
Can a hangover pill really work? I brought one to Glastonbury for the ultimate test
I like feeling tipsy. People are funnier, I'm funnier and I enjoy the buzz of being in a group who are sipping drinks, relaxing into an evening out together. I also really like the bitter taste of a negroni.
But I'm 33 and part of a cohort of middling millennials who lament how just a few years ago, we used to be able to sink pints and bottles of wine and feel fresh the next day. Those days, I hate to admit, are over. Our livers are getting slower at processing alcohol and we're feeling that.
The hangovers last longer and they are definitely more painful. Mine usually involve an aura-type headache which forces me to spend the day being gentle with myself on the sofa, glugging litres of cold water. All of this to say: I am not a joy to be around the day after I've been drinking.
The idea of dealing with this middling millennial hangover at Glastonbury – far from the quiet calm of my sofa, in a field with 200,000 people, with music reaching levels above 85 decibels – fills me with dread.
So when I read about a hangover pill 'For Those Who Want To Enjoy A Social Evening And Feel Refreshed The Next Morning', I decided that I owe it to my liver to try it out. And if not my liver, I definitely owe it to my friends. I set off for Glastonbury, with five days of drinking ahead of me and enough ' Myrkl' pills to last me the festival. Will taking one a few hours before I start drinking mean I make it through Glastonbury with a clear head?
Exactly how will the pill save me from a hangover?
Before I set off, I talk to Johan de Faire, the biochemist who developed Myrkl to understand exactly how it works. De Faire tells me that the active ingredient in this pill is fermented rice bran, a natural probiotic (containing bacteria that promotes good gut health), while the vitamin B12 and protein L-Cysteine are added as 'companion ingredients'.
He started taking fermented rice bran in powder form in 1994 and has taken it every day since then, attributing his good health to it. After he and friends of his who were also taking it noticed improved hangovers, he set about trying to get a clinical trial to prove what they'd been experiencing. 'When we took the pill into a clinical study, we were finally able to confirm my initial results. Both the breathalyser and blood analysis showed that our pill breaks down alcohol in the body 70 per cent faster than the liver,' he says.
But if it's breaking down the alcohol by 70 per cent an hour after drinking as the packet claims, will I even feel tipsy?
Yes, says de Faire. 'Because what you enjoy when drinking is the 20 per cent that's absorbed to the blood through your mouth cavity and stomach. The remaining 80 per cent moves into the small intestine and is there for quite some time before it's absorbed into the blood. That 80 per cent doesn't bring anything to the enjoyable part of alcohol. It's basically a burden on the liver and other organs. And that's what our pill helps to break down.
'When you take Myrkl, it stimulates the gut microbiome to metabolise alcohol faster, breaking down the alcohol in your small intestine into water and carbon dioxide, before it's absorbed into the blood. That is why people report not suffering the consequences from the heavy night before.'
Will the pill protect my gut microbiome from alcohol?
Until now, my understanding was that alcohol is toxic for your gut microbiome and, as ethanol is the main ingredient, it can actually kill off some of the microbes in your gut, reducing the diversity of your microbiome that we're so often told to make thrive through our diet. So I'm interested to understand whether this pill, apart from anything else, will protect my gut health. Sadly, liver specialist at the University of Liverpool and chairman of the alcohol health alliance Professor Sir Ian Gilmore says there's absolutely no evidence to suggest that a probiotic will protect your gut health from alcohol and it's not very likely. 'It is highly improbable that taking a couple of tablets before going out would have any effect on the complex gut microbiome,' he says.
Since he understands a lot about how the body responds to alcohol, I ask him about the claims de Faire is making on these pills. 'It is true that a tiny fraction of alcohol is absorbed from the oral cavity but this alcohol is likely to be just as damaging and causative of a hangover as the alcohol absorbed from the stomach and small intestine. Also, the studies that suggested that less alcohol was absorbed by taking the tablets, which I understand were funded by the pill manufacturers themselves, have been criticised for the small numbers, all men and the low doses of alcohol used. Also, several of the common cancers associated with alcohol consumption are in the mouth, gullet and intestine that will be exposed to alcohol, whether or not it is absorbed.
