logo
Major UK Pride parades ban political parties from marching

Major UK Pride parades ban political parties from marching

Metro13-05-2025
Political parties have been banned from marching with LGBTQ+ people at four of the UK's largest Pride parades across the summer.
Birmingham, Brighton, London and Manchester Pride organisers announced the ban yesterday, saying they are standing 'in solidarity' with trans people who have been 'abandoned'.
The Supreme Court ruled last month that the definition of woman in equality law is based on 'biological sex'.
Days later, Downing Street confirmed Prime Minister Keir Starmer does not believe trans women are women.
The Pride groups, which include Pride in London, the largest Pride march in the UK, said they are refusing to 'platform those who have not protected our rights'.
The four said: 'The recent ruling by the UK Supreme Court to exclude trans women from the definition of the term 'woman' underscores the urgent need for immediate action.
'In this moment, we choose to stand firmer, louder, and prouder in demanding change that protects and uplifts trans lives.
With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community.
Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications!
'That is why this year, we are collectively suspending political party participation in our Pride events.'
The Pride organisers said the ruling was the latest in a 'disturbing global trend' of trans rights being rolled back.
They pointed to Hungary banning LGBTQ+ Pride events and the wave of US states outlawing trans youth healthcare and banning trans young people from playing sports as a warning to the UK.
The four said: 'The UK must not follow this path of regression. Instead, it must rise as a global leader in human rights and equality.'
Organisers added: 'We demand real commitments and measurable progress. The Pride movement was born from protest, and we must continue to embody that spirit with intention and urgency.
'The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.'
This is what Lord Patrick Hodge, deputy president of the court, said when announcing the ruling in April.
The court was deciding whether trans people can be included under the protected characteristic of 'sex' as well as for 'gender reassignment' under the 2010 Equality Act.
But judges said that the word 'sex' means 'biological sex', as in what people are assigned at birth.
Lord Hodge stressed that the judgment is not a 'triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another', as trans people would continue to have protections against discrimination.
Some sports associations, police forces and political buildings say they will treat trans women differently from women in response to the ruling, such as by banning trans women from using single-sex spaces. While others, such as LGBTQ+ venues, have vowed to defy the ruling.
'To move forward, we need more than promises.
'We need every political party to stand unequivocally with every member of the LGBTQ+ community, and to centre the voices of trans people in policy, practice, and public life.'
Sir Keir, former Conservative leader Boris Johnson, Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey and Carla Denyer, co-leader of the Green Party, have all marched in Pride parades.
LGBT+ Liberal Democrats, the party's queer member wing, said the group 'firmly believes that Pride is a protest'.
It said: 'While we understand Pride organisers' frustrations with Labour and the Conservatives' swithering on LGBT+ and especially trans+ rights of late, we are sickened to our core to be lumped together with them in a blanket suspension on political parties attending major Prides this year.
The statement added: 'We look forward to a constructive dialogue with Pride organisers so we can come back bigger and better, while those parties who pander to bigotry and hatred can be left in the past where they belong.'
The UK was ranked the most LGBTQ+-friendly place in Europe in 2015 on the annual Rainbow Map. Now it is 16th out of 49.
The mapmakers, ILGA Europe, said last year that the NHS restricting healthcare options for trans youth and spiralling transphobic hate crime rates are among the reasons why the UK has tumbled.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Sycamore Gap pair quizzed over homophobic attack days before tree was felled
MORE: Bimini: Trans people in public toilets aren't your enemies – they're victims
MORE: 'I was put through gay conversion therapy – here's how it changed my life forever'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pressure is building on Sir Keir Starmer to sack his trade envoy to Turkey over trip to northern Cyprus
Pressure is building on Sir Keir Starmer to sack his trade envoy to Turkey over trip to northern Cyprus

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Pressure is building on Sir Keir Starmer to sack his trade envoy to Turkey over trip to northern Cyprus

