logo
The council job cut rumours, the Ray Hadley interview, and the ‘dead man walking'

The council job cut rumours, the Ray Hadley interview, and the ‘dead man walking'

The Agea day ago
Morthen said she left the meeting with Ajaka and called her USU manager, Steve Donley, to tell him the council was 'looking at cutting 150 jobs', and the pair spoke about organising union meetings.
Soon after, Morthen had breakfast with a colleague at Lilys Cafe in Prestons, where she saw Mannoun with other Liberal councillors. She asked why the council was mulling the job cuts, but he 'just kept asking me if I thought it was acceptable one of our members told him to shut the f--- up'.
Morthen told the inquiry the revolving door of 10 acting or permanent chief executive officers in eight years was 'a bit of a joke' in the 13 years she had represented workers at the council.
'A new CEO will start, and they'll be called dead man walking. It's a constant refrain.
'We knew John's job was at risk.'
Loading
The inquiry heard Donley said in an interview with 2GB radio host Ray Hadley on April 23 that 150 jobs were 'on the line', and union members were to protest outside the next day's council meeting.
Hadley told listeners a short time later that Mannoun denied those figures, and had 'supplied me with page after page of repudiation of what I've said. What he's told me is 'We wouldn't cut 150 [jobs]. That's 15 per cent of our organisation. We've asked the manager to look at reducing management costs.' '
Morthen said although Mannoun had denied the figures, the situation was 'not clear'. The union delegates had the night before agreed on some approved chants for the rally, which she said were 'usually pretty boring, like 'heave go, Ned's got to go'.'
The inquiry later heard she had not objected to a chant of 'Ned's a knob, save our jobs' because she didn't think it was 'too colourful'. 'It rhymes, it's catchy, it's easy to say,' she said.
Morthen said one person at the rally had chanted 'put some pork on your fork', and a union representative had repeated the phrase once before Morthen had told him to stop.
The inquiry heard Mannoun reposted on his Facebook page a video of the workers' rally, which showed people chanting 'put some pork on your fork' and included text which read: 'Council union employees attack Muslim mayor with Islamophobic and antisemitic chants and bring pig to protest.'
Mannoun included remarks saying he wouldn't be 'bullied by racist thugs', and wrote: 'This is what happens when we ask them to do a better job cutting the grass or fixing the roads for you.'
Morthen said members were 'extremely upset they were being called racist'. She spoke of several alleged incidents which had caused workers to fear for their safety after Mannoun's post.
One worker, who was deaf, said he was in a park when a member of the public 'came up behind him and was gesturing in an aggressive way and he thought it was linked to the mayor's comments'.
A childcare worker in a council uniform was also approached by a man in a supermarket who yelled at her about 'being a racist council employee' and followed the woman to her car.
In a third reported incident, a council employee claimed that he was driving on a road in a 'big enclosed tractor … and he alleged his vehicle was shot at and there was a bullet hole in the glass'.
The inquiry heard the concerns were referred to the Industrial Relations Commission after union members stopped working on safety grounds. Mannoun later removed the social media post, and the union agreed to inform members it no longer believed 150 jobs would be cut, following mediation.
Under questions from Mannoun's lawyer, Kate Richardson, SC, Morthen admitted she regretted that she had misled an independent investigator by suggesting Ajaka was not the source of the 150 job cuts rumour because she was worried his contract would be terminated, and she was 'protecting my member'.
Loading
'The USU did not create that number. Mr Ajaka told me that number,' Morthen said.
She admitted she later felt 'angry it appeared I was being thrown under the bus'.
Richardson asked Morthen whether it was appropriate for a general manager to tell a mayor to 'shut the f--- up'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lehrmann arrives stony faced ahead of defamation appeal
Lehrmann arrives stony faced ahead of defamation appeal

The Advertiser

time5 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Lehrmann arrives stony faced ahead of defamation appeal