'I am sceptical of the claim that this pill reduces alcohol absorption (and the company-sponsored research on which the claim is based). A much more reliable (and cheaper) method of avoiding hangovers is to drink less. To my knowledge, there is no credible scientific evidence that this costly medication reduces the unwanted side-effects.'
I so want the evidence behind this pill to stack up, so I ask a third expert what he thinks: Professor David Nutt, the author of Drink? The New Science of Alcohol and Your Health and a professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London.
'This pre-treatment is one of several products on the market that accelerate the metabolism of alcohol before it gets into the body. The ingredients will stimulate the gut microbiome to metabolise alcohol faster – so there will be less acetaldehyde (the toxic by-product of alcohol) in the body. You will get less of a hangover because essentially, you're consuming less alcohol. It would be so much cheaper to drink less but if the act of drinking itself to compete with your peers is important to you then it might help. But it's probably better to avoid alcohol altogether.'
The verdict
After getting the experts' takes, I wasn't hopeful that this anti-hangover pill would work. I wanted it to do exactly what de Faire outlined: to allow me to drink rounds of drinks with my friends over the five day festival, but save me from the dreaded hangover symptoms the next day. I could see how though, as the other experts pointed out, it might feel a bit pointless drinking and spending money on alcohol if I wasn't absorbing it.
But by the third cool pint of cider I noticed that I was still getting that buzz from the alcohol, like you do when you drink your first. And that continued through the day and into the evening. I drank three ciders, a beer and three canned negronis but I felt energised and happy, without reaching the point where the alcohol was making me groggy or tired. The day after I'd usually be reaching for paracetamol, rehydration tablets, a wet flannel, salty crisps and water if I'd drunk this much, but miraculously I woke up without even a headache.
It's expensive at £30 for 15 tablets, and there is a strange after taste once you've swallowed the capsules, a little bit like when you take antibiotics. But it did work for me. Possibly, because it doesn't take too many drinks for me to feel the effects of alcohol. I'm not sure how someone would respond if they drank a lot more. I was also drinking a lot of water throughout the day because of the 30C heatwave that hit this year, so that will have helped lessen the dehydration.
At several points, I reflected on why it is that I carry on past the first alcoholic drink if I enjoy the feeling of having one or two. As Nutt points out, it would be cheaper to just not drink as much – and it would also protect my gut health. For me, it's about enjoying the taste and the sensation of sipping it, and it's also about being sociable. Like it or not, we live in a drinking culture and at festivals especially, where you're part of a group, the ritual of buying rounds and reaching that giggly alcohol-fuelled state together is a big part of the experience. So for me personally, this pill's a game changer and is firmly on my festival essentials list.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
NHS struggles to improve under Labour as waiting lists rose in June and patients still facing delays in A&E
NHS LISTS GROW While NHS England said staff 'pulled out all the stops' in June the backlog increased for the second time this year THE NHS is struggling to get better under Labour, figures suggest. Waiting lists rose in June and there are still unacceptable numbers of patients facing day-long delays in A&E, they show. 1 Data confirmed the recent British Medical Association strike was less damaging than previous ones. And while NHS England said staff 'pulled out all the stops' in June the backlog increased for the second time this year, from 7.36million to 7.37million. Dr Becks Fisher, of the Nuffield Trust think tank, said: 'The figures show the NHS waiting list has gone up slightly after falling over most months this year.' She added: 'It is still treating fewer patients than are being referred.' Danielle Henry, of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network, added: 'The NHS needs to rapidly increase the amount of activity it delivers if it is going to successfully reduce waiting lists by one million each year.' Official figures show improvements to A&E delays, cancer treatment times and ambulance response times but doctors said the system was still struggling. Dr Nick Murch, of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: 'Clinicians across the UK are reporting this week as one of the worst they have experienced. "Figures show an unacceptable amount of people — 35,467 — waited over 12 hours in emergency departments, often suffering avoidable harm.' Lib Dem MP Helen Morgan said: 'This Government is doing no better than treading water.' Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'We are getting on with the job of delivering progress in the face of strike action, and we will continue to put patients first.'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Why London hospital was forced to evacuate
