europe and Asia.
Learn more at https://www.vinfastauto.ph/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
36 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Stanley Thai's wife appeals order blocking Supermax Holdings winding-up
Married in 1987, Supermax co-founders Stanley Thai and Tan Bee Geok are in the midst of divorce proceedings. KUALA LUMPUR : Stanley Thai's estranged wife has appealed a High Court ruling that bars her from pursuing a winding-up petition against Supermax Holdings Sdn Bhd until their divorce proceedings are resolved. FMT understands Tan Bee Geok disagrees with the reasons given by Justice Evrol Mariette Peters in a written judgment handed down last week. Peters had on May 31 issued an order restraining Tan from pursuing the winding-up of Supermax Holdings – a company she jointly owns with Thai – until their divorce proceedings are fully resolved. In her judgment, the judge acknowledged that the family court does not generally have jurisdiction to intervene in matters that fall exclusively under the purview of the winding-up court. 'These are matters expressly governed by the Companies Act 2016 and fall within the supervisory jurisdiction of the commercial or insolvency courts, specifically designated to oversee winding-up proceedings,' she said. However, the judge said the limitation on subject-matter jurisdiction did not exclude the family court from exercising its authority, particularly where the parties have voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction. 'The authority of the family court in the present case arose not from an intrusion into the winding-up court's domain, but over the parties' conduct in the matrimonial dispute before it,' Peters said. She added that the family court was in this case acting as a court of equity to ensure that the parties did not undermine or frustrate the objectives of matrimonial proceedings – particularly in cases involving financial remedies, asset division or preservation orders – by taking unilateral steps in parallel forums. 'This exercise of jurisdiction is consistent with the family court's mandate to regulate the conduct of parties before it, and to ensure that the integrity of its orders and processes is maintained,' she said. Married in 1987, Tan and Thai have endured a rocky marriage. In April 2022, Tan petitioned for judicial separation from her businessman husband. In her petition, she sought a division of matrimonial assets, including shares in Supermax, and early last year secured an injunction restraining Thai from dealing with them. In April last year Thai filed a divorce petition, and, in August, Tan responded with a cross-petition, again praying for the division of assets, including the Supermax shares. By doing so, Peters said Tan had expressly invited the family court to assume jurisdiction over, and determine, the appropriate division or disposition of those shares. The judge also said it was inherently inconsistent and inequitable for Tan to now pursue the winding-up petition in another court when she had earlier sought judicial intervention to preserve the status quo. 'Her current course of action undermined the integrity of the judicial process and suggested a tactical shift that was both disingenuous and abusive of the court's process,' she said. Peters said the inference was that the winding-up petition was filed to prevent the family court from potentially adjusting Tan's shareholding to her detriment. The judge said Tan's petition to wind up Supermax was also an attempt to interfere with the family court's division of matrimonial assets, thus constituting an abuse of process. She said this was especially so since Supermax's assets were liable to be sold off or liquidated – possibly below their true market value – if the company was wound up, particularly if the liquidator was looking to settle its debts swiftly. 'This process could significantly reduce the overall value of Supermax and consequently, diminish the total pool of matrimonial assets available for division between the parties in the context of a divorce,' she added. Peters said Tan's conduct in attempting to wind up Supermax was indicative that there was a real and substantial risk that she would continue in her attempt to dissipate the other matrimonial assets that have been prayed for in the divorce petition and judicial separation. Accordingly, the judge inserted an order restraining the dissipation of assets on identical terms to one issued against Thai in January last year. 'In my view, the principle of fairness requires that the clause in the court order be applied consistently across both the judicial separation and divorce petitions. 'As the saying goes, what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Fairness demands that the same rules apply equally to both parties to ensure parity in legal obligations and treatment,' she said.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Deep-sea mining race heats up as Canada's The Metals Company bypasses UN rules, seeks US backing