Pressure was last night coming from within Labour for Keir Starmer to sack his trade envoy to Turkey over an unauthorised trip. Afzal Khan is back in the UK after a trip to the self-declared Turkish republic of northern Cyprus - a territory the UK, and most of the rest of the world, does not recognise. During his trip, the MP for Manchester Rusholme met Ersin Tatar, the leader of Turkish Cypriots, in his official residence. He posed for a photo with the leader, giving a suggestion of a bilateral meeting as opposed to a personal visit. After days of questions being asked by others, the Daily Mail understands the matter is being raised internally within Labour, with a sense of unhappiness as to how it has been allowed to escalate into a diplomatic spat and demands that No 10 act. Labour MPs are also believed to have raised the matter with ministers to channel the fury of Greek Cypriots over the trip. The official government of Cyprus said the visit last week was 'absolutely condemnable and unacceptable' and that UK officials should 'respect' their state. It also provoked an outcry from Greek Cypriots who have called for his dismissal over a breach of UN resolutions that forbid recognition of the territory's government. Mr Khan was due to receive a degree from a local university, but no announcement has been made, suggesting he may have been recalled by the UK Government or a news blackout was imposed, given the controversy. The trip is said to have been a 'personal' visit and ministers were not aware of the plans, raising further questions about whether he can remain in his job. Tory MP Sir Roger Gale, the honorary president of the all-party parliamentary group for Cyprus, said Sir Keir should sack Mr Khan. 'The UK has a responsibility as a guarantor power to Cyprus,' he added. 'His position as trade envoy is untenable.' Shadow foreign affairs minister Wendy Morton has written to ministers calling for the envoy to be removed from his role. 'This visit risks undermining the UK's credibility as a guarantor power and as an impartial interlocutor in settlement negotiations,' she said. Mr Tatar waded into the row this week by criticising the 'intolerant statements and excessive attacks made by the Greek Cypriot side'. A hardline nationalist who is close to Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan, he added that the visit was undertaken 'at my invitation'. Mr Tatar told Mr Khan he wanted to pursue a 'two-state solution' despite no international recognition of the seized territory, it was reported. Mr Khan replied that his friends of Cypriot origin living in Manchester had encouraged him to visit the island, adding: 'That is why I am happy to be here.' A government spokesman said last night the visit was 'undertaken in a personal capacity' and there was no change to the UK's long-standing position on the seized territory.

Labour's obsession with the religion of 'rewilding' threatens lives, livelihoods - and deadly moorland blazes
Labour's obsession with the religion of 'rewilding' threatens lives, livelihoods - and deadly moorland blazes

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour's obsession with the religion of 'rewilding' threatens lives, livelihoods - and deadly moorland blazes

Wildfires are getting too close for comfort. The weekend blaze on Arthur's Seat in Edinburgh is the latest in a series of fires in what is already by far the worst year on record in this country. Our National Fire Chiefs Council has warned that not only are blazes increasingly common, they are increasingly dangerous and starting to cross the 'rural-urban interface'. As we have sadly seen in Los Angeles, even homes are under threat. The smoke, too, poses real dangers. The fumes from the devastating blaze on Saddleworth Moor in 2018 were inhaled by more than five million people, for example. The result, say scientists, is that more than 20 lives were brought to a premature end. You might be glad to learn that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has put Angela Rayner in charge of the Government's response to this growing crisis. Or maybe you're not. Because I cannot see a single thing that Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner has done to tackle a threat made worse by tinder-dry vegetation – which is made all the more combustible thanks to the sharp reduction in humidity as the climate warms. So a smart response would be to reduce the volume of vegetation on our hillsides. And for thousands of years, this is exactly what our ancestors did by conducting controlled burns in the winter months. The vegetation, including dead bracken and heather, is carefully set ablaze by gamekeepers when the weather is cold and damp. The result is to lessen the intensity of wildfires that take hold in the summer by creating firebreaks and reducing the amount of fuel available. Burns like this also create a habitat for game birds, including grouse, curlew and lapwing, to thrive. This ancient wisdom is backed up by scientific research which shows that, when done with skill and experience, preventative fires produce less smoke than uncontrolled blazes and even help sequester carbon. Efficient winter burns brush across the surface of the wet ground, leaving the moss and peat below untouched. Famously, you can place a Mars bar on the ground in the midst of a preventative heather fire and it won't melt. Yet this Government doesn't do ancient wisdom. And it doesn't do science. It does the religion of 'rewilding'. Beloved among metropolitan eco warriors, this obsession opposes traditional farming methods and demands that the landscape and its ecosystems be returned to the chaos of nature. As a fad it's relatively new, but even so it has done enormous damage. It is hard not to believe the drive to rewild our uplands – which effectively means abolishing managed grouse moors – is being led, at least in part, by the metropolitan Left's sheer animosity towards country sports in general and gamekeepers in particular. Among other things, the creed of rewilding outlaws precautionary winter burns on our hillsides. The result of such bans is that year in, year out, the vegetation keeps growing. And out-of-control vegetation can lead to out-of-control fires. It is a particular irony that Ms Rayner's constituents in Ashton-under-Lyne, east of Manchester, were among those who could see the flames on Saddleworth Moor. For the blaze started on land where Natural England, the Government's environmental quango, was carrying out its rewilding vision by banning winter burns. Despite the evidence, the Labour Government, driven by Ms Rayner, is now attempting to ban preventative fires on swathes of English upland, with plans afoot to outlaw burns on hills and moors with a peat depth of 30 centimetres (11in) or more. The claim is that this would protect the peat. The zealots at Natural England want to go much further still, however, and – by threatening to withdraw subsidies to landowners – is attempting to outlaw burns on hills with a mere 10cm (4in) peat depth. Covering pretty much all English peat land, this means vast areas of the countryside would see vegetation building up with no control. It would be like putting jerry cans of petrol on our hillsides. Sooner or later, they will catch fire. The snobbery facing country people is best summed up by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, which, needless to say, is pushing for the ban on burning heather in the winter months. In fact, the RSPB is running what amounts in my view to a campaign of slander against country people. And that, in turn, is fuelling intimidation. One RSPB executive, for example, told listeners to BBC Radio 4's Today programme that gamekeepers were a 'co-ordinated gang of armed criminals roaming the uplands'. The same type of language is used in RSPB press releases. The result? Threats against, and even physical attacks on, gamekeepers, who will be especially vigilant this week as the Glorious Twelfth marks the start of the grouse shooting season. Yet gamekeepers are the heart of the countryside. If the craziness directed at them does not end, then jobs will be destroyed. Rural communities will disintegrate. Moorland hotels, taxi drivers and restaurants all rely on the seasonal income set to be destroyed by the vilification from the RSPB on the one hand and the mindless stupidity of Natural England on the other. Labour's old motto was that 'things can only get better'. Under this Government, things seem only to get worse. We have seen ever more pylons, turbines, solar farms, urban sprawl and now the threat of unnecessary wildfires. Draw your own conclusions. So as another heatwave takes hold, and the threat of deadly conflagrations grows, Labour MPs in rural seats should have a word with the Deputy Prime Minister. Ms Rayner and the too-clever-by-half pen-pushers at Natural England might take a moment to reflect on why so many scientists and powerful people disagree with them about the urgent measures we must take to protect ourselves from wildfires. In June, the G7 group of nations issued a declaration on the wildfire crisis which recommended... winter burns. A week earlier the White House issued an order that there must be no restrictions on preventative burns in the US, the lack of which has been cited as a factor is last year's catastrophic California fires. Meanwhile, the European Commission recommends reducing wildfire risk by having more livestock grazing to keep the vegetation short. Yet what has Natural England done? It has decreed that the number of cattle and sheep on our hills be sharply reduced – a policy enforced by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs through its regime of subsidies. Sheep numbers have fallen by 7 per cent in the past two years. Country people care about this issue because they hate seeing their hillsides scarred. They hate finding the burnt bodies of animals which could not escape. And these, remember, are the farmers, gamekeepers and their wives who are on the front line helping to put out wildfires. Sooner or later, people will be killed fighting wildfires or die in their homes. The voters will know who to blame.

