Don't cut cash Isas – they're our refuge in an uncertain world
There are good reasons why cash Isa holders like me don't want to convert to share-based investments (Cash Isas: pressure grows against rumoured move to £4,000 allowance, 1 March). We don't trust the City or governments. After Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson's deregulation of the City in 1986, people were encouraged to become part of the 'shareholder democracy'. This worked until it didn't. In 1990, the splurge of loose cash and cheap shares duly went pop.
In the end people will decide for themselves. It's all very well investment firms telling us that a share instrument will perform better than cash over a period – but what period? Suppose great volatility arrives out of nowhere – where economic cycles are so short that they are measured in the lifetime of a lettuce. The bankers were back taking their bonuses long ago, and are now asking the chancellor to allow them to hold less capital.
Ordinary savers are investing in cash Isas, and with the international situation so uncertain, who can blame them for going 'safety first'?David RedshawSaltdean, East Sussex
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
20 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
HMRC sends letters out to people with £3,500 or more in their savings account
HMRC is currently sending out letters to everyone who has a savings account and has earned more than £500 in interest over the last financial year Brits with savings of £3,500 or more are being warned they could be hit with an unexpected tax bill from His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC). HMRC has the ability to automatically detect interest on savings generated by your bank account and if you exceed a certain limit, you will automatically receive a notice of an additional tax bill. With the new tax year 2025-26 having kicked off in the past month, the taxman has been busy dispatching letters to individuals urging them to register for self-assessment or requesting them to pay extra tax. Now that your entire previous financial year is wrapped up, HMRC is currently evaluating people's final situations and issuing tax bills to those who it determines owe money in tax on savings accounts. Such data is automatically reported to the taxman by your bank unless it is in a Cash ISA, which is shielded from tax. The Personal Savings Allowance allows you to earn £1,000 per year in savings interest without being taxed on it, but this only applies to people earning less than £50,270. If you earn £50,271 or more, your Personal Savings Allowance is reduced to just £500. And if you earn £125,000, your Personal Savings Allowance plummets to £0, reports the Express. The precise amount you will owe depends on how much you earn, how much interest you received, and when it was paid out. Stashing your savings into a fixed account could leave you facing a hefty tax bill, with experts cautioning that you might be hit by HMRC demands having accumulated as little as £3,500 in savings after tying it up for three years. The catch lies in the fact that interest on fixed accounts is paid out in a lump sum, meaning all the interest is considered for one tax year at once. If you tuck away £3,500 into a 5% fixed savings account for a trio of years, you're on track to collect upwards of £500 interest. Fixed accounts mean the interest gets locked in - or "crystallised" - as soon as it's paid, so after three years, you're handed the full amount. With the whole £500+ interest landing in your lap simultaneously, say goodbye to your £500 Personal Savings Allowance and brace for a nudge from the taxman. For those raking in higher wages, the sting bites harder – coughing up 40% on every quid past £500, not merely 20%. Dip just £100 beyond your allowance, and it'll cost you a tidy £40. And if you're sitting pretty with heftier sums in savings, even an easy-access account might breach the threshold. Pop £11,000 into an account at 5% for a year, and you'd snag £550 interest, sneaking over the limit and potentially nudging you into owing tax, especially if your earnings are above the £50,270 mark. Even those earning under £50,270 could owe HMRC money if they accumulate over £1,000 in interest from savings, as you'd break the threshold with an interest of £1,050 on savings of £21,000 at a 5% rate. Multiple sources of income are considered in your Personal Savings Allowance. The Government explains the process, stating: "If you're employed or get a pension, HMRC will change your tax code so you pay the tax automatically. "To decide your tax code, HMRC will estimate how much interest you'll get in the current year by looking at how much you got the previous year."
The Independent
20 hours ago
- The Independent
How much do I need to save to build a £100,000 ISA pot?