Bruce Lehrmann kept his face blank as he strolled into Federal Court to challenge findings he raped his colleague Brittany Higgins in Parliament House. The former federal political staffer is seeking to overturn a judgment he was not unlawfully defamed by Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson during an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project in 2021. Justice Michael Lee found Ms Higgins' claims she had been raped in Parliament House in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024. But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors which his lawyers plan to ventilate in a three-day appeal hearing, beginning on Wednesday. He arrived at the Sydney courthouse on Wednesday more than an hour before the hearing, wearing his trademark rectangular glasses and navy suit, and carrying a brown briefcase. The former Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were "starkly different" from the case run by Ten. He points to the allegation Ms Higgins had repeatedly said "no on a loop" during the alleged incident, which Justice Lee was not satisfied had occurred. The case as found by Justice Lee was not put to him during cross-examination for his response, Lehrmann argues. He says because of deficiencies in Ms Higgins' evidence, the judge should not have found he engaged in rape. The judge found Lehrmann had been "hell-bent" on having sex with Ms Higgins and had a mindset of "non-advertent recklessness" which showed he knew she was not consenting. But his definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it is inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person. The former staffer also challenges the finding that he would only be entitled to $20,000 in damages had his defamation suit succeeded. Lehrmann's lawyer Zali Burrows has argued her client was entitled to more than $1 million for the "false charge of rape". Lehrmann denies sexually assaulting Ms Higgins. A criminal case against him in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him. "Having escaped the lions' den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat," Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024. The appeal hearing before the Full Court of the Federal Court is due to end on Friday, with a decision expected to be months away. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Bruce Lehrmann kept his face blank as he strolled into Federal Court to challenge findings he raped his colleague Brittany Higgins in Parliament House. The former federal political staffer is seeking to overturn a judgment he was not unlawfully defamed by Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson during an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project in 2021. Justice Michael Lee found Ms Higgins' claims she had been raped in Parliament House in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024. But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors which his lawyers plan to ventilate in a three-day appeal hearing, beginning on Wednesday. He arrived at the Sydney courthouse on Wednesday more than an hour before the hearing, wearing his trademark rectangular glasses and navy suit, and carrying a brown briefcase. The former Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were "starkly different" from the case run by Ten. He points to the allegation Ms Higgins had repeatedly said "no on a loop" during the alleged incident, which Justice Lee was not satisfied had occurred. The case as found by Justice Lee was not put to him during cross-examination for his response, Lehrmann argues. He says because of deficiencies in Ms Higgins' evidence, the judge should not have found he engaged in rape. The judge found Lehrmann had been "hell-bent" on having sex with Ms Higgins and had a mindset of "non-advertent recklessness" which showed he knew she was not consenting. But his definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it is inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person. The former staffer also challenges the finding that he would only be entitled to $20,000 in damages had his defamation suit succeeded. Lehrmann's lawyer Zali Burrows has argued her client was entitled to more than $1 million for the "false charge of rape". Lehrmann denies sexually assaulting Ms Higgins. A criminal case against him in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him. "Having escaped the lions' den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat," Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024. The appeal hearing before the Full Court of the Federal Court is due to end on Friday, with a decision expected to be months away. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Bruce Lehrmann kept his face blank as he strolled into Federal Court to challenge findings he raped his colleague Brittany Higgins in Parliament House. The former federal political staffer is seeking to overturn a judgment he was not unlawfully defamed by Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson during an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project in 2021. Justice Michael Lee found Ms Higgins' claims she had been raped in Parliament House in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024. But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors which his lawyers plan to ventilate in a three-day appeal hearing, beginning on Wednesday. He arrived at the Sydney courthouse on Wednesday more than an hour before the hearing, wearing his trademark rectangular glasses and navy suit, and carrying a brown briefcase. The former Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were "starkly different" from the case run by Ten. He points to the allegation Ms Higgins had repeatedly said "no on a loop" during the alleged incident, which Justice Lee was not satisfied had occurred. The case as found by Justice Lee was not put to him during cross-examination for his response, Lehrmann argues. He says because of deficiencies in Ms Higgins' evidence, the judge should not have found he engaged in rape. The judge found Lehrmann had been "hell-bent" on having sex with Ms Higgins and had a mindset of "non-advertent recklessness" which showed he knew she was not consenting. But his definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it is inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person. The former staffer also challenges the finding that he would only be entitled to $20,000 in damages had his defamation suit succeeded. Lehrmann's lawyer Zali Burrows has argued her client was entitled to more than $1 million for the "false charge of rape". Lehrmann denies sexually assaulting Ms Higgins. A criminal case against him in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him. "Having escaped the lions' den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat," Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024. The appeal hearing before the Full Court of the Federal Court is due to end on Friday, with a decision expected to be months away. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Bruce Lehrmann kept his face blank as he strolled into Federal Court to challenge findings he raped his colleague Brittany Higgins in Parliament House. The former federal political staffer is seeking to overturn a judgment he was not unlawfully defamed by Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson during an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project in 2021. Justice Michael Lee found Ms Higgins' claims she had been raped in Parliament House in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024. But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors which his lawyers plan to ventilate in a three-day appeal hearing, beginning on Wednesday. He arrived at the Sydney courthouse on Wednesday more than an hour before the hearing, wearing his trademark rectangular glasses and navy suit, and carrying a brown briefcase. The former Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were "starkly different" from the case run by Ten. He points to the allegation Ms Higgins had repeatedly said "no on a loop" during the alleged incident, which Justice Lee was not satisfied had occurred. The case as found by Justice Lee was not put to him during cross-examination for his response, Lehrmann argues. He says because of deficiencies in Ms Higgins' evidence, the judge should not have found he engaged in rape. The judge found Lehrmann had been "hell-bent" on having sex with Ms Higgins and had a mindset of "non-advertent recklessness" which showed he knew she was not consenting. But his definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it is inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person. The former staffer also challenges the finding that he would only be entitled to $20,000 in damages had his defamation suit succeeded. Lehrmann's lawyer Zali Burrows has argued her client was entitled to more than $1 million for the "false charge of rape". Lehrmann denies sexually assaulting Ms Higgins. A criminal case against him in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him. "Having escaped the lions' den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat," Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024. The appeal hearing before the Full Court of the Federal Court is due to end on Friday, with a decision expected to be months away. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

Fallen MP Daryl Maguire jailed for lying to ICAC
Fallen MP Daryl Maguire jailed for lying to ICAC

Sydney Morning Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Fallen MP Daryl Maguire jailed for lying to ICAC

Former NSW Liberal MP Daryl Maguire has been sentenced to jail after giving misleading evidence to the corruption watchdog about a multimillion-dollar Sydney property and the benefits he expected to receive. The former member for Wagga Wagga, half of the 'love circle' that cost Gladys Berejiklian her premiership, fronted up to Central Local Court after being found guilty of lying to the Independent Commission Against Corruption 's 2018 probe into Canterbury Council. Magistrate Clare Farnan on Tuesday sentenced Maguire to 10 months in prison. 'The misleading evidence was given deliberately while Mr Maguire was the sitting member of parliament... he has not demonstrated any remorse and maintains his innocence,' Farnan said. 'A significant sentence is required to deter others who might give misleading evidence to the ICAC. 'A term of imprisonment is required.' Magistrate Farnan ordered Maguire to stand in the court and said he would serve five months, until 19 January 2026, without parole. Maguire nodded and sat down, clasping his hands as his lawyer said he would lodge an appeal. He was led from the room by NSW Corrections officers into a subterranean cell. Operation Dasha, as the ICAC investigation was known, forced Maguire to resign after phone taps captured him speaking to then-Canterbury councillor Michael Hawatt about the potential sale of a 300-unit site in Campsie for Chinese company Country Garden to buy and develop in May 2016.

Fallen MP Daryl Maguire jailed for lying to ICAC
Fallen MP Daryl Maguire jailed for lying to ICAC

The Age

time5 hours ago

  • The Age

Fallen MP Daryl Maguire jailed for lying to ICAC

Former NSW Liberal MP Daryl Maguire has been sentenced to jail after giving misleading evidence to the corruption watchdog about a multimillion-dollar Sydney property and the benefits he expected to receive. The former member for Wagga Wagga, half of the 'love circle' that cost Gladys Berejiklian her premiership, fronted up to Central Local Court after being found guilty of lying to the Independent Commission Against Corruption 's 2018 probe into Canterbury Council. Magistrate Clare Farnan on Tuesday sentenced Maguire to 10 months in prison. 'The misleading evidence was given deliberately while Mr Maguire was the sitting member of parliament... he has not demonstrated any remorse and maintains his innocence,' Farnan said. 'A significant sentence is required to deter others who might give misleading evidence to the ICAC. 'A term of imprisonment is required.' Magistrate Farnan ordered Maguire to stand in the court and said he would serve five months, until 19 January 2026, without parole. Maguire nodded and sat down, clasping his hands as his lawyer said he would lodge an appeal. He was led from the room by NSW Corrections officers into a subterranean cell. Operation Dasha, as the ICAC investigation was known, forced Maguire to resign after phone taps captured him speaking to then-Canterbury councillor Michael Hawatt about the potential sale of a 300-unit site in Campsie for Chinese company Country Garden to buy and develop in May 2016.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store