‘Catherine will make an excellent president': Labour Party backs Connolly's bid for Áras
Labour Party
has decided to support Independent TD Catherine Connolly in the upcoming presidential
election race
.
Labour's decision was taken at a meeting of its TDs, Senators, its MEP and Executive Board on Thursday evening.
A statement from the party said the meeting was briefed on the Party's membership consultation process which concluded earlier this week.
That consultation 'showed a clear majority of members' in favour of supporting
Ms Connolly's
bid for the presidency.
READ MORE
The meeting also appointed Dublin South West TD Ciarán Ahern, as the Labour Party's co-ordinator with Ms Connolly's campaign.
Mr Ahern thanked party members who took part in the consultation, saying: 'As a party that values democracy and equality, our membership is the driving force of our Party and it was vital to hear their input on this important question.'
He added that the party is supporting Ms Connolly as 'the Left candidate for the Presidency' and said: 'We are doing so in the spirit of supporting the development and growth of the Left across the country and demonstrating that an alternative politics is possible here, a cause which our party leader Ivana Bacik has led and promoted over recent years.'
Mr Ahern also said: 'While there are issues where we have differed with Deputy Connolly, we are determined that the social democratic values of equality, justice and tolerance should shape the Presidency over the next seven years and follow the legacy of Michael D Higgins.'
He added: 'We believe that Catherine Connolly shares those values, and has put them into practice during her political career.
'Catherine will make an excellent President, campaigning and advocating for the common good.'
Ms Connolly was previously a Labour councillor before she left the party in 2006 when it denied her a chance to run in the 2007 general election as future president
Mr Higgins's
running mate.
First elected to the Dáil in 2016, Ms Connolly said at the time that Labour had 'lost its soul'.
In recent weeks some Labour sources dismissed her fractious history with the party as being in the past.
Prospective candidates who wish to get on the presidential election ballot paper must have nominations from 20 Oireachtas members or four local authorities.
Ms Connolly announced her candidacy in July with the backing of left-wing parties the Social Democrats and People Before Profit along with a number of Independent Oireachtas members.
While she said at the time she had more than enough backers to get on the ballot paper, the addition of the Labour Party will put her comfortably over the 20 Oireachtas-member threshold.
It comes as a separate online Connolly campaign rally - viewed at times by more than 700 participants - heard more than €28,500 has been donated for her election bid so far.
The rally heard praise for Ms Connolly from civil rights campaigner Bernadette Devlin McAliskey, who spoke of how she encouraged the Galway West TD to run, as well as supportive contributions from businessman Fintan Drury, and poet Sarah Clancy.
Candidates in the last two presidential campaigns spent hundreds of thousands of Euro in their bids for Áras an Uachtaráin.
The rally was told by one of Ms Connolly's team, Béibhinn O'Connor, that more than €26,000 has been raised for the campaign so far with donations averaging at €30.
She said: 'This campaign is powered by ordinary people not by wealthy donors or corporate cheque books'.
She added: 'At the same time we do need to be honest. We need to raise much more money if we're going to build something strong and lasting.'
A further sum of about €2,500 was raised during the rally.
When she spoke Ms Connolly pledged to dedicate herself to the 'welfare of the people' should she be successful.
'I promise and I assure you, that notwithstanding the restrictions of the Constitution and the law that governs the role of the president, which I'm very conscious of, I will use my voice as best I can, if I'm elected with your help,' she said.
Ms Connolly said her presidential campaign is part of a movement that is 'looking for something different in our country'.
'It is a movement that says we cannot stand idly by and tolerate genocide as we look on in Gaza, or look at the normalisation of war, the normalisation of homelessness,' she said, adding: 'None of this is normal.'