NEW YORK, June 7 — The head of submarine mining pioneer The Metals Company told AFP he had 'no doubt' the Canadian firm would be the first to to extract coveted minerals from the deep seas, with help from Donald Trump. Metal-containing deep-sea nodules, which have the appearance of potato-size pebbles and typically contain nickel and cobalt, are highly sought for use in electric vehicle batteries and electric cables, and the race is on to be the first to extract them from the untapped deep sea. TMC's chief executive Gerard Barron told AFP in an interview in New York that his company was sure to win the race. The company turned its back on the International Seabed Authority (ISA), which has jurisdiction over the international seabed, complaining over its slow pace in adopting a mining code that establishes the rules for exploiting seabed minerals. Instead, TMC surprised everyone when its US subsidiary submitted a request to Washington, which is not an ISA member, to grant it the first commercial mining permit in international waters. TMC has asked to harvest so-called polymetallic nodules – deposits made up of multiple metals – in 9,700 square miles (25,200 square kilometers) of the Pacific's Clarion-Clipperton Zone. Here is what Barron said about what might lie ahead. Q: When is your target to start mining?A: 'With the help of the executive order from President Trump,... we're expecting an expedited permitting process. And that hopefully will mean that within this next year, maybe even by the end of the year, we'll see the permission from the US government to move forward.' 'We do have our first production vessel, the Hidden Gem,... We've finalized how we turn these nodules into the intermediate nickel and copper and cobalt and manganese products. So we're all set.' 'We haven't formally told the market when we'll be seeing first production. But what I'm confident of is that it'll be sooner than people expect.' 'If you would have suggested me 2027, I'd say I hope so.' Q: Do you need to first modify the Hidden Gem to increase its production capacity?A: 'The original plan was that we were going to make quite extensive modifications to suit a much higher production number. But (expecting) an expedited permit, our thinking is, let's get the boat into production as quickly as possible, and then focus on the bigger production scale for boat number two, three, four and five.' Q: When do you expect to reach the hoped-for full-scale production of 12 million tonnes of nodules per year?A: 'I hope by 2030-2031.' Q: How important is it to be the first to extract minerals from the deep sea?A: 'It's not important, but it's a fact that we will be... No doubt.' Q: Do you expect this to be seen as a historical step?A: 'I think time will be the judge of just how important ocean metals are going to be to society.' 'The people that oppose us are pretty (much) the same people that oppose nuclear... They dramatized the potential impacts. They lied about the facts. We ended up burning a whole heap of fossil fuels. We contributed a lot of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. That didn't need to happen, and now the world is waking up with the fact that we need nuclear energy. So shame on those people that created that situation. And I think ocean metals will be the same.' 'I know based on the environmental research and the more than a petabyte of data that we've gathered to support our claims that the impacts of picking up these rocks and turning them into metals are a fraction compared to the land based alternatives.' Q: Would you consider going back to ISA if it adopts a mining code for deep sea mining?A: 'Not the way it stands now, no. Because the mining code has been overtaken by activists.' 'There are many ways that you can frustrate the process if you're Greenpeace. One way is to get countries to sign on to moratoriums... Another way is to get your countries to do the bidding for you by resisting language in the mining code that makes it practical.' 'China (has) five licenses more than any other nation, they have state-owned enterprises controlling those licenses. And they can afford to be more patient... They play the long game, whereas private contractors like ourselves, our shareholders won't sit around waiting for that.' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Vision 2020 plaque removed for safety reasons, says KL Tower
Visitors queuing up to enter the Kuala Lumpur Tower after its reopening. The Vision 2020 time capsule was opened on April 13. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : A plaque marking where the Vision 2020 time capsule was planted at the Kuala Lumpur Tower was removed for safety reasons, according to the skyscraper's operator. LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd said the plaque originally functioned as a cover for the special chamber where the time capsule was located, but could no longer be securely closed after the capsule was opened on April 13. 'This posed a risk of injury to visitors passing by the area. Therefore, it was removed for safety reasons, in line with the management's priority to ensure the well-being of all visitors,' said the company's CEO Khairil Faizal Othman in a statement. Khairil added that there were no longer any historical elements or artifacts stored in the chamber after the time capsule was opened by former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He also said the plaque had not been discarded but has been 'properly stored' by the company, though he did not elaborate on its whereabouts. Khairil also denied that the company intended to erase or alter history by removing the plaque, in response to a claim by Bersatu MP Wan Saiful Wan Jan. He said: 'All actions taken were based on safety considerations, corporate compliance, and a commitment to preserving the legacy of KL Tower.' Khairil added that the plaque featured the tower's old corporate logo and that it cannot be used for official display in line with the skyscraper's rebranding. Earlier today, Wan Saiful reportedly urged communications minister Fahmi Fadzil to explain why the plaque had been removed, saying it should have stayed put since it was meant to commemorate the time capsule planted in 1996. The Tasek Gelugor MP questioned if the government was attempting to erase history, particularly Mahathir's role in planting the time capsule.