Whether you are saving for retirement, looking at long-term wealth building or have a specific goal in mind for the future, Individual Savings Accounts (Isas) can be a great tool to help you achieve it. Gains made from money in them - interest earned, dividends or capital gains - are tax free and under current regulations, each person can save up to £20,000 in them every single tax year. What's more, the earlier you start, the greater your chances of hitting your long-term targets, as time can be the great multiplier when it comes to your money thanks to the effect of compounding. Therefore, even if you don't get anywhere near using up your £20,000 allowance, you can still set yourself lofty targets over time - such as a milestone figure of reaching £100,000. There are other types of Isa available, but here we'll look at cash and investing Isas. Cash ISA The most-used Isa type is the cash Isa. Right now with the interest rate on cash Isas somewhere around a competitive 4.5 per cent mark, you can not only earn a reasonable amount on your money, but you can also protect it from inflation, which is running at 3.5 per cent and not projected to drop below 3 per cent until next year at least. However, interest rates fluctuate a lot over time, meaning you may need to regularly check you are earning the best amount on your money. How long it takes to reach £100,000 depends on multiple factors, such as your initial deposit amount, ongoing contributions and your interest rate. Example 1: £2,000 lump sum to start and £250 saved per month, at an average of 3.5% interest. In this scenario, you would cross the £100,000 mark during your 22nd year of saving regularly. At that point you'd have saved £68,000 of your own money, earning an additional £35,000 in compounded interest. Example 2: No initial deposit but £400 a month saved at average 3.5% interest. Some people may have no lump sum to get started with, but have perhaps taken a new job or a pay rise - so bigger monthly savings are possible. In this scenario, year 16 would be the milestone - with more than £25,000 of the total £102,000 in the pot being interest earned, showing the importance of consistency. Investing ISA While the above examples use a flat 3.5 per cent interest rate for cash, there's no way of knowing what the rate will be a year or a decade from now - it could be far higher or lower, as could inflation. There may be a better way of reaching your target figure than purely cash, however: a stocks and shares Isa, sometimes called an investing Isa. Here, your money can be put into the stock market in search of better returns - over longer periods of time, investing has historically always outperformed cash. If it's not your area of expertise, there are plenty of automated options where you can simply select your risk tolerance or other preferences and let your money be allocated for you accordingly. In investing, there is no certainty though - cash savings remain as cash savings and are easily predictable. A typical World Index Fund has returned between 10 and 11 per cent annually over the last decade, while the FTSE 100 (the UK's biggest 100 listed companies) generated a 6.3 per cent annualised return over the 20 years from 2003 to 2023, including dividends. Neither are guarantees of the future, but many experts suggest over the long term, an annual return of 6-8 per cent is possible for investors - which over many years can have a significant difference when compared to cash saving rates. Example 1: £2,000 lump sum to start and £250 invested per month, with an annual 6.5 per cent return. After 18 years of investing at this rate you'd hit the £100,000 mark - and your own money would only make up half of this total. £56,000 would have been saved through your deposits, with just over £50,000 gains giving a total of £106,866. By year 20, your total gains would outstrip your own deposits and you'd have £127,000 all told. Example 2: No initial deposit but £400 a month invested, with an annual 6.5 per cent return. More money going in each month means the initial pot builds quicker, so £100,000 is reached by year 14. However, as that money has had less time to grow and compound, £67,200 is of your deposits compared to just under £41,000 in earnings. The tipping point for bigger gains comes in year 20 - by which time the total pot would be £192,000. The lesson remains: starting sooner rather than later is key, as time plays the biggest role in compounding money, even if you start with small amounts.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Spending plans for British Council may force it to close in 60 countries, sources say
Ministers have asked the British Council to draw up spending plans that would force it to close in as many as 60 countries, sources have told the Guardian, in the latest sign of the impact of Keir Starmer's decision to slash the aid budget. The council has been asked to draw up two sets of spending plans as part of Wednesday's spending review: one in which its funding would remain the same in cash terms and one in which it would be cut by 2% in cash terms each year. The scenarios are the same as those that have been demanded of the BBC World Service, and would mean the council having to shut completely in large parts of the world. The plans are likely to add to warnings that the government's cuts to overseas aid are at risk of damaging its soft power just as Russia and China are putting more resources into strengthening theirs. Scott McDonald, the council's chief executive, would not comment on the Treasury's demands, but said: 'The British Council plays a vital role in delivering UK soft power around the globe. 'Investment in soft power is imperative to any nation that wishes to be instrumental on the world stage. Over the last three years we have taken £180m of costs out of the organisation through a substantial transformation plan, but the amount of funding we receive from the UK government will have an impact on country closures.' McDonald has previously warned that financial pressures on the council could make it 'disappear' within a decade. The council receives £1bn in revenue each year, but 85% of that comes from selling its English-language services around the world. In 2024-25, it received £163m in a government grant, most of which came from the international aid budget. Earlier this year, the prime minister announced he would slash the aid budget from 0.5% of gross domestic product to 0.3%, freeing up about £6bn in extra spending for defence. The reductions to the aid budget are now being felt in Whitehall, with the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, having imposed what insiders say are swingeing cuts on the Foreign Office. As a result, institutions such as the British Council and BBC World Service are being asked to model major spending reductions. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Those close to the negotiations with the government say the council had asked for an additional £20m in funding per year, not least to help repay a £197m loan to keep it running during the pandemic. That loan, which was made on commercial terms, has now been rolled over for another 18 months, but insiders say the repayments are costing it £14m a year. If it receives no extra cash in the next few years, those close to the talks say, it will have to close in 40 countries. Cuts of 2% in cash terms would require 60 closures. Both of these would be on top of the 20 office closures that it announced in 2021, when it was told to reduce its budget by £185m over five years. The council's financial crisis is causing alarm among politicians and military chiefs, who say its activities boost Britain's national security. Dozens of high-profile figures recently wrote to the prime minister urging him not to cut the council's funding. They included the former home secretary James Cleverly, the former defence secretaries Grant Shapps, Ben Wallace and Michael Fallon, the former foreign secretary David Miliband, and the former military chiefs Richard Dannatt and David Richards. The letter warned: 'As we compete harder for global influence, the need for the British Council's unique contribution to our security is greater than ever. We call upon you to invest in this great national asset and force-multiplier, before it is too late.' Peter Ricketts, the former national security adviser who organised the letter, told the Guardian: 'A lot of defence people will tell you that a small investment in soft power such as the British Council is worth a lot of money on the military side.' A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Despite the tough fiscal situation, we continue to back the British Council with over £160m in 2025-26.' The spokesperson added that no decisions had yet been taken over its funding for the next few years.