'I have no doubt, with your help, that we will be celebrating in the Áras in November.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Donohoe delayed approving sale of State's final shares in AIB
Minister for Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe asked for a three-week postponement on the final sale of the State's stake in AIB so he could consult government about the bank's exit from 'crisis relationships'. Senior officials had sought permission to carry out a 'clean-up share disposal' on May 23rd to finally end state ownership in the bank after the financial crash. However, the Minister looked for extra time as officials said the sale would 'inevitably refocus the discussion around the topic of remuneration' and the salary cap for bankers. In a note on the submission, Mr Donohoe wrote: 'I am absolutely committed to the return of AIB to private ownership. However, I want to exit from crisis relationships with [the] bank at same time. READ MORE 'I will need to engage with government on this and will not have this complete by end of this week. Ask department to consider execution of same plan but in second half of June.' [ How AIB went from boom to bust and back again Opens in new window ] In mid-June, officials submitted a second submission on the sale saying it would 'trigger an opportunity re: salary cap.' It said the State was looking to offload nearly 44 million shares and hoped to bring in around €310 million through the sale. The submission said: 'The implication of this trade is that it will trigger an expectation to begin unwinding the crisis-era remuneration restrictions that remain in place (in particular the removal of the salary cap).' Officials wrote that AIB was one of the best performing banks in Europe and that strong momentum had continued since the last time the State sold some of its shareholding. It said the final sale would represent a 'natural point' to normalise the relationship between AIB and the State. The submission also cautioned that if pay restrictions from AIB were removed, it should also apply to PTSB . 'Absent of that happening, it would put PTSB at a severe disadvantage,' said the document. 'Such a scenario is not in taxpayers' interests.' In a note, Mr Donohoe wrote: 'I agreed to this process via phone yesterday. This is to indicate that approval was given and to conclude official documentation.' A separate presentation on the State's post-crash investment in banks said the taxpayer had invested €29.4 billion in AIB, Bank of Ireland, and PTSB. From that, around €28.7 billion had been recovered although this was over an extended period of a decade and a half. The presentation said as well as implications for the salary cap, other restrictions on how AIB operates would change. One slide said: 'These restrictions include monthly meetings with senior management, access to board papers, [and] various reporting/consent/consultation requirements. 'Since the State's exit from BOI ( Bank of Ireland ), that bank is no longer subject to these conditions. We recommend putting AIB on an equal footing with BOI in this context.' On pay caps, another slide said all restrictions were eliminated for Bank of Ireland apart from bonus payments exceeding €20,000 per year. 'While restrictions around variable pay up to €20,000 and fringe benefits were also removed for AIB and PTSB, both banks continue to abide by the total compensation cap of €500,000 per annum that is currently in place,' it said. This additional restriction relative to Bank of Ireland was 'anti-competitive and unsustainable'.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Couple fails to stop demolition of Co Meath home built in ‘wilful' breach of planning laws almost 20 years ago
A couple have lost a last ditch legal bid at preventing the demolition of their large Co Meath home built in 'wilful breach' of planning laws almost 20 years ago. There was 'no merit' to the appeals by Chris Murray and his wife Rose, Mr Justice Senan Allen said, when giving the three judge Court of Appeal 's judgment dismissing them. The appeals concerned an action that, while initiated in September 2022, was 'the latest battle' in a 20-year war about the fate of the unauthorised development at Faughan Hill, Bohermeen, Navan . It was, he believed, obvious to Meath County Council from the outset that the action and appeal were 'artifices calculated to postpone the evil day'. READ MORE After Mr Murray's 2006 application for permission to build a house on the lands was refused, the couple, 'undaunted, and in wilful breach of the planning laws', built a house anyway of about 588 sq m (6,220 sq ft), twice the size of the house for which permission was refused, the judge said. The council took proceedings in 2007 under the Planning Act and in 2017 the Supreme Court upheld High Court orders for the couple to remove any unauthorised development from their land. They were given one year to vacate the property. When that was not complied with, the council issued contempt proceedings in 2019 that settled in 2020 on terms involving the Murrays agreeing to vacate the property within two years to facilitate the council demolishing it. The council issued contempt proceedings in 2019 that settled in 2020 on terms involving the Murrays agreeing to vacate the property within two years to facilitate the council demolishing it Three days before they were to vacate, the Murrays issued a case against the council, claiming there was new evidence relating to land sterilisation agreements made by the previous owners of the land that invalidated the council's planning refusals. Last year the High Court granted a council application to strike out that case as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process. In the Court of Appeal judgment on Tuesday, Mr