Guy's Hospital in Southwark, London, was evacuated on Thursday morning due to a chlorine gas leak caused by the accidental mixing of chemicals in a boiler room. Approximately 150 people were evacuated from the basement and ground floor of the hospital shortly before 9 am. Nine individuals were attended to by the London Ambulance Service at the scene, with four subsequently requiring hospital treatment. One staff member was injured in the incident, and several people who came to their aid were also treated for chlorine gas inhalation. Firefighters and specialist hazardous materials officers attended the scene, ventilating the building, which has since reopened for appointments.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Baroness Amos to lead NHS maternity and neonatal investigation
The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has welcomed the selection of Baroness Valerie Amos to lead the investigation into NHS maternity and neonatal care, adding it is 'vital' the review gets under way quickly. Baroness Amos was selected by Health Secretary Wes Streeting after bereaved families expressed a preference for someone with distance from the NHS who is able to bring a fresh pair of eyes to the role, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said. Mr Streeting has been meeting bereaved and harmed families who have been let down by maternity and neonatal services across the country, including in some of the worst affected trusts, DHSC added. In June, he announced that a national investigation into 'systemic' failures in NHS maternity care had been launched by the Government after families were 'gaslit' in their search for the truth. Baroness Amos is master of University College, Oxford, and was a UK Government minister and a senior official at the United Nations. Mr Streeting said: 'I have been appalled by the many harrowing stories I've heard from mothers and fathers let down by the NHS. ' Families asked for fresh eyes, independence and compassion – and that's why I've appointed Baroness Amos. Valerie has an outstanding record of leadership and driving change, nationally and internationally. She will work closely with families to uncover the truth, confront problems and drive the improvements needed so every woman and baby receives safe, high-quality care. 'Through our Plan for Change, we will rebuild the NHS to ensure no family suffers like this again.' Baroness Amos said: 'I will carry the weight of the loss suffered by families with me throughout this investigation. I hope that we will be able to provide the answers that families are seeking and support the NHS in identifying areas of care requiring urgent reform.' The investigation will look at up to 10 services in the country. It will also review the maternity and neonatal system, bringing together the findings of past reviews into one national set of actions, the DHSC said. It will begin work this summer and produce an initial set of national recommendations by December. The 10 maternity and neonatal units will be decided by Baroness Amos and her team, alongside the terms of reference of the investigation, which are being developed with families who have experiences of maternity and neonatal care, including in Leeds, Sussex and Nottingham, the DHSC added. The investigation is separate from the National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, which will be made up of a panel of experts and families, and chaired by Mr Streeting. Gill Walton, chief executive of the RCM, said: 'We are pleased to hear of the appointment of Baroness Amos as chair of the rapid review. She has a reputation for taking a thoughtful and strategic approach and we welcome her fresh insight into maternity and neonatal safety. 'It is absolutely vital, though, that this review gets under way quickly. When he announced it in June, we welcomed Wes Streeting's commitment to publishing the review by Christmas, a promise he repeated at the Progress in Partnership summit on maternity and neonatal safety last month. 'However, we are already halfway through August, with no terms of reference, no sense of the trusts who are likely to be part of the review or no clarity on how the review will be conducted. 'Every woman and family should leave maternity and neonatal services whole, happy and healthy, and every member of maternity staff should start and end their shift knowing they have provided safe, good-quality care. 'At the moment, that simply isn't the case. Previous reviews and countless Care Quality Commission reports have flagged the same the systemic failings that are at the heart of the issues facing maternity and neonatal care issues time and time again: unsafe staffing, poor workplace cultures, and not listening to women. 'In spite of that, there has been no forward movement. Wes Streeting promised to change that. Thousands of midwives and maternity support workers, and the whole of the maternity community, are desperate for him to keep that promise and deliver the change we all want to see.' The RCM has also urged the review to look at examples of good maternity care, as well as where services are not meeting standards of care.