From Budget Drones To Hypersonic Missiles: India's Defence Sector Enters A New Era
Last Updated:
India is soon to get an indigenous hypersonic missile that can fly at a speed of Mach 5. This will mark a significant boost in Indian defence sector.
Army drones that can hit the target are available in India for just Rs 1 lakh, said Major General Ramesh Chandra Padhi (retd), Senior Vice President of IG Drones, at the Network18 Powering Bharat Summit. His remarks are notable as they challenge the conventional belief that defence technologies are expensive.
Speaking at the Defending Bharat panel at the summit, Padhi spoke about FPV Kamikaze — small drones with the capacity to fly at 140 km/hr before hitting the target.
'We have got very small drones, FPV Kamikaze, where you see your target, the speed goes up to 140 km/hr and then it drops directly and hits the target," he said.
Padhi's remarks also indicate that made-in-India defence technologies can be more affordable.
IG Drones recently gained significant attention after being listed in a government release as one of the four drone companies involved in Operation Sindoor. India carried out the operation in response to the 22 April Pahalgam attack that claimed 26 lives.
During the attack, India targeted nine terror camps across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
In another significant development in the defence sector, India is soon to get an indigenous hypersonic missile that can fly at a speed of Mach 5, marking a major achievement in the defence sector, informed Dr Sudhir Kumar Mishra, veteran DRDO scientist, who was speaking at the Powering Bharat Summit.
In conversation with Moneycontrol's Managing Editor Nalin Mehta, the ex-DRDO chief said that DRDO recently conducted a hypersonic engine test, and soon it will come out with a hypersonic missile that will reach Mach 5 speed.
'All the technologies for BrahMos were developed in-house by DRDO. We even built the world's largest launcher ourselves," Mishra said.
First Published:
May 17, 2025, 08:37 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
36 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lauritz Knudsen Electrical and Automation (formerly L & T Switchgear) Introduces enConnect for Seamless Home Automation
VMPL New Delhi [India], June 5: Lauritz Knudsen Electrical and Automation (formerly known as L & T Switchgear), a leader in the Indian electrical and automation sector, has announced the launch of its groundbreaking smart home platform - enConnect, designed to transform homes into intelligent, seamlessly connected living spaces. This innovative solution empowers homeowners to manage every aspect of their home effortlessly, enhancing convenience, comfort, and security. According to MarketsandMarkets, the Indian smart home market is projected to grow from USD 1.4 billion in 2020 to USD 6.4 billion by 2025, at a CAGR of 30.4%. As demand for intelligent, secure, and energy-efficient homes rises, enConnect--will enable homeowners to optimize energy consumption, enhance security, and personalize their living spaces through intelligent automation. The enConnect platform integrates lighting, appliances, curtains, and more, allowing homeowners to control their living spaces through touch, a mobile app, or voice commands. Built with robust cybersecurity measures and energy-efficient technology, it ensures a secure, intuitive, and future-ready home automation experience. "The demand for simple, intuitive, and user-friendly smart home solutions is rapidly increasing in India," said Naresh Kumar, COO, Lauritz Knudsen Electrical and Automation. "With enConnect, we are addressing this market need by offering a sophisticated yet accessible home automation platform. Our goal is to make modern, connected living a reality for all homeowners, ensuring seamless integration, enhanced security, and energy efficiency." He further added, "We envision a future where technology seamlessly integrates into daily life, enhancing comfort and simplifying routines. With this launch, we are not just introducing a product--we are redefining modern living. This platform offers homeowners effortless control, advanced cybersecurity, and a truly seamless user experience." Key Features of the enConnect Smart Home Platform: * Seamless Integration: Effortlessly connect and control a wide range of devices, from lighting and appliances to curtain and more * Personalized Control: Customize your home environment with tailored settings and automation. * Enhanced Convenience: Manage your home from anywhere, anytime, using touch, a mobile app, or voice commands. * Advanced Data and Cybersecurity: Enjoy peace of mind knowing your data and privacy are protected with robust security measures. * Intuitive Interface: Experience a user-friendly platform designed for ease of use and effortless navigation. * Create Scenes and Schedules: Automate your daily routines and desired scenarios with single click or voice command * Modular and retrofit solution: The enConnect Modular concept provide retrofit solution which enable customers to switch from conventional switches to Smart Home Automation. Lauritz Knudsen is committed to empowering homeowners with innovative solutions to create truly smart and connected living spaces, driving the future of modern home automation and leading this transformation with cutting-edge technology. About Lauritz Knudsen: Lauritz Knudsen Electrical & Automation, formerly known as L & T Switchgear, is a leading player in the Indian Electrical industry, drawing strength from over 70 years of rich heritage and a steadfast dedication to contributing towards the growth of India. The brand currently exports to 30 + countries and is dedicated to providing a wide range of electrical and automation solutions to vital sectors of the economy, including industries, utilities, infrastructure, buildings, and agriculture. Our extensive portfolio includes low-voltage and medium-voltage switchgear, automation solutions, tailored software, and services. With multiple manufacturing facilities in India, we adhere to global standards of excellence. Our operations are supported by well-equipped, in-house design and development centers, as well as tooling facilities, ensuring precision in manufacturing. With a strong global footprint, supported by an expansive electrical distribution network in India and worldwide, our ambition is to foster excellence and provide top-tier products and solutions that drive the progress of nations globally. We Listen. We Partner. We Innovate. Media Contact: Debolina Mukherjee - Corporate Communication, Schneider Electric Lauritz Knudsen | 761946288 | Bidisha Suri, Adfactors PR Pvt. Ltd
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Real estate developers build a steady quarter even as demand woes bite
As per Anarock, housing sales across the top Indian cities declined by 28 per cent YoY in Q4 FY25 Listen to This Article India's top listed real estate developers reported steady growth in Q4FY25, supported by healthy pre-sales, even as earnings reflected signs of moderation amid elevated housing prices and subdued launches. 'Q4FY25 was a steady quarter for top listed real estate developers, albeit with some signs of moderation compared to the aggressive growth observed in earlier quarters. Pre-sales remained strong across major cities, backed by continued demand in the mid to premium housing segments,' said Shobhit Agarwal, managing director and CEO, Anarock Capital. According to Anarock, housing sales across key Indian cities declined by 28 per cent year-on-year (Y-o-Y) in Q4FY25 —
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Should India amend its nuclear energy laws?
Discussions are ongoing in India to amend the nuclear liability framework, regulated by the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act (CLNDA), 2010, and the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), 1962, to allow private companies to build and operate nuclear energy-generation facilities. This move is part of a broader strategy to expand India's nuclear energy capacity from the current 8 GW to 100 GW by 2047, aligning with the country's clean energy goals. Should India amend its nuclear energy laws? Ashley Tellis and D. Raghunandan discuss the question in a conversation moderated by Kunal Shankar. Edited excerpts: Do you support the proposed amendments to India's nuclear energy laws? Ashley Tellis: If India has set for itself a goal of expanding nuclear energy, it cannot reach that goal without expanding its domestic capacity. If we are talking of a timeline that is, say, 20 years, we must supplement those indigenous capabilities with foreign participation. This is where there is a roadblock. Current Indian law prevents foreign participation. The imagined future when we negotiated the U.S.-India civil nuclear deal in 2008 was that foreign companies would participate in India's nuclear renaissance. That dream has been frustrated by the legal evolution in the liability regime in India since 2000. So I would cheer the Prime Minister on, with respect to getting these amendments done. D. Raghunandan: The idea of amending the law to attract foreign investment to expand nuclear power generation capacity in India is based on two flawed arguments or assumptions. The first is that the roadblock to expansion of nuclear power is one of investment. The second is that no major nuclear supplier country has shown domestic capacity expansion at the rate at which we assume India will expand. We have not seen that happen in the U.S. or France. Britain does not have much capacity anyway; Japan is on a slow track. Only China, perhaps, has the capacity to expand at scale and I don't see major Chinese investment coming into India. Ashley Tellis: The Indian nuclear liability law is a genuine impediment to foreign participation in the sector. Companies from France, Japan, and the U.S. have said they cannot enter the market if the current law stands. Russia is an interesting case because Rosatom is a parastatal. Even Rosatom refused to accept India's liability law. India indemnified Rosatom through a contractual agreement reached in 2008 before the liability law was passed. After 2010, that is not an option available to the government because to indemnify through a private contract would violate parliamentary intention. This law affects Indian industry as well. The Department of Atomic Energy (DEA) had NPCIL (Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd) indemnify Indian private suppliers through contractual agreements. The problem started at Kovvada; after the civil liability legislation was passed, domestic suppliers refused to supply components. So NPCIL, through contractual agreements, waived liability using a rationale that if there is a failure in components made to their specifications, it is NPCIL's fault, a logic that is suspect and never tested in court. Raghu is right: the U.S. is driving this pressure, partly for political and economic reasons. If we want foreign participation, we have to amend the law. Regarding supply-side capacity, whether we have it now is suspect. But this investment in India is over a long horizon. Western nuclear suppliers are responsive to market signals and will build up capacity if demand presents itself. One of the reservations with private companies' participation has been about technology transfer, particularly as this is considered a strategic space with attendant security risks. Even if India were to amend the AEA, would the level of technology transfer that took place under agreements in the past between Russia and India take place in future? Particularly in the case of the Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) that appear to be gaining ground as a safer alternative to large nuclear reactors? Ashley Tellis: This is a commercial question. If your suppliers are private entities, their technology transfer decisions will be based on profitability. Governments don't have powers to force a private entity to transfer technology. The U.S. will have a role through its licensing process for what technology transfer is permitted. For example, the U.S. permitted Westinghouse to transfer certain reactor design technologies to China, a decision Westinghouse probably rues because the AP1000 technology was cloned by the Chinese. My expectation is that India will seek technology transfer and will probably get some, consistent with company profitability and what the U.S. government will want to protect for national security or proliferation reasons. Even Rosatom has not done a complete transfer of VVER-1000 technology to India; they have allowed India to build sub-components but maintain proprietary control over many elements, especially in the hot section, related to advanced materials and chemistry. This will not be a showstopper. Newer companies involved in SMRs are actually more enthusiastic about technology transfer than old majors because it is an economic decision to access the market, get economies of scale, and increase profit. This will not be a serious problem. The bigger problems are high capital costs and how much money will India be able to invest. D. Raghunandan: A lot of this debate is based on hypotheticals and we cannot frame policies based on those. For 15 years, India has been chasing technology transfer and investment in defence, increasing FDI from 25% to 100%, yet no major foreign company invested or transferred technology because it's not in their interest. So I am not convinced that new futuristic technologies such as SMRs, which India does not possess, will transform the nuclear energy landscape if they come to India. The argument often comes down to making smaller 200 MW or even 60-70 MW reactors instead of 500 MW ones. In its last Budget, India earmarked money for five small reactors based on the pressurised heavy water cycle that it is familiar with. The question is attracting investment to scale this up. Dr. Tellis, considering India is a developing country with other commitments, for these newer SMR suppliers, would it not be fair to seek compensation [if things go wrong] because it's an untested technology? Ashley Tellis: No, I don't think so. The Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) is an international effort to create an environment conducive for expanding nuclear power production and understanding its inherent risks. The CSC's purpose in a nuclear accident is not to litigate who is responsible, but to rush compensation to those affected. It has three key principles: first, all liability is channeled to the operator. Second, a pre-accident fund is created (the Convention has a three-tiered fund). Third, supplier liability is permitted if it's through contract or if there are issues of wilful misconduct; there isn't an overarching principle of supplier liability because of the fear of litigation delays. This model assumes an environment with adequate design review and a neutral regulatory authority not linked to the operator or supplier. If a real nuclear accident occurs, the sovereign on whose territory it occurs is the ultimate guarantor of protection. The question was how to create a regime allowing them to pick from a readily available pool of money, hence the insurance pool systems. Regarding SMRs, the problem is not design immaturity. Many SMRs have very advanced passive designs. The real problem SMRs will face is economic: capital costs are still extremely high. We don't know if the SMR cost will be disproportionately smaller. A big assumption with SMRs is that they will be manufactured through an assembly line process in a factory and components transported and assembled on site. I have greater faith in the SMR technology than in the assembly line model of manufacturing just yet. Listen to the conversation in The Hindu Parley podcast