Justice Allen said the couple built a 6,220 sq ft house without planning permission, 'well knew' they would need permission 'but hoped they would get away with it'. The Murrays claimed, as a result of actions, inactions and misrepresentations by the council, they had acquired a 'pig in a poke' title to the lands, he said. While a planning condition for a nearby residence stated an agreement sterilising (preventing) the lands from any other housing or non-agricultural development should be entered into – and the council relied on that in refusing permission to the Murrays – it was accepted no sterilisation agreement was ever entered. There was 'no justification' for contending the council misrepresented the case to the court, he said. The Murrays had not appealed the original permission refusal to An Bord Pleanála or sought to judicially review it, he said. They had had 'every opportunity' to make whatever case they thought they had; the courts had considered all they had to say but the Supreme Court had, in 2017, decided the house 'had to come down'. While they argued in this appeal that adequate account was not taken of their new evidence, there was no appeal against the High Court conclusion it would not have affected the original outcome. At the heart of their opposition to the council's enforcement procedures was a grievance with the refusal of their original planning application but, as a matter of law, that grievance was 'not justiciable'. Any infirmity in the original refusal could not conceivably have provided any justification for unauthorised construction of a house, still less one twice the size, he said. It was 'perverse' that the Murrays, having 'driven a coach and four' through the planning Act, were complaining the council failed 'to strictly comply with the prescribed procedures'. A 'so-called constitutional challenge' concerning the council's use of section 160 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 in its proceedings was unrelated to the new evidence, he said. The couple's fresh permission retention applications were not relevant to whether their proceedings raised a fair issue to be tried, he held. The couple had not identified any error in the decision under appeal, the court concluded.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Keir Starmer promises ‘no more gimmicks' as migrant-returns deal with France kicks in
Britain has promised to begin detaining 'within days' asylum seekers who arrive there illegally on small boats, under a returns deal with France that was ratified this week. The 'one in, one out' deal was agreed last month, but only finalised in recent days. It stipulates that Britain can send a small number of small boat arrivals back to France. However, it must also accept an equal number of migrants sent by the French in the other direction, such as family members of migrants already living in the UK. Yvette Cooper, Britain's home secretary, suggested the first detainees could be sent back to France 'within weeks'. Britain's Labour government has insisted the returns deal with France will act as a deterrent to illegal immigrants. Ms Cooper declined, however, to give an exact timeline on when the first returns would take place, while Britain's home office also would not confirm how many migrants would be sent back to France under the scheme, which will operate on a pilot basis for the next 12 months. It is believed only about 50 a week will be sent back initially. READ MORE The arrival on small boats of illegal immigrants to English shores – many of whom then go on to claim asylum – has been a significant political issue in Britain since 2018. The previous Tory government devised a scheme to send such immigrants on to Rwanda, but this was scrapped by Labour immediately upon winning the election last July. Since then, however, small boat arrivals have soared, putting significant political pressure on prime minister Keir Starmer 's government. Official statistics show about 25,000 have arrived on small boats so far this year, up almost 50 per cent on 2024. Figures released by the home office in recent days show 1,047 arrived on 15 boats on Tuesday and Wednesday of last week alone. Balmy weather in Britain since May has contributed to the rise, due to calmer sea conditions that facilitate more crossings. Britain's government this week announced a further £100 million (€115 million) would be spent on border security, including funding for up to 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle the issue. 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve,' said Mr Starmer. The wider topic of illegal immigration and asylum seekers continues to raise tensions in Britain, a year after an outbreak of race-fuelled riots across England. There were several demonstrations over the weekend in London, Manchester and Newcastle outside hotels that provide accommodation to asylum seekers. Meanwhile, hard-right activists who have demonstrated against immigration continue to draw significant media attention in Britain. Prominent activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson , was released on bail on Tuesday after he was arrested on Monday at Luton airport. He had been sought by UK police last week following the alleged assault of another man at St Pancras train station in London. Mr Yaxley-Lennon released a video on Tuesday in which he alleged he had been the one assailed by a man, who was filmed by a passerby lying on the ground at St Pancras, allegedly following an altercation with Mr Yaxley-Lennon. The activist complained to his social media followers that he can no longer walk the streets of Britain alone. He insisted, however, that he had not fled from Britain after the St Pancras incident, as media had reported, but that his trip abroad had been pre-planned.
