Huyton electric bike crash: Arrest after man critically injured
Police have arrested a man after a cyclist was critically injured in a crash with an electric bike.A pedal cyclist in his 40s was taken to hospital with a potentially life-threatening head injury after a collision with a man on a Sur-Ron electric bike in Princess Drive, Huyton, at about 18:30 BST on Monday, Merseyside Police said.The man on the electric bike rode off towards Liverpool Road while the victim was taken to hospital where he remains in a critical but stable condition.A 29-year-old man from Huyton has been detained on suspicion of wounding with intent, driving a vehicle dangerously and failing to stop after a road accident.
Det Insp Steve Byrom said: "Although a man has been arrested in connection with the collision, our enquiries continue and we would urge anyone who has information about the incident, who we haven't already spoken to, to please contact us as it may prove vital to the investigation."He said officers were "working hard to disrupt and arrest offenders involved in the illegal and anti-social use of electric bikes".Electrically-assisted pedal cycles (EAPC) can be legally ridden by people aged 14 or over but not on pavements.Electric bikes that do not meet the EAPC rules are classed as a motorcycle or moped with users having to meet certain legal requirements.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Boss of Bournemouth-based home insulation firm jailed for fraud
The director of a home insulation company who encouraged his sales staff to "systematically" bully and lie to vulnerable customers has been Beckett – whose businesses were the subject of a BBC Rip Off Britain investigation in 2018 – was found guilty at Bournemouth Crown Court of two counts of fraudulent said the 41-year-old's two firms, NRG Installs Ltd and The Insulate Group Ltd, turned over £8m between 2017 and 2018 before they closed. Becket, of Canford Magna, Poole, was sentenced to six years and six months in prison. Officers identified 28 victims of Beckett's companies - operating from a call centre in Hinton Road, Bournemouth - around the also uncovered scripts used by his staff containing unsubstantiated and misleading included claims they could reduce a customer's heating bill by 40%, falsely stating that prices could be reduced via age-related discount codes, and charging different amounts for the same products. Unbeknown to police at the time, the BBC was also investigating Beckett and he was captured discussing changing his companies' corporate identity and feigning a mental illness to stop the programme being aired. 'Lengthy investigation' Det Insp Jamie Halford, of Dorset Police, said: "Our investigation found that Beckett was operating two corrupt and fraudulent businesses. "He encouraged his sales staff to persistently and systematically lie in order to deceive, mislead and bully customers who were known to be vulnerable in order to make as much money as possible."This was a lengthy investigation, which saw us work with various Trading Standards teams across the country and expert chartered surveyors in order to build a strong case against Beckett."The work of Beckett's companies had a lasting effect on some victims, who encountered difficulties when trying to sell their properties due to the spray foam that was installed when it was not required." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Inside half-built and abandoned £40m mansion ‘bigger than Buckingham Palace' & owned by a convicted criminal
A £40million mansion in Sussex once said to be the most expensive private house built in Britain for a century remains unfinished – 40 years after work first started. Hamilton Palace near Uckfield, in East Sussex, is owned by notorious property tycoon Nicholas van Hoogstraten and is bigger than Buckingham Palace. 5 5 5 Van Hoogstraten was once dubbed Britain's youngest millionaire and has been locked in a dispute with neighbours of the property for decades. But, 40 years after work on the enormous £40 million mansion began in 1985, it remains no more than a huge shell and has been dubbed the "Ghost House of Sussex." After work halted in 2001, the mansion was mostly abandoned, unfinished and is surrounded by acres of countryside. It's been the subject of immense investment despite the fact that no one has ever lived in it. But despite its scale, there is little to hint at its presence. It is hidden away off of an unassuming junction on the A22 south of Uckfield and the house is completely obscured by a thick wooded area. The closest glimpse you can get on foot is of a gated entrance onto the estate that gives nothing away, aside from a bricked unit and a large, white container. But there is a definite sense of unease. It has been reported that stuck on the gate is a sign, written in capital letters. It baldly states: "High Cross Estate, Private Property, Keep Out." If that's not enough, multiple other signs reportedly warn of "shooting in progress", "dogs running free" and CCTV being in operation. I came home to find my