Starmer ‘set to revive Northern Powerhouse Rail plan' to boost UK infrastructure
Starmer ‘set to revive Northern Powerhouse Rail plan' to boost UK infrastructure

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • The Independent

Starmer ‘set to revive Northern Powerhouse Rail plan' to boost UK infrastructure

The Northern Powerhouse Rail will reportedly be revived this winter, as part of Labour's commitment to improving transport connections to the north and to boost UK infrastructure. Sir Keir Starmer is set to make the announcement before the Labour conference in a speech with chancellor Rachel Reeves. Transport secretary Heidi Alexander is also set to make the rail project a central topic of her conference speech, which is due to take place on 28 September. A government source told The Guardian that the announcement was likely to take place before then but that the timing was not yet confirmed. It comes after a series of recent U-turns that have frustrated Labour voters and backbench MPs, as speculation continues that the Treasury will announce tax rises to plug a £40bn spending hole. Since being elected last July, political and industry leaders in the north of England have been pushing for Starmer to revive the Manchester section of HS2 and to commence building for Northern Powerhouse Rail. With plans set for the railway to connect Liverpool to Hull, it is seen as a crucial development for the UK as it would also provide connections Leeds, Bradford and Sheffield. Current infrastructure in the north is frequently criticised, with train routes falling into disrepair coupled with poor bus and road connections. Former prime minister Rishi Sunak decided not to extend the HS2 railway between the West Midlands and Manchester in 2023, after the project exceeded its budget and became mired in delays. The previous Conservative government's Integrated Rail Plan sparked outrage among northern leaders in November 2021, when it said that a new line would only be built on one section, and the rest of the route would get enhancements to existing lines. In July, Ms Reeves said: 'In the coming weeks I will set out this Government's plan to take forward our ambitions for Northern Powerhouse Rail.' The Chancellor has also announced £3.5 billion more funding to support the TransPennine Route Upgrade, a project to improve the railway between York and Manchester. She said the Government would provide £2.5 billion of additional funding to enable the 'continued delivery' of East West Rail, a new line between Oxford and Cambridge. In her spending review she also said railways in Wales would get £445 million investment over 10 years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store