logo
‘Don't use it': NSW Roads Minister Jenny Aitchison grilled over $50m splash on neighbourhood bridge

‘Don't use it': NSW Roads Minister Jenny Aitchison grilled over $50m splash on neighbourhood bridge

News.com.au2 days ago
Roads Minister Jenny Aitchison has denied any conflict of interest over a $50m bridge project near to her Maitland home in NSW's Lower Hunter region during a heated exchange in budget estimates.
The duplication to Thornton Bridge received a boost earlier this year with the government promising a further $35m to the project on top of an existing $15m allocation, as part of its Regional Roads Fund.
The committee was told on Tuesday the project accounted for about a sixth of the fund, which is funding more than 20 remote and regional projects, but is now subject to a review by the Auditor-General.
The bridge became a flashpoint between Nationals MLC Nichole Overall, opposition roads spokeswoman Natalie Ward and Ms Aitchison, who said: 'I don't have a conflict of interest in this at all.
'I am a resident of Maitland, and everyone knows that.
'I don't use that bridge to get to work or to use it to get to, to drop off kids to school. I don't use it to get to medical appointments.
'I very rarely use that access and the reality is there are more than 20,000 or 30,000 more people who live in that area.'
Ms Aitchison confirmed Premier Chris Minns knew 'where I live' when he announced the additional funding.
'Why did he not compel you to declare a conflict of interest?' Ms Overall asked.
In response, Ms Aitchison said: 'I make all delegations that are required of me'.
Asked what amount of use would constitute a need to declare a conflict of interest, Ms Aitchison said she would have to use it on a 'daily basis or to help me get to work'.
Ms Aitchison said told the committee the project began in 2010 before languishing under the former Coalition government.
It drew heated responses from the opposition, with Ms Overall stating: 'A $50-45m project, paid for from your ministerial regional roads fund that is currently being investigated by the Auditor-General.
'A project with no business case, no benefit cost ratio in your electorate.
'In fact, within cooee of your own home and no declaration of a conflict of interest even though such proximity could be perceived to have its obvious advantages.'
A business case for the bridge duplication is expected to be completed by February 2026.
During proceedings, Ms Aitchison dismissed suggestions that funding commitments were made predominantly in Labor seats.
'For the opposition to characterise this as only favouring Labor seats, that is absolutely ridiculous,' she said.
'I don't accept the premise it was actually around marginal seats because some of the seats had quite high margins.'
Ms Aitchison welcomed the audit, which would not examine the 'selection of projects' but the 'administration of grants'.
Transport for NSW secretary Josh Murray confirmed the road and rail organisation would participate in the Auditor-General's review.
Ms Overall and Ms Ward regularly traded verbal blows with Ms Aitchison during hours of heated evidence on Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors
‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors

Sydney Morning Herald

time9 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors

Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien have fought over government spending inside the high-powered economic roundtable on Thursday morning. At the opening of a session on fiscal management, the Coalition representative at the government-run summit made his major first intervention in the three-day event, accusing Chalmers of over-spending and baking in long-term deficits. A source familiar with the conversation, unauthorised to disclose it publicly, said the argument became 'heated'. NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, who was due to speak next, stepped in and encouraged the pair to move on from the debate. 'Jim [Chalmers] got very defensive and said, 'We're not in question time, Ted',' the source said. O'Brien claimed Labor's budget deficit would have been about $40 billion better and argued national debt would have been $100 billion lower if Labor had offset its new spending with savings. O'Brien also argued in favour of fiscal rules to mandate budget restraint – a Coalition policy before the election when the Dutton opposition eventually laid out a plan to spend more than Labor in the near-term. According to the source, Chalmers claimed: 'Every number you just said is wrong.' The reform roundtable, held around the federal cabinet table, has been a low-key affair until the bust-up on Thursday morning. But the sparring match reflects the political importance of debt and deficits to Australian politics. The summit will wrap up on Thursday afternoon, when Chalmers is expected to confirm that Labor intends to cut red and green tape to speed up housing and energy project approvals.

‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors
‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors

The Age

time9 minutes ago

  • The Age

‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors

Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien have fought over government spending inside the high-powered economic roundtable on Thursday morning. At the opening of a session on fiscal management, the Coalition representative at the government-run summit made his major first intervention in the three-day event, accusing Chalmers of over-spending and baking in long-term deficits. A source familiar with the conversation, unauthorised to disclose it publicly, said the argument became 'heated'. NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, who was due to speak next, stepped in and encouraged the pair to move on from the debate. 'Jim [Chalmers] got very defensive and said, 'We're not in question time, Ted',' the source said. O'Brien claimed Labor's budget deficit would have been about $40 billion better and argued national debt would have been $100 billion lower if Labor had offset its new spending with savings. O'Brien also argued in favour of fiscal rules to mandate budget restraint – a Coalition policy before the election when the Dutton opposition eventually laid out a plan to spend more than Labor in the near-term. According to the source, Chalmers claimed: 'Every number you just said is wrong.' The reform roundtable, held around the federal cabinet table, has been a low-key affair until the bust-up on Thursday morning. But the sparring match reflects the political importance of debt and deficits to Australian politics. The summit will wrap up on Thursday afternoon, when Chalmers is expected to confirm that Labor intends to cut red and green tape to speed up housing and energy project approvals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store