Indian-origin Howard University professor says H-1B visas have no connection to US worker shortage
Howard University professor Ron Hira said H-1B visa programs that allow US companies to hire skilled labour from outside the country have no connection to merit or shortage of US workers for those specific jobs.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Ron Hira, whose parents were Indians and came to the US on similar visas has long been a critic of the H-1b visa programs as he argued that companies misuse these programs to outsource cheaper employees instead of giving work to US graduates. In 2016, he gave a testimony in the Senate on immigration and detailed that both his parents were from India and his wife is an India-born. And hence to testify against this visa program was very meaningful to him personally.
Amid the ongoing H-1B row, triggered by the release of the latest H-1B figures of the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Roh Hira said that H-1B workers get selected by a random lottery and not the best and brightest. The USCIS revealed that the administration selected 120,141 H-1B visa applications for 2026, which is the lowest since 2021, but US tech workers claim that the number is huge given the massive layoffs that are happening in companies.
USCIS makes selections by lottery every year when the agency receives more H-1B electronic registrations than permitted. The annual H-1B limit is 65,000 plus a 20,000 exemption for individuals with an advanced degree from a US university.
The H-1B figures for 2026 have puzzled MAGA, as they expected a crackdown on H-1B from the Donald Trump administration. During the major H-1B row that involved Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy supporting the program, President Donald Trump said he was in favor of H-1B, though he has taken a stern stance on illegal immigration.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Republican leader Virgil Bierschwale questioned whether the 2026 H-1B figures reveal that the employers have already chosen the employees they will fire as no new jobs are being created.
"This 2026 visa approval gets me. Over a year ahead of the current date, they already have approved visas. And they must have a job to have a visa. Which means the employer has already picked out the employee they plan on firing since they are not creating new jobs.
How is this not fraud at every level?" Bierschwale wrote.
"A huge chunk of H-1B petitions are for jobs that don't even exist. Indian IT body shops are notorious for hoarding H-1B workers, hoping to lease them out later. If there's no client, they get 'benched'—which is illegal. But exploiting desperate migrants is a business model too profitable to quit," X handle US Tech Workers wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
15 minutes ago
- News18
PM Modi May Not Attend G7 Summit In Canada In First Miss In 6 Years: Sources
Last Updated: While the two countries have taken steps towards mending ties after a change of guard in Canada, a complete reset could take some time, according to analysts Prime Minister Narendra Modi may give the upcoming G7 Summit in Canada a miss amid strained relations with Ottawa—marking the first time in six years that he will skip the meeting of the grouping of the most industrialised economies in the world as well as the European Union, IMF, World Bank, and the United Nations. India has recently achieved the status of the fourth-largest economy in the world. Analysts say it could play a key role as a trade partner for Canada, which is desperately trying to revive its sluggish economy. While the two countries have taken steps towards mending ties after a change of guard in Canada, a complete reset could take some time, according to analysts. Sources have told CNN-News18 that India was unlikely to accept any invitation from Canada for the G7 meeting, slated for mid-May. They have cited security concerns, especially because Canada has emerged as a hub for Khalistani extremists, as well as the broader diplomatic chill. India-Canada ties hit an all-time low after former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau blamed India for the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar— a charge New Delhi vehemently denied; Trudeau was unable to provide proof. A diplomatic crisis ensued as both countries expelled diplomats, and India suspended visa services for Canadians. Geopolitical observers hoped for a turnaround with Trudeau stepping down ahead of elections and his Liberal party colleague, Mark Carney, taking charge of the country staring at an economic crisis. Carney steered his party to poll victory. According to analysts, India is Carney's best bet to revive Canada's economy in the backdrop of his standoff with US President Donald Trump and rift with China. Anand said in her talks with Jaishankar that the leaders discussed 'strengthening Canada-India ties". When asked if she believed that the conversation would lead to the appointment of new high commissioners between the two countries, Anand said that they are taking 'one step at a time". 'As I mentioned, the rule of law will never be compromised, and there is an ongoing investigation regarding the case that you mentioned," she said in an interview while referring to Nijjar's murder, The Globe And Mail reported. First Published: June 02, 2025, 15:11 IST
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Without escalating dispute…': GTRI recommends this ‘pragmatic route' for India to deal with Donald Trump's tariffs on steel & aluminium
Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the US, effective from June 4, 2025. (AI image) Donald Trump's fresh set of tariffs on steel and aluminium products should be dealt with as a part of the India-US trade deal framework, says the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). This strategy holds particular significance as India and the United States are presently engaged in comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA) discussions. Last week US President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the US, effective from June 4, 2025. GTRI recommends that India should pursue a practical approach by leveraging the current bilateral FTA discussions as a negotiation instrument with the United States. The GTRI analysis indicates that through the FTA framework, India could achieve a favourable resolution by urging the United States to remove or substantially lower the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium products. Also Read | 'Wait and watch…': India, US working to give preferential market access to businesses, says Piyush Goyal on trade deal "This approach would allow India to use its negotiating leverage to gain meaningful market access benefits without escalating the dispute through trade or legal fights at this stage," the release by GTRI said according to an ANI report. Meanwhile, the US dismissed India's WTO petition on May 23, stating that their steel and aluminium tariffs do not constitute safeguard measures under WTO regulations. The American stance maintains that these tariffs are implemented under Section 232 for national security considerations, falling within Article XXI of GATT, rather than the Safeguards Agreement. This position invalidates India's proposed suspension of concessions under the Safeguards Agreement. After the US rejected India's suggested retaliation on both legal and procedural bases, India can still explore alternative courses of action. GTRI noted that one option involves implementing retaliatory tariffs against the US, which would "send a clear message, but it also brings the risk of U.S. countermeasures and possible legal battles". "Other countries like the EU, Canada, and China have done this against the U.S. Section 232 tariffs as a political signal of resistance." Another possibility involves initiating a WTO dispute to challenge the US's use of the national security exception, though this approach presents challenges due to America's historical dismissal of WTO judgements on similar grounds and the currently non-operational Appellate Body. Also Read | Will the Donald Trump administration be forced to give billions of dollars in tariff refunds? Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Modi not likely to attend G7 summit this year, his first miss since 2019
Narendra Modi is unlikely to attend the G7 summit in Canada due to strained relations over Khalistan separatists and the unresolved Nijjar assassination accusations. Canada has not formally extended an invitation, and logistical issues, potential disruptions, and diplomatic tensions make Modi's attendance improbable. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Prime Minister Narendra Modi is not expected to attend the G7 summit taking place in Canada from June 15 to 17 this year, ToI reported on June 2. Canada, the hosts of the event this year, has not formally extended an invitation for the event in Alberta, but in any case, it is unlikely that Modi would have traveled to North America, particularly due to uncertainty regarding how the newly elected Canadian government will address India's concerns regarding the actions of Khalistan separatists.A spokesperson for the Canadian G7 declined to confirm whether Modi would receive an invitation, ToI's report (by Sachin Parashar) said. Should an invitation arrive at the last minute, India is likely to find it hard to accept due to logistical issues, potential disruptions from separatist groups, and the already strained relationsThis marks the first occasion since 2019, when France hosted the summit, that Modi will not be in attendance at this gathering of the world's most advanced economies, which has previously been seen as a testament to India's expanding global far, Canada has not officially released the names of the leaders invited to the summit, which will feature heads of government from major global economies. However, Canadian media reports indicate that Ottawa has extended invitations to the leaders of Australia, Ukraine, South Africa, and week, Sikh separatists urged the Carney administration to refrain from inviting the Indian Prime Minister, citing India's alleged lack of cooperation in the ongoing investigations into the assassination of separatist leader Hardeep Singh absence from the G7 summit underscores the persistent diplomatic hurdles between India and Canada. Tensions between the two nations have remained escalated following accusations linked to the killing of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had accused the Indian government of involvement in the murder but failed to provide any supporting evidence, a claim that India has repeatedly denied. This diplomatic conflict led to a significant downturn in relations, resulting in both nations expelling each other's diplomats due to perceived hostile is optimistic that Carney will approach the situation more judiciously than Trudeau and has expressed its willingness to collaborate with Ottawa based on mutual respect and Delhi is pressing Canada to ensure the safety of Indian diplomats and to take decisive action against extremists and separatists engaged in anti-India activities. A bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the summit could have served as a valuable opportunity for the leaders to renew their commitment to restoring diplomatic Carney has not explicitly addressed the Nijjar situation, he has mentioned his intentions to use trade as a means to reset and Carney have both given hints that they would try and improve strained ties. Carney, however, still asserts that Canada is not to blame for the current bilateral situation.