nightmare neighbour knocking down my DOOR – he claimed it was his right to do it The only recent photographs of the property have been taken by drones and older photographs taken on site apparently when work was still ongoing. Those photos show an an eerie building, shrouded in scaffolding and overgrowing foliage, with discarded containers, construction equipment and other items littered throughout the grounds. It doesn't look like anything has happened at the site for a long time. Few have been inside, but one reporter who did, in 2000, when it was said to be two years off completion, described a grand central staircase and reception hall, with lift shafts already installed and expensive stone balustrades and pillars. Who is Nicholas van Hoogstraten? Nicholas van Hoogstraten is a convicted criminal. He is now 80 and goes by the name of Nicholas von Hessen. A Sussex native born in Shoreham, he owns dozens of properties in the area. He is said to have started making money selling stamps as a teenager before moving into property and, by the age of 22, had 350 properties in Sussex alone. In the 1980s housing boom he acquired more than 2,000 properties and had sold 90% of them by the 1990s. Over the past couple of decades, he has been involved in widely reported disputes with neighbours over Hamilton Palace. Low-level lighting had been installed on the roof, where there was to be a garden, and there was space for a fountain below. One entire floor was due to house van Hoogstraten's art collection. Today, the domed roof of the main building still rises over the top of the treeline and remains visible from a distance from the nearest set of houses in the hamlet of Palehouse Common. Locals have previously vented about the large area being left unused and there was a row over a public footpath that ran through it that van Hoogstraten did not want to be used. In answer to those complaints, he was quoted as saying "even the most moronic of peasants would be able to see… that we have been busy landscaping the grounds of the palace so as to prepare for scheduled works". And he has also denied that the house is falling apart. He added: "Hamilton Palace is far from 'crumbling' and was built to last for at least 2,000 years. "The scaffolding only remains as a part of ongoing routine maintenance such a property would require until completion." It has been reported the estate is now owned by his children through the company Messina Investments. 5 5
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Met officers to face gross misconduct hearing after woman, 90, targeted with Taser
Two serving Metropolitan police officers and one former officer will face a gross misconduct hearing after a 90-year-old woman with dementia was targeted with a Taser, the police watchdog said. The woman was also handcuffed and put in a spit hood during the incident in Peckham, south London, in May 2023, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said. One officer initially responded to a disturbance at an address in the area after a call from the woman's carer. The officer found the woman holding kitchen utensils and she was 'red-dotted', or targeted, with the Taser when she refused to drop them. The Taser was not discharged. More officers then attended and the woman was handcuffed, before the spit hood was applied after she spat at the officers, the IOPC said. She was not arrested and was taken to hospital where both items were removed. It was determined there was a gross misconduct case to answer for one officer over their treatment of the woman, including their use of force regarding the Taser and their communication towards the woman, after an investigation by the watchdog. Another serving officer and former officer, who left the force in August last year, will also answer their own cases over the time the woman was kept in the handcuffs and spit hood and failing to take into account her age and disability during the incident. The IOPC investigation was launched in June 2023 after a voluntary referral from the Met and a complaint from the family over use of force and alleged discrimination due to her age, race, sex and disability. The watchdog found no evidence the woman was discriminated against based on race or sex. The Crown Prosecution Service decided in November 2023 that none of the officers should face criminal charges over the incident after receiving evidence from the IOPC. It confirmed its decision would stand after a review in June last year. The IOPC investigation concluded in January. Both serving officers are on restricted duties, the Met said. Three further officers will undergo a reflective practice review process after their behaviour during the incident. Amanda Rowe, a director at the IOPC, said: 'This was a concerning incident, particularly given the woman's vulnerabilities. 'We have decided that three officers who attended the incident should face a police disciplinary hearing which will ultimately determine whether the gross misconduct allegations are proven.' No date has yet been set for the proceedings